Wire-guided Localization Research Articles

Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: A Targeting Challenge–Comparison of Radio-Guided vs. Wire-Guided Localization Techniques

Background: The incidence of non-palpable breast cancer is increasing due to widespread screening and neo-adjuvant therapies. Among the available tumor localization techniques, radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) has largely replaced wire-guided localization (WGL). The aim of this study was to compare the ROLL and WGL techniques in terms of the effectiveness of isotopic marking of axillary sentinel lymph nodes and to assess patient perspectives along with surgeon and radiologist preferences. Methods: A single-center, prospective, randomized study enrolled 110 patients with non-palpable breast lesions (56 ROLL, 54 WGL). Breast type, tumor volume, location, histological and radiological features, and localization/surgical duration were evaluated in the context of sentinel lymph node marking using isotope (technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin) and blue dye. Statistical analysis was performed with significance set at p < 0.05 and strong significance at p < 0.01. Results: A single-center, prospective, randomized study enrolled 110 patients with non-palpable breast lesions (56 ROLL, 54 WGL). Breast type, tumor volume, location, histological and radiological features, and localization/surgical duration were evaluated in the context of sentinel lymph node marking using isotope (technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin) and blue dye. Statistical analysis was performed with significance set at p < 0.05 and strong significance at p < 0.01. Conclusions: While ROLL provided advantages in terms of patient comfort and logistical simplicity, WGL was superior for axillary sentinel lymph node marking, particularly in inner quadrant tumors, suggesting that WGL may be preferred in these cases.

Eco-logistical comparison of non-radioactive seeds and the wire-guided localization for intraoperative detection of breast lesions

BackgroundThe current standard for the preoperative marking of non-palpable breast lesions is wire guided localization (WGL) which is associated with logistical efforts and patient discomfort. Non-radioactive seeds (NRS) recently challenged the use of WGL; but do they provide a better alternative from a logistical and environmental perspective? MethodsWGL standard was compared with NRS available in Germany: Magseed®, Pintuition®, SAVI SCOUT ® and LOCalizer™ on a logistical and carbon-footprinting basis. In the logistical analysis the number of patient contacts with the healthcare system for lesion localization/removal and the number of breast punctures were evaluated in two different clinical scenarios (primary surgery and secondary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment). The carbon footprints of WGL and NRS (with exception of LOCalizer) were assessed based on their material compositions and operating energy in a streamlined approach. ResultsApplication of NRS reduces the number of contacts by 33.3 % (2 vs. 3) in primary, by 50 % (2 vs. 4) in secondary surgery, and the number of breast punctures by 33.3 % (2 vs.3). Annual Germany-wide material- and energy-based carbon footprints of NRS (1.6 to 3.2 tons CO2eq) are significantly lower in comparison to WGL (10.3 tons CO2eq). The implementation of NRS would lead to a CO2eq reduction by around 79 % compared to WGL. ConclusionsThe use of NRS for the localization of non palpable breast lesions is more favorable from the environmental and logistical perspective, when compared to WGL with possible benefits for patients, healthcare providers and the environment.

Non-palpable breast lesions localization techniques - A new priority: Results of a Senonetwork survey among breast centers in Italy

IntroductionNon palpable breast tumors are increasingly diagnosed because of screening programs, and their localization during surgery is essential to ensure an adequate resection. Little is known regarding which techniques are used in “real world”. Materials and methodsA national web-based survey, with a 21-items questionnaire, was conducted among Breast Centers (BCs) in Italy in 2023. ResultsAmong 153 BCs, 110 (72 %) participated. Wire-guided localization was reported to be the most used technique, regardless of the volume of malignant tumors treated by each Center (N = 36, 33 %). However, newer techniques such as Radioactive occult lesion localization and magnetic seeds, were reported to be employed in 34 (31 %) BCs, and more often among high-volume BCs (>300 cases/year) (N = 32, 29 % vs. N = 13, 12 %; p = 0.02). Logistic problems of localization were reported to cause delays to the scheduled surgery at least once or in multiple occasions in 26 (24 %) and in 4 (3.5 %) BCs, respectively. Although the majority of BCs declared they were satisfied (N = 48, 44 %) or somewhat satisfied (N = 41, 37 %) with the procedure used in their center, responders stated that they would change their technique, or that they were strongly considering this possibility in 24 (22 %) and in 38 (35 %) cases, respectively. The main barrier to introducing a new technique was associated with procedure costs (90 BCs, 82 %). ConclusionsThere are several critical issues regarding localization techniques at a national level. This should be recognized as a priority because of its impact on both patients and clinical practices.

MELODY: A prospective non-interventional multicenter cohort study to evaluate different imaging-guided methods for localization of malignant breast lesions (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET).

TPS623 Background: In the last decades, the proportion of breast cancer patients receiving breast-conserving surgery has increased, reaching 70-80% in developed countries. In case of non-palpable lesions, surgical excision requires some form of breast localization. While wire-guided localization has long been considered gold standard, it carries several limitations, including logistical difficulties, the potential for displacement and patient discomfort, and re-excision rates reaching 21%. Other techniques (radioactive seed or radio-occult lesion localization, intraoperative ultrasound, magnetic, radiofrequency, and radar localization) have been developed with the aim of overcoming these disadvantages. However, comparative data on the rates of successful lesion removal, negative margins, and re-operations are limited. In most studies, the patient perspective, addressing e.g. discomfort and pain, has not been evaluated. The aim of MELODY (Methods for Localization of Different Types of Breast Lesions) is to evaluate different imaging-guided localization methods with regard to oncological safety, patient-reported outcomes, and surgeon and radiologist satisfaction. Methods: The EUBREAST and the iBRA-NET have initiated the MELODY study to assess breast localization techniques and devices from several perspectives (NCT05559411, http://eubreast.org/melody ). MELODY is a prospective intergroup cohort study which enrolls female and male patients. planned for breast-conserving surgery with imaging-guided localization for invasive breast cancer or DCIS. Multiple or bilateral lesions and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are allowed. Primary outcomes are: 1) Intended target lesion and/or marker removal and 2) Negative resection margin rates. Secondary outcomes are, among others: rates of second surgery and secondary mastectomy, Resection Ratio (defined as actual resection volume divided by the calculated optimum specimen volume), duration of surgery, marker dislocation rates, rates of marker placement or localization failure, patient-reported outcomes, rates of “lost markers”, radiologist and surgeon satisfaction, and health economic evaluation of the different techniques. Target accrual: 7,416 patients. The study will be conducted in 30 countries. Clinical trial information: NCT05559411 .

Radar localization of breast and axillary lesions with SCOUT: a prospective single institution pilot study.

Wire-guided localization has been the mainstay of localization techniques for non-palpable breast and axillary lesions prior to excision. Evidence is still growing for relatively newer localization technologies. This study evaluated the efficacy of the wireless localization technology, SCOUT®, for both breast and axillary surgery. Data were extracted from a prospective database (2021-2023) of consecutive patients undergoing wide local excision, excisional biopsy, targeted axillary dissection, or axillary lymph node dissection with SCOUT at a high-volume tertiary centre. Rates of successful reflector placement, intraoperative lesion localization, and reflector retrieval were evaluated. A survey of surgeon-reported ease of lesion localization and reflector retrieval was also evaluated. ACTRN386751. One-hundred-ninety-five reflectors were deployed in 172 patients. Median interval between deployment and surgery was 3 days (range 1-20) and mean distance from reflector to lesion was 3.2 mm (standard deviation, SD 3.1). Rate of successful localization and reflector retrieval was 100% for both breast and axillary procedures. Mean operating time was 65.8 min (SD 33). None of the reflectors migrated. No reflector deployment or localization-related complications occurred. Ninety-eight percent of surgeons were satisfied with ease of localization for the first half of cases. SCOUT is an accurate and reliable method to localize and excise both breast and axillary lesions, and it may overcome some of the limitations of wire-guided localization.

Abstract PO4-18-12: MELODY: A prospective non-interventional multicenter cohort study to evaluate different imaging-guided methods for localization of malignant breast lesions (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET, NCT 05559411)

Abstract Background: In the last decades, the proportion of breast cancer patients receiving breast-conserving surgery has increased, reaching 70-80% in developed countries. In case of non-palpable lesions, surgical excision requires some form of breast localization. While wire-guided localization has long been considered gold standard, it carries several limitations, including logistical difficulties, the potential for displacement and patient discomfort, and re-excision rates reaching 21%. Other techniques (radioactive seed or radio-occult lesion localization, intraoperative ultrasound, magnetic, radiofrequency and radar localization) have been developed with the aim of overcoming these disadvantages. However, comparative data on the rates of successful lesion removal, negative margins and re-operations are limited. In the majority of studies, the patient’s perspective with regard to discomfort and pain level has not been evaluated. The aim of MELODY (MEthods for LOcalization of Different types of breast lesions) is to evaluate different imaging-guided localization methods with regard to oncological safety, patient-reported outcomes, and surgeon and radiologist satisfaction. Methods: The EUBREAST and the iBRA-NET have initiated the MELODY study to assess breast localization techniques and devices from several perspectives (NCT05559411, http://melody.eubreast.com). MELODY is a prospective intergroup cohort study which enrolls female and male pts. requiring breast-conserving surgery and imaging-guided localization for invasive breast cancer or DCIS. Multiple or bilateral lesions and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are allowed. Primary outcomes are: 1) Intended target lesion and/or marker removal, independent of margin status on final histopathology, and 2) Negative resection margin rates at first surgery. Secondary outcomes are, among others: rates of second surgery and secondary mastectomy, Resection Ratio (defined as actual resection volume divided by the calculated optimum specimen volume), duration of surgery, marker dislocation rates, rates of marker placement or localization failure, comparison of patient-reported outcomes, rates of “lost markers” and diagnostician/radiologist’s and surgeon’s satisfaction as well as the health economic evaluation of the different techniques. Target accrual: 7,416 patients. Enrollment started in January 2023. The study will be conducted in 30 countries and is supported by the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC), AWOgyn, AGO-B and SENATURK. Financial support will be provided by Endomag, Merit Medical, Sirius Medical and Hologic. Citation Format: Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Thorsten Kühn, Yazan Masannat, Nina Ditsch, Antonio Esgueva, Neslihan Cabıoğlu, Dawid Murawa, Nuh Zafer Canturk, Isabel Rubio, Jana de Boniface, Andreas Karakatsanis, Rajiv Dave, Shelley Potter, Ashutosh Kothari, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Walter Weber, Natalia Krawczyk, Steffi Hartmann, Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak, Markus Hahn, Michael P. Lux, Tove Tvedskov, Lina Pankratjevaite, Michalis Kontos, Florentia Peintinger, Aoife Lowery, Marjolein Smidt, Lia Rebaza, Maria Vasconcelos, Bahadir M. Gulluoglu, Bilge Aktas Sezen, Rosa Di Micco, Sarah Nietz, Francois Malherbe, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Séverine Alran, SVS Deo, Mah Muneer Khan, James Harvey. MELODY: A prospective non-interventional multicenter cohort study to evaluate different imaging-guided methods for localization of malignant breast lesions (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET, NCT 05559411) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-18-12.

Evaluation of intra-operative cavity shave and margin re-excision in SAVI SCOUT versus wire-guided localization in non-palpable breast lesions

Evaluation of intra-operative cavity shave and margin re-excision in SAVI SCOUT versus wire-guided localization in non-palpable breast lesions

Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.

With an increasing number of non-palpable breast lesions detected due to improved screening, accurate localization of these lesions for surgery is crucial. This literature review explores the evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions, highlighting the translational journey from concept to clinical practice. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases until September 2023 was conducted. Multiple methods have been developed throughout the past few decades. (I) Wire-guided localization (WGL) introduced in 1966, has become a reliable method for localization. Its simplicity and cost-effectiveness are its key advantages, but challenges include logistical constraints, patient discomfort, and potential wire migration. (II) Intraoperative ultrasound localization (IOUS) has shown promise in ensuring complete lesion removal with higher negative margin rates. However, its utility is limited to lesions visible on ultrasound (US) imaging. (III) Breast biopsy marker localization: the use of markers has improved the precision of localization without the need for wire. However, marker visibility remains a challenge despite improvements in their design. (IV) Radioactive techniques: radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL) offer flexibility in scheduling and improved patient comfort. However, they require close multidisciplinary collaboration and specific equipment due to radioactive concerns. (V) Other wireless non-radioactive techniques: wireless non-radioactive techniques have been developed in recent three decades to provide flexible and patient-friendly alternatives. It includes magnetic seed localization, radar techniques, and radiofrequency techniques. Their usage has been gaining popularity due to their safety profile and allowance of more flexible scheduling. However, their high cost and need for additional training remain a barrier to a wider adoption. The evolution of breast lesion localization methods has progressed to more patient-friendly techniques, each with its unique advantages and limitations. Future research on patient-reported outcomes, cosmetic outcomes, breast biopsy markers and integration of augmented reality with breast lesion localization are needed.

O182: Tag localisation vs wire localisation: which is the more effective technique for localising non palpable breast lesions?

Abstract Introduction Following the expansion of breast screening programmes, non-palpable lesions comprise a challenge for accurate localisation. Placement of wires has been the historic gold standard of care. We aimed to compare wire-guided localisation (WGL) to radiofrequency identification system (RFID) LOCalizer(Hologic) with regards to resection margins and complications. Methods Data was collected retrospectively on patients who underwent breast conserving surgery for malignancy following localisation with LOCalizer RFID system or wire, in Beaumont Breast Centre, from January 2018 to March 2023. Lesion type, size, specimen weight, resection margins and complications were recorded and analysed. Results 690 were included in the study. 391 (57%) had a pre-operative diagnosis of malignancy: 88 in RFID tag guided localisation (TGL), 129 in mammogram wire guided localisation (MG-WGL) and 174 in ultrasound (US-WGL). The remaining had therapeutic excisional biopsy in which 18 (6%) were upgraded to in situ or invasive. Positive surgical margins were; US-WGL was 24% (43), MG-WGL was 23% (34) and TGL was 12% (11). Average tumour size was: 20.3mm US-WGL, 13.0mm MG-WGL, 18.3mm TGL. Average specimen weight for malignant cases were 33.8g US-WGL, 43.5g MG-WGL and 40.7g TGL. No significant complications were recorded in either group, however, a second localisation procedure was required for 14 patients in the TGL group and 10 patients in the WGL group. Conclusion TGL is a safe and effective alternative technique which allows greater flexibility in scheduling and increased efficiency. It has a learning curve which accounts for the slightly higher complication rate identified.

Early Breast Cancer: Could Combined LOCalizerTM and Ultrasound Localization Replace the Metallic Wire? A Multicentric Study.

Background: Breast localization plays a key role in early breast cancer (BC) surgery. The current gold standard is wire-guided localization (WGL), despite the known disadvantages. The patients often experience anxiety and discomfort due the metallic wire placed in the breast, and surgeons are compelled to perform the surgery on the same day as the radiological release of the wire to prevent migrations or breakages. Various wireless systems have been proposed as alternative to WGL. LOCalizerTM offers the advantage of providing the exact distance from the marker called Tag. The combined technique using LOCalizerTM and US allows for determining the distance from the BC margin, a critical surgical goal for oncological radicality. Methods: Patients referred for breast surgery to two Italian hospitals were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group A, including patients undergoing a combined approach, and group B, including patients treated with conventional WGL. Results: The combined approach with LOCalizerTM and US was associated with better outcomes in terms of oncological radicality, cosmetic results, and patients' satisfaction. Conclusions: In the current study, LOCalizerTM associated with US could be considered an excellent approach for localizing non-palpable BC. Further larger comparative studies are needed to address this issue.

Radioactive Seed Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study is a systematic review with meta-analysis comparing radioactive seed localization (RSL) versus radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and wire-guided localization (WGL) for patients with impalpable breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery and evaluating efficacy, safety, and logistical outcomes. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO with the number CRD42022299726. A search was conducted in the Embase, Lilacs, Pubmed, Scielo, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov databases, in addition to a manual search in the reference list of relevant articles, for randomized clinical trials and cohort studies. Studies selected were submitted to their own data extraction forms and risk of bias analysis according to the ROB 2 and ROBINS 1 tools. A meta-analysis was performed, considering the random effect model, calculating the relative risk or the mean difference for dichotomous or continuous data, respectively. The quality of the evidence generated was analyzed by outcome according to the GRADE tool. Overall, 46 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review; of these, 4 studies compared RSL and ROLL with a population of 1550 women, and 43 compared RSL and WGL with a population of 19,820 women. The results showed that RSL is a superior method to WGL in terms of surgical efficiency in the impalpable breast lesions' intraoperative localization, and it is at least equivalent to ROLL. Regarding security, RSL obtained results equivalent to the already established technique, the WGL. In addition to presenting promising results, RSL has been proven to be superior to WGL and ROLL technologies.

Breast cancer localization by iodine seed 125I vs. wire- -guided localization - retrospective case-control study.

For many years, the gold standard in the localization of non-palpable malignant breast tumors has been the use of wire-guided method. However, this has recently been replaced by more modern localization techniques in many institutions. This is a retrospective case-control study comparing two localization techniques (iodine seed 125I and wire-guided localization) for localizing non-palpable tumors in patients with histologically verified breast carcinoma. The study included 62 patients - 31 with localization of malignant breast tumor by iodine seed (subgroup 125I) and 31 by wire-guided localization (subgroup FV). The average volume of the resected tissue in subgroup 125I (46.2 cm3) was statistically significantly smaller compared to subgroup FV (83.7 cm3; P = 0.0063). R0 resection was achieved in 29 cases (93.5%) in subgroup 125I and in 24 cases (77.4%) in subgroup FV (P = 0.0714). In subgroup 125I, re-resection was not indicated in any case, while in subgroup FV, re-resection due to tumor reaching the margin was indicated in 6 cases (19.4%; P = 0.01). Our initial experience show that the use of iodine seeds for localizing non-palpable breast tumors is associated with the removal of a smaller volume of resected tissue compared to wire-guided localization, with a trend towards more frequent achievement of R0 resection. In the subgroup of patients localized with iodine seeds, there was a smaller proportion of re-resections due to inadequate safety margins.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of body surface mapping plus wire-guided localization and body surface mapping plus methylene blue-guided localization in occult breast lesions

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of body surface mapping plus wire-guided localization and body surface mapping plus methylene blue-guided localization in occult breast lesions

Wire-guided localization and surgical resection of non-palpable recurrent of thyroid carcinoma: A STROBE-compliant, retrospective cohort study

BackgroundInformation on hook-wire guided (HWG) surgery for non-palpable thyroid carcinoma (TC), locoregional-recurrent disease (LRRD) is scarce. We analyze the results of HWG resection compared with the traditional procedure. MethodsCohort study performed between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients with TC and non-palpable LRRD were included. A “Standard cohort”, patients with non-HWG resection and “HWG cohort”, with HWG resection of LRRD were defined. Surgical morbidity, re-recurrent/progressive disease (RRD), and re-recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were defined. Results43 and 23 patients were assigned to the Standard or HWG cohorts, respectively. Complications occurred in 28 % and 17.3 % of cases, in control or HWG cohorts, respectively. HWG cohort, size of primary TC, 131I dose >150 mCi, and thyroglobulin level >1 ng/ml at detection of LRRD were associated with RRD. HWG cohort, thyroglobulin level at LRRD, 131I treatment, and dose were associated with RRFS. ConclusionsHWG surgery of non-palpable TC LRRD had improved results regarding surgical morbidity, RRD, and RRFS.

Comparison of wire-guided localization (WGL) and radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) in localization of non-palpable breast lesions

BackgroundThe number of patients with non-palpable breast lesions has increased gradually. This is because of the technological development in imaging techniques and the screening programs that lead to early detection of breast lesions.The number of patients with non-palpable breast lesions has increased gradually. This is because of the technological development in imaging techniques and the screening programs that lead to early detection of breast lesions. The aim of marking the non-palpable breast lesions is to achieve accurate lesion localization, to obtain the better cosmetic result with less tissue loss and to provide negative surgical margin.Aim of the studyIn the current study, we aimed to compare the wire-guided localization (WGL) technique with the radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) technique to assess their accuracy and efficacy in non-palpable breast lesions localization.MethodsThis is a retrospective study conducted at Baheya center for Early Detection and Treatment of Breast Cancer from January 2018 and June2022,where 670 patients with non-palpable breast lesions underwent an excision were enrolled randomly in ROLL group (n = 320) and WGL (n = 350).ResultsBoth the localization time and the time of operation were significantly decreased with the ROLL in comparison to WGL(P < 0.001). Complete lesion excision with clear margins were reported in 119/135(88.2%) of ROLL group and in 130/159 (81.8%) of WGL group and the difference was significant (P < 0.001). Reoperations (re-lumpectomy or mastectomy) were done as a second procedure on 16(11.8%) of the ROLL patients compared with 29(18.2%) in the WGL patients(P < 0.001).ConclusionThis study shows that ROLL is as effective as WGL for non-palpable breast lesions excision. Also, ROLL improve the outcomes by decreasing the duration of surgery, localization time, achieving a higher percentage of clear margin in spite of lower specimen size and scar length.

Evaluation of Wire Localization in Management of Non-Palpable Breast Cancer

Abstract Background Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is considered the goldstandard treatment for early breast cancer. Various techniques have been proposed for identifying non-palpable breast tumors, but the most popular method is the wireguided localization (WGL technique). The most important drawback of BCS is the possible presence of microscopic tumor at or close to the margin of excision. Objective To highlighting the significance of screening programs, early detection and recent advances in the management of early non palpable breast cancer. Methods This is a prospective study on 30 patients with a single nonpalpable breast lesion. A preoperative USG or MMG-guided hook wire localization technique was performed then intraoperative frozen section was done. Results Of the prospective study, 30 patients were treated with wire-guided localization and BCS. And intraoperative frozen sections. According to positive margins, patient age, menopausal status, tumor size and histologic type were associated with increased risk of positive margins. The reexcision at the time of original operation was (6/30) (20%) and need for second operation in (1/30) (3.3%) of cases. According to postoperative complication increased by neoadjuvant chemotherapy, size of mass, specimen volume, margin status and LNs affection. Conclusion In early diagnosis of breast cancer, the validity of the imagingguided hook wire localization biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions has been proved. The cooperation of surgeon, radiologist and pathologist increases the successful results of hook wire localization technique.

Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound.

Breast conservative surgery is the primary therapeutic choice for non-aggressive early breast cancers, and a minimally-invasive approach is strongly recommended. The breast localization represents a modern challenge for surgery. Wire-guided localization is still the gold standard technique, but new wireless systems have been proposed, such as radiofrequency identification with LOCalizerTM (Hologic, Santa Carla, CA, USA), which reports encouraging results. The current study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of the combined use of LOCalizerTM and ultrasound compared with the results obtained using LOCalizerTM alone for the detection of non-palpable breast cancer. Ninety-six patients who were candidates for breast localization were enrolled. Group A received a combined localization with LOCalizerTM and US, while group B underwent only LOCalizerTM identification. Oncological radicality was reached in 100% of the patients in Group A and in 89.2% of the patients in Group B, with p = 0.006. The mean specimens' volume was 13.2 ± 0.6 cm3 for Group A and 16.1 ± 1.4 cm3 for Group B, while mean specimen weights were 21.8 ± 2.2 and 24.4 ± 1.8 g, respectively (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). LOCalizerTM with ultrasound, in the current series, has resulted in the preferred option for the localization of non-palpable breast cancer, allowing limited resection (in weight and volume), guaranteeing excellent oncological outcomes, and great satisfaction for patients and physicians.

Comparison of Wire and Non-Wire Localisation Techniques in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Review of the Literature with Pooled Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Wide local excision is a common procedure in the treatment of breast cancer. Wire-guided localisation (WGL) has been the gold standard for many years; however, several issues have been identified with this technique, and therefore, wire-free techniques have been developed. This scoping review synthesises the available literature comparing wire-guided localisation with the wire-free techniques used in breast-conserving cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Multiple databases including Pubmed and MEDLINE were used to search articles between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2022. Terms included "breast neoplasms", "margins of excision", and "reoperation". In total, 34/256 papers were selected for review. Comparisons were made between positive margins and re-excision rates of WGL with wire-free techniques including SAVI SCOUT, Magseed, ROLL, and RSL. Pooled p-values were calculated using chi-square testing to determine statistical significance. Results: Pooled analysis demonstrated statistically significant reductions in positive margins and re-excision rates when SAVI SCOUT, RSL, and ROLL were compared with WGL. When SAVI SCOUT was compared to WGL, there were fewer re-excisions {(8.6% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.0001) and positive margins (10.6% vs. 15.0%; p = 0.0105)}, respectively. This was also the case in the ROLL and RSL groups. When compared to WGL; lower re-excision rates and positive margins were noted {(12.6% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.0007), (17.0% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.0268)} for ROLL and for RSL, respectively {(6.8% vs. 14.9%),(12.36% vs. 21.4%) (p = 0.0001)}. Magseed localisation demonstrated lower rates of re-excision than WGL (13.44% vs. 15.42%; p = 0.0534), but the results were not statistically significant. Conclusions: SAVI SCOUT, Magseed, ROLL, and RSL techniques were reviewed. Pooled analysis indicates wire-free techniques, specifically SAVI SCOUT, ROLL, and RSL, provide statistically significant reductions in re-excision rates and positive margin rates compared to WGL. However, additional studies and systematic analysis are required to ascertain superiority between techniques.

MELODY (Methods for Localization of Different Types of Breast Lesions): A prospective non-interventional multicenter cohort study to evaluate different imaging-guided methods for localization of malignant breast lesions (EUBREAST-4/iBRA-NET).

TPS626 Background: In the last decades, the proportion of breast cancer patients receiving breast-conserving surgery has increased, reaching 70-80% in developed countries. In case of non-palpable lesions, surgical excision requires some form of breast localization. While wire-guided localization has long been considered gold standard, it carries several limitations, including logistical difficulties, the potential for displacement and patient discomfort, and re-excision rates reaching 21%. Other techniques (radioactive seed or radio-occult lesion localization, intraoperative ultrasound, magnetic, radiofrequency and radar localization) have been developed with the aim of overcoming these disadvantages. However, comparative data on the rates of successful lesion removal, negative margins and re-operations are limited. In the majority of studies, the patient’s perspective with regard to discomfort and pain level has not been evaluated. The aim of MELODY is to evaluate different imaging-guided localization methods with regard to oncological safety, patient-reported outcomes, and surgeon and radiologist satisfaction. Methods: The EUBREAST and the iBRA-NET have initiated the MELODY study to assess breast localization techniques and devices from several perspectives (NCT05559411, http://melody.eubreast.com ). MELODY is a prospective intergroup cohort study which enrolls female and male pts. requiring breast-conserving surgery and imaging-guided localization for invasive breast cancer or DCIS. Multiple or bilateral lesions and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are allowed. Primary outcomes are: 1) Intended target lesion and/or marker removal, independent of margin status on final histopathology, and 2) Negative resection margin rates at first surgery. Secondary outcomes are, among others: rates of second surgery and secondary mastectomy, Resection Ratio (defined as actual resection volume divided by the calculated optimum specimen volume), duration of surgery, marker dislocation rates, rates of marker placement or localization failure, comparison of patient-reported outcomes, rates of “lost markers” and diagnostician/radiologist’s and surgeon’s satisfaction as well as the health economic evaluation of the different techniques. Target accrual: 7,416 patients. Enrollment started in January 2023. The study will be conducted in 20 countries and is supported by the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC), AWOgyn, AGO-B and SENATURK. Clinical trial information: NCT05559411 .

Abstract OT1-12-03: Precision breast conserving surgery with the guidance of localization combined with multidetector CT 3-dimensional image reconstruction: a single center, prospective, cohort study

Abstract Introduction: Precision breast conserving surgery (PBCS) requires doctors to precisely remove the tumor while preserving as much normal tissue as possible. The aims of this study were to determine whether wire-guided localization (WGL) combined with multidetector CT (MDCT) guided 3D reconstruction could guide PBCS. Methods: From 2020 to 2022, 31 patients with unifocal breast cancer were enrolled for PBCS guided by WGL combined with MDCT guided 3D reconstruction. Surrounded WGL was performed under local anesthesia, followed by an immediate contrast enhanced MDCT scan. PBCS guided by MDCT guided 3D reconstruction was performed one day after the localization. Women who underwent palpation guided BCS were included as control, and logistic regression analysis was applied. Results: PBCS were performed in 31 patients. The mean tumor size in US was 19.48±5.86mm (9-32mm). Compare with control group, a smaller specimen diameter was observed in PBCS group (P=0.005), and the rate of the largest margin greater than or equal to 20mm were significantly lower (P=0.004). The operation time of PBCS was shortened (P=0.046). Moreover, PBCS does not affect the reoperation rate (P=0.514) or the rate of positive margins (P=0.660). Conclusion: For patients with unifocal breast cancer, WGL combined with MDCT guided 3D reconstruction could guide PBCS without affecting the safety. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients in PBCS group and control group. BMI, body mass index; US, ultrasound; HR, hormone receptor. Table 2. Surgical outcomes of patients in PBCS group and control group. Citation Format: Yiqin Xia, Da Cao, Lili Yang, Mingjie Zheng, Miaomiao Weng, Ke Shi, Ruoxi Wang, Meng Zhao, Hui Xie, Shui Wang. Precision breast conserving surgery with the guidance of localization combined with multidetector CT 3-dimensional image reconstruction: a single center, prospective, cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-12-03.