Abstract
The article is devoted to the institution of contingency fee to lawyers for the provision of legal services, its ambiguous assessment, both in legal doctrine and in the current judicial practice, which creates certain obstacles to the introduction of contingency fee in the mechanism for improving the quality of professional legal assistance. Based on the analysis of the acts of the current legislation and the legal positions of the highest court, the author comes to the conclusion that, despite the ambiguity of the attitude towards the contingency fee as a type of incentive payment for a lawyer, its final legalization and a uniform understanding at the level of law enforcement practice are only a matter of time and firstly depend on consistent and worked out procedures on the part of the legislator.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
