Wind-induced stress analysis is essential for evaluating the local failure and fatigue damage of long-span bridges in wind-prone regions. Nevertheless, the accuracy of stress-level analysis can be affected by the choice of wind loading and structure models. This study formulates three scenarios to calculate the wind-induced response of a long-span bridge, incorporating two types of wind load models (lumped force or distributed force) and two types of finite element (FE) models (spine-beam or substructure). Specifically, Case 1 employs the lumped force and beam model, Case 2 adopts the lumped force and substructure model, and Case 3 utilizes the distributed force and substructure model. The aerodynamic parameters for forces and POD pressure modes are obtained through wind tunnel tests. By comparing the wind-induced structural response in terms of global behavior (displacement, acceleration) and local behavior (stress), the influence of wind loading and structure models is discussed. The findings reveal that employing a simplified beam model underestimates local stress, and neglecting wind load distribution leads to further underestimation. Therefore, the refined FE model and distributed wind load models are recommended for the precise assessment of wind-induced stresses in long-span bridges.
Read full abstract