Abstract
초록·키워드 목차 오류제보하기 With the enactment and enforcement of laws on the management and utilization of marine healing resources, interest in marine healing policies has increased. However, each individual"s understanding and interpretation of new policies may differ depending on the forum for discussion or the passage of time. Therefore, this study analyzed the structural differences in perception through interpretation and comparative analysis of issues regarding marine healing policies in the press and academic journal articles. As a result of the study, first, the articles frequently showed conceptual frames such as marine resources and use and utilization, while the press frequently showed concrete frames such as Wando-gun and projects. Second, the articles frequently showed effect frames such as conflict healing, influence, and mutual sympathy, while the press frequently showed project frames such as project, development and region. Third, over time, the agenda frames in the articles shifted to resources, policy and residents while those in the press shifted to project, region, and tourism indicating that there were structural differences. Since policy implementation without understanding the complex context of marine healing hardly allows us to expect outcomes, diverse marine policy frames should be considered. #해양치유(Marine Healing) #해양치유관광정책(Marine Healing Tourism Policy) #텍스트 마이닝(Text Mining) AbstractⅠ. 서론Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰Ⅲ. 연구방법Ⅳ. 분석 결과Ⅴ. 결론참고문헌
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call