Abstract

The article deals with modern interviews with Ukrainian politicians from the point of view of the existence of precedent intertexts and their functions. Intertextuality induces the recipient to thinking activity: to determine the existence of an intertextual text, to identify it, to understand the newly created meaning, to evaluate it, to perceive / not to perceive, that is, to compare with the values’ scale and possible intellectual compromise with the world's reflection and the pragmatic purpose of the author. The basic groups of precedent phenomena are defined: precedent texts and precedent situations, which are analyzed in more detail, precedent names, precedent statements. The main sources of precedent texts in interviews with politicians are legislative documents that are logical from the point of view and the thematic specifics of texts and communicative strategies in the media representatives of the political community. In the analyzed interviews precedent scenarios are presented through direct nominations and indirectly through the description of phenomena, facts, details that are associated for most respondents with a particular situation, with a certain emotional/evaluative attitude that the communicants support or attempt through comments, refinements, refutation, ridiculing, etc. change to the opposite, ie to form strategically defined beliefs.

Highlights

  • Information about author: Shulinova Larysa Vasylivna – PhD, associate professor; associate professor of the department of stylistics and language communication; Institute of philology; Kyiv national Taras Shevchenko university

  • The article deals with modern interviews with Ukrainian politicians

  • Intertextuality induces the recipient to thinking activity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Що інтертексти прецедентні для політика не завжди є такими для аудиторії, на яку спрямоване інтерв’ю, проте ці тексти є засобом аргументації думки, впливу на реципієнтів та в окремих випадках – переконання. В аналізованих інтерв’ю прецедентні ситуації представлені через прямі номінації й опосередковано через опис явищ, фактів, деталей, котрі асоціюються у більшості реципієнтів із відповідною ситуацією з певним емоційним / оцінним ставленням, яке комуніканти підтримують чи намагаються через коментарі, уточнення, спростування, висміювання тощо змінити на протилежне, тобто сформувати стратегічно визначені переконання: Окремо хочу сказати, що вже за три роки в Україні будуть ліквідовані черги в дитячі садочки.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.