Abstract Background Wound complications (WC) are associated with increased cost, recurrence, and mesh infection. Operative CPs have not been evaluated in AWR. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of a CP on wound infection (WI) and WC. Method A prospective, institutional database was used to compare AWR with and without CP. Descriptive statistics and a Bayesian Structured time series analysis (BSTA) were performed to evaluate rates of WI and WC. Data is reported as means unless stated. The CP involves antibiotic wound irrigation, glove and instrument exchange, re-draping the field, surgeon-only handling the mesh prior to mesh implantation. The introduction of on-going quality improvement efforts were accounted for in the model. Results A total of 2541 patients were examined with an age of 57.9 ± 12.6 years, 56.7% female, BMI 32.9 ± 9.8 kg/m2, 24.2% diabetic, and 41.2% former-smokers. Defect size was 203.1 ± 205.8 cm2 and 83.1% were CDC Class 1 or 2 wounds. Follow-up was 31.5 ± 41.4 months. Overall WI and WC rate decreased after CP (14.5% vs. 2.6% and 29.3% vs. 10.3%, P < 0.001). Specifically, the rate of wound cellulitis (9.7% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001), wound infection (13.8 vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001), and mesh infection (2.1% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.004) were reduced after CP. For WI, BSTA revealed a relative effect of 83% (±2%, 95%CI:-87%,-78%; P = 0.0002) reduction compared to counterfactual. For WC, the BSTA revealed a relative effect reduction compared to counterfactual of 67% (±3%, 95%CI:-60%, -72%; P = 0.0002). Conclusion Introduction of a CP prior to mesh implantation in open AWR led to a significant reduction in overall wound infections and wound complications. The use of a CP should be strongly considered.
Read full abstract