Withdrawal Trial Research Articles

Aripiprazole once-monthly for the treatment of adult patients with earlier-stage bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis of data from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week randomized withdrawal trial

BackgroundIncreased awareness of the factors contributing to the diagnostic disparities seen in bipolar disorder between individuals of different heritage is needed to achieve equity in diagnosis and treatment. One such inequity is the provision of earlier treatment. Earlier treatment of patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder may prolong time to recurrence of mood episodes and reduce functional impairment and other poor outcomes associated with disease progression. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to study the efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400) in patients with earlier-stage bipolar I disorder (BP-I). Data from a 52-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial of AOM 400 versus placebo in patients with BP‑I (NCT01567527) were analyzed. Those patients in the lowest quartiles for age (18–≤32 years; n = 70) or disease duration (0.13–≤4.6 years; n = 67) at baseline were categorized with earlier-stage BP-I. The primary endpoint was time from randomization to recurrence of any mood episode. Other endpoints included proportion of patients with recurrence of any mood episode, and change from baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores.ResultsMaintenance treatment with AOM 400 significantly delayed time to recurrence of any mood episode versus placebo in patients aged 18–≤32 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09, 5.55]; p = 0.0251) or with disease duration 0.13–≤4.6 years (HR: 3.21 [95% CI 1.35, 7.65]; p = 0.005). This was largely driven by a lower proportion of patients in the AOM 400 group with YMRS total score ≥15 or clinical worsening. Changes from baseline in MADRS total score in both earlier-stage groups indicated AOM 400 did not worsen depression versus placebo. The safety profile of AOM 400 was consistent with the original study. Note that the original study included patients who had previously been stabilized on AOM 400 monotherapy, which may have enriched the population with patients who respond to and tolerate AOM 400.ConclusionsIn this post hoc analysis, AOM 400 prolonged time to recurrence of any mood episode versus placebo in earlier-stage BP-I. These findings support early initiation of maintenance treatment with AOM 400.

Long-term safety and efficacy of open-label nabilone on sleep and pain in Parkinson´s Disease

The synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol-analog nabilone improved non-motor symptoms (NMS) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized withdrawal trial with enriched enrollment (NMS-Nab-study). This was a single-center open-label extension study to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of nabilone for NMS in PD. To be eligible for this study, patients had to be treatment responders during the previous NMS-Nab-trial and complete its double-blind phase without experiencing a drug-related serious/severe/moderate adverse event (AE). Patients were re-introduced to nabilone during an up-titration phase until their overall NMS burden improved. Nabilone was continued for six months with clinic visits every 3 months. Evaluation of AEs was based on self-report and clinical assessment. Twenty-two patients participated in the NMS-Nab2-study (age-median 68.33 y, 52% females, disease duration-median 7.42 y). Nabilone was well tolerated with concentration difficulties as the most common treatment-related AE (possibly/not related n = 1 each). One in two drop-outs discontinued because of an AE for which a prohibited concomitant medication needed to be introduced (night-time sleep problems). Efficacy evaluation showed a significant and lasting improvement in NMS burden according to the CGI-I (79% at V3). Nabilone improved overall sleep (NMSS Domain-2: –8.26 points; 95%CI –13.82 to –2.71; p = 0.004; ES = –0.72), night-time sleep problems (MDS-UPDRS-1.7: –1.42 points; 95 CI –2.16 to –0.68; p = 0.002; ES = –0.92), and overall pain (KPPS Total Score: –8.00 points; 95%CI –15.05 to –0.95; p = 0.046; ES –0.55 and MDS-UPDRS-1.9: –0.74 points; 95%CI –1.21 to –0.26; p = 0.008; ES = –0.74). This study demonstrates continuous long-term safety and efficacy in PD patients responding early to nabilone without intolerable side effects.

Determination of fluralaner residues in eggs by LC-MS/MS and laying hen withdrawal trial

The presence of residues of veterinary drugs in eggs is an ongoing and significant issue of concern. Fluralaner is widely used in the prevention of ectoparasites, including the poultry red mite, but no analytical method has been reported for detection of its residues in eggs. An HPLC-MS/MS method was established for the determination of fluralaner residues in whole eggs and validated for LOD, LOQ, specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, and matrix effects. LOD was 5 μg•kg−1 and LOQ was 65 μg•kg−1. Recovery ranged from 97.7% to 103.7% (spiked at 65, 650, 1300, and 2600 μg•kg−1), while intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were consistently below 1.5%. A drug withdrawal trial was conducted with 16 laying hens administered a therapeutic dose of fluralaner in drinking water on days 0 and 7, with eggs being analyzed for 23 days. The highest concentration, 1235 μg•kg−1, was detected on day 13. This was below the European Union maximum residue limit for fluralaner in edible chicken tissues and eggs (1300 μg•kg−1). Residues were detectable up to two weeks after cessation of treatment. This method is suitable for routine compliance monitoring of fluralaner residues in egg matrices and may be adapted for analysis of other edible tissues.

P854 Tofacitinib demonstrates preliminary efficacy in induction of remission in chronic pouchitis

Abstract Background Pouchitis is common following total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and generally responds to antibiotics. However, up to 20% of patients develop either antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, collectively referred to as chronic pouchitis. Methods We report our preliminary induction results from a multi-center open label induction with randomized withdrawal trial to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib in chronic pouchitis. All eligible participants received 10mg tofacitinib twice daily for 8 weeks, with an additional 8 weeks of therapy given to patients with an inadequate initial clinical response. The primary endpoint was clinical response (a reduction of clinical PDAI≥2) at week 8. Secondary endpoints included endoscopic response (a reduction of endoscopic PDAI≥2), mPDAI remission (modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI)≤ 4 and a reduction of mPDAI≥2), mPDAI response (a reduction of mPDAI≥2) and improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (SIBDQ). Serum cytokine levels was analyzed using LEGENDplex human inflammation panel 1. Univariate analysis was performed to identify clinical and biochemical predictors of response to tofacitinib. Results A total of 33 patients with chronic pouchitis (Table 1) were included in the preliminary analysis. The clinical and endoscopic response rates at week 8 were 55% and 58% respectively, with a median improvement of 1 (p<0.05) and 3 (p<0.05) respectively (Figure 1). The mPDAI remission rate was 49% at week 8 with an mPDAI response rate of 73%. Endoscopic responders exhibited significant improvements in endoscopic oedema, granularity, friability, and mucous exudate (p<0.05). There was significant improvement in HRQoL, with the median SIBDQ score increasing from 35 at baseline to 54 at week 8 (p<0.05). Eleven patients received a further 8 weeks of therapy with a clinical response rate of 36%, yielding an overall response rate including extended induction of 67%. Univariate analysis did not reveal significant differences in baseline characteristics, clinical, or biochemical markers between responders and non-responders. However, a history of corticosteroid use (p=0.08) and high baseline levels of faecal calprotectin (p=0.15) demonstrated a non-significant association with treatment response. Elevated baseline serum levels of IL-1b, IFN-a and IL-33 were associated with a treatment response at week 8 (p<0.05). Conclusion Tofacitinib demonstrated preliminary efficacy in inducing both clinical and endoscopic response in patients with chronic pouchitis who have undergone IPAA for UC.

Study protocol for safety and efficacy of all-oral shortened regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicenter randomized withdrawal trial and a single-arm trial [SEAL-MDR

IntroductionThe urgent need for new treatments for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR-TB) is evident. However, the classic randomized controlled trial (RCT) approach faces ethical and practical constraints, making alternative research designs and treatment strategies necessary, such as single-arm trials and host-directed therapies (HDTs).MethodsOur study adopts a randomized withdrawal trial design for MDR-TB to maximize resource allocation and better mimic real-world conditions. Patients’ treatment regimens are initially based on drug resistance profiles and patient’s preference, and later, treatment-responsive cases are randomized to different treatment durations. Alongside, a single-arm trial is being conducted to evaluate the potential of sulfasalazine (SASP) as an HDT for pre-XDR-TB, as well as another short-course regimen without HDT for pre-XDR-TB. Both approaches account for the limitations in second-line anti-TB drug resistance testing in various regions.DiscussionAlthough our study designs may lack the internal validity commonly associated with RCTs, they offer advantages in external validity, feasibility, and ethical appropriateness. These designs align with real-world clinical settings and also open doors for exploring alternative treatments like SASP for tackling drug-resistant TB forms. Ultimately, our research aims to strike a balance between scientific rigor and practical utility, offering valuable insights into treating MDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB in a challenging global health landscape. In summary, our study employs innovative trial designs and treatment strategies to address the complexities of treating drug-resistant TB, fulfilling a critical gap between ideal clinical trials and the reality of constrained resources and ethical considerations.Trail registrationChictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100045930. Registered on April 29, 2021.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial of sarilumab for the treatment of glucocorticoid-dependent sarcoidosis.

Effective steroid-sparing therapies for the treatment of sarcoidosis are lacking; IL-6 antagonists may reduce sarcoidosis disease activity. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of the IL-6 receptor antagonist, sarilumab, in subjects with glucocorticoid-dependent sarcoidosis. This phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial enrolled 15 subjects with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis at Stanford University from November 2019 to September 2022. In period 1, subjects were treated with open-label s.c. sarilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks for 16 weeks, with predefined tapering of prednisone. Subjects who completed period 1 without a sarcoidosis flare entered period 2 and were randomized to continue sarilumab or to receive matching placebo for 12 weeks. The end points included flare-free survival, as well as changes in pulmonary function tests, chest imaging, patient-reported outcomes, and laboratory values. Fifteen subjects were enrolled in the study (median age 57 years, 80% male, 73.3% White), and 10 subjects successfully completed period 1. During period 1, 4 of the 15 subjects (26.7%) discontinued due to worsening of their sarcoidosis, and CT chest imaging worsened in 5 of the 15 subjects (35.7%). During period 2, 0 of 2 subjects in the sarilumab group and 1 of 8 subjects (12.5%) in the placebo group had a flare. Treatment with sarilumab 200 mg was generally well tolerated in subjects with sarcoidosis. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial, a meaningful signal of improvement in subjects with sarcoidosis treated with sarilumab was not observed. Given the small numbers in this study, no definitive conclusions can be drawn. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04008069.

Baricitinib in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal, efficacy, and safety trial

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis can be refractory to some or all treatment regimens, therefore new medications are needed to treat this population. This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, an oral Janus kinase 1/2-selective inhibitor, versus placebo in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal, efficacy, and safety trial was conducted in 75 centres in 20 countries. We enrolled patients (aged 2 to <18 years) with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (positive or negative for rheumatoid factor), extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, or juvenile psoriatic arthritis, and an inadequate response (after ≥12 weeks of treatment) or intolerance to one or more conventional synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The trial consisted of a 2-week safety and pharmacokinetic period, a 12-week open-label lead-in period (10 weeks for the safety and pharmacokinetic subcohort), and an up to 32-week placebo-controlled double-blind withdrawal period. After age-based dosing was established in the safety and pharmacokinetic period, patients received a once-daily 4 mg adult-equivalent dose of baricitinib (tablets or suspension) in the open-label lead-in period. Patients meeting Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-American College of Rheumatology (JIA-ACR) 30 criteria (JIA-ACR30 responders) at the end of the open-label lead-in (week 12) were eligible for random assignment (1:1) to receive placebo or continue receiving baricitinib, and remained in the double-blind withdrawal period until disease flare or up to the end of the double-blind withdrawal period (week 44). Patients and any personnel interacting directly with patients or sites were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was time to disease flare during the double-blind withdrawal period and was assessed in the intention-to-treat population of all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of baricitinib throughout the three trial periods. For adverse events in the double-blind withdrawal period, exposure-adjusted incidence rates were calculated. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03773978, and is completed. Between Dec 17, 2018 and March 3, 2021, 220 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of baricitinib (152 [69%] girls and 68 [31%] boys; median age 14·0 years [IQR 12·0-16·0]). 219 patients received baricitinib in the open-label lead-in period, of whom 163 (74%) had at least a JIA-ACR30 response at week 12 and were randomly assigned to placebo (n=81) or baricitinib (n=82) in the double-blind withdrawal period. Time to disease flare was significantly shorter with placebo versus baricitinib (hazard ratio 0·241 [95% CI 0·128-0·453], p<0·0001). Median time to flare was 27·14 weeks (95% CI 15·29-not estimable) in the placebo group, and not evaluable for patients in the baricitinib group (<50% had a flare event). Six (3%) of 220 patients had serious adverse events during the safety and pharmacokinetic period or open-label lead-in period. In the double-blind withdrawal period, serious adverse events were reported in four (5%) of 82 patients (incidence rate [IR] 9·7 [95% CI 2·7-24·9] per 100 patient-years at risk) in the baricitinib group and three (4%) of 81 (IR 10·2 [2·1-29·7]) in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent infections were reported during the safety and pharmacokinetic or open-label lead-in period in 55 (25%) of 220 patients, and during the double-blind withdrawal period in 31 (38%) of 82 (IR 102·1 [95% CI 69·3-144·9]) in the baricitinib group and 15 (19%) of 81 (IR 59·0 [33·0-97·3]) in the placebo group. Pulmonary embolism was reported as a serious adverse event in one patient (1%; IR 2·4 [95% CI 0·1-13·3]) in the baricitinib group in the double-blind withdrawal period, which was judged to be related to study treatment. Baricitinib was efficacious with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, and juvenile psoriatic arthritis, after inadequate response or intolerance to standard therapy. Eli Lilly and Company under licence from Incyte.

Long-term Safety During a Clinical Trial of Low-Sodium Oxybate in Participants With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy (P5-13.006)

<h3>Objective:</h3> To analyze treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during a 6-month open-label extension (OLE) of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial (NCT03030599) of lower-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav^®). <h3>Background:</h3> LXB is FDA approved for treating cataplexy or excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy aged ≥7 years and for treating idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> Participants entered the OLE following rescreening (re-entry) after discontinuing LXB or directly following the main study (rollover). Re-entry participants initiated LXB (4.5 g/night) or, if taking sodium oxybate (SXB) during rescreening, transitioned to LXB gram-for-gram. Rollover participants initiated LXB at ≤1/2 their stable dose during the main study. Participants titrated to a maximum 9 g/night. TEAEs were assessed in those receiving ≥1 LXB dose. TEAE duration represents time from TEAE start to end date (or end of OLE, if TEAE end date unrecorded). <h3>Results:</h3> In the analysis population (N=74, mean±SD age=37.6±12.6 years, 66.2% female, 91.9% White), 27 (36.5%) re-entered, and 47 (63.5%) rolled over. Most reported ≥1 TEAE (overall, 58.1%; re-entry, 59.3%; rollover, 57.4%). Commonly reported TEAEs were headache (n=7, 9.5%; peak incidence, month 3 [n=5/72]; median [range] duration=1.0 [1–25] day), nasopharyngitis (n=6, 8.1%; peak incidence, month 6 [n=2/69]; median [range] duration=9.0 [1–24] days), and dizziness (n=5, 6.8%; peak incidence, month 1 [n=3/74]; median [range] duration=26.0 [1–181] days). TEAEs were most prevalent in month 3 (n=11/72 [15.3%] reporting a TEAE). No participant reported fall or enuresis; 1 reported nausea (rollover). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate; 2 participants had severe TEAEs (invasive ductal carcinoma [IDC], n=1; dizziness, n=1). Few participants (14.9%) had LXB-related TEAEs, most frequently dizziness (overall, 5.4%). Seven participants discontinued (re-entry, n=2; rollover, n=5), 3 due to TEAEs (IDC, n=1; apathy, n=1; sleep apnea syndrome, n=1); only apathy was treatment related. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> In this long-term study, LXB safety and tolerability were generally consistent with the known SXB safety profile. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. Bogan has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Harmony. Dr. Bogan has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Jazz. Dr. Bogan has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Takeda. Dr. Bogan has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Avadel. Dr. Bogan has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Merck. Dr. Bogan has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Harmony. Dr. Bogan has received personal compensation in the range of $50,000-$99,999 for serving on a Speakers Bureau for Jazz. The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Harmony . The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Philips. The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Eisai. The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Fresca. The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Avadel. The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Takeda. The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Suven. The institution of Dr. Bogan has received research support from Axsome. Dr. Bogan has received intellectual property interests from a discovery or technology relating to health care. Dr. Bogan has a non-compensated relationship as a Chair with National Sleep Foundation that is relevant to AAN interests or activities. Dr. Foldvary-Schaefer has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving on a Scientific Advisory or Data Safety Monitoring board for Jazz. The institution of Dr. Foldvary-Schaefer has received research support from Jazz. The institution of Dr. Foldvary-Schaefer has received research support from Suven. The institution of Dr. Foldvary-Schaefer has received research support from Takeda. Dr. Foldvary-Schaefer has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Foldvary-Schaefer has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care. Dr. Skowronski has nothing to disclose. Ms. Chen has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Ms. Chen has received stock or an ownership interest from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Thorpy has received personal compensation in the range of $10,000-$49,999 for serving as a Consultant for Jazz. Dr. Thorpy has received publishing royalties from a publication relating to health care.

Clinical adult outcome 11-30 years after pediatric epilepsy surgery: Complications and other surgical adverse events, seizure control, and cure of epilepsy.

Pediatric epilepsy surgery promises seizure freedom or even cure of epilepsy. We evaluated the long-term (≥10 years) adult clinical outcome including surgery-related adverse events and complications, which are generally underreported. A monocentric, single-arm, questionnaire study in now adult patients who underwent epilepsy surgery during childhood. A novel ad hoc parental/patient questionnaire, which addressed diverse outcome domains was applied. From a total of 353 eligible patients, 203 could be contacted (3 patients died of causes unknown) and 101 (50%) returned appropriately filled-in surveys. No evidence for a survey-response bias was found. The rate of surgical complications according to the patient records was 9%. As regards the survey, half of the parents/patients reported surgical adverse events (expected and unexpected issues) and one-third reported permanent aversive sequels. Two-thirds of the patients were seizure-free during the last year before follow-up; 63% were Engel class 1A; favorable seizure outcomes (including auras only) were obtained in 73%; and 54% were seizure-free and off antiseizure medicine (ASM), that is, cured of epilepsy. In non-seizure-free patients, seizure relapse occurred at any time during the follow-up interval but 87% of those with a seizure-free first postoperative year were seizure-free at follow-up. One patient experienced a seizure relapse during the ASM withdrawal trial but became seizure-free again with ASMs. Eleven patients reported an increased number of ASMs as compared to the time before surgery. Earlier focal surgery did not affect the long-term clinical outcome. Pediatric epilepsy surgery was capable of curing epilepsy in about one-half of the children and to significantly control seizures in about three-fourths. Long-term success of focal surgery did not depend on age at surgery or duration of epilepsy. Surgical adverse events including complications may be underreported and must be assessed more thoroughly.

159 Qualitative examination of participation in the SIMPLIFY treatment withdrawal trial

159 Qualitative examination of participation in the SIMPLIFY treatment withdrawal trial

Efficacy and Safety of Lower-Sodium Oxybate in an Open-Label Titration Period of a Phase 3 Clinical Study in Adults with Idiopathic Hypersomnia.

PurposeTo report the efficacy and safety of lower-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav®) during the open-label titration and optimization period (OLT) and stable-dose period (SDP) in a clinical study for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia.Patients and MethodsData were collected during treatment titration and optimization in a phase 3 randomized withdrawal trial in adults (18–75 years of age) with idiopathic hypersomnia who took LXB treatment (once, twice, or thrice nightly, administered orally) in the OLT (10–14 weeks), followed by the 2-week, open-label SDP. Endpoints included the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Idiopathic Hypersomnia Severity Scale (IHSS), Patient Global Impression of Change, Clinical Global Impression of Change, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ)-10, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP).ResultsThe safety population included 154 participants; the modified intent-to-treat population comprised 115 participants. During open-label treatment, mean (SD) ESS scores improved (decreased) from 15.7 (3.8) at baseline to 6.1 (4.0) at end of SDP, and IHSS scores improved (decreased) from 31.6 (8.3) to 15.3 (8.5). Improvements were also observed during OLT in each individual IHSS item and in FOSQ-10 and WPAI:SHP scores. Thirty-five (22.7%) participants discontinued during OLT and SDP, 22 (14.3%) due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during OLT and SDP. The most frequent TEAEs in the first 4 weeks were nausea, headache, dizziness, and dry mouth; TEAE incidence decreased throughout OLT and SDP (weeks 1–4, n = 87 [56.5%]; weeks 13–16, n = 39 [31.7%]).ConclusionDuring open-label treatment with LXB, participants showed clinically meaningful improvements in idiopathic hypersomnia symptoms and in quality of life and functional measures. TEAE incidence declined over LXB titration and optimization.

LB941 Importance of six-month dosing with QTORIN rapamycin to achieve maximal effect in patients with pachyonychia congenita

PC is a rare, debilitating disease with lifelong limited mobility caused by mutations in KRT6, 16, or 17. There are no approved therapies. mTOR regulates expression of KRT6 and its binding partners KRT16 and 17. We completed Ph. 2/3 and 3b trials with QTORIN rapamycin for PC. We identified a cohort of subjects, gradual responders, who accrued a higher response between 12 and 24 weeks of therapy. The Ph. 2/3 trial was a randomized withdrawal trial, where all subjects received 12-weeks of QTORIN rapamycin.

0386 Long-term Safety During a Clinical Trial of Lower-Sodium Oxybate in Participants With Narcolepsy With Cataplexy

Abstract Introduction Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed during a 6-month open-label extension (OLE) of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial (NCT03030599) of lower-sodium oxybate (LXB; Xywav™). LXB is FDA approved for treating cataplexy or excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy aged ≥7 years and for treating idiopathic hypersomnia in adults. Methods Participants entered the OLE following rescreening (re-entry) after discontinuing LXB treatment or directly after completing the main study (rollover). Re-entry participants initiated LXB (4.5 g/night) or, if taking sodium oxybate (SXB) during rescreening, transitioned to identical LXB doses (gram-for-gram). Participants titrated (1‒1.5 g/night/week) to a maximum of 9 g/night. TEAEs were assessed in all participants receiving ≥1 LXB dose. TEAE duration represents time from TEAE start to end date (or end of OLE, if TEAE end date unrecorded). Results In the analysis population (N=74, mean±SD age=37.6±12.6 years, 66.2% female, 91.9% White), 27 (36.5%) re-entered (after a median [range] of 15.0 [4.0‒33.0] days), and 47 (63.5%) rolled over. Most reported ≥1 TEAE (overall, 58.1%; re-entry, 59.3%; rollover, 57.4%). Overall, the most commonly reported TEAEs were headache (n=7, 9.5%; peak incidence was month 3 [n=5/72]; median [range] duration=1.0 [1‒25] day), nasopharyngitis (n=6, 8.1%; peak incidence was month 6 [n=2/69]; median [range] duration=9.0 [1‒24] days), and dizziness (n=5, 6.8%; peak incidence was month 1 [n=3/74]; median [range] duration=26.0 [1‒181] days). TEAEs were most prevalent in month 3 (n=11/72 [15.3%] reporting a TEAE). No participant reported fall or enuresis; 1 reported nausea (rollover). Most TEAEs were mild or moderate; 2 participants had severe TEAEs (invasive ductal carcinoma [IDC], n=1; dizziness, n=1). Few participants (14.9%) had LXB-related TEAEs, most frequently dizziness (overall, 5.4%; re-entry, 7.4%; rollover, 4.3%). LXB-related TEAEs were more common in participants who re-entered (re-entry, 22.2%; rollover, 10.6%). Seven participants discontinued (re-entry, n=2; rollover, n=5), 3 due to TEAEs (IDC, n=1; apathy, n=1; sleep apnea syndrome, n=1); only apathy was treatment related. Conclusion In this long-term study of LXB, safety and tolerability profiles were generally consistent with the known safety profile of SXB. The most common TEAEs were headache, nasopharyngitis, and dizziness. Support (If Any) Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

Standardizing the histological assessment of late posttransplantation biopsies from pediatric liver allograft recipients.

Excellent short-term survival after pediatric liver transplantation (LT) has shifted attention toward the optimization of long-term outcomes. Despite considerable progress in imaging and other noninvasive modalities, liver biopsies continue to be required to monitor allograft health and to titrate immunosuppression. However, a standardized approach to the detailed assessment of long-term graft histology is currently lacking. The aim of this study was to formulate a list of histopathological features relevant for the assessment of long-surviving liver allograft health and to develop an approach for assessing the presence and severity of these features in a standardized manner. Whole-slide digital images from 31 biopsies obtained ≥4 years after transplantation to determine eligibility for an immunosuppression withdrawal trial were selected to illustrate a range of typical histopathological findings seen in children with clinically stable grafts, including those associated with alloantibodies. Fifty histological features were independently assessed and, where appropriate, scored semiquantitatively by six pathologists to determine inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the histopathological features using unweighted and weighted kappa statistics; the latter metric enabled distinction between minor and major disagreements in parameter severity scoring. Weighted interobserver kappa statistics showed a high level of agreement for various parameters of inflammation, interface activity, fibrosis, and microvascular injury. Intraobserver agreement for these features was even more substantial. The results of this study will help to standardize the assessment of biopsies from long-surviving liver allografts, aid the recognition of important histological features, and facilitate international comparisons and clinical trials aiming to improve outcomes for children undergoing LT.

Abstract 8895: Design of Phase IV, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized-Withdrawal Trial Evaluating Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (REALIZE-K Trial)

Introduction: International guideline-recommended therapies for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), are underutilized, in part due to concerns of hyperkalemia (HK) especially among those at high risk. The REALIZE-K trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), a selective potassium (K + ) binder, to enable MRA use in patients with HFrEF at high risk for HK. Methods: REALIZE-K is a prospective, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled randomized withdrawal trial enrolling symptomatic HFrEF (NYHA class II-IV and LVEF ≤40%) patients on guideline-directed medical therapy (but not full-dose MRA) with either HK (serum K + 5.1-5.9 mmol/L) or high risk for HK during MRA titration. All eligible patients enter a 1-month open-label run-in phase, during which patients with hyperkalemia receive SZC to correct HK; all patients undergo protocol-mandated titration of spironolactone (SPL) as tolerated to a target of 50 mg QD with supplemental SZC to maintain normokalemia (serum K + 3.5-5.0 mmol/L; Figure ). All patients tolerating ≥25 mg QD of SPL will be randomly assigned to continued SPL+SZC or SPL+PBO during an 8-month double-blind withdrawal phase. Serial K + monitoring will guide protocol-directed dosing of SZC/PBO and SPL during the randomized period. The primary study endpoint is the occurrence at 8 months of normokalemia on SPL ≥25 mg QD without the need for rescue therapy for severe HK in the SZC vs PBO group. Secondary endpoints include individual components of the primary endpoint and health status assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score. Exploratory endpoints include time to first occurrence of the composite of CV death or worsening HF, and change in mean urine albumin-creatinine ratio. Conclusions: REALIZE-K will evaluate the efficacy and safety of SZC, enabling MRA therapy for HFrEF patients at high risk for HK.

A pilot randomised controlled trial of patient education to improve umbilical cleanliness prior to laparoscopic surgery

Before laparoscopic abdominal surgery, surgeons frequently remove debris from patients' umbilici to prevent it from passing into the abdomen and optimise skin antisepsis. This task irritates the skin, takes time and contaminates sterile equipment. This pilot randomised controlled trial aimed to inform a definitive study investigating whether patient education improves umbilical cleanliness in these patients. To generate data on effect size and sample size, adult patients undergoing elective and emergency laparoscopic abdominal surgery were randomised to an intervention group, who received an education pack to clean their umbilicus prior to surgery, or a control group, who received no pack. Umbilical cleanliness was measured using a novel scale. To assess scale validity and reliability, all umbilici were scored by nine surgeons and surgical trainees using photographs and umbilici were swabbed to estimate bacterial load. Intervention acceptability was assessed via study consent and withdrawal rates and trial feasibility was evaluated using qualitative insights documented by investigators. Seventy-one percent (22/31) of the intervention group had clean umbilici versus 61% (19/31) in the control group. A definitive trial would require 712 participants to show statistical significance between study groups. The umbilical cleanliness scale had excellent interrater and test-retest reliability and a moderate degree of convergent validity with respect to bacterial load. The intervention was highly acceptable to participants, and theatre nurses and surgical trainees were central to trial feasibility. A definitive trial is warranted and would contribute to an evidence-based, standardised approach to preoperative care. Trial registration no. ACTRN12620000278932.

Belatacept for Simultaneous Calcineurin Inhibitor and Chronic Corticosteroid Immunosuppression Avoidance: Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Trial.

Immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation is associated with numerous toxicities. CD28-mediated T-cell costimulation blockade using belatacept may reduce long-term nephrotoxicity, compared with calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. The efficacy and safety of simultaneous calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and rapid steroid withdrawal were tested in a randomized, prospective, multicenter study. This study reports the 2-year results of a randomized clinical trial of 316 recipients of a new kidney transplant. All kidney transplants were performed using rapid steroid withdrawal immunosuppression. Recipients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive belatacept with alemtuzumab induction, belatacept with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction, or tacrolimus with rATG induction. The composite end point consisted of death, kidney allograft loss, or an eGFR of <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 2 years. The composite end point was observed for 11 of 107 (10%) participants assigned to belatacept/alemtuzumab, 13 of 104 (13%) participants assigned to belatacept/rATG, and 21 of 105 (21%) participants assigned to tacrolimus/rATG (for belatacept/alemtuzumab versus tacrolimus/rATG, P=0.99; for belatacept/rATG versus tacrolimus/rATG, P=0.66). Patient and graft survival rates were similar between all groups. An eGFR of <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was observed for nine of 107 (8%) participants assigned to belatacept/alemtuzuab, eight of 104 (8%) participants assigned to belatacept/rATG, and 20 of 105 (19%) participants assigned to tacrolimus/rATG (P<0.05 for each belatacept group versus tacrolimus/rATG). Biopsy sample-proven acute rejection was observed for 20 of 107 (19%) participants assigned to belatacept/alemtuzuab, 26 of 104 (25%) participants assigned to belatacept/rATG, and seven of 105 (7%) participants assigned to tacrolimus/rATG (for belatacept/alemtuzumab versus tacrolimus/rATG, P=0.006; for belatacept/rATG versus tacrolimus/rATG, P<0.001). Gastrointestinal and neurologic adverse events were less frequent with belatacept versus calcineurin-based immunosuppression. Overall 2-year outcomes were similar when comparing maintenance immunosuppression using belatacept versus tacrolimus, and each protocol involved rapid steroid withdrawal. The incidence of an eGFR of <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was significantly lower with belatacept compared with tacrolimus, but the incidence of biopsy sample-proven acute rejection significantly higher. Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial, NCT01729494.

Non-invasive alloimmune risk stratification of long-term liver transplant recipients

Management of long-term immunosuppression following liver transplantation (LT) remains empirical. Surveillance liver biopsies in combination with transcriptional profiling could overcome this challenge by identifying recipients with active alloimmune-mediated liver damage despite normal liver tests, but this approach lacks applicability. Our aim was to investigate the utility of non-invasive tools for the stratification of stable long-term survivors of LT, according to their immunological risk and need for immunosuppression. We conducted a cross-sectional multicentre study of 190 adult LT recipients assessed to determine their eligibility to participate in an immunosuppression withdrawal trial. Patients had stable liver allograft function and had been transplanted for non-autoimmune non-replicative viral liver disease >3 years before inclusion. We performed histological, immunogenetic and serological studies and measured the intrahepatic transcript levels of an 11-gene classifier highly specific for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In this cohort, 35.8% of patients harboured clinically silent fibro-inflammatory liver lesions (13.7% had mild damage and 22.1% had moderate-to-severe damage). The severity of liver allograft damage was positively associated with TCMR-related transcripts, class II donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), ALT, AST, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and negatively correlated with serum creatinine and tacrolimus trough levels. Liver biopsies were stratified according to their TCMR transcript levels using a cut-off derived from biopsies with clinically significant TCMR. Two multivariable prediction models, integrating ALT+LSM or ALT+class II DSAs, had a high discriminative capacity for classifying patients with or without alloimmune damage. The latter model performed well in an independent cohort of 156 liver biopsies obtained from paediatric liver recipients with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria. ALT, class II DSAs and LSM are valuable tools to non-invasively identify stable LT recipients without significant underlying alloimmunity who could benefit from minimisation of immunosuppression. A large proportion of liver transplant patients with normal liver tests have inflammatory liver lesions, which in 17% of cases are molecularly indistinguishable from those seen at the time of rejection. ALT, class II donor-specific antibodies and liver stiffness are useful in identifying patients with this form of subclinical rejection. We propose these markers as a useful tool to help clinicians determine if the immunosuppression administered is adequate.

Clinically-Relevant Weight Loss is Achieved Independently of Early Weight Loss Response to Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide 2.4 MG (STEP 4)

Background: Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, is being investigated in people with overweight or obesity. A post-hoc analysis of the STEP 4 trial was conducted to identify whether early weight loss is predictive of later weight loss with maintenance once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide 2.4 mg. Methods: STEP 4 was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 withdrawal trial (NCT03548987). Adults aged ≥18 years with either body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity or BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without type 2 diabetes, underwent a 20-week run-in period. Participants reaching the maintenance dose of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg at week 20 (regardless of weight loss achieved) were randomized 2:1 to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo, as adjunct to lifestyle intervention, for an additional 48 weeks. Percent change in body weight from week 0 to 68 was estimated using a mixed model for repeated measurements analysis with treatment, week 20 responder status, and the interaction between treatment and week 20 responder status as factors, and baseline body weight as a covariate, all nested within visit (based on the trial product estimand [treatment effect assuming treatment adherence and without use of rescue intervention] for the on-treatment period). Participants were considered responders if they achieved ≥5% weight loss at week 20. Whether the week 20 response to semaglutide predicted the achievement of clinically-relevant weight loss (≥5%) by week 68 was also assessed. Results: In STEP 4, 902 participants initiated semaglutide at week 0, of whom 803 were randomized at week 20 (semaglutide: n=535, placebo: n=268; characteristics at week 0 for all randomized participants: mean age 46 years, body weight 107.2 kg, BMI 38.4 kg/m2; 79.0% female; 83.7% white). For the 88.0% of participants randomized to semaglutide and who were responders at week 20, mean body weight change from week 0 to 68 was -19.7%. For non-responders at week 20, mean body weight change was -6.4% with continued semaglutide vs -0.3% with switch to placebo. Of all participants randomized to semaglutide, 86.2% achieved a clinically-relevant weight loss (≥5%) at week 68. Being a responder at week 20 was highly predictive of achieving this outcome (positive predictive value: 96.4%), whereas being a non-responder at week 20 had limited predictive value (negative predictive value: 42.9%). Conclusion: In the STEP 4 trial, the vast majority of participants who were randomized to the maintenance dose of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg at week 20 had lost ≥5% body weight by week 68, with most achieving this by week 20. Overall weight loss with semaglutide was greater among early responders, but non-responders also achieved a clinically-relevant weight loss by week 68 if semaglutide treatment was continued.

Weight Loss Maintenance With Once-Weekly Semaglutide 2.4 MG in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Reaching Maintenance Dose (STEP 4)

Background: In people with overweight or obesity, long-term maintenance of weight loss is challenging. Subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, has shown clinically-relevant weight loss in a phase 2 trial in people with obesity. STEP 4 investigated the impact of continued semaglutide 2.4 mg treatment, vs switching to placebo, on maintenance of weight loss in participants who reached 2.4 mg of semaglutide during a run-in period. Methods: This was a 68-week withdrawal trial (NCT03548987) in 902 subjects aged ≥18 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (or BMI ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity), without diabetes. Following a 20 week run-in period, 803 subjects who reached the maintenance dose of once-weekly (OW) s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg were randomized 2:1 to continue treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg or switch to placebo for 48 weeks, both as adjunct to lifestyle intervention. The primary endpoint was percentage change in body weight between randomization (week 20) and week 68. Confirmatory secondary endpoints included change in waist circumference and systolic blood pressure. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy and trial product; results are presented for the treatment policy estimand, unless stated otherwise. Results: Mean body weight (±SD) was 107.2 ±22.7 kg at week 0 and 96.1 ±22.6 kg at randomization (week 20; mean change -10.6%). Randomized participants were mostly female (79%) and white (84%); mean age was 46 years and mean BMI was 34.4 kg/m2. Between weeks 20–68, estimated mean body weight change was −7.9% vs +6.9% for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: −14.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −16.0, −13.5; p<0.0001), and -8.8% vs 6.5%, respectively, for the trial product estimand (ETD: -15.3%; 95% CI: -16.5, -14.1; p<0.0001). For participants randomized to continue semaglutide, the estimated change in body weight from week 0–68 was -17.4% (-18.2% for trial product estimand). Continued semaglutide treatment (weeks 20–68) led to clinically-relevant improvements in waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, and lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, and triglycerides) vs switching to placebo (p<0.0001 for all). During the run-in period, 5.3% of participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events; during the randomized period, 2.4% (semaglutide) and 2.2% (placebo) discontinued. Nausea, diarrhea and constipation (mostly transient and mild-to-moderate) were the most frequent adverse events with semaglutide. Conclusion: In adults with overweight or obesity, continued treatment after dose escalation with OW s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg until week 68 led to clinically-relevant weight loss, while switching to placebo led to significant weight regain; these data underscore the chronicity and relapsing nature of obesity, and the need for continued treatment.