Abstract

In the framework of this article, the author, based on his dissertation research, presents for public discussion a number of issues that, in his view, are quite important and relevant aspects related to the specifics of the preparation and appointment of forensic examinations in criminal cases of crimes that obstruct the administration of justice. The reader is presented with the results of the study, which revealed quite often appointed forensic examinations in the framework of the category of criminal cases under consideration. Their percentage ratio is noted, some features are outlined from the standpoint of forensic tactics; some examples from judicial and investigative practices are given, and so on. It is advisable to take into account that the correct choice of tactical and scientific recommendations is paramount for the investigator. Depending on what tactics the investigator chooses, it will depend on how quickly he can appoint and conduct a particular forensic examination. Taking into account the fact that there are often errors in the appointment and direct production of examinations, the author of this article offers his own algorithm of actions and some recommendations for practical employees, and notes a number of identified features of those examinations that are assigned and performed for the studied category of criminal cases.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call