«Хотя Карамзину, Державину не равен, Но в обществе певцов российских не бесславен» (рецензия на монографию А. Н. Пашкурова «М. Н. Муравьев и литературная культура: диалог восприятий». Казань, 2019)

Sergey N Travnikov,Elena G Iyulskaya,Elena K Petrivnyaya

doi:10.37816/2073-9567-2021-61-357-364

Abstract

The new monograph by A. N. Pashkurov is a serious scientific study that goes beyond the scope of the work of M. N. Muravyev, raising important methodological problems in the study of Russian literature of the 18th century. A talented historian and theorist of literature, Professor Pashkurov provides an example of the methodology for mastering the literary myth and the system of views of the writer on the world around him and artistic creation. This book marked the beginning of a series of works by philologists on the comprehension of the creative personality in its relation to the past, present and future of literature. This is the special value of the monograph.

Highlights

Pashkurov is a serious scientific study that goes beyond the scope of the work of M
A talented historian and theorist of literature, Professor Pashkurov provides an example of the methodology for mastering the literary myth and the system of views of the writer on the world around him and artistic creation
This book marked the beginning of a series of works by philologists on the comprehension of the creative personality in its relation to the past, present and future of literature

Summary

Introduction

“ HE WAS NOT EQUAL TO KARAMZIN AND DERZHAVIN, IN THE SOCIETY OF RUSSIAN ARTISTS HE WAS NOT UNFAMED” N. Pashkurov is a serious scientific study that goes beyond the scope of the work of M. N. Muravyev, raising important methodological problems in the study of Russian literature of the 18th century.

Results

Conclusion