Wiltse Approach Research Articles

TROPIC: Transfascial Oblique Posterior Interbody Correction: Technical Note

Adult spinal deformity is a common problem in today's aging adult population, particularly in the thoracolumbar spine. This can lead to severe pain and disability, leading to a poorer quality of life. Traditionally, open deformity correction has been the mainstay of treatment for these patients as it provides an excellent operative corridor; however, this comes with severe risk and high complication rates. There has been a trend toward more minimally invasive approaches to correct the deformity while preserving the muscle and soft tissue surrounding the bony spine across the fusion. We describe a minimally invasive surgical technique through a Wiltse approach without invading the paraspinal musculature to gain access to the bony spine to perform lumbar interbody fusions and osteotomies. A total of 3 patients were identified for this technical note who underwent the transfascial oblique posterior interbody correction procedure for adult spinal deformity. The patients had severe coronal and rotational imbalances. We were able to achieve adequate correction through an approach without disturbing the spinal musculature and soft tissues. This technique provides benefits of spinal rotational and coronal plane correction and restores lordosis with current advancements of today's technologies without the downsides of an open surgical approach.

Clinical application of a modified wiltse approach in middle and lower thoracic vertebrae: a case-control study of thoracic fracture patients

BackgroundThe Wiltse approach has been extensively employed in thoracolumbar surgeries due to its minimal muscle damage. However, in the middle and lower thoracic spine, the conventional Wiltse approach necessitates the severance of the latissimus dorsi and trapezius muscles, potentially leading to muscular injury. Consequently, we propose a modified Wiltse approach for the middle and lower thoracic vertebrae, which may further mitigate muscular damage.MethodsFrom May 2018 to April 2022, 60 patients with spinal fractures in the middle and lower thoracic vertebrae (T5-12) were enrolled in this study. Thirty patients underwent surgery using the modified Wiltse approach (Group A), while the remaining 30 patients received traditional posterior surgery (Group B). The observation indices included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, number of C-arm exposures, postoperative drainage, postoperative ambulation time, discharge time, as well as preoperative and postoperative Cobb’s angle, percentage of anterior vertebral body height (PAVBH), visual analog scale (VAS) Score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI).ResultsCompared to the traditional posterior approach, the modified Wiltse approach demonstrated significant advantages in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of incision, postoperative ambulation time, postoperative drainage, and discharge time, as well as postoperative VAS and ODI scores. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of number of C-arm exposures, postoperative Cobb’s angle, or postoperative PAVBH.ConclusionWe propose a modification of the Wiltse approach for the middle and lower thoracic vertebral regions, which may further minimize muscular damage and facilitate the recovery of patients who have undergone surgery in the middle and lower thoracic vertebrae.

The use of intraoperative CT-neuronavigation in Wiltse approach. A technical note.

The paraspinal approach was first introduced in 1968 and later refined by Leon Wiltse to gain access to the lateral interevertebral foraminal region. However, challenges can arise due to unfamiliarity with this approach, unique patient anatomy, or in case of revision surgery, potentially elevating the risk of complications and/or poor outcome. Here we report on two cases in which the intraoperative Oarm CT neuronavigation was used during a Wiltse approach. Under general anesthesia, the spinous process near the surgical level is exposed through a midline incision. The patient's reference anchor is then attached to the exposed spinous process. Intraoperative CT is acquired and transferred to the Stealth Station S8 Surgical Navigation System (Medtronic). The Wiltse approach is now performed through a paramedian incision under neuronavigation guidance and perfectly tailored to the patient's unique anatomy. The first case was a patient harboring a left lumbar intraextraforaminal schwannoma and the second one was a patient with an extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation at the adjacent level of a previous lumbar instrumentation. We were able to easily identify and remove both the lesions minimizing the surgical approach with no complication and optimal clinical outcome. Our cases demonstrate the feasibility of application of intraoperative O-arm CT-neuronavigation to the Wiltse approach. In our opinion, this technique helps in minimizing the surgical approach and rapidly identifying the lesion of interest. Further studies are needed to address the effective utility and advantages of intraoperative CT-neuronavigation in this specific surgical scenario.

Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes in unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis of three surgical approaches.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the combined spinous process-splitting approach with a Wiltse (SPSW) approach, the combined conventional approach with a Wiltse (CW) approach, and the conventional open (CO) approach in unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The clinical outcomes were assessed, and intraoperative data and complications were collected. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for low back pain and leg pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) scores for evaluating functions of the lumbar spine and health-related quality of life, and the modified MacNab standard for assessing satisfaction were analyzed. Radiographic outcomes included disc space height, segmental lordosis, interbody fusion assessment, and the rate of muscle atrophy of the multifidus and the erector spinae muscles. Among the three groups, the SPSW group exhibited the shortest operation and drain retention time, lowest intraoperative blood loss, and minimal postoperative blood loss. Notably, the SPSW group displayed the highest level of social life function based on the JOABPEQ, and the highest level of patient satisfaction according to the modified MacNab Criteria, along with the lowest rate of muscle atrophy. All the SPSW, CW, and CO approach TLIF procedures achieved overall satisfactory effects of decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. The SPSW approach procedure appears to be associated with the smallest surgical trauma and highest satisfaction because of reducing iatrogenic injury of the paraspinal muscles.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) in treatment of degenerative diseases of lumbosacral spine compared to modified open TLIF: a prospective randomised controlled study.

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) compared to modified open TLIF via the Wiltse approach for treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbosacral region. The results were evaluated over a post-operative period of 48 months. Radiological data and medical records of patients who underwent MIS TLIF and modified open TLIF between May 2017 and May 2021 were reviewed. Parameters monitored to evaluate the surgical results were: clinical status, operation time, blood loss, radiation dose to patient, day of discharge, analgesic consumption, fusion, and complications rate. For functional assessment, the Visual Analogue Scale for back pain (VAS-BP), VAS for leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Patient Satisfaction Rate (PSR), and the complication rate were used. This study included 57 patients randomly divided into two groups: 30 operated on using the MIS TLIF technique, and 27 operated on using the modified open TLIF technique via the Wiltse approach. 48-month follow-up rates were similar for the two cohorts. Patients did not differ significantly at baseline in terms of ODI, VAS-BP, or VAS-LP. Perioperatively, MIS TLIF was associated with significantly less blood loss (167.3 ± 80.0 vs. 297.9 ± 81.5 ml, p = 1.1E-05), slightly longer procedures (185.7 ± 45.2 vs. 183.1 ± 66.4 minutes, p = 0.76), a lower radiation dose (MIS 16.9 ± 7.1 vs. 22.0 ± 9.7 mGy OPEN p = 0.012), and shorter hospitalisations (MIS 5.9 ± 1.8 vs. 7.7 ± 1.6 days OPEN). The most common complication was radiculitis, which accounted for 33% and 37% in the MIS and the TLIF groups, respectively. The second most common complication was malposition of the fixation material, which accounted for 18.5% in the TLIF group and 20% in the MIS group. The level of fusion achieved was 92.6% in the MIS group versus 92.3% in the TLIF group. There was lower consumption of analgesics in MIS. Patient Satisfaction Rate (PSR) was 90%. Clinical and radiological outcomes after MIS TLIF in patients with degenerative disease of the lumbosacral region are generally favourable. MIS TLIF was associated with decreased blood loss perioperatively, a lower radiation dose and an earlier discharge, but there was no difference between MIS TLIF and modified open TLIF in 48-month outcomes in terms of disability, back pain, leg pain, quality of life, or patient satisfaction rate or complication rate. Although the differences taper off over time, MIS TLIF has undeniable advantages in the perioperative and early postoperative periods.

Fully Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for L5–S1 Foraminal Stenosis: A Narrative Review

Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is a fairly common degenerative condition of the spine that can often occur in the L5–S1 segment. Traditional surgical approaches for LFS can be categorized into microscopic foraminotomy via the Wiltse approach and interbody fusion. Microscopic foraminotomy via the Wiltse approach was previously considered the gold standard for treating LFS. However, with advancements in endoscopic equipment and techniques, fully endoscopic foraminotomy through various approaches is now widely performed for the treatment of LFS. Among these approaches, endoscopic foraminotomy via the transforaminal approach offers many advantages, but difficulties may be encountered when there are anatomical barriers, which are often present in the L5–S1 segment. This study aimed to explore the overall clinical outcomes and complications of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy, as well as the challenges specific to the L5–S1 segment and techniques to overcome them.

Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography to evaluate the effect of less paraspinal muscle damage on bone mineral density changes after lumbar interbody fusion.

A retrospective cohort study. This study aimed to assess the reliability of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in measuring bone mineral density (BMD) of instrumented vertebrae and investigate the effect of less paraspinal muscle damage on BMD changes after lumbar interbody fusion. Patients always experience a decrease in vertebral BMD after lumbar interbody fusion. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has analyzed the effect of paraspinal muscles on BMD changes. This retrospective analysis included a total of 155 patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion, with 81 patients in the traditional group and 74 patients in the Wiltse group (less paraspinal muscle damage). QCT was used to measure the volumetric BMD (vBMD), Hounsfield unit value, and cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV), vertebrae one segment above the UIV (UIV+1), and the vertebrae one segment above the UIV+1 (UIV+2). Statistical analyses were performed. No significant differences in general data were observed between the two groups (p>0.05). Strong correlations were noted between the preoperative and 1-week postoperative vBMD of each segment (p<0.01), with no significant difference between the two time points in both groups (p>0.05). Vertebral BMD loss was significantly higher in UIV+1 and UIV+2 in the traditional group than in the Wiltse group (-13.6%±19.1% vs. -4.2%±16.5%, -10.8%±20.3% vs. -0.9%±37.0%; p<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in the percent vBMD changes in the UIV segment between the two groups (37.7%±70.1% vs. 36.1%±78.7%, p>0.05). QCT can reliably determine BMD in the instrumented spine after lumbar interbody fusion. With QCT, we found that reducing paraspinal muscle destruction through the Wiltse approach during surgery can help preserve the adjacent vertebral BMD; however, it does not help increase the BMD in the instrumented vertebrae.

Prospective same day discharge instrumented lumbar spine surgery - a forty patient consecutive series.

Outpatient lumbar decompression surgeries have been successfully performed in France for over twenty years, earning acceptance. However, outpatient instrumented lumbar spine procedures and arthroplasties are less documented. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of outpatient lumbar instrumented surgery. A prospective single-center study involving three experienced surgeons was conducted from September 2020 to September 2021, with a minimum six-month postoperative follow-up. Inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 18 to 75 eligible for same-day discharge, undergoing single-level lumbar spinal fusion or arthroplasty via anterior or posterior Wiltse approach. The primary endpoint was assessing the percentage of successful outpatient discharges (within twelve hours), with secondary endpoints including perioperative/postoperative complications and discharge pain prescriptions in terms of frequency and severity. Forty patients (mean age: 44 years; 16/24 male/female ratio) underwent surgery, including 18 lumbar arthroplasties, twelve ALIF, and ten TLIF procedures. The majority of surgeries were performed at L4-L5 (18 procedures) and L5-S1 levels (22 procedures). 95% (38/40) of patients were successfully discharged within twelve hours, with only two patients discharged the following day. No postoperative hematomas, serious adverse events, or revision surgeries were noted. 95% of patients were discharged successfully within twelve hours following outpatient lumbar fusion surgery, with a 100% patient satisfaction rate. Specific technical solutions were not necessary, and oral pain relief sufficed. Patient selection and education, including early pain management, played crucial roles in complication avoidance. This study underscores the safety of outpatient instrumented lumbar spine procedures, leading to cost reduction and expedited recovery.

Safety and feasibility of mini-open Wiltse approach in posterolateral lumbar stabilization and fusion: intra- and post-operative evaluation

BackgroundExpected operative challenges in minimally invasive spine surgeries as a result of restricted surgical field, unfamiliarity with surgical approaches and fear of complications are behind the preference of using traditional "open" spine surgery.ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and feasibility of mini-open Wiltse approach in comparison with the conventional midline approach for posterolateral lumbar stabilization and fusion.Patients and methodsA retrospective comparative study conducted on 49 patients with low grade single level lumbar spondylolithesis who were surgically treated in our Department between May 2020 and May 2022. Patients who were surgically treated with traditional midline approach were included in group (A) and patients in whom the mini-open Wiltse approach was used, were assigned to group (B). The two groups were compared regarding various intra and postoperative parameters.ResultsGroup (A) included 27 patients (55.1%) operated upon with the classic midline approach and 22 patients (44.9%) were surgically treated using the Wiltse approach (group B). The mean patients' age (50.43 ± 5.538) years and L4-5 was the most commonly affected level (71.4%). The intra-operative parameters (operation time, blood loss and fluoroscopy time) showed significant lower results (P < 0.001) among patients of group (B). No cases in the group (B) required blood transfusion versus 5 cases in group (A) (P = 0.033). Postoperatively, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were significantly improved in each group in comparison to the preoperative scores (P < 0.001). However, after 3 months the ODI score in group (B) was superior to that in group (A) (P = 0.045) and postoperative VAS score in group (B) was significantly improved compared to that in group (A) at discharge (P = 0.016), and also after 1 and 3 months (P < 0.001). Patients operated with Wiltse approach had a shorter duration of hospital stay but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.090).ConclusionsBecause of minimal trauma to the muscles and soft tissues, the mini-open Wiltse approach can be faster, safer and requires less recovery time as opposed to the classic midline approach.

Comparison of mMO-TLIF via Midline Incision Versus MIS-TLIF via Wiltse Approach in Lumbar Degenerative Disease

BackgroundTo compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mMO-TLIF) via posterior midline incision for "targeted limited dissection" versus minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) via Wiltse approach in lumbar degenerative diseases.MethodsA total of 60 consecutive patients in our center from January 2019 to March 2020 were enrolled, including 30 patients who were treated with mMO-TLIF via posterior midline incision and 30 treated with MIS-TLIF through the Wiltse approach. Perioperative parameters were recorded. The questionnaires of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) were conducted before the operation and after the operation (3 days, 1 week, and 2 years). CT and MRI radiological outcomes were evaluated before the operation and at a 2-year follow-up.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the general data, gender, age, and BMI between the two groups. All patients were successfully operated without intraoperative complications. There were significant differences between the two groups in the operation time (p < 0.001) and intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.05). There was no difference in ODI and VAS scores between groups pre- and post-operatively, but they were both significantly improved compared to those before the operation (p < 0.01). At a 2-year follow-up, the paraspinal muscle atrophy and fat infiltration were increased comparing to pre-operation, but the difference was also not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In addition, both the two groups’ fusion rates were more than 90% at a 2-year follow-up, however, no difference was detected between the two groups.ConclusionmMO-TLIF via midline incision for “targeted limited dissection” could achieve similar clinical and radiological outcomes as MIS-TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease.

Flexible posterior vertebral tethering for the management of Scheuermann's kyphosis: correction by using growth modulation-clinical and radiographic outcomes of the first 10 patients with at least 3years of follow-up.

The present prospective cohort study was intended to present the minimum 3years' results of flexible posterior vertebral tethering (PVT) applied to 10 skeletally immature patients with SK to question, if it could be an alternative to fusion. Ten skeletally immature patients with radiographically confirmed SK, who had flexible (minimum 35%) kyphotic curves (T2-T12), were included. A decision to proceed with PVT was based on curve progression within the brace, and/or persistent pain, and/or unacceptable cosmetic concerns of the patient/caregivers, and/or non-compliance within the brace. Patients had an average age of 13.1 (range 11-15) and an average follow-up duration of 47.6months (range 36-60). Posterior vertebral tethering (PVT) was undertaken to all patients by utilizing Wiltse approach and placing monoaxial pedicle screws intermittently. At the final follow-up: mean pre-operative thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis improved from 73.6°-45.7° to 34.7°-32.1°. Mean sagittal vertical axis, vertebral wedge angle and total SRS-22 scores improved significantly. A fulcrum lateral X-ray obtained at the latest follow-up, showed that the tethered levels remained mobile. This study, for the first time in the literature, concluded, that as a result of growth modulation applied to skeletally immature patients with SK, flexible PVT was detected to yield gradual correction of the thoracic kyphosis by reverting the pathological vertebral wedging process, while keeping the mobility of the tethered segments in addition to successful clinical-functional results. The successful results of the present study answered the role of the PVT as a viable alternative to fusion in skeletally immature patients with SK. IV.

Comparison of the Wiltse Approach and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures

Purpose: To compare the curative effect of two minimally invasive techniques for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. Methods: 37 patients with type A fractures without neurological deficits were selected and divided into two groups. Among them, 18 patients received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF group), and 19 patients were treated using a mini-open Wiltse approach with pedicle screw fixation (WPSF group). The clinical outcomes, surgery-related results, and radiological findings were compared between the two groups. Results: The length of incision, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative hospitalization time, satisfaction, visual analog score (VAS), and Cobb’s angle between the two groups showed no significant differences (P &gt; 0.05). However, the operation time and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopy of the WPSF group were significantly lower than those of the PPSF group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Both minimally invasive techniques are effective for neurologically intact thoracolumbar fractures. Nevertheless, the mini-open Wiltse approach has lower radiation exposure and a shorter learning curve compared with PPSF. A larger sample, multi-center randomized controlled study is necessary to prove the clinical effectiveness of the Wiltse approach.

Comparison of a novel hand-held retractor-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by the wiltse approach and posterior TLIF: a one-year prospective controlled study

BackgroundThis study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of a novel hand-held retractor system-assisted Wiltse TLIF with that P-TLIF and assess whether this hand-held retractor system assisted Wiltse TLIF can yield less paraspinal muscle injury.Methods56 patients (P-TLIF: 26, Wiltse TLIF: 30) were included in this one year prospective controlled study. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, mobilization time, and discharge time were recorded. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by ODI, VAS, JOA, and SF-36 scores (7 days, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery). Paraspinal muscle injury was assessed by postoperative MRI (6 months after surgery). CK and C-reaction protein were measured pre and postoperatively, and CT or X-ray (one year postoperatively) was used to assess bony union/non-union.ResultsThe Wiltse (study) group was associated with significantly less estimated blood loss (79.67 ± 28.59 ml vs 192.31 ± 59.48 ml, P = 0.000*), postoperative drainage (43.33 ± 27.89 ml vs 285.57 ± 123.05 ml, P = 0.000*), and shorter mobilization (4.1 ± 1.2 d vs. 3.0 ± 0.9 d, P < 0.05) and discharge times (7.7 ± 1.9 d vs. 6.1 ± 1.2 d, P = 0.002*) than the P-TLIF (control) group. Serum CK activity at 24 h postoperatively in the study group was significantly lower than in the control group (384.10 ± 141.99 U/L vs 532.76 ± 225.76 U/L, P = 0.018*). At 7 days after surgery, VAS (2.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.2 ± 0.7, P = 0.000*)and ODI scores (43.9 ± 11.9 vs 55.2 ± 12.9, P = 0.001*) were lower, while the JOA scores (18.4 ± 3.4 vs 16.3 ± 4.2, P = 0.041*) was higher in the control group than in the study group. Results observed at 3 months of follow-up were consistent with those at 7 days. After six months postoperatively, paraspinal muscle degeneration in the control group was more significant than in the study group (P = 0.008*).ConclusionOur study showed that this novel hand-held retractor system assisted Wiltse approach TLIF can significantly reduce paraspinal muscle injury, postoperative drainage, and intraoperative blood loss, mobilization and discharge time, as well as yield better short-term outcomes compared to P-TLIF.Trial registration25/09/2023 NCT06052579.

Wiltse Approach for Lumbar Microdiscectomy and Foraminotomy: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Far lateral disc herniations account for between 7% and 12% of all disk herniations and occur predominantly at L3/4 and L4/5.1,2 They can cause severe radicular pain due to dorsal root ganglion involvement and are exacerbated by lateral bending to the side of the lesion. Back pain is less of a feature with this pathology.3 The Wiltse approach was first described in the 1960s as an approach to L5/S1 noninstrumented fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis4; its use in pedicle screws and far lateral discs was described in 1988.5 It has been shown to reduce muscle atrophy, wound infection, and blood loss.6,7 The Wiltse approach for a far lateral disc herniation provides a direct route to the disc pathology and as such is useful in cases with this isolated pathology. It confers less extensive muscle dissection and therefore less postoperative pain, minimal bone resection with preservation of the integrity of the facet joint, and it does not rely on endoscopy (rather the traditional operating microscope). It can also be used where endoscopy is contraindicated such as in revision cases. Here we present the case of a 53-year-old woman who presented with several weeks of back pain and right L3 radiculopathy, as well as right hip flexion and knee extension weakness. A Wiltse approach microdiscectomy was proposed for her far lateral disk herniation, and the patient consented to the procedure. At 6 weeks of follow-up, her radicular pain had resolved and there was improvement in hip flexion and knee extension. Image at 5:50 of Surgical Video is used with permissions from the Wiltse, L, Bateman, JD, Hutchinson, RH, and Nelson, WE. The Paraspinal Sacrospinalis-Splitting Approach to the Lumbar Spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1968;50(5):919-926. Copyright © 1968 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Posterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Preliminary Study of a New Technique to Correct Lenke 5C Lumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Vertebral body tethering has been approved for adolescent scoliosis correction. The usual approach is anterior, which is relatively easy for the thoracic spine, but becomes much more challenging for the lumbar curves, with a higher rate of complications. The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the first results of a new posterior vertebral body tethering (PVBT) technique using pedicle screws through a posterolateral Wiltse approach. Twenty-two patients with 5C idiopathic scoliosis (Lenke classification) were included in this retrospective study, with a follow up of 2 years after surgery. The lumbar and thoracic curves were measured pre-operatively (POS), at first standing (FS) and at 2 years (2Y). Complications were also analysed. A significant improvement of 30.7° was observed for lumbar curve magnitude between POS and 2Y. Both the thoracic kyphosis and the lumbar lordosis remained stable. Thirteen complications were noted: three led to posterior arthrodesis, three needed a revision with a good outcome, and the seven others (overcorrections, screw breakage or pull-out) achieved a good result. PVBT seems an effective technique for the management of type 5 C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The complication rate seems high but is probably secondary to the learning curve of this new technic as it concerns only the first half of the patients.

The feasibility and efficacy of pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach in the thoracic spine.

Retrospective Cohort Study. To explore the feasibility and assess the efficacy of pedicle fixation with the Wiltse approach in the thoracic spine. The current application of Wiltse approach is mainly practiced in the lumbar and thoracolumbar spines. Its application in the thoracic spine, however, has received little attention, especially in cases that requires only pedicel screw fixation without spinal decompression. The study analyzed the clinical records of consecutive patients with thoracic diseases who underwent pedicle fixation with either Wiltse or the conventional transmuscular approach (Wiltse group: 60 cases; Transmuscular group: 48 cases). Perioperative parameters, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, accuracy of pedicle screw placement, dead space between the muscles, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) appearance, electrophysiological changes in the multifidus muscle were compared between the two groups. Compared with the transmuscular group, the Wiltse group was significantly better in blood loss and postoperative VAS scores. No difference was observed in incision length, operation time, and hospital stay. The dead space between the muscle cross-sectional region in the transmuscular group was 315 ± 53 mm2, and no dead space was found in the Wiltse group. On MRI images, the multifidus cross-sectional area (CSA) in the Wiltse group between the preoperative period and the last follow-up reduced by only 10.1%, while transmuscular group showed 46.1% CSA reduction. Electrophysiologically, the median frequency slope of the transmuscular group grew by 47.8% with average amplitude reduced by 16.4% between the preoperative period and 12-month postoperative. The Wiltse approach for pedicle fixation in the thoracic spine is a feasible and effective treatment, with fewer traumas and reliable clinical results. In particular, the Wiltse approach reduces postoperative dead space between the muscles and causes less atrophy in the multifidus muscle.

Case series: O-arm navigation assisted by the Wiltse approach improves the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in ankylosing spondylitis combined with thoracolumbar fractures

Here we assessed the accuracy of O-arm navigation assisted by Wiltse approach to improve based pedicle screw insertion in ankylosing spondylitis combined with thoracolumbar fractures. We then compared it with the freehand pedicle screw insertion technique. The study sample included 32 patients with ankylosing spondylitis combined with thoracolumbar fractures. Pedicle screw reduction and internal fixation was performed under an O-arm navigation system assisted by a Wiltse approach-combined osteotomy (“navigation group,” n = 17) and posterior pedicle screw reduction and internal fixation was performed using freehand technique combined osteotomy (“freehand group,” n = 15). We then compared the operation time and bleeding volume between the 2 groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were then used to evaluate the clinical efficacy and the kyphosis Cobb angle was used to evaluate the radiological efficacy before operation, 3 days after operation and after the last follow-up. All complications were noted when detected. Finally, classification of screw positions as proposed by Neo et al was used to evaluate the relationship of the position between the screw, the bone cortex, and the incidence of screw penetration. All patients were followed up for 18 to 36 months (i.e., 24.2 ± 3.5 months). The operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume of the navigation group were significantly shorter (lower) than those of the freehand group (P &lt; .05). In addition, Both groups showed significantly decreased VAS, ODI, and Cobb angle 3 days after the operation and at the last follow-up when compared to values recorded pre-operation. However, we found no significant difference in VAS, ODI, and Cobb angle between the 2 groups (P &gt; .05). We identified no complications (e.g., infection, VTE/PE, or nerve injury). Moreover, the pedicle screw placement position of the navigation group was better than that of the freehand group (P &lt; .05), and the screw cortical penetration rate was lower than the freehand group (P &lt; .05). During the process of posterior pedicle screw placement, O-arm navigation assisted by the Wiltse approach can significantly reduce operation time, minimize the amount of bleeding volume, and enhance the accuracy of pedicle screw implantation.

Comparative Outcome Data Using Different Techniques for Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Large Single-Center Study.

Retrospective single-center study. This study aims to evaluate perioperative and intermediate-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing different lumbar fusion techniques. Various open and minimally invasive techniques for lumbar fusion are available, but previous studies comparing lumbar fusion techniques have heterogeneous data, making interpretation challenging. Between 2011 and 2018, data from 447 consecutive patients undergoing one/two-level lumbar fusion were analyzed. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with bilateral muscle strip or Wiltse approach, open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive TLIF, and posterolateral fusion only were among the surgical techniques used. Core outcomes measure index (COMI) questionnaires were distributed before surgery and at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively to establish patient selfreported outcome measures. Demographic data (age, gender, and body mass index [BMI]) for each patient were also collected in addition to surgical indication, previous operative history, perioperative outcomes, and complications, and whether later revision surgery was required. Pearson's chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, repeated measure mixed-effects models, and ordinal logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Postoperative COMI scores improved across all procedures compared with pre-surgery (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between different postoperative COMI scores. Significant predictors of higher postoperative COMI score included higher pretreatment COMI score (p≤0.001), previous surgery (p≤0.04), younger age (p≤0.05), higher BMI (p≤0.005), and the indications of lytic spondylolisthesis (p=0.02) and degenerative disc disease (p<0.001). Patients undergoing minimally invasive TLIF had a significantly shorter post-surgery stay than patients undergoing open PLIF (Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.03). At 2 years postoperatively, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between open and minimally invasive techniques. These findings suggest that the main determinant of surgical approach should be surgeon preference and training.

Comparing the Wiltse approach and classical approach of pedicle screw and hook internal fixation system for direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis in young patients: A case-control study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of direct isthmus repair via Wiltse approach and classical approach in the treatment of simple lumbar spondylolysis in young patients. Thirty-three patients with simple lumbar spondylolysis underwent direct isthmic repair via the Wiltse approach (n = 17) or the classical approach (n = 16). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hospital stay, fusion rate, visual analogue scale (VAS), and the Oswestry disability index were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. The amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and the duration of hospital stay in the Wiltse group were lower than those in the classical group (P < .05). There was no significant difference in Oswestry disability index score between the Wiltse group and the classical group at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after operation, but the visual analogue scale score in the Wiltse group was lower than that in the classical group at 6 months after surgery (P < .05). The Wiltse approach was comparable to the classical approach in terms of bone graft fusion time and fusion rate. The Wiltse approach for isthmus repair can achieve the same or even better clinical effect than the classical approach, and the Wiltse approach is more minimally invasive. Pedicle screw-hook internal fixation system combined with autogenous iliac bone graft via Wiltse approach is a feasible, safe, and effective minimally invasive surgical method for the repair of isthmic spondylolysis in young patients.

A Comparison of Outcomes between the Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation and the Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Multi-Segmental Thoracolumbar Fractures.

Multi-segmental thoracolumbar fracture (MSF) generally refers to fractures occurring in two or more segments of the thoracolumbar spine. With the development of minimally invasive concept, there is little research on its application in the field of MSF. The purpose of this study is to compare two minimally invasive surgical techniques and determine which one is more suitable for treating patients with neurologically intact MSF. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 49 MSF patients with intact nerves who were admitted from January 2017 to February 2019. Among them, 25 cases underwent percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF), and 24 cases underwent Wiltse approach pedicle screw fixation (WAPSF). The operation time, number of fixed segments, blood loss, length of incision, postoperative ambulation time, accuracy of pedicle screw placement, facet joint violation (FJV), number of C-arm exposures, as well as pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), local Cobb's angle (LCA), and percentage of anterior vertebral body height (PAVBH) were recorded for both groups. Paired sample t-test was used for intra-group comparison before and after surgery while independent sample t-test was used for inter-group comparison. The differences in the number of fixed segments, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bed time, accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement, VAS, and ODI between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, the operative time and total surgical incision length were significantly shorter in the WAPSF group than in the PPSF group (p < 0.05), and the FJV was significantly higher in the PPSF group than in the WAPSF group (p < 0.05). Also, the PPSF group received more intraoperative fluoroscopy (p < 0.05). The result of LCA and PAVBH in the WAPSF group were significantly better than in the PPSF group (p < 0.05). Both PPSF and WAPSF were found to be safe and effective in the treatment of MSF without neurological deficits through our study. However, considering radiation exposure, FJV, vertebral height restoration, correction of kyphosis, and learning curve, WAPSF may be a better choice for neurologically intact MSF.