Abstract
The article is devoted to studying juridical terminology on migration in the period of the European migrant crisis of 2015-2019. The research objective includes identifying the most frequent techniques to translate juridical terminology by the material of the official European Commission documents. The comparative analysis of the original and translated texts allows concluding that high level of translation equivalence leads to ambiguous interpretation and the most frequent translation techniques include adaptive translation, lexico-grammatical transformations, alternative translation and omission.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
