Интеграция криминалистических категорий в практику участия прокурора в гражданском судопроизводстве

Abstract

Introduction. The paper examines the participation of the prosecutor in civil proceedings, the legal framework, and the history of the formation of the institution in question, highlighting some forensic aspects that form an integral part of prosecutorial activity in the analyzed area. Purpose. The substantiation of the claim that the collection and consolidation for the purpose of subsequent research and evaluation of evidence in civil proceedings without the use of criminalistics categories does not allow recognizing the prosecutor’s activities as sufficiently effective. Methods. The methodological framework for the study was the methods of scientific cognition, among which the main ones were the methods of analysis, consistency, synthesis, and comparative law. Results. The conclusion is formulated that prosecutors in civil proceedings must necessarily have and possess forensic categories when working with evidence, as well as apply forensic recommendations when conducting certain procedural actions. Conclusions. Based on the provisions discussed in the paper, the conclusion is substantiated by the need for further development of tactical forensic recommendations in the field of prosecutor participation in civil proceedings. It is concluded that, based on the integration of the most effective tactical recommendations, the developments in this direction will allow for the optimization of both the participation of the prosecutor in civil proceedings and civil litigation in general.