Abstract

The aim of this paper is to combine and analysethe relationship between the company’s financial characteris-tics: risk, return, andthe leaders’ characteristics for various stages of the organization’s life cycle. The results of the em-pirical analysis of this paper reveal the dependencies between both the physiological and personal characteristics of lead-ers. Such indicators as education, previous experience as a Chief Executive Officer (CEO), CEO remuneration, and the number of years in the current position were evaluated for this analysis. The sample is represented by 409 companies in-cluded in the S&P 500 index. The profitability of the companies is assessed using an integral indicator, whereas the risk is assessed using the Leverage Beta coefficient and the Altman Z-account. The stages of the company’s life cycle are distin-guished through the ratio of cash from operating, financial, and investment activities. This paper also examines the posi-tion of companies as an analogue of the portfolio and is noted on the Capital Market Line (CML). To assess the relation-ship, decision trees were built taking into account risk and return for different stages of the life cycle of companies: “growth”, “maturity” and “decline”. As a result, it has been concluded that different characteristics of leaders are signifi-cantat various stages of the organization’s life cycle. So, for the “growth” stage, the remuneration has a positive effect on the risk indicator, but after a certain level of increase, it has a completely inverse relationship. The indicator for a leader’s education is non-linear, and the education received in the financial sphere has a negative relationship with the company’s risk indicator for the “growth” stage. The indicator for the CEO’’s previous work is more significant for risk assessment than the company’s return.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call