Within-subject Biological Variation Research Articles

Within- and between-subject biological variation estimates for the enumeration of lymphocyte deep immunophenotyping and monocyte subsets.

This study aimed to deliver biological variation (BV) estimates for 25 types of lymphocyte subpopulations subjected to deep immunophenotyping (memory T/B cells, regulatory T cells, etc.) and classical, intermediate, and nonclassical monocyte subsets based on the full spectrum flow cytometry (FS-FCM) and a Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC) design. Samples were collected biweekly from 60 healthy Chinese adults over 10 consecutive two-week periods. Each sample was measured in duplicate within a single run for lymphocyte deep immunophenotyping and monocyte subset determination using FS-FCM, including the percentage (%) and absolute count (cells/μL). After trend adjustment, a Bayesian model was applied to deliver the within-subject BV (CVI) and between-subject BV (CVG) estimates with 95 % credibility intervals. Enumeration (% and cells/μL) for 25 types of lymphocyte deep immunophenotyping and three types of monocyte subset percentages showed considerable variability in terms of CVI and CVG. CVI ranged from 4.23 to 47.47 %. Additionally, CVG ranged between 10.32 and 101.30 %, except for CD4+ effector memory T cells re-expressing CD45RA. No significant differences were found between males and females for CVI and CVG estimates. Nevertheless, the CVGs of PD-1+ T cells (%) may be higher in females than males. Based on the desired analytical performance specification, the maximum allowable imprecision immune parameter was the CD8+PD-1+ T cell (cells/μL), with 23.7 %. This is the first study delivering BV estimates for 25 types of lymphocyte subpopulations subjected to deep immunophenotyping, along with classical, intermediate, and nonclassical monocyte subsets, using FS-FCM and adhering to the BIVAC design.

Biological Variation Data in Triathletes for Metabolism and Growth-Related Biomarkers Included in the Athlete Biological Passport.

When using biological variation (BV) data, BV estimates need to be robust and representative. High-endurance athletes represent a population under special physiological conditions, which could influence BV estimates. Our study aimed to estimate BV in athletes for metabolism and growth-related biomarkers involved in the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP), by 2 different statistical models. Thirty triathletes were sampled monthly for 11 months. The samples were analyzed for human growth hormone (hGH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), insulin, and N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (P-III-NP) by immunoassay. Bayesian and ANOVA methods were applied to estimate within-subject (CVI) and between-subject BV. CVI estimates ranged from 7.8% for IGFBP-3 to 27.0% for insulin, when derived by the Bayesian method. The 2 models gave similar results, except for P-III-NP. Data were heterogeneously distributed for P-III-NP for the overall population and in females for IGF-1 and IGFBP-3. BV components were not estimated for hGH due to lack of steady state. The index of individuality was below 0.6 for all measurands, except for insulin. In an athlete population, to apply a common CVI for insulin would be appropriate, but for IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 gender-specific estimates should be applied. P-III-NP data were heterogeneously distributed and using a mean CVI may not be representative for the population. The high degree of individuality for IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and P-III-NP makes them good candidates to be interpreted through reference change values and the ABP.

Diurnal and day-to-day biological variation of salivary cortisol and cortisone.

There is a growing interest in the relevance of salivary cortisol and cortisone concentrations in stress-related research. To correctly attribute the magnitude of salivary cortisol and cortisone variation as an effect of a stressful event, a coherent understanding of the day-to-day intra-individual and inter-individual variability across the diurnal cycle of the two steroids is required. However, such information is currently lacking. This study aimed to overcome these existing limitations by performing an investigation of the biological variation (BV) of salivary cortisol and cortisone within one day and between five days using an LC-MS/MS method. Saliva samples were collected from 20 healthy volunteers immediately after waking up, at 8:00, 12:00, 15:00, 19:00 and 23:00 on each day over five days. All samples were analyzed in duplicate in one run. Nested ANOVA was used to calculate the sums of squares for analytical and biological components of variation. The within-subject BV of salivary cortisol and cortisone (CVI) ranged from a minimum of 29.3 and 19.0 % to a maximum of 56.5 and 49.1 %, respectively, while the between-subject biological variation (CVG) ranged from 29.7 and 29.0 % to 51.6 and 43.6 %. The reference change values (RCVs) ranged from 96 to 245 % for cortisol and from 55 to 194 % for cortisone. A medium index of individuality was observed for both compounds at all time points. This study provides updated BV estimates and RCVs for different times of day that can be used to assess the magnitude of change in biomarkers in future stress-related research.

End-user verification results of two serum separator tubes for clinical chemistry analytes according to CLSI GP34-A and CLSI GP41-A6

Tube manufacturers use different composition of gels and blood clot activator formulations in serum tube production. Our aim was to investigate the within-tube (repeatability) and between-tube variation, concordance between comparison results of BD and VacuSEL tubes. Blood samples were collected from control subjects (n = 20) and patients (n = 30) in accordance with the CLSI GP41-A6 and CLSI GP34-A guidelines. Twenty-three clinical chemistry parameters were analysed via Roche Cobas C702 Chemistry Analyzer on T0 (0 hour) and T24 (24 hour). Mean differences % were compared with Wilcoxon matched pair test. Clinical significance was evaluated based on desirable bias according to total allowable error (TEa). VacuSEL tubes demonstrated acceptable performance for the results of 20 parameters with regards to desirable bias % limits. Lactate dehydrogenase (LD) [mean difference % (%95 confidence intervals (CI) values of BD and VacuSEL tubes at T0 [6.41% (4.80–8.01%)]; sodium (Na) and total protein (TP) at T24 [-0.27% (-0.46 to −0.07%) and −1.39% (-1.87 to −0.91), respectively] were over the desirable bias limits (LD: 4.3%, Na: 0.23% and TP: 1.36%, respectively) but not exceeding total biological variation CV % [Na: 0.5 (0.0–1.0) % and TP: 2.6 (2.3–2.7) %). %95 confidence intervals (CI) of T0 LD values overlap with within-subject biological variation % (CI) limits (LD: 5.2 (4.9–5.4) %). The differences between two tubes were not medically significant and necessarily conclusive. VacuSEL serum tubes presented comparable performance with BD serum tubes.

Sharing reference intervals and monitoring patients across laboratories- findings from a likely commutable external quality assurance program.

Laboratory results are increasingly interpreted against common reference intervals (CRIs), published clinical decision limits, or previous results for the same patient performed at different laboratories. However, there are no established systems to determine whether current analytical performance justifies these interpretations. We analysed data from a likely commutable external quality assurance program (EQA) to assess these interpretations. The use of CRIs was assessed by evaluating instrument group medians against minimum specifications for bias. The use of clinical decision limits was assessed using specifications from professional bodies, and the monitoring of patients by testing at different laboratories was assessed by comparing all-laboratory imprecision to within-subject biological variation. Five of the 18 analytes with Australasian CRIs did not meet specification for all instrument groups. Among these, calcium and magnesium failed for one instrument group out of seven, while bicarbonate, chloride, and lipase failed for two instrument groups. Of the 18 analytes reviewed currently without CRIs in Australasia, 10 candidates were identified. Among analytes with clinical decision limits, i.e.lipids, glucose, and vitamin D, only triglycerides met both bias and imprecision specifications, while vitamin D met the imprecision specification. Monitoring patients by testing at different laboratories was supported for 15 of the 46 (33 %) analyte-method principles groups that met minimum imprecision specifications. Analysis of data from commutable EQA programs can provide a mechanism for monitoring whether analyticalperformance justifies the interpretations made incontemporary laboratory practice. EQA providers shouldestablish systems for routinely providing this information to the laboratory community.

The European biological variation study (EuBIVAS): Biological variation data for testosterone, follicle stimulating hormone, prolactin, luteinizing hormone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in men

BackgroundKnowledge of biological variation (BV) of hormones is essential for interpretation of laboratory tests and for diagnostics of endocrinological and reproductive diseases. There is a lack of robust BV data for many hormones in men. MethodsWe used serum samples collected weekly over 10 weeks from the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) to determine BV of testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin, luteinizing hormone (LH) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) in 38 men. We derived within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) BV estimates by CV-ANOVA after trend, outlier, and homogeneity analysis and calculated reference change values, index of individuality (II), and analytical performance specifications. ResultsThe CVI estimates were 10 % for testosterone, 8 % for FSH, 13 % for prolactin, 22 % for LH, and 9 % for DHEA-S, respectively. The IIs ranged between 0.14 for FSH to 0.66 for LH, indicating high individuality. ConclusionsIn this study, we have used samples from the highly powered EuBIVAS study to derive BV estimates for testosterone, FSH, prolactin, LH and DHEA-S in men. Our data confirm previously published BV estimates of testosterone, FSH and LH. For prolactin and DHEA-S BV data for men are reported for the first time.

Biological variation of inflammatory and iron metabolism markers in high-endurance recreational athletes; are these markers useful for athlete monitoring?

To deliver biological variation (BV) data for serum hepcidin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), erythropoietin (EPO) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) in a population of well-characterized high-endurance athletes, and to evaluate the potential influence of exercise and health-related factors on the BV. Thirty triathletes (15 females) were sampled monthly (11months). All samples were analyzed in duplicate and BV estimates were delivered by Bayesian and ANOVA methods. A linear mixed model was applied to study the effect of factors related to exercise, health, and sampling intervals on the BV estimates. Within-subject BV estimates (CVI) were for hepcidin 51.9 % (95 % credibility interval 46.9-58.1), sTfR 10.3 % (8.8-12) and EPO 27.3 % (24.8-30.3). The mean concentrations were significantly different between sex, but CVI estimates were similar and not influenced by exercise, health-related factors, or sampling intervals. The data were homogeneously distributed for EPO but not for hepcidin or sTfR. IL-6 results were mostly below the limit of detection. Factors related to exercise, health, and sampling intervals did not influence the BV estimates. This study provides, for the first time, BV data for EPO, derived from a cohort of well-characterized endurance athletes and indicates that EPO is a good candidate for athlete follow-up. The application of the Bayesian method to deliver BV data illustrates that for hepcidin and sTfR, BV data are heterogeneously distributed and using a mean BV estimate may not be appropriate when using BV data for laboratory and clinical applications.

Biological variation estimates of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers in healthy individuals.

Blood biomarkers have proven useful in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. However, little is known about their biological variation (BV), which improves the interpretation of individual-level data. We measured plasma amyloid beta (Aβ42, Aβ40), phosphorylated tau (p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) in plasma samples collected weekly over 10weeks from 20 participants aged 40 to 60 years from the European Biological Variation Study. We estimated within- (CVI ) and between-subject (CVG ) BV, analytical variation, and reference change values (RCV). Biomarkers presented considerable variability in CVI and CVG . Aβ42/Aβ40 had the lowest CVI (≈ 3%) and p-tau181 the highest (≈ 16%), while others ranged from 6% to 10%. Most RCVs ranged from 20% to 30% (decrease) and 25% to 40% (increase). BV estimates for AD plasma biomarkers can potentially refine their clinical and research interpretation. RCVs might be useful for detecting significant changes between serial measurements when monitoring early disease progression or interventions. Highlights Plasma amyloid beta (Aβ42/Aβ40) presents the lowest between- and within-subject biological variation, but also changes the least in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients versus controls. Plasma phosphorylated tau variants significantly vary in their within-subject biological variation, but their substantial fold-changes in AD likely limits the impact of their variability. Plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein demonstrate high between-subject variation, the impact of which will depend on clinical context. Reference change values can potentially be useful in monitoring early disease progression and the safety/efficacy of interventions on an individual level. Serial sampling revealed that unexpectedly high values in heathy individuals can be observed, which urges caution when interpreting AD plasma biomarkers based on a single test result.

Sex-related differences in within-subject biological variation estimates for 22 essential and non-essential amino acids

BackgroundMeasurement of serum amino acid (AA) concentrations is important in particular for the diagnosis and monitoring of inborn errors of AA metabolism. To ensure optimal clinical interpretation of AAs, reliable biological variation (BV) data are essential. In the present study, we derived BV data for 22 non-essential, conditionally essential, and essential AAs and assessed differences in BV of AAs related to sex. MethodsMorning blood samples were drawn from 66 subjects (31 males and 35 females) once a week for 10 consecutive weeks. All samples were analyzed in duplicate using liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry. The data were assessed for outliers, trends, normality and variance homogeneity analysis prior to estimating within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) BV. ResultsCVI estimates ranged from 9.0 % for histidine (male) to 33.0 % for taurine (male). CVI estimates in males and females were significantly different for all AAs except for aspartic acid, citrulline and phenylalanine, in most cases higher in females than in males. Apart from for arginine, CVG estimates in males and females were similar. ConclusionsIn this highly powered BV study, we provide updated BV estimates for 22 AAs and demonstrate that for most AAs, CVI estimates differ between males and females, with implications for interpretation and use of AAs in clinical practice.

Biological variation of plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3, Serum vitamin B12, folate and ferritin in Turkish healthy subject

Biological variation (BV) plays a crucial role in determining analytical performance specifications, assessing serial measurements of individuals, and establishing the use of population-based reference intervals. Our study aimed to calculate the BV and BV-based quality goals of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH D3), ferritin, folate and vitamin B12 tests. We included a total of 22 apparently healthy volunteers (9 women and 13 men) aged 18-55 years in the study that we conducted in Turkey. Blood samples were collected from the participants once a week for five weeks. Serum ferritin, folate and vitamin B12 levels were measured using immunochemical method, while plasma 25-OH D3 levels were determined using the high-performance liquid chromatography method. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate analytical variation(CVA), within-subject BV(CVI) and between-subject BV(CVG). The individuality index (II) and reference change value (RCV) were calculated based on these data. The CVI of 25-OH D3, ferritin, folate, and vitamin B12 were found to be 1.8% (0.6%-2.5%), 16.9% (14.4%-20.2%), 10.7% (9.2%-12.7%), and 8.6% (6.8%-10.5%), respectively. CVG were 44.2% (34.3%-69.9%), 132% (87.7%-238%), 19.4% (14.4%-28.8%), and 39.6% (29.8%-59.0%) for the same biomarkers, while CVA were 3.2% (2.81%-3.71%), 3.5% (3.1%-4.1%), 4.0% (3.5%-4.6%), and 7.5% (6.6%-8.6%), respectively. The II values for 25-OH D3, ferritin, folate, and vitamin B12 were calculated as 0.04, 0.13, 0.55, and 0.22, respectively. The RCV were 10.2%, 47.8%, 31.7%, and 31.6%, respectively. Because the tests analyzed in this study exhibit high individuality, RCV should be preferred rather than population-based reference ranges in clinical interpretation of results.

Biological variation of serum neopterin concentrations in apparently healthy individuals.

The aims of this study were to determine the biological variation (BV), reference change value (RCV), index of individuality (II), and quality specifications for serum neopterin concentrations; a measurand provided by clinical laboratories as an indicator of cellular immunity. The study delivered serum samples collected for 10 consecutive weeks from 12 apparently healthy individuals (3 male, 9 female). Serum neopterin concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorometric detection. The data analysis was performed using an online statistical tool and addressed published criteria for estimation of biological variation. The mean neopterin concentration was 5.26 nmol/L. The within-subject biological variation (CVI) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) of neopterin serum concentrations was 11.54 % (9.98-13.59), and the between-subject biological variation (CVG) with 95 % CI was 43.27 % (30.52-73.67). The neopterin asymmetrical RCV was-24.9 %/+33.1 %, and the II was 0.27. The desirable quality specifications for neopterin were <5.77 % for precision, <11.20 % for bias, and <20.72 % for total allowable error (TEa). When analytical variation was used instead of CVI to calculate TEa, the desirable TEa was <18.39. This study determined BV data for neopterin, an indicator of cell-mediated immune response. Asymmetric RCV values, of 24.9 % decrease or a 33.1 % increase between consecutive measurements indicate significant change. The II of 0.27 indicates a high degree of individuality, therefore that it is appropriate to consider the use of personal reference data and significance of change rather than the reference interval as points of reference for the evaluation of neopterin serum concentrations.

Biological variation estimates for serum neurofilament light chain in healthy subjects

ObjectivesNeurofilament light chain (NfL) is an emerging biomarker of neurodegeneration disorders. Knowledge of the biological variation (BV) can facilitate proper interpretation between serial measurements. Here BV estimates for serum NfL (sNfL) are provided. MethodsSerum samples were collected weekly from 24 apparently healthy subjects for 10 consecutive weeks and analyzed in duplicate using the Siemens Healthineers sNfL assay on the Atellica® IM Analyzer. Outlier detection, variance homogeneity analyses, and trend analysis were performed followed by CV-ANOVA to determine BV and analytical variation (CVA) estimates with 95%CI and the associated reference change values (RCV) and analytical performance specifications (APS). ResultsDespite observed differences in sNfL concentrations between males and females, BV estimates remained consistent across genders. Both within-subject BV (CVI) for males (10.7%, 95%CI; 9.2–12.6) and females (9.1%, 95%CI; 7.8–10.9) and between-subject BV (CVG) for males (26.1%, 95%CI; 18.0–45.6) and females (30.2%, 95%CI; 20.9–53.5) were comparable. An index of individuality value of 0.33 highlights significant individuality, indicating the potential efficacy of personalized reference intervals in patient monitoring. ConclusionsThe established BV estimates for sNfL underscore its potential as a valuable biomarker for monitoring neurodegenerative diseases, offering a foundation for improved decision-making in clinical settings.

A comparative analysis of Sigma metrics using conventional and alternative formulas

Background and AimThe Six Sigma approach, employing Sigma Metrics (SM), is commonly used to evaluate analytical performance in clinical laboratories. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the suitability of the conventional SM formula, which incorporates total allowable error (TEa) and bias. To address this, an alternative formula based on within-subject biological variation (CVI) as the tolerance range (TR) has been proposed. The study aimed to calculate and compare SM values using both formulas. Material and MethodsTwenty clinical chemistry parameters were evaluated, and SM values were calculated using conventional formula with two TEa goals and the alternative formula. Intermediate precision (CVA%) values were obtained from internal quality control data, while bias values were derived from external quality assessment reports. ResultsThe results showed that using the conventional formula, 11 SM values based on CLIA TEa goals and 21 SM values based on BV TEa goals were deemed unacceptable (SM < 3). Additionally, 22 SM values calculated using the alternative formula were below 3. ConclusionThe choice of TR had a substantial impact on the assessed analytical performance. Laboratories should carefully consider the appropriateness of each approach based on their specific quality objectives, analyte characteristics, and laboratory operations.

Within- and between-subject biological variation of hemostasis parameters in a study of 26 healthy individuals

Abstract Objectives The study aimed to estimate the biological variation (BV) of routine coagulation tests, including prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen, in a healthy population to enhance the accuracy of laboratory results and improve diagnosis and treatment decisions. Methods The study included 26 healthy volunteers over 10 weeks; samples were collected weekly. The within-subject BV (CVI) and between-subject BV (CVG) were calculated for each parameter, and the index of individuality (II) and reference change values (RCV) were determined. All tests were performed in duplicate on the Roche Cobas T-711 coagulation analyzer. Results Fibrinogen exhibited the highest BV, with a CVI of 11 % and CVG of 17.4 %. The aPTT test had a CVI of 5.8 %, a CVG of 8.4 %, and an II of 0.91. The PT test had a CVI of 3.2 %, a CVG of 5.8 %, and an II of 0.73. The RCV values ranged from −7.5 to 8.1 for PT, −12.7 to 14.6 for aPTT, and −22.7 to 29.4 for fibrinogen. Conclusions The study underscores the significant biological variation in routine hemostasis parameters, such as PT, APTT, and fibrinogen, which impacts clinical diagnoses and treatment decisions. Despite certain limitations, the findings offer valuable insights for clinicians and suggest that future research should include more parameters for a comprehensive understanding of biological variations in hemostasis testing.

Reference change values of FIB-4

When comparing two analytical results for the same analyte, the clinicians may benefit from knowing the reference change values (RCVs) of the analyte. For Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4), a noninvasive test used for assessing the risk of liver fibrosis, no RCVs have been published for non-cirrhotic individuals. Therefore, we estimated RCVs for adults, using retrospectively collected data from outpatients with AST, ALT, and thrombocytes within the respective reference intervals. FIB-4 was calculated as (age × AST)/(thrombocytes × ALT0.5). From two FIB-4 values in each patient we calculated the RCVs parametrically and non-parametrically. For both methods, we estimated the limits of the central 90% of the distribution of the ratio between the second and the first measurement. We obtained data on 599 outpatients with two blood tests taken 3 - 972 (median 258) days apart. The RCVs were 0.72 − 1.40 and 0.72 − 1.43, respectively, using the parametric and non-parametric methods. The 5 and 95 percentiles were not statistically significantly associated with sex, age, level of analyte, or the time between the measurements. The within-subject biological variation of FIB-4 was estimated to be 13.9%. Conclusion: In 90% of the patients the ratio between the second and the first FIB-4 result was approximately 0.7 − 1.4.

Analytical and Non-Analytical Variation May Lead to Inappropriate Antimicrobial Dosing in Neonates: An In Silico Study.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of aminoglycosides and vancomycin is used to prevent oto- and nephrotoxicity in neonates. Analytical and nonanalytical factors potentially influence dosing recommendations. This study aimed to determine the impact of analytical variation (imprecision and bias) and nonanalytical factors (accuracy of drug administration time, use of non-trough concentrations, biological variation, and dosing errors) on neonatal antimicrobial dosing recommendations. Published population pharmacokinetic models and the Australasian Neonatal Medicines Formulary were used to simulate antimicrobial concentration-time profiles in a virtual neonate population. Laboratory quality assurance data were used to quantify analytical variation in antimicrobial measurement methods used in clinical practice. Guideline-informed dosing recommendations based on drug concentrations were applied to compare the impact of analytical variation and nonanalytical factors on antimicrobial dosing. Analytical variation caused differences in subsequent guideline-informed dosing recommendations in 9.3-12.1% (amikacin), 16.2-19.0% (tobramycin), 12.2-45.8% (gentamicin), and 9.6-19.5% (vancomycin) of neonates. For vancomycin, inaccuracies in drug administration time (45.6%), use of non-trough concentrations (44.7%), within-subject biological variation (38.2%), and dosing errors (27.5%) were predicted to result in more dosing discrepancies than analytical variation (12.5%). Using current analytical performance specifications, tolerated dosing discrepancies would be up to 14.8% (aminoglycosides) and 23.7% (vancomycin). Although analytical variation can influence neonatal antimicrobial dosing recommendations, nonanalytical factors are more influential. These result in substantial variation in subsequent dosing of antimicrobials, risking inadvertent under- or overexposure. Harmonization of measurement methods and improved patient management systems may reduce the impact of analytical and nonanalytical factors on neonatal antimicrobial dosing.

Biological variation of CA 15-3, CA 125 and HE 4 on lithium heparinate plasma in apparently healthy Caucasian volunteers

Tumor markers are well-known for being important tools in the support of diagnosis, monitoring of treatment efficacy and follow-up of cancers. CA 125, CA 15-3 and HE 4 have demonstrated potential efficacy in other clinical indications. The main objective was to evaluate the biological variation of these glycoproteins using two different immunoassays in an apparently healthy Caucasian population. Nineteen healthy volunteers including 11 women and 8 men were sampled weekly for 5 consecutive weeks. Samples were analyzed in duplicate on Lumipulse® G600II (Fujirebio) and on the Cobas e602 (Roche Diagnostics) analyzers. After assessment of normality, exclusion of outliers and analysis of homogeneity of variance, analytical variation (CVA), within-subject biological variation (CVI) and between-subject biological variation (CVG) were determined using a nested ANOVA. CVA, CVI and CVG were determined on both analyzers and both genders. For CA 125, the CVA ranges from 1.0 to 3.4%, the CVI from 5.7 to 13.8% and the CVG from 32.2 to 42.9%. For CA 15-3, the CVA is between 1.1 and 3.4%, the CVI between 3.9 and 6.5% and the CVG between 43.7 and 196.9%. Lastly, HE 4 has CVA values between 1.4 and 2.4%, CVI between 5.1 and 10.5% and CVG between 7.1 and 12.6%. Our study provided updated data on the biological variation of CA 125, HE 4 and CA 15-3. These data allow to improve the clinical interpretation and thus the management of the patient.

Physiological Rhythms and Biological Variation of Biomolecules: The Road to Personalized Laboratory Medicine.

The concentration of biomolecules in living systems shows numerous systematic and random variations. Systematic variations can be classified based on the frequency of variations as ultradian (<24 h), circadian (approximately 24 h), and infradian (>24 h), which are partly predictable. Random biological variations are known as between-subject biological variations that are the variations among the set points of an analyte from different individuals and within-subject biological variation, which is the variation of the analyte around individuals' set points. The random biological variation cannot be predicted but can be estimated using appropriate measurement and statistical procedures. Physiological rhythms and random biological variation of the analytes could be considered the essential elements of predictive, preventive, and particularly personalized laboratory medicine. This systematic review aims to summarize research that have been done about the types of physiological rhythms, biological variations, and their effects on laboratory tests. We have searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases for biological variation and physiological rhythm articles in English without time restrictions with the terms "Biological variation, Within-subject biological variation, Between-subject biological variation, Physiological rhythms, Ultradian rhythms, Circadian rhythm, Infradian rhythms". It was concluded that, for effective management of predicting, preventing, and personalizing medicine, which is based on the safe and valid interpretation of patients' laboratory test results, both physiological rhythms and biological variation of the measurands should be considered simultaneously.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of within-subject and between-subject biological variation data of coagulation and fibrinolytic measurands.

The diagnosis and monitoring of bleeding and thrombotic disorders depend on correct haemostatic measurements. The availability of high-quality biological variation (BV) data is important in this context. Many studies have reported BV data for these measurands, but results are varied. The present study aims to deliver global within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) BV estimates for haemostasis measurands by meta-analyses of eligible studies, by assessment with the Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC). Relevant BV studies were graded by the BIVAC. Weighted estimates for CVI and CVG were obtained via meta-analysis of the BV data derived from BIVAC-compliant studies (graded A-C; whereby A represents optimal study design) performed in healthy adults. In 26 studies BV data were reported for 35 haemostasis measurands. For 9 measurands, only one eligible publication was identified and meta-analysis could not be performed. 74% of the publications were graded as BIVAC C. The CVI and CVG varied extensively between the haemostasis measurands. The highest estimates were observed for PAI-1 antigen (CVI 48.6%; CVG 59.8%) and activity (CVI 34.9%; CVG 90.2%), while the lowest were observed for activated protein C resistance ratio (CVI 1.5%; CVG 4.5%). This study provides updated BV estimates of CVI and CVG with 95% confidence intervals for a wide range of haemostasis measurands. These estimates can be used to form the basis for analytical performance specifications for haemostasis tests used in the diagnostic work-up required in bleeding- and thrombosis events and for risk assessment.

Long-Term Within- and Between-Subject Biological Variation Data of Hematological Parameters in Recreational Endurance Athletes.

Hematological parameters have many applications in athletes, from monitoring health to uncovering blood doping. This study aimed to deliver biological variation (BV) estimates for 9 hematological parameters by a Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC) design in a population of recreational endurance athletes and to assess the effect of self-reported exercise and health-related variables on BV. Samples were drawn from 30 triathletes monthly for 11 months and measured in duplicate for hematological measurands on an Advia 2120 analyzer (Siemens Healthineers). After outlier and homogeneity analysis, within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) BV estimates were delivered (CV-ANOVA and log-ANOVA, respectively) and a linear mixed model was applied to analyze the effect of exercise and other related variables on the BV estimates. CVI estimates ranged from 1.3% (95%CI, 1.2-1.4) for mean corpuscular volume to 23.8% (95%CI, 21.6-26.3) for reticulocytes. Sex differences were observed for platelets and OFF-score. The CVI estimates were higher than those reported for the general population based on meta-analysis of eligible studies in the European Biological Variation Database, but 95%CI overlapped, except for reticulocytes, 23.9% (95%CI, 21.6-26.5) and 9.7% (95%CI, 6.4-11.0), respectively. Factors related to exercise and athletes' state of health did not appear to influence the BV estimates. This is the first BIVAC-compliant study delivering BV estimates that can be applied to athlete populations performing high-level aerobic exercise. CVI estimates of most parameters were similar to the general population and were not influenced by exercise or athletes' state of health.