Муниципальная общественность и развитие делиберативных процессов на местном уровне (на примере разрешения городских конфликтов)

Abstract

The study examines the role of the public as an institution of local democracy in deliberative processes, emphasizing its significance in resolving urban conflicts. Specific examples of urban conflict resolution in the city of Surgut, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, are utilized. Methods employed include content analysis of mass media, expert surveys, and mass sociological surveys. The research demonstrates that urban conflicts possess substantial potential for resolution through consensus-based approaches. Therefore, the concept of “deliberative democracy” is quite applicable for analyzing such conflicts at the local level. However, achieving such a consensus necessitates the aggregation and articulation of citizen demands. This, in turn, underscores the need for a local policy actor to function within the political space of the city. In this context, the local community serves as this actor. The internal structure of the municipal public is described, along with the factors contributing to its successful performance as an actor in the deliberative process at the municipal level. In conclusion, the local community plays a crucial role in deliberative processes, especially in the resolution of urban conflicts. The study highlights the structural dynamics and critical factors that enable the local community to effectively function as a deliberative actor in local governance.