НСТИТУЦІОНАЛЬНІ ЗАСАДИ АНТИМОНОПОЛЬНОГО РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ТА ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ПІДПРИЄМНИЦЬКОЇ КОНКУРЕНТОСПРОМОЖНОСТІ НА МІЖНАРОДНИХ ТА НАЦІОНАЛЬНИХ ТОВАРНИХ РИНКАХ

Abstract

The formation and development of state antimonopoly policy and antimonopoly regulation takes place taking into account the peculiarities of the institutional environment in which this regulation takes place. The institutional environment of antimonopoly policy and antimonopoly regulation represented by mandatory and voluntary components. All institutional formations of antimonopoly policy and antimonopoly regulation play certain roles that differ in function. The article describes the institutional features of the state antimonopoly policy formation and development on national consumer markets. Among the peculiarities of the functioning and development of the state antimonopoly policy, mandatory and voluntary components highlighted. A mandatory component of the antimonopoly regulation institutional environment are state and international institutions subject to general, pre-documented regulatory acts, regulations, agreements, etc., it is a formal regulatory level. Institutions that have a clearly documented structure, rights, obligations, norms and rules of conduct. Antimonopoly regulation for these institutes is one of the mandatory elements of their functioning. The second component of the antimonopoly environment functions on a voluntary basis. These institutes can function based on legally registered agreements, on voluntary regulatory regulation, and without entering into documented agreements, on non-normative informal regulation. The voluntary component includes market participants, enterprises, organizations, associations, public unions, scientific research centers and institutes that are interested in antimonopoly regulation, purpose of promoting their interests and purpose of improving the general economic situation. Both components of antimonopoly regulation include institutions that are responsible for the role of institutional design. Within the framework of institutional design, each participant in antimonopoly regulation plays a certain role, while the same institutional formation can play several roles at the same time. The functions played by institutional formations vary from maximally aimed at promoting the formation and development of state antimonopoly policy and antimonopoly regulation to a lack of interest in changes and even active opposition to the introduction of new institutions, adaptation or improvement of already existing ones