World Of Qualitative Research Research Articles

Innovation in social work research

Greetings to readers as we start a new year for Qualitative Social Work. Last year saw an increase in papers to the Journal and as our readership continues to grow, the value of qualitative research for social work is confirmed. However, there is no room for complacency and if we are to ensure that the Journal continues to thrive, it is important to remain abreast of changes in the world of qualitative research and social research more generally. So, this brings me to consider the issue of innovation in this new year editorial. For readers familiar with writing or reviewing grant applications, claims by academics that their work is novel or innovative are all very familiar. As Taylor and Coffey described in 2009, pressures stemming from funding councils and publishers encourage academics to state and indeed over-state the cutting edge nature of their work. Writing in 2015, it seems that claims to innovation are now endemic and if we examine the mission of the UK’s major social science research funding council – the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) – the word innovation is never far from the Council’s funding calls, strategy statements or impact case studies. In the Council’s research funding guide, applicants must pay attention to impact, innovation and interdisciplinarity. The Council’s conceptualisation of innovation is broad, to include: ‘innovative or even untested methods’, through to research which challenges ‘existing paradigms in respect of research ethics’ (ESRC, 2015). So what exactly is meant by innovation and to what extent is new invention better than old? In response to the latter question, critics differ in their opinion. For example, there are those who consider that innovative methods simply represent the latest fads, leaving unresolved the long-standing challenges in qualitative research (Travers, 2009). The problem of fad is that where we fetishise the novel we may inadvertently recast tried and tested methodologies as dated, or at worse obsolete. Traditional ethnography and conventional methods of qualitative interviewing have been so vital to our understanding of the social world, we must resist casting such methods as old hat (Wiles et al., 2011). Critics have also argued that claims to innovation are frequently overstated and can amount to little more than Qualitative Social Work 2016, Vol. 15(1) 3–10 ! The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1473325015619822 qsw.sagepub.com

Qualitative Research Practice

This is a book for researchers. I love it, but I'm a professional nurse-researcher! The book is an anthology. It is about putting research methodology and method into practice. Each chapter has a different author who presents an issue in their particular area of research expertise. Typically, the author explores the issue by drawing on examples of how it has been problematic in their own research and how they have found a pragmatic solution. For example, Chapter 6: Narrative Research, is written by four narrative researchers; Molly Andrews; Shelley Day Sclater; Corinne Squire; and Maria Tamboukou. Although they have worked closely together for years, they could not reach a consensus view on narrative research for the purpose of writing the chapter. They illustrate their lack of consensus by each presenting their own research story. This demonstrates that the many forms of narrative research can all generate useful and relevant insights. The book is full of authoritative voices from the world of qualitative research. It has utility for research students wanting to familiarise themselves with issues faced by practicing researchers. I can envisage it being referenced in many nursing doctoral theses in the future. It is also useful for people like me, who have to find solutions to these authors' challenges in my everyday working life as a nurse-researcher. I learned a lot from reading about how the contributors practice their craft. I found this textbook a really engaging read, although a little too big and heavy to carry around in a handbag.