Abstract

In February 2018 the “Act on Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life” (hereafter the “Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act”) went into effect in South Korea.” In order learn the lesson for Korean physicians’ practice in end-of-life care, we reviewed the debates surrounding the passage of similar legislation in the US. In particular, we examined the debates concerning the “Patient Self-Determination Act,” which was implemented in the US in 1991. We systemically searched for related medical articles on PubMed online and reviewed 17 articles that were retrieved through this search. One of the main findings of this review is that most of the articles expressed support for the Patient Self-determination Act on the grounds that it would enhance patient autonomy. In contrast with this, the Korean medical society criticized the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on the grounds that it would undermine physician authority and limit respect for patient autonomy. This reflects the fact that Korean physicians are unfamiliar or uncomfortable with the idea of respecting patient autonomy as a way of furthering the patient’s best interests. In this article I argue that the reasons for welcoming the provisions of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act are not only legal, but also medical and ethical: the law can improve the end-of-life care that is given in healthcare settings. However, in order to achieve this goal, patients must be fully informed about their rights and physicians should initiate discussions about advance care planning, as part of general health care, before serious illness arises.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.