Abstract

Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most complex and urgent problems of rheumatology. Objective : We undertook a study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of long-term therapy with etanercept in patients with JIA without systemic manifestations. Methods and patients : Patients in the study were divided into 2 groups. Patients of the main group (n = 197) received etanercept, the comparison group (n = 200) - methotrexate. The effectiveness was assessed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and Wallace's criteria for clinical remission (CR) and the 4-year JADAS71 index. Results : We included 397 patients with JIA. In 6 months and 12 months a remission of articular syndrome was detected in 72 and 53 patients respectively; 83% and 65% of patients receiving etanercert and methotrexate, respectively. Laboratory indicators of disease activity corresponded with reference values in 91 and 48% in a period of 6 months, in 12 months - in 94 and 68% of patients. According to the results of Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ ) functional activity fully recovered in 65 and 79%; 30 and 58% of children in a period of 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Within 1 month improvement according to ACR pedi criteria 30/50/70 was achieved in 79/62/34% of patients treated by genetically engineered biological agents. After 6 months AKRpedi criteria 30/50/70 was achieved in 97/96/89% and 63/57/47% against the background of therapy with etanercept and methotrexate, respectively. Etanercept induced inactive stage of the disease / remission [6 (4, 9) and 12 (6, 18) months; p <0,0001, respectively] in significantly shorter time than methotrexate. Within 6 and 12 months of follow up inactive stage of the disease / remission was reported in 30 and 49% of patients treated with inhibitor etanercept, and 9 and 38% of patients receiving methotrexate. Disease activity index JADAS71 in children treated with etanercept was significantly lower than in patients treated with methotrexate for 1 year. Conclusion : Etanercept has a significantly faster and more pronounced anti-inflammatory effect than the classic immunosuppressant methotrexate.

Highlights

  • Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most complex and urgent problems of rheumatology

  • The effectiveness was assessed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and Wallace's criteria for clinical remission (CR) and the 4-year JADAS71 index

  • Within 1 month improvement according to ACRpedi criteria 30/50/70 was achieved in 79/62/34% of patients treated by genetically engineered biological agents

Read more

Summary

Оригинальная статья

Цель исследования: оценить эффективность и безопасность длительной терапии этанерцептом у пациентов с ЮИА без системных проявлений. Через 6 и 12 мес ремиссия суставного синдрома зарегистрирована у 72 и 53 (83 и 65%) пациентов, получавших этанерцерт и метотрексат, соответственно. Спустя 6 мес показатель АКРпеди30/50/70 составил 97/96/89% и 63/57/47% в условиях терапии этанерцептом и метотрексатом, соответственно. Этанерцепт в достоверно более короткие сроки, чем метотрексат, индуцировал стадию неактивной болезни/ремиссию [6 (4; 9) и 12 (6; 18) мес; p < 0,0001, соответственно]. Через 6 и 12 мес наблюдения стадия неактивной болезни/ремиссия была зарегистрирована у 30 и 49% больных, лечившихся ингибитором этанерцептом, и у 9 и 38% пациентов, получавших метотрексат. Активность болезни по индексу JADAS71 у детей, лечившихся этенрцептом, была значимо ниже, чем у больных, получавших метотрексат, в течение 1 года.

Background
Нестероидные противовоспалительные средства
Число суставов с активным артритом
Функциональная способность по CHAQ
КОНФЛИКТ ИНТЕРЕСОВ
Findings
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.