Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the institution of special proceedings in arbitration courts, in a comparative description of two types of facts on their establishment with legal significance: the fact of ownership, use of property as one’s own and information discrediting the business reputation of economic entities. The author draws a line of priority of qualitative characteristics of prescription possession in the procedural advantage of participants in the arbitration process and the subject of evidence in the case.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
