Судебная власть в системе защиты частных и публичных прав в условиях реализации антикризисных мер

Abstract

The ways of improving the civil procedural and arbitration procedural legislation in order to improve the anti-crisis measures taken by the state are considered. It is proposed to exclude the possibility of both extrajudicial and judicial reconciliation of the parties to public law conflicts. It is shown that the mandatory pre-trial (claim) procedure for the settlement of civil disputes needs regulatory regulation and the consolidation of clear criteria for determining the proper fulfillment of the obligation to resolve the dispute. It is recommended to fix the presence of a notarized mediation agreement as a basis for refusing to accept a statement of claim. The legal uncertainty of the category “economic activity” is noted, which negatively affects the delimitation of the competence of courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts. It is proposed to strengthen the functions of the prosecutor in arbitration proceedings.