Yeast Ribosomal Protein Genes Research Articles

The Product of the Fission Yeast fhl1 Gene Binds to the HomolE Box and Activates In Vitro Transcription of Ribosomal Protein Genes.

Fission yeast ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) contain a HomolD box as a core promoter element required for transcription. Some of the RPGs also contain a consensus sequence named HomolE, located upstream of the HomolD box. The HomolE box acts as an upstream activating sequence (UAS), and it is able to activate transcription in RPG promoters containing a HomolD box. In this work, we identified a HomolE-binding protein (HEBP) as a polypeptide of 100 kDa, which was able to bind to the HomolE box in a Southwestern blot assay. The features of this polypeptide were similar to the product of the fhl1 gene of fission yeast. The Fhl1 protein is the homolog of the FHL1 protein of budding yeast and possesses fork-head-associated (FHA) and fork-head (FH) domains. The product of the fhl1 gene was expressed and purified from bacteria, and it was demonstrated that is able to bind the HomolE box in an electrophoretic mobility assay (EMSA), as well as being able to activate in vitro transcription from an RPG gene promoter containing HomolE boxes upstream of the HomolD box. These results indicate that the product of the fhl1 gene of fission yeast can bind to the HomolE box, and it activates the transcription of RPGs.

Intron-mediated induction of phenotypic heterogeneity

Intragenic regions that are removed during maturation of the RNA transcript—introns—are universally present in the nuclear genomes of eukaryotes1. The budding yeast, an otherwise intron-poor species, preserves two sets of ribosomal protein genes that differ primarily in their introns2,3. Although studies have shed light on the role of ribosomal protein introns under stress and starvation4–6, understanding the contribution of introns to ribosome regulation remains challenging. Here, by combining isogrowth profiling7 with single-cell protein measurements8, we show that introns can mediate inducible phenotypic heterogeneity that confers a clear fitness advantage. Osmotic stress leads to bimodal expression of the small ribosomal subunit protein Rps22B, which is mediated by an intron in the 5′ untranslated region of its transcript. The two resulting yeast subpopulations differ in their ability to cope with starvation. Low levels of Rps22B protein result in prolonged survival under sustained starvation, whereas high levels of Rps22B enable cells to grow faster after transient starvation. Furthermore, yeasts growing at high concentrations of sugar, similar to those in ripe grapes, exhibit bimodal expression of Rps22B when approaching the stationary phase. Differential intron-mediated regulation of ribosomal protein genes thus provides a way to diversify the population when starvation threatens in natural environments. Our findings reveal a role for introns in inducing phenotypic heterogeneity in changing environments, and suggest that duplicated ribosomal protein genes in yeast contribute to resolving the evolutionary conflict between precise expression control and environmental responsiveness9.

Physiological function of FKBP12, a primary target of rapamycin/FK506: a newly identified role in transcription of ribosomal protein genes in yeast.

In this review, we have summarized the information from a study on FKBP12 (FK506 binding protein 12kDa) with a view to understand its drug-free, physiological roles in transcription of ribosomal protein gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FKBP12 with peptidyl-prolylisomerase (PPIase) activity is widely conserved among many eukaryotes. FKBP12 is a primary target for the two structurally related drugs, FK506 and rapamycin. FKBP12 bound with FK506 or rapamycin inhibits calcineurin and target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1), respectively. The molecular mechanisms of the effect of FKBP12 in the presence of these drugs have been elucidated. Conversely, the physiological role of FKBP12 has been unclear, especially in yeast. Our study revealed that the deletion of FPR1 (FK506-sensitive prolinerotamase 1 gene), which encodes yeast FKBP12, induced severe growth defect synthetically with deletion of HMO1 (high mobility group family 1). HMO1 encodes an HMGB family protein involved in transcription of ribosomal component genes. Fpr1 was shown to bind specifically to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) dependent on Rap1 (repressor/activator binding protein 1). Importantly, Fpr1 and Hmo1 promote the binding of Fhl1/Ifh1 (forkhead-like 1/interacts with forkhead 1), key regulators of RPG transcription, to certain RPG promoters independently and/or cooperatively with each other. Taken together, we conclude that Fpr1 physiologically functions as transcription factor of RPGs in S. cerevisiae. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that FKBP12 participates in ribosome synthesis independently of drugs, and it may also provide a clue to the unidentified function of other PPIase proteins.

Alignment and quantification of ChIP-exo crosslinking patterns reveal the spatial organization of protein-DNA complexes.

The ChIP-exo assay precisely delineates protein–DNA crosslinking patterns by combining chromatin immunoprecipitation with 5′ to 3′ exonuclease digestion. Within a regulatory complex, the physical distance of a regulatory protein to DNA affects crosslinking efficiencies. Therefore, the spatial organization of a protein–DNA complex could potentially be inferred by analyzing how crosslinking signatures vary between its subunits. Here, we present a computational framework that aligns ChIP-exo crosslinking patterns from multiple proteins across a set of coordinately bound regulatory regions, and which detects and quantifies protein–DNA crosslinking events within the aligned profiles. By producing consistent measurements of protein–DNA crosslinking strengths across multiple proteins, our approach enables characterization of relative spatial organization within a regulatory complex. Applying our approach to collections of ChIP-exo data, we demonstrate that it can recover aspects of regulatory complex spatial organization at yeast ribosomal protein genes and yeast tRNA genes. We also demonstrate the ability to quantify changes in protein–DNA complex organization across conditions by applying our approach to analyze Drosophila Pol II transcriptional components. Our results suggest that principled analyses of ChIP-exo crosslinking patterns enable inference of spatial organization within protein–DNA complexes.

We'll always have RNA.

We'll always have RNA.

The Ribosomal Protein Rpl22 Controls Ribosome Composition by Directly Repressing Expression of Its Own Paralog, Rpl22l1

Most yeast ribosomal protein genes are duplicated and their characterization has led to hypotheses regarding the existence of specialized ribosomes with different subunit composition or specifically-tailored functions. In yeast, ribosomal protein genes are generally duplicated and evidence has emerged that paralogs might have specific roles. Unlike yeast, most mammalian ribosomal proteins are thought to be encoded by a single gene copy, raising the possibility that heterogenous populations of ribosomes are unique to yeast. Here, we examine the roles of the mammalian Rpl22, finding that Rpl22−/− mice have only subtle phenotypes with no significant translation defects. We find that in the Rpl22−/− mouse there is a compensatory increase in Rpl22-like1 (Rpl22l1) expression and incorporation into ribosomes. Consistent with the hypothesis that either ribosomal protein can support translation, knockdown of Rpl22l1 impairs growth of cells lacking Rpl22. Mechanistically, Rpl22 regulates Rpl22l1 directly by binding to an internal hairpin structure and repressing its expression. We propose that ribosome specificity may exist in mammals, providing evidence that one ribosomal protein can influence composition of the ribosome by regulating its own paralog.

Inferring gene expression from ribosomal promoter sequences, a crowdsourcing approach

The Gene Promoter Expression Prediction challenge consisted of predicting gene expression from promoter sequences in a previously unknown experimentally generated data set. The challenge was presented to the community in the framework of the sixth Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM6), a community effort to evaluate the status of systems biology modeling methodologies. Nucleotide-specific promoter activity was obtained by measuring fluorescence from promoter sequences fused upstream of a gene for yellow fluorescence protein and inserted in the same genomic site of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Twenty-one teams submitted results predicting the expression levels of 53 different promoters from yeast ribosomal protein genes. Analysis of participant predictions shows that accurate values for low-expressed and mutated promoters were difficult to obtain, although in the latter case, only when the mutation induced a large change in promoter activity compared to the wild-type sequence. As in previous DREAM challenges, we found that aggregation of participant predictions provided robust results, but did not fare better than the three best algorithms. Finally, this study not only provides a benchmark for the assessment of methods predicting activity of a specific set of promoters from their sequence, but it also shows that the top performing algorithm, which used machine-learning approaches, can be improved by the addition of biological features such as transcription factor binding sites.

Nonrandom Survival of Gene Conversions among Yeast Ribosomal Proteins Duplicated through Genome Doubling

By comparing the patterns of evolution in the coding and upstream noncoding regions of yeast ribosomal protein (RP) genes duplicated in a genome duplication, we find that although nonsynonymous sites in the coding sequences show strong evidence for the fixation of recent gene conversion events, similar patterns are less evident among the synonymous positions and noncoding regulatory elements. This result suggests a potential explanation for the somewhat puzzling fact that duplicated RP genes are not functionally redundant despite their very high protein sequence identity. An analysis of the patterns of regulatory network evolution after genome duplication also indicates that the duplicated proteins have diverged considerably in expression despite their similar protein sequences.

Direct Transactivator-Transcription Factor IID (TFIID) Contacts Drive Yeast Ribosomal Protein Gene Transcription

Transcription factor IID (TFIID) plays a key role in regulating eukaryotic gene expression by directly binding promoters and enhancer-bound transactivator proteins. However, the precise mechanisms and outcomes of transactivator-TFIID interaction remain unclear. Transcription of yeast ribosomal protein genes requires TFIID and the DNA-binding transactivator Rap1. We have previously shown that Rap1 directly binds to the TFIID complex through interaction with its TATA-binding protein-associated factor (Taf) subunits Taf4, -5, and -12. Here, we identify and characterize the Rap1 binding domains (RBDs) of Taf4 and Taf5. These RBDs are essential for viability but dispensable for Taf-Taf interactions and TFIID stability. Cells expressing altered Rap1 binding domains exhibit conditional growth, synthetic phenotypes when expressed in combination or with altered Rap1, and are selectively defective in ribosomal protein gene transcription. Taf4 and Taf5 proteins with altered RBDs bind Rap1 with reduced affinity. We propose that collectively the Taf4, Taf5, and Taf12 subunits of TFIID represent the physical and functional targets for Rap1 interaction and, furthermore, that these interactions drive ribosomal protein gene transcription.

Analysis of transcriptional synergy between upstream regions and introns in ribosomal protein genes of yeast

Transcriptional regulation in eukaryotic genes generally requires combinatorial binding on DNA of multiple transcription factors. Though many analyses have been performed for identification of combinatorial patterns in promoter sequences, there are few studies concerned with introns of genes. Here our study focuses on the transcriptional synergistic (cooperative) regulation between upstream promoters and introns of ribosomal protein (RP) genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. We first extract some potential transcriptional regulatory motifs based on a statistical comparative analysis. 98% of these motifs are accordance with experimental analyses. Then by pairing these motifs each other, we identify some potential synergistic motif pairs between upstream regions and introns of yeast RP genes (RPGs). Among 48 detected motif pairs, 44 match the binding sites for interacting transcriptional factors known from experiments or predictions. Checking the positions of these motif pairs in yeast RPGs, it is found that both motifs of the detected motif pairs are enriched in specific regions of upstream regions and introns, respectively. Some motif pairs present distance and orientation preferences, which may be favorable for transcription factors to bind simultaneously to DNA. These results will be helpful to understand the mechanism of synergistic regulation in yeast RPGs.

Precise Regulation of Gene Expression Dynamics Favors Complex Promoter Architectures

Promoters process signals through recruitment of transcription factors and RNA polymerase, and dynamic changes in promoter activity constitute a major noise source in gene expression. However, it is barely understood how complex promoter architectures determine key features of promoter dynamics. Here, we employ prototypical promoters of yeast ribosomal protein genes as well as simplified versions thereof to analyze the relations among promoter design, complexity, and function. These promoters combine the action of a general regulatory factor with that of specific transcription factors, a common motif of many eukaryotic promoters. By comprehensively analyzing stationary and dynamic promoter properties, this model-based approach enables us to pinpoint the structural characteristics underlying the observed behavior. Functional tradeoffs impose constraints on the promoter architecture of ribosomal protein genes. We find that a stable scaffold in the natural design results in low transcriptional noise and strong co-regulation of target genes in the presence of gene silencing. This configuration also exhibits superior shut-off properties, and it can serve as a tunable switch in living cells. Model validation with independent experimental data suggests that the models are sufficiently realistic. When combined, our results offer a mechanistic explanation for why specific factors are associated with low protein noise in vivo. Many of these findings hold for a broad range of model parameters and likely apply to other eukaryotic promoters of similar structure.

Characteristic differences between the promoters of intron-containing and intronless ribosomal protein genes in yeast

BackgroundMore than two thirds of the highly expressed ribosomal protein (RP) genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae contain introns, which is in sharp contrast to the genome-wide five percent intron-containing genes. It is well established that introns carry regulatory sequences and that the transcription of RP genes is extensively and coordinately regulated. Here we test the hypotheses that introns are innately associated with heavily transcribed genes and that introns of RP genes contribute regulatory TF binding sequences. Moreover, we investigate whether promoter features are significantly different between intron-containing and intronless RP genes.ResultsWe find that directly measured transcription rates tend to be lower for intron-containing compared to intronless RP genes. We do not observe any specifically enriched sequence motifs in the introns of RP genes other than those of the branch point and the two splice sites. Comparing the promoters of intron-containing and intronless RP genes, we detect differences in number and position of Rap1-binding and IFHL motifs. Moreover, the analysis of the length distribution and the folding free energies suggest that, at least in a sub-population of RP genes, the 5' untranslated sequences are optimized for regulatory function.ConclusionOur results argue against the direct involvement of introns in the regulation of transcription of highly expressed genes. Moreover, systematic differences in motif distributions suggest that RP transcription factors may act differently on intron-containing and intronless gene promoters. Thus, our findings contribute to the decoding of the RP promoter architecture and may fuel the discussion on the evolution of introns.

Ribosomal Protein S24 Gene Is Mutated in Diamond-Blackfan Anemia

Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) is a rare congenital red-cell aplasia characterized by anemia, bone-marrow erythroblastopenia, and congenital anomalies and is associated with heterozygous mutations in the ribosomal protein (RP) S19 gene (RPS19) in approximately 25% of probands. We report identification of de novo nonsense and splice-site mutations in another RP, RPS24 (encoded by RPS24 [10q22-q23]) in approximately 2% of RPS19 mutation-negative probands. This finding strongly suggests that DBA is a disorder of ribosome synthesis and that mutations in other RP or associated genes that lead to disrupted ribosomal biogenesis and/or function may also cause DBA.

Growth-regulated recruitment of the essential yeast ribosomal protein gene activator Ifh1

Regulation of ribosome biogenesis is central to the control of cell growth. In rapidly growing yeast cells, ribosomal protein (RP) genes account for approximately one-half of all polymerase II transcription-initiation events, yet these genes are markedly and coordinately downregulated in response to a number of environmental stress conditions, or during the transition from fermentation to respiration. Although several conserved signalling pathways (TOR, RAS/protein kinase A and protein kinase C) impinge upon RP gene transcription, little is known about how initiation at these genes is controlled. Rap1 (refs 6, 7) and more recently Fhl1 (ref. 8) were shown to bind upstream of many RP genes. Here we show that the essential protein Ifh1 binds to and activates many RP gene promoters under optimal growth conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ifh1 is recruited to RP gene promoters through the forkhead-associated domain of Fhl1. Ifh1 binding decreases when RP genes are downregulated either by TOR inhibition or nutrient depletion, and is restored after release from starvation or upon regulated induction of IFH1 expression. These findings indicate a central role for Ifh1 and Fhl1 in RP gene regulation.

The transcription factor Ifh1 is a key regulator of yeast ribosomal protein genes

Ribosomal protein (RP) genes in eukaryotes are coordinately regulated in response to growth stimuli and environmental stress, thereby permitting cells to adjust ribosome number and overall protein synthetic capacity to physiological conditions. Approximately 50% of RNA polymerase II transcription is devoted to RP genes. The transcriptional regulator Rap1 binds most yeast RP promoters, and Rap1 sites are important for coordinate regulation of RP genes. However, Rap1 is not the specific regulator that controls RP transcription because it also functions as a repressor, and many Rap1-activated promoters are not coordinately regulated with RP promoters. Here we show that the transcription factors Fhl1 and Ifh1 associate almost exclusively with RP promoters; association depends on Rap1 and (to a lesser extent) a DNA element at many RP promoters. Ifh1 is recruited to promoters via the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of Fhl1; the level of Ifh1 associated with RP promoters determines the level of transcription; and environmental stress causes a marked reduction in the association of Ifh1, but not Fhl1 or Rap1. Thus, Ifh1 association with promoters is the key regulatory step for coordinate expression of RP genes.

Activator-Specific Recruitment of TFIID and Regulation of Ribosomal Protein Genes in Yeast

In yeast, TFIID strongly associates with nearly all ribosomal protein (RP) promoters, but a TAF-independent form of TBP preferentially associates with other active promoters. RP promoters are regulated in response to growth stimuli, in most cases by a Rap1-containing activator. This Rap1-dependent activator is necessary and sufficient for TFIID recruitment, whereas other activators do not efficiently recruit TFIID. TAFs are recruited to RP promoters even when TBP and other general transcription factors are not associated, suggesting that TFIID recruitment involves a direct activator-TAF interaction. Most RP promoters lack canonical TATA elements, and they are preferentially activated by the Rap1-containing activator. These results demonstrate activator-specific recruitment of TFIID in vivo, and they suggest that TFIID recruitment is important for coordinate expression of RP genes.

Coordinate Regulation of Yeast Ribosomal Protein Genes Is Associated with Targeted Recruitment of Esa1 Histone Acetylase

The Esa1-containing NuA4 histone acetylase complex can interact with activation domains in vitro and stimulate transcription on reconstituted chromatin templates. In yeast cells, Esa1 is targeted to a small subset of promoters in an activator-specific manner. Esa1 is specifically recruited to ribosomal protein (RP) promoters, and this recruitment appears to require binding by Rap1 or Abf1. Esa1 is important for RP transcription, and Esa1 recruitment to RP promoters correlates with coordinate regulation of RP genes in response to growth stimuli. However, following Esa1 depletion, H4 acetylation decreases dramatically at many loci, but transcription is not generally affected. Therefore, the transcription-associated targeted recruitment of Esa1 to RP promoters occurs in a background of more global nontargeted acetylation that is itself not required for transcription.

The Yeast Homolog of Mammalian Ribosomal Protein S30 Is Expressed from a Duplicated Gene without a Ubiquitin-like Protein Fusion Sequence: EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS

In mammals, the 59-residue ribosomal protein S30 (rpS30) is synthesized as a fusion to a 74-residue ubiquitin-like protein, which is cleaved to yield mature rpS30. An artificial fusion of this ubiquitin-like protein to E. coli beta-galactosidase was not cleaved when expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), indicating that yeast lack this cleaving activity. The yeast rpS30 homolog (yrpS30) was purified and sequenced to reveal a 63-residue protein with 61% sequence identity to mammalian rpS30. Degenerate oligonucleotides based on the yrpS30 sequence were used to isolate full-length yrpS30 cDNAs. Sequence analysis of five cDNA clones revealed that yrpS30 is not synthesized as a fusion to a ubiquitin-like protein but is extended at its N terminus by a single methionine residue. The corresponding gene was identified in the GenBankTM data base by sequence alignment and termed RPS30A. The gene consists of two exons separated by a 430-base pair intron, which contains consensus splicing elements. Exon 1 encodes the initiator methionine residue and is preceded by canonical yeast ribosomal protein gene promoter elements. Exon 2 encodes the 62-residue mature yrpS30. Genomic hybridization reveals that the RPS30A gene is duplicated. Disruption of the RPS30A gene is not lethal but confers a slow growth phenotype. Ribosomes in the mutant strains contain an authentic yrpS30 protein, indicating that a functional yrpS30 is expressed from the duplicated gene but that the reduced capacity for yrpS30 synthesis restricted the growth rate. Analysis of available DNA sequence data bases reveals that rpS30 is synthesized as a fusion to a ubiquitin-like protein in nematodes and mammals but unfused in yeast, plants, and protazoa.

C-terminal domains of general regulatory factors Abf1p and Rap1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae display functional similarity.

Abf1p and Rap1p are global regulatory factors which play an essential role in the transcription activation of yeast ribosomal protein genes. This functional link prompted us to investigate whether these factors may be functionally interchangeable. We focused on the indispensable C-terminal portions of both factors and performed mutual domain swaps. The functional capacity of the resulting hybrid proteins was subsequently examined using yeast strains conditionally expressing either the ABF1 or the RAP1 gene. Both the Abf1p-Rap1p and the Rap1p-Abf1p fusion proteins were found to be able to complement the growth defect of the respective strains. Furthermore, Abf1p and Rap1p are both able to promote transcription of a reporter gene through a combination of the respective binding site and a T-rich promoter element. These data strongly suggest that the C-terminal domains of Abf1p and Rap1p have, at least partially, identical functions. Finally, a deletion analysis of the so far largely uncharacterized C-terminal domain of Abf1p was performed, which revealed that two regions of 50 amino acids can perform all essential Abf1p functions.

Feedback Inhibition of the Yeast Ribosomal Protein Gene CRY2 Is Mediated by the Nucleotide Sequence and Secondary Structure of CRY2 Pre-mRNA

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae CRY1 and CRY2 genes, which encode ribosomal protein rp59, are expressed at a 10:1 ratio in wild-type cells. Deletion or inactivation of CRY1 leads to 5- to 10-fold-increased levels of CRY2 mRNA. Ribosomal protein 59, expressed from either CRY1 or CRY2, represses expression of CRY2 but not CRY1. cis-Acting elements involved in repression of CRY2 were identified by assaying the expression of CRY2-lacZ gene fusions and promoter fusions in CRY1 CRY2 and cry1-delta CRY2 strains. Sequences necessary and sufficient for regulation lie within the transcribed region of CRY2, including the 5' exon and the first 62 nucleotides of the intron. Analysis of CRY2 point mutations corroborates these results and indicates that both the secondary structure and sequence of the regulatory region of CRY2 pre-mRNA are necessary for repression. The regulatory sequence of CRY2 is phylogenetically conserved; a very similar sequence is present in the 5' end of the RP59 gene of the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. Wild-type cells contain very low levels of both CRY2 pre-mRNA and CRY2 mRNA. Increased levels of CRY2 pre-mRNA are present in mtr mutants, defective in mRNA transport, and in upf1 mutants, defective in degradation of cytoplasmic RNA, suggesting that in wild-type repressed cells, unspliced CRY2 pre-mRNA is degraded in the cytoplasm. Taken together, these results suggest that feedback regulation of CRY2 occurs posttranscriptionally. A model for coupling ribosome assembly and regulation of ribosomal protein gene expression is proposed.