Work Relative Value Units Research Articles

Impact of 2023 Ventral Hernia Repair CPT Code Changes on Work Relative Value Units in a Tertiary Hernia Referral Center.

CPT codes for ventral hernia repair (VHR) changed in January 2023 to address the heterogeneity of procedures with a concomitant shift from a 90-day to a 0-day global period. This study reviews a tertiary referral center's experience with hernia coding comparing the work relative value units (wRVUs) generated for ventral hernia repair pre-2023 compared to post-2023. CPT codes were analyzed for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic VHR before updates to the CPT hernia codes (January 2022-September 2022) and following CPT change (January 2023-September 2023). Work RVU values were assigned based on nationally published values. CPT codes in 2022, CPT codes in 2023, 8 inpatient E&M codes, and 5 outpatient E&M codes were evaluated. 299 patients underwent VHR, 143 in 2022 and 156 in 2023. Average procedural VHR wRVUs increased from 9.6 in 2022 to 11.6 in 2023 (p<0.001). Procedures involving myofascial advancement flaps/component separation techniques (53.8% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.419) and wRVUs for the component separation procedures were similar between 2022 and 2023, respectively 17.7 vs 16.1 (p=0.419)]. The wRVUs associated with adjunctive procedures (mesh removal/placement) decreased from 3.3 to 0.6 (p<0.001) in the post-2023 era. Postoperative E&M wRVUs increased in 2023 for postoperative inpatient (0.48) and postoperative outpatient (0.39) services, compared to 0 wRVUs in 2022. Overall, the total management including follow-up clinic visit adjusted wRVUs for hernia repair was similar between 2022 and 2023, respectively 30.7 vs 29.2 (p=0.409). Procedural wRVUs for anterior abdominal hernia repair increased from 2022 to 2023 (p<0.001) at a tertiary referral medical center. However, total wRVUs, including the operation and postoperative visits, remained unchanged.

Evolving Trainee Participation in Radiologists’ Workload: A National Medicare-Focused Analysis From 2008 to 2020

PurposeIncreasing volumes and productivity expectations, along with practice type consolidation, may be impacting trainees’ roles in the work effort of radiologists involved in education. We assessed temporal shifts in trainee participation in radiologists’ workload nationally. MethodsAll US radiologists interpreting noninvasive diagnostic imaging for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were identified from annual 5% Research Identifiable Files from 2008 to 2020 (n = 35,595). Teaching radiologists were defined as those billing services using Medicare’s GC modifier, indicating trainee supervision. Billed work relative value units were used to determine the percentage of teaching radiologists’ total workload with trainee participation. Mean trainee participation in workload was calculated for teaching radiologists overall and stratified by radiologist and practice characteristics determined using National Downloadable Files. ResultsThe percentage of radiologists involved in teaching increased from 13.6% (2008) to 20.4% (2020). Among teaching radiologists, mean total workload increased 7% from 2008 to 2019 and decreased in 2020 to 2% below 2008’s level; mean teaching workload decreased 19% from 2008 to 2019 and decreased in 2020 to 31% below 2008’s level. Mean trainee participation in teaching radiologists’ total workload decreased from 35.3% (2008) to 26.3% (2019) and 24.5% (2020). Teaching radiologists showed decreased mean trainee participation when stratified by gender, experience, subspecialty, geography, practice type, and practice size. ConclusionsThe percentage of US radiologists involved in resident teaching has increased, likely reflecting academic practice expansion and academic-community practice consolidation. However, a declining percentage of teaching radiologists’ total workload involves trainees; this dispersion effect could have implications for education quality.

For the Love of the Game: Calculating the Premium Associated With Academic Surgical Practice.

We sought to determine the premium associated with a career in academic surgery, as measured by compensation normalized to the work relative value unit (wRVU). An academic surgical career embodying innovation and mentorship offers intrinsic rewards but is not well monetized. We know compensation for academic surgeons is less than their nonacademic counterparts, but the value of clinical effort, as normalized to the wRVU, between academic and nonacademic surgeons has not been well characterized. Thus, we analyzed the variations in the valuation of academic and nonacademic surgical work from 2010 to 2022. We utilized Medical Group Management Association Provider Compensation data from 2010, 2014, 2018, and 2022 to compare academic and nonacademic surgeons. We analyzed raw total cash compensation (TCC), wRVU, TCC per wRVU (TCC/wRVU), and TCC to collections (TCCtColl). We calculated collections per wRVU (Coll/wRVU). We adjusted TCC and TCCtColl for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. Linear modeling for trend analysis was performed. Compared with nonacademic, academic surgeons had lower TCC (2010: $500,415.0±23,666 vs $631,515.5±23,948.2, -21%; 2022: $564,789.8±23,993.9 vs $628,247.4±15,753.2, -10%), despite higher wRVUs (2022: 9109.4±474.9 vs 8062.7±252.7) and higher Coll/wRVU (2022: 76.68±8.15 vs 71.80±6.10). Trend analysis indicated that TCC will converge in 2038 at an estimated $660,931. In 2022, academic surgeons had more clinical activity and superior organizational revenue capture, despite less total and normalized clinical compensation. On the basis of TCC/wRVUs, academia charges a premium of 16% over nonacademic surgery. However, trend analysis suggests that TCC will converge within the next 20 years.

Distribution and Disparities of Industry Payments to Neuroradiologists.

Physician-industry relationships can be useful for driving innovation and technologic progress, though little is known about the scale or impact of industry involvement in neuroradiology. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends and distributions of industry payments to neuroradiologists. Neuroradiologists were identified using a previously-validated method based on Work Relative Value Units and Neiman Imaging Types of Service classification. Data on payments from industry were obtained from the Open Payments database from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, from 2016 to 2021. Payments were grouped into 7 categories, including consulting fees, education, gifts, medical supplies, research, royalties/ownership, and speaker fees. Descriptive statistics were calculated. A total of 3019 neuroradiologists were identified in this study. Between 2016 and 2021, 48% (1440/3019) received at least 1 payment from industry, amounting to a total number of 21,967 payments. Each year, among those receiving payments from industry, each unique neuroradiologist received between a mean of 5.49-7.42 payments and a median of 2 payments, indicating a strong rightward skew to the distribution of payments. Gifts were the most frequent payment type made (60%, 13,285/21,967) but accounted for only 4.1% ($689,859/$17,010,546) of payment value. The greatest aggregate payment value came from speaker fees, which made up 36% ($6,127,484/$17,010,546) of the total payment value. The top 5% highest paid neuroradiologists received 42% (9133/21,967) of payments, which accounted for 84% ($14,284,120/$17,010,546) of the total dollar value. Since the start of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the number of neuroradiologists receiving industry payments decreased from a mean of 671 neuroradiologists per year prepandemic (2016-2019) to 411 in the postpandemic (2020-2021) era (P = .030). The total number of payments to neuroradiologists decreased from 4177 per year prepandemic versus 2631 per year postpandemic (P = .011). Industry payments to neuroradiologists are highly concentrated among top earners, particularly among the top 5% of payment recipients. The number of payments decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, though the dollar value of payments was offset by coincidental increases in royalty payments. Further investigation is needed in subsequent years to determine if the postpandemic changes in industry payment trends continue.

Advanced Practice Providers in Pediatric Surgery: A 10-Year Analysis of Clinical Productivity

Introduction: Advanced practice providers (APPs) are integral to nonsurgical and surgical fields. In surgical settings, APPs work autonomously alongside surgeons to enhance continuity of care. While small-scale studies across various surgical specialties have explored APP utilization, literature specific to the pediatric population is limited. This study assesses the impact of increased APP utilization on productivity within one of the largest pediatric surgery departments in the United States. Methods: Data was sourced from the Surgery Department Executive Committee (SDEC) annual reports. Descriptive analyses were performed to delineate trends in clinical volumes, OR cases, gross charges, work relative value units (wRVUs), and provider full-time equivalents (FTEs) between October 2011 and September 2023. Secondary analyses were performed from 2016 to 2023, after APP roles were refined in each division. Results: Since 2012, an upward trend is observed in total clinic visits, total OR cases, and OR cases per MD. In 2016, APPs saw 1 clinic patient for every 2.2 seen by MDs, decreasing to a 1:1 ratio by 2023. The MD surgical conversion rate has increased by 20.5% since 2016, while the conversion rate per total clinic volume has decreased by 7.3% over the same period. Total wRVUs and gross charges increased across the department and per provider, despite fewer overall providers since 2021. Conclusion: Increased utilization of APPs within the department of surgery may enhance procedural productivity for surgeons while ensuring continued patient access to care. This study highlights the importance of developing care models that optimize the full skillset of APPs.

The comprehensive value of the modern vascular surgeon to the orthopedic surgery service

ObjectiveOrthopedic surgery is among the highest compensated specialties in modern practice. Vascular surgeons are consulted frequently during orthopedic operations, however, the comprehensive value of the vascular surgery service to the safe delivery of orthopedic care has not been characterized previously. MethodsElectronic medical records were retrospectively queried for all operations performed by orthopedic surgeons requiring operative vascular surgical consultation from June 2013 to December 2023. Data were collected on case-specific details, reasons for consultation, and total charges. Work relative value units were calculated for each primary orthopedic procedure using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician fee schedule. ResultsA total of 952 operative vascular surgery consultations were required over the study period. Consults were requested by 56 orthopedic surgeons across all eight orthopedic subspecialties at our institution. Operative vascular consultation was requested across 108 different procedure types. A total of 94 consults (9.9%) were emergent, intraoperative requests, with the remaining 858 consults (90.1%) occurring in the preoperative setting. The most common causes for consultation included surgical exposure (n = 832 [87.4%]), inadvertent bleeding (n = 44 [4.6%]), need for bypass (n = 12 [1.3%]), and acute limb ischemia (n = 11 [1.2%]). Total charges for all operative consultations exceeded $91.5 million, and the calculated total work relative value units for all primary orthopedic procedures was 19,384.5. A total of 54 cases (5.7%) occurred after hours, on a weekend, or both. ConclusionsVascular surgeons are integral to the provision of orthopedic surgical services, inclusive of all orthopedic subspecialties, for both the prevention and treatment of iatrogenic vascular injury. The around-the-clock availability of a vascular surgeon enables the orthopedic surgery department to generate significant revenue for the hospital system. These findings are important to the ongoing discussions regarding the value and compensation of the modern vascular surgeon.

Relative Value Unit (RVU) and Medicare Severity Diagnosis-related Group (MS-DRG) Reimbursement in Cervical Spinal Fusion: A 2011-2023 Trends Report.

Level 3 retrospective database study. This study aims to compare work RVU (wRVU), practice expense RVU (peRVU), malpractice RVU (mpRVU), and inflation-adjusted facility price alongside MS-DRG relative weight length of stay (LOS) for cervical spine fusions between 2011 and 2023. Both RVU and MS-DRG reimbursement have been studied in various surgical subspecialties; however, little investigation has centered on cervical spine fusions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate trends in RVU and MS-DRG reimbursement in cervical spine fusion throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) physician fee schedule was queried between 2011 and 2023 for RVU and facility reimbursement using common single and multilevel anterior and posterior cervical fusion codes. RVU facility prices were inflation adjusted to 2023. MS-DRG reimbursement data from 2011 to 2022 were compiled for cervical spinal fusion procedures with major complication or comorbidity (MCC) 471, complication or comorbidity (CC) 472, and without CC/MCC 473. Compound annual growth rates (CAGRs), Mean Annual Change, and yearly percent changes were calculated. No changes in wRVU were seen for all cervical CPT codes; however, the CAGR of peRVU (-0.51%±0.60%) and mpRVU (0.69%±0.41%) demonstrated marginal fluctuations. Every CPT code displayed an inflation-adjusted facility price decrease (-2.18%±0.24%). When assessing MS-DRG, there were marginal changes in geometric mean LOS (0.17%±0.45%), arithmetic mean LOS (-0.15%±0.84%), and relative weight (1.09%±0.68%). Unlike RVU reimbursement, the yearly percent change differs between each MS-DRG code. Inflation-adjusted RVU reimbursement facility prices demonstrated a consistent decrease, while DRG code reimbursement stayed relatively consistent over the study period. This data may help surgeons and hospitals become cognizant of temporal variations in reimbursement patterns as it may affect their personal practice. Level III retrospective study.

Perioperative Outcomes and Reimbursement Patterns Associated With the Anterior versus Posterior Approach for Treatment of Type 2 Odontoid Fractures, a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis

To evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes and the reimbursement patterns, after treatment of type 2 odontoid fractures using the anterior or posterior approach. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for surgically treated patients with type 2 odontoid fractures by the anterior or posterior approach between 2016 and 2020. Propensity score matching with the optimal approach was used to balance the cohorts. A total of 96 patients in the anterior and 352 patients in the posterior surgery group were included in the unmatched analysis. After propensity score matching 1:1, 96 anterior and 96 posterior cases were included in the matched analysis. Operative times were shorter in the anterior group (92.0 vs. 145.0minutes, P < 0.001). The need for intraoperative or postoperative transfusions was higher in the posterior group (15% vs. 2.1%; P= 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in complications between groups (P > 0.05). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the posterior group (4.5days vs. 3.0; P= 0.049). Nonroutine discharge was more frequent in the posterior group (55% vs. 40%, P= 0.030). However, the rate of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). Also, the work relative value units were significantly higher in the anterior group (22.7 vs. 20.6, P < 0.001), indicating higher reimbursement trends for this approach. In this matched analysis, the anterior approach for type 2 odontoid fractures was superior to the posterior approach. The anterior approach was associated with significantly shorter operation times, hospital stays, fewer transfusions, nonroutine discharges, and higher reimbursements.

Vulnerable populations and the emergency ventral hernia: A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionVentral hernias can be repaired electively; however, many circumstances require emergency repair. The association between sociodemographic status and rate of emergency repair are unclear and the Social Vulnerability Index may be a useful tool to better understanding this association. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between Social Vulnerability Index and emergency ventral hernia repair. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2012–2018) data for patients at a level 1 trauma center. We included patients who had an open ventral hernia repair. Social Vulnerability Index was based on residential address at the time of surgery. We conducted univariate and bivariate statistics, including χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests to compare high and low social vulnerability. ResultsOur sample had 1,017 patients. Patients who underwent emergency operations were older (P = .025) and had higher Social Vulnerability Index (P = .029). Patients in the high Social Vulnerability Index group were 1.5 times more likely to receive emergency surgery (P = .047). Emergency repair was also associated with increased frequency of nonhome discharge (9% vs 2%, P = .001) and higher mean work relative value unit (15.4 vs 11.9, P < .001). ConclusionPatients requiring emergency ventral hernia repair have significantly higher Social Vulnerability Index than those undergoing elective repair. This vulnerable population also has increased cost associated with the repair and higher rates of nonhome discharge. This work provides a foundation for efforts to reach patients in high Social Vulnerability Index environments at an earlier stage to achieve earlier elective repair.

Estimated Financial Impact of 2021 Office-Visit Work Relative Unit Updates on Surgical Global Periods

This cross-sectional study assesses the impact of changes to medical billing and coding work relative value units in 2021.

Reply to Editorial Comment on “Predicting Peak Productivity in Urologic Medicare Practice via Work-relative Value Units”

Reply to Editorial Comment on “Predicting Peak Productivity in Urologic Medicare Practice via Work-relative Value Units”

Comparison of Work Relative Value Units Assigned to Urological and Gynecological Surgical Procedures.

We sought to determine if work relative value unit differences exist between analogous, sex-specific procedures. Representatives from the AUA and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists independently reviewed the entire procedural code set and identified sex-specific procedures that had an analogous procedure in the opposite sex. These pairs were then evaluated and compared using current American Medical Association Relative Value Scale Update Committee methodology. Comparable code pair values were then examined to determine any systemic bias in the work relative value units assigned between the procedures. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were used to determine any differences in procedure or physician time values. The methodology used considered global period, intraservice time, total time, hospital days, postoperative office visits, and the date of the committee review. Of the 10 directly analogous code pairs reviewed, 7 of the female procedures had higher work relative value unit differences (range 0.29-6.47), and 3 of the male procedures had higher work relative value unit differences (range 1.23-2.34). There was no statistical difference between the code pair work relative value units. The work relative value unit per minute of intraservice time and total time were not statistically different. In this study, we compared operative procedures performed in women with clinically comparable operative procedures performed in men that had similar surgical approaches, global periods, and valuation methodologies. Overall, no statistical differences in work relative value units were demonstrated.

Defining the Value of Vascular Surgery Service at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center

BackgroundVascular surgeons play a critical role in the functioning of a healthcare system. As a service line, vascular surgery not only performs its own complex operations but also provides support to other surgical specialties by assisting in the management of vascular-related complications. Previous reports have acknowledged the value of consulting vascular surgeons; however, these studies have primarily been limited to single-center series. In this study, we aim to contribute to the existing literature by sharing our experience and highlighting the financial value of consulting vascular surgeons at a large tertiary academic medical center. MethodsInstitutional electronic medical records were retrospectively queried for all operations performed by vascular surgeons from 2020-2022. Two separate procedural groups were identified. The first group comprised all surgeries where vascular surgery was listed as a co-surgeon for other surgical specialties. The second group comprised all surgeries where vascular surgery was the primary surgeon for service-level cases. Service cases were defined as operations resulting directly from (1) iatrogenic complications from other services, (2) consultations for traumatic injury, or (3) primary surgeon for non-vascular cases. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Fee Schedule was used to calculate work relative value units (wRVU) per primary procedure code. ResultsA total of 7821 surgeries were performed with vascular involvement over the study period. Of these, 726 operations (9.3%) were co-surgeon cases requiring intraoperative vascular assistance, from 109 surgeons across all 16 surgical specialties. There was no missing data. The most common specialties requesting vascular assistance included cardiac surgery (n=247, 34.0%), orthopedic surgery (n=152, 20.9%), and neurosurgery (n=131, 18.0%). Total procedural wRVU for co-surgeon cases was 16,220, and total charges exceeded $77.5 million dollars. Vascular surgery served in a primary surgeon role in an additional 154 service-level cases (2.0%) resulting from ten non-surgical services. The most common service-level indication was iatrogenic vascular injury (n=87, 56.4%), and the majority of service-level cases required urgent or emergent surgery (n=123, 79.9%). These procedures generated an additional 2,150 wRVU and $1.1 million dollars in charges for the hospital system. Of all co-surgeon or service-level cases, 19.1% (n=168) occurred after-hours and 10.3% (n=91) occurred on a holiday or weekend. ConclusionVascular surgery is crucial to the operation of all surgical services and many non-surgical service lines within an academic medical center. Apart from providing essential services for primary vascular diseases, the vascular surgery service line offers substantial financial benefits to the healthcare system through its consulting role. A considerable portion of operative consultations are performed under urgent or emergent circumstances, often necessitating surgical intervention outside regular working hours or on holidays/weekends. These findings have significant implications for assessing the value and compensation of vascular surgeons in today's healthcare landscape.

Comparing Relative Value Units for Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Procedures to Common Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeries to Determine Adequate Compensation.

Reimbursement for surgical procedures is determined by a computation of the relative value unit (RVU) associated with CPT codes. It is based on the amount of work required to provide a service, resources available, and level of expertise involved. Given the evolution of changes in the limb lengthening field, we wanted to evaluate whether the RVU values were comparable across different orthopaedic subspecialties. Consequently, this study compares the work relative value unit (wRVU) totals of 3 common pediatric orthopaedic surgeries-arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and antegrade femoral intramedullary limb lengthening. This was an IRB-approved, multicenter, retrospective chart review. Charts of subjects who had ACL reconstructions, including meniscal repairs; spinal fusion surgeries for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (7 to 12 levels), including Ponte osteotomies, and femoral antegrade internal limb lengthening procedures, each completed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed. Comparisons were carried out between several parameters, including mean duration per procedure, number of CPT codes billed per procedure, number of postoperative visits in the 90-day global period, and the wRVU for each procedure. Fifty charts (25 per center) per procedure were reviewed. The wRVU per hour was lowest in the antegrade femur lengthening group ( P < 0.0001). The number of postoperative visits in the 90-day global postsurgery period was significantly higher in the antegrade femur lengthening group ( P < 0.0001). Intramedullary limb lengthening also had the least number of CPT codes billed. RVUs per time are statistically lowest in the limb lengthening group and highest in the scoliosis group. The limb lengthening patient also requires significantly more visits and time in the postoperative period compared with the other groups. These extra visits during the global period do not add any RVU value to the lengthening surgeon and occupy clinic spots that could be filled with new patients. Based on these data, a review of the RVU values assigned to the limb lengthening codes may be necessary. Level III-retrospective comparison study.

The work relative value estimation assessment in China: an empirical research for common surgical procedures.

China's National Health Service Items Standard (NHSIS) establishes a relative value system and plays an important role in pricing. However, there are few empirical evaluations of the objectivity of the NHSIS-estimated relative value. This paper presents a comparison between physician work relative value units (wRVUs) estimates for 70 common surgical procedures from NHSIS and those from the U.S. Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). We defined the ratio of the wRVUs for sample procedures to the benchmark procedure (inguinal hernia repair) as a standardized relative value unit (SRVU), which was used to standardize the data for both schedules. We examined the variances in the ranking and quantification of SRVUs across specialties and procedures, as well as how SRVUs impact procedure reimbursement prices between the two schedules. There was no systematic difference between MHSIS-estimated SRVUs and MPFS-estimated, but the dispersion of MPFS-estimated SRVU was greater than that of MHSIS-estimated, and the discrepancies increased with surgical risk and technical complexity. The discrepancies of SRVUs were significant in cardiothoracic procedures. Additionally, whether SRVUs were based on MPFS or MHSIS, there was a positive association between them and payment prices. However, in terms of the impact of SRVUs on payment pricing, the NHSIS system was lower than the MPFS system. China has made incremental progress in estimating the relative value of healthcare services, but there are shortcomings in valuation methods and their impact on pricing. The modular assessment method should be considered as a component to optimize reform.

Downstream Revenue Generated by Patients With Hereditary Cancer in the Multigene Panel Testing Era.

Patients with hereditary cancer syndromes face increased medical management recommendations to address their cancer risks. As multigene panels are the standard of testing today, more patients needing clinical intervention are being identified. This study calculates the downstream revenue (DSR) generated by patients ascertained by a genetic counselor (GC) with a hereditary cancer likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant (LPV/PV). Retrospective chart review was performed for patients seen in a high-volume cancer genetics clinic between October 1, 2009, and December 31, 2021, with LPV/PVs in hereditary cancer predisposition genes. DSR and work relative value units (wRVUs) were calculated for each patient before and after they met with a GC. Subgroup analyses calculated DSR/wRVUs from patients affected and unaffected with cancer and those whose genetic counseling visit was the first at the institution (naїve). A total of 978 patients were available for analysis after exclusions were applied. Patients generated $73.06 million (M) in US dollars (USD) in DSR and 54,814 wRVUs after their initial genetic counseling visit. Unaffected patients (n = 370, 37.8%) generated $11.38M (USD) and 13,879 wRVUs; affected patients (n = 608, 62.2%) generated $61.68M (USD) and 40,935 wRVUs. Naïve patients (n = 367, 37.5%) generated $15.39M (USD) and 11,811 wRVUs; established patients (n = 611, 62.5%) generated $57.67M (USD) and 43,003 wRVUs. Unaffected, naïve patients (n = 204, 20.9%) generated $5.48M (USD) and 5,186 wRVUs. By identifying patients with hereditary cancer, GCs can bring in substantial DSR for their institution. Naïve and unaffected patients provide the greatest GC value-add as these patients represent new business and revenue sources to the institution. As multigene panels continue to expand, the number of patients needing downstream services will increase. Recognizing patients at increased cancer risk will improve patient outcomes while simultaneously providing DSR for institutions.

Abstract PO5-10-10: Disparities in Work RVUs for Breast and Prostate Cancer Operations

Abstract Introduction: In a vast array of different methods used to quantify healthcare processes, the Relative Value Unit (RVUs) has become the federal precedent set by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to assign value to different procedures and processes. The current RVU conversion factor in 2023 is $33.06 per unit. Physician work RVUs, malpractice RVUs (MP RVUs) and practice expense RVUs (PE RVUs) were first implemented in 1992 as a system for assigning payment to physicians while providing administrative budgeting based on clinical and liability expenditures. These values are subject to reevaluation every 5 years at minimum, or as new services become available. The CMS updates it’s RVU model by consulting the American Medical Association’s Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC), which controversially sets higher values in certain fields of medicine than others. This article will objectively analyze the RVUs provided by the CMS to surgical oncologists treating breast cancer and compare them to the RVUs compensated to urologists treating prostate cancer, across multiple modalities. Methods: Work RVUs, practice expense RVUs, and malpractice RVUs were obtained from the CMS 2023 physician fee schedule, using the HCPCS codes to identify the services from their database. Estimated pre-evaluation times, intra-procedure times, immediate post service times, and total procedural times were gathered from the CY 2023 Final Rule Physician Work Time database provided by CMS. The HCPCS codes used for mastectomy variations were 19301 for partial mastectomy, 19302 for partial mastectomy with lymph node removal, 19303 for a simple complete mastectomy, 19305 for a radical mastectomy, 19306 for an urban type radical mastectomy, and 19307 for a modified radical mastectomy. The HCPCS codes used for armpit lymph nodes were 38740 and 38745 for axillary lymph node dissections. The HCPCS codes used for prostatectomy variations were 55810 and 55812 for a radical perineal prostatectomy, 55840 and 55845 for a radical retropubic prostatectomy, and 55866 for a laparoscopic retropubic radical prostatectomy. The HCPCS codes used for pelvic lymph nodes were 38571-38573 for laparoscopic lymphadenectomies. Work RVUs were compared between mastectomy and prostatectomy procedures, and axillary node procedures were compared to those of pelvic lymph nodes. To further asses any true disparities in the values assigned to the operations, a second analysis of work RVUs divided by total operation times were compared between their surgical counterparts. Conclusion: Values collected from CMS indicate 59% more RVUs are provided to urologists for prostatectomies than breast surgeons for mastectomies per procedure, and 12% more per hour of total procedure time. Additionally, the CMS indicates on average 29% more work RVUs are provided to urologists for pelvic lymph node removals than breast surgeons for axillary lymph node removals, and 3.4% more per hour of total procedure time (appendix 1). Breast cancer and prostate cancer have similar incidence and mortality rates, but one affects mostly women and the other only men. The decision by the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services to place a higher value in prostate cancer management is unknown, and elicits future analysis with surveyed procedural data across the nation for statistical significance determination. Appendix 1 allocated work RVUs, practice expense RVUs, malpractice RVUs, and median operative times for prostate cancer and breast cancer operations. Citation Format: Noah Khosrowzadeh, Kyle Chambers, Matthew Gompels, Cyrus Washington, Jessica Meshman. Disparities in Work RVUs for Breast and Prostate Cancer Operations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-10-10.

Comparison of Full-Time Equivalent and Clinic Time Labor Input Measures in Productivity Metrics.

A lack of improvement in productivity in recent years may be the result of suboptimal measurement of productivity. Hospitals and clinics benefit from external benchmarks that allow assessment of clinical productivity. Work relative value units have long served as a common currency for this purpose. Productivity is determined by comparing work relative value units to full-time equivalents (FTEs), but FTEs do not have a universal or standardized definition, which could cause problems. We propose a new clinical labor input measure-"clinic time"-as a substitute for using the reported measure of FTEs. In this observational validation study, we used data from a cluster randomized trial to compare FTE with clinic time. We compared these two productivity measures graphically. For validation, we estimated two separate ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models. To validate and simultaneously adjust for endogeneity, we used instrumental variables (IV) regression with the proportion of days in a pay period that were federal holidays as an instrument. We used productivity data collected between 2018 and 2020 from Veterans Health Administration (VA) cardiology and orthopedics providers as part of a 2-year cluster randomized trial of medical scribes mandated by the VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018. Our cohort included 654 unique providers. For both productivity variables, the values for patients per clinic day were consistently higher than those for patients per day per FTE. To validate these measures, we estimated separate OLS and IV regression models, predicting wait times from the two productivity measures. The slopes from the two productivity measures were positive and small in magnitude with OLS, but negative and large in magnitude with IV regression. The magnitude of the slope for patients per clinic day was much larger than the slope for patients per day per FTE. Current metrics that rely on FTE data may suffer from self-report bias and low reporting frequency. Using clinic time as an alternative is an effective way to mitigate these biases. Measuring productivity accurately is essential because provider productivity plays an important role in facilitating clinic operations outcomes. Most importantly, tracking a more valid productivity metric is a concrete, cost-effective management tactic to improve the provision of care in the long term.

Physician workload and practice management in pediatric gastroenterology.

The pediatric gastroenterology workforce has grown in the last few decades. The North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) formed a task force to understand current pediatric gastroenterology organizations' practicestructures. 19-item electronic survey was distributed to NASPGHAN members who were clinical or academic division directors. 30% responded to the survey, all directors of academic practices. The median number of clinical sessions per week was seven sessions, and the median individual work relative value unit(wRVU) target for practices was 4000-4500. Healthcare team ratios compared to provider clinical full-time equivalentwere reported as the following: Nursing 0.80, medical assistant 0.29, dietitian 0.29, social worker 0.14, and psychologist 0.13. Regarding compensation, 68.0% were salaried with bonus based on billing or director decision, 28.0% were salaried with no incentive pay, and 4.0% were salaried with a portion at risk if the target was not met, and a bonus was given if the target was met. Most practices participated in a wellness activity with the most common strategies being didactic lectures about physician burnout (80%), annual burnout check-ins (68%), and/or after-hours social activities(60%). Pediatric gastroenterology practices vary regarding clinical sessions per week and annual wRVU targets with the median at sevensessions per week and an annual goal of 4000-4500 wRVUs, similar to reported national benchmark goals at the 50th percentile. Healthcare teams, including nursing, medical assistants, dietitians, social workers, and psychologists, had similar ratios of staff to providers for all sizes and types of practices. Most practices are engaging in wellness initiatives.

Predicting Peak Productivity in Urologic Medicare Practice via Work-Relative Value Units

ObjectivesTo explore factors associated with productivity in urologic practice. Work-relative value units (wRVUs), the basis for Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and private payer reimbursements, commonly serve to estimate physician productivity. Limited data describes which practice factors predict increased wRVU productivity. MethodsThe 2017 and 2018 CMS databases were retrospectively queried for urologic Medicare provider demographics and procedural/service details. Medical school graduation year was used to estimate years in practice and generation (Millennial, Gen X, Baby Boomer, or Post-War). Treated patients’ demographics were obtained. Adjusted and unadjusted linear mixed models were performed to predict wRVU production. ResultsIncluded were 6,773 Medicare-participating urologists across the United States. Millennials produced 1115 wRVUs per year, while Gen X and Baby Boomers produced significantly more (1997 and 2104, respectively, p<.01). Post-War urologists produced numerically more (1287, p=.88). In adjusted analyses, predictors of Medicare wRVU productivity included FPMRS (exponentiated beta estimate (β) 1.46, 95% CI 1.32-1.60), men’s health (β 1.22, 95% CI 1.13-1.32), and oncologic sub-specialization (β 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14), female gender (β 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.92), wRVUs generated from inpatient procedures (β 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.09) and office visits (β 0.88, 95% CI 0.87-0.89), and the level of education (β 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.14) and percent impoverished patients (β 0.85, 95% CI 0.83-0.88) in provider’s practice zip code. ConclusionsUrologic experience, specialization, demographics, practice patterns, and patient demographics are significantly associated with wRVU productivity in Medicare settings. Further work should incorporate quality metrics into wRVUs and ensure patient demographics do not affect reimbursement.