Abstract Tumor protein 53 (TP53) is the most commonly altered gene in human cancers. In breast cancers, TP53 is mutated in approximately 30% of all cases, but this frequency fluctuates widely within the different molecular subclasses. Different types of mutations may be observed, such as substitutions (replacement of a nucleotide pair by another one), or complex mutations (deletions or insertions of one or more nucleotides). Mutation types may reflect mechanism of DNA lesion or DNA repair deficiencies. Furthermore, mutations can give rise to different effects such as truncating mutations leading to loss of function, or missense mutations often leading to dominant negative activity. Those mutation effects can be advantageous in tumorigenesis and thus can be subject to selective pressure. Here we classified 572 breast tumors in three groups, according to microarray data: luminal, basal and molecular apocrine. TP53 status was assessed by a yeast-based functional assay (FASAY) and cDNA sequencing. We then assessed whether any feature of TP53 mutations would be preferentially associated to a specific subtype of breast cancer. - In term of TP53 mutation frequencies, as expected, lowest frequency was observed in luminal subgroup (26%) and highest in basal (90%) and molecular apocrine (70%). Notably, much higher rate of TP53 mutations occurred in luminal B subgroup (41%) than in luminal A one (17%), suggesting that TP53 may be an important feature in progression from luminal A to B. - In term of mutations types, luminal tumors showed high frequency of substitutions, while molecular apocrine and basal presented increased rate of deletions and insertions, reflecting probably increased rate of DNA breaks. This suggests that same mutational events may occur in basal and molecular apocrine tumors. - In term of mutation effects, we found high frequency of missense mutations in luminal tumors (notably AT to GC) and much higher rate of truncating mutations in basal tumors. These observations point to an existence of different selection pressure in each of them, such as a strong pressure for P53 mutations with potential dominant negative inhibition of P73/P63 (recently shown to favor invasion), in luminal tumors. Collectively, these results point not only to different mechanisms of P53 gene inactivation, but also different functional consequences among the different breast cancer subclasses. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-02-09.
Read full abstract