Wild-type mCRC Research Articles

Tislelizumab plus cetuximab and irinotecan in refractory microsatellite stable and RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-arm phase 2 study

Immunotherapy confers little to no benefit in the treatment of microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Mechanistic insights suggested that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody plus irinotecan might augment the tumor immune response in mCRC. Therefore, we conducted a proof-of-concept, single-arm, phase 2 study (ChiCTR identifier: ChiCTR2000035642) of a combination treatment regimen including tislelizumab (anti-PD-1), cetuximab (anti-EGFR) and irinotecan in 33 patients with MSS and RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC who were previously treated with ≥2 lines of therapy. The primary endpoint was met, with a confirmed objective response rate of 33%. As secondary endpoints, the disease control rate was 79%, and the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.3 and 17.4 months respectively. Among the 33 patients, 32 (97.0%) had treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Three (9.1%) reported grade ≥ 3 AEs, including rash (n = 1), neutropenia (n = 2). The post-hoc evaluation of dynamic circulating tumor DNA using next generation sequencing and the analysis of peripheral immune proteomics landscape using Olink revealed that lower variant allele frequency (VAF) at baseline, greater reduction in VAF on treatment, and a hot peripheral macroenvironment were associated with the treatment response independently. Our study showed the antitumor activity of tislelizumab, cetuximab, and irinotecan combination with a tolerable safety profile in previously treated MSS and RAS WT mCRC.

Impact of primary tumor sidedness and sex on prognosis and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody efficacy in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of AIO studies FIRE-1, CIOX, FIRE-3, XELAVIRI, and VOLFI

Primary tumor (PT) sidedness is an established prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and has a predictive impact on the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody [monoclonal antibody (mAb)] in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. This investigation focuses on patients with BRAFV600E-mutated (BRAFmt) mCRC and examines the efficacy of anti-EGFR mAbs in relation to primary tumor sidedness (PTS). This pooled analysis was carried out using individual patient data from five randomized studies in the first-line setting of mCRC. The population of interest was limited to patients with BRAFmt mCRC and known PTS. For analysis, treatment was stratified into two groups: those treated with anti-EGFR mAbs and those without. Dichotomous variables, such as overall response rate and objective response rate (ORR), were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Time-to-event endpoints [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression. An interaction test was carried out via Cox regression. A total of 102 patients with BRAFmt mCRC were identified. The type of targeted therapy (anti-EGFR-based versus non-anti-EGFR) did not significantly impact the outcome. However, in patients with left-sided primary tumors, anti-EGFR mAb-based treatment, compared with non-anti-EGFR, was associated with a higher ORR (58% versus 34%; P < 0.01), trended toward improved PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-1.13; P= 0.12], and demonstrated prolonged OS (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.20-0.72; P < 0.01). In patients with right-sided primary tumors, anti-EGFR-based therapy had no effect on ORR (33% versus 36%; P > 0.99), induced inferior PFS (HR 1.97; 95% CI 1.12-3.47; P= 0.02), and trended toward a worse OS (HR 1.76; 95% CI 0.99-3.13; P= 0.05). This analysis suggests that PTS has predictive value for the efficacy of anti-EGFR mAb in the first-line treatment of BRAFmt mCRC.

Prognostic and Predictive Significance of Primary Tumor Localization and HER2 Expression in the Treatment of Patients with KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Single-Centre Experience from Serbia.

The treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is complex and is impacted by the location of the primary tumor (LPT). Our study aims to emphasize the importance of LPT as a prognostic and predictive marker as well as to examine the significance of HER2 overexpression in patients with mCRC, particularly in relation to the response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody treatment (anti-EGFR therapy). In this study, 181 patients with Kirsten RAS (KRAS) wild-type mCRC who received anti-EGFR therapy were included. Among them, 101 had left colon cancer (LCC) and 80 had right colon cancer (RCC). Results demonstrated that patients with KRAS wild-type LCC had better median overall survival (OS) (43 vs. 33 months, p = 0.005) and progression-free survival (PFS) (6 vs. 3 months, p < 0.001) compared to those with RCC. Multivariate analysis identified mucinous adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001), RCC location (p = 0.022), perineural invasion (p = 0.034), and tumors at the resection margin (p = 0.001) as independent predictors of OS, while mucinous adenocarcinoma (p = 0.001) and RCC location (p = 0.004) independently correlated with significantly shorter PFS. In addition, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive expression was significantly associated with worse PFS compared to HER2 negative results (p < 0.001). In conclusion, LPT is an important marker for predicting outcomes in the treatment of wild-type mCRC using anti-EGFR therapy, since patients with RCC have a statistically significantly shorter PFS and OS. Further investigation is needed to understand the role of HER2 overexpression in wild-type mCRC, as these patients also exhibit shorter survival.

Model-informed Evidence for Clinical Non-inferiority of Every-2-Weeks Versus Standard Weekly Dosing Schedule of Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Cetuximab was initially developed and approved as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for weekly administration (250 mg/m2 Q1W with 400 mg/m2 loading dose). An every-2-weeks schedule (500 mg/m2 Q2W) was approved recently by several health authorities. Being synchronized with chemotherapy, Q2W administration should improve patients' convenience and healthcare resource utilization. Herein, we present evidence of non-inferiority of Q2W cetuximab, compared with Q1W dosing using pharmacometrics modeling and clinical trial simulation (CTS). Pooled data from five phase I-III clinical trials in 852 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC treated with Q1W or Q2W cetuximab were modeled using a population exposure-tumor size (TS) model linked to overall survival (OS); exposure was derived from a previously established population pharmacokinetic model. A semi-mechanistic TS model adapted from the Claret model incorporated killing rate proportional to cetuximab area under the concentration-time curve over 2 weeks (AUC) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status as covariate on baseline TS. The OS was modeled with Weibull hazard using ECOG, baseline TS, primary tumor location, and predicted percent change in TS at 8 weeks as covariates. Model-based simulations revealed indistinguishable early tumor shrinkage and survival between Q2W vs. Q1W cetuximab. CTS evaluated OS non-inferiority (predefined margin of 1.25) in 1,000 trials, each with 2,000 virtual patients receiving Q2W or Q1W cetuximab (1:1), and demonstrated non-inferiority in 94% of cases. Taken together, these analyses provide model-based evidence for clinical non-inferiority of Q2W vs. Q1W cetuximab in mCRC with potential benefits to patients and healthcare providers.

Comprehensive genomic profiling by liquid biopsy captures tumor heterogeneity and identifies cancer vulnerabilities in patients with RAS/BRAFV600E wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer in the CAPRI 2-GOIM trial

Emerging evidence supports tumor tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Data on liquid biopsy-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) CGP are scarce and mainly retrospective. Prospective comparison between the two tests is not currently available. The CAPRI 2-GOIM trial investigates efficacy and safety of ctDNA-driven, cetuximab-based, sequence of three treatment lines in patients with RAS/BRAFV600E wild type (WT) mCRC, as determined by local laboratory. Before first-line therapy, CGP is performed with FoundationOne (F1) CDx and F1 Liquid (F1L) CDx (324 genes) on tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA, respectively. For 2/207 (0.96%) patients, no ctDNA was detected by F1L CDx. No patient displayed tumor fraction (TF) below 1%, whereas elevated ctDNA (TF≥10%) was detected among 140/205 (68.3%) patients. 1013 genomic variants were identified. F1L CDx found KRAS, NRAS or BRAFV600E alterations in 19 patients, whose tumors were classified as RAS/BRAFV600E WT by local laboratory. Both F1 CDx and F1L CDx were available for 164/205 (80%) patients. Concordance of 61.4% between the two tests was observed. Concordance increased to 72.7% for F1L CDx with TF ≥10%. Concordance for genes potentially involved in anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) resistance was found in 137/164 (83%) patients, increasing to 91.5% for F1L CDx with TF ≥10%. A higher number of genomic alterations was detected by F1L CDx compared with F1 CDx, including 6 cases with KRAS and NRAS alterations. Overall, 109/205 (53.2%) patients displayed at least one actionable genomic alteration (I to IIIB), according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT). Baseline liquid biopsy-based CGP is feasible, it has high concordance with tumor tissue-based CGP, it could better recapitulate tumor heterogeneity, and it is clinically informative by identifying additional actionable genomic alterations in approximately half of RAS/BRAFV600E WT mCRC patients.

Loss-of-function mutation of REV1 (p.R704Q) mediates cetuximab primary resistance by activating autophagy in RAS-wild type metastatic colorectal cancer

Cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI/FOLFOX is the standard first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, some patients experience rapid tumor progression after treatment with cetuximab (primary resistance). Our previous research identified a gene mutation, REV1 p.R704Q, which may be a key biomarker for primary cetuximab resistance. This study aimed to study the mechanism of cetuximab resistance caused by REV1 p.R704Q mutation and reveal a novel mechanism to induce cetuximab resistance. Sanger sequencing and multivariate clinical prognostic analysis of 208 patients with mCRC showed that REV1 p.R704Q mutation is an independent risk factor for tumor progression after treatment with cetuximab in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC (Hazard ratio = 2.481, 95 % Confidence interval: 1.389–4.431, P = 0.002). The sensitivity of REV1 p.R704Q mutant cell lines to cetuximab decreased in vitro Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and in vivo subcutaneous tumor model. In vitro, we observed that decreased stability and accelerated degradation of REV1 mutant protein results in REV1 dysfunction, which activated autophagy and mediated cetuximab resistance. These findings suggested that REV1 p.R704Q mutation could predict cetuximab primary resistance in mCRC. REV1 p.R704Q mutation caused decreased stability and degradation of REV1 protein, as well as dysfunction of p.R704Q protein. REV1 p.R704Q mutation activates autophagy and mediates cetuximab resistance; further, inhibition of autophagy could reverse cetuximab resistance.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Targeting in Colorectal Carcinoma: Antibodies and Patient-Derived Organoids as a Smart Model to Study Therapy Resistance.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Therefore, the need for new therapeutic strategies is still a challenge. Surgery and chemotherapy represent the first-line interventions; nevertheless, the prognosis for metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients remains unacceptable. An important step towards targeted therapy came from the inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, by the anti-EGFR antibody, Cetuximab, or by specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Cetuximab, a mouse-human chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb), binds to the extracellular domain of EGFR thus impairing EGFR-mediated signaling and reducing cell proliferation. TKI can affect the EGFR biochemical pathway at different steps along the signaling cascade. Apart from Cetuximab, other anti-EGFR mAbs have been developed, such as Panitumumab. Both antibodies have been approved for the treatment of KRAS-NRAS wild type mCRC, alone or in combination with chemotherapy. These antibodies display strong differences in activating the host immune system against CRC, due to their different immunoglobulin isotypes. Although anti-EGFR antibodies are efficient, drug resistance occurs with high frequency. Resistant tumor cell populations can either already be present before therapy or develop later by biochemical adaptations or new genomic mutations in the EGFR pathway. Numerous efforts have been made to improve the efficacy of the anti-EGFR mAbs or to find new agents that are able to block downstream EGFR signaling cascade molecules. Indeed, we examined the importance of analyzing the anti-EGFR antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) developed to overcome resistance and/or stimulate the tumor host's immunity against CRC growth. Also, patient-derived CRC organoid cultures represent a useful and feasible in vitro model to study tumor behavior and therapy response. Organoids can reflect tumor genetic heterogeneity found in the tissue of origin, representing a unique tool for personalized medicine. Thus, CRC-derived organoid cultures are a smart model for studying the tumor microenvironment and for the preclinical assay of anti-EGFR drugs.

A Phase II Study of Potentiation of Pembrolizumab with Binimetinib and Bevacizumab in Refractory Microsatellite-Stable Colorectal Cancer.

In this single-institution phase II investigator-initiated study, we assessed the ability of MAPK and VEGF pathway blockade to overcome resistance to immunotherapy in microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer (MSS mCRC). Patients with MSS, BRAF wild-type mCRC who progressed on ≥2 prior lines of therapy received pembrolizumab, binimetinib, and bevacizumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After a safety run-in, patients were randomized to a 7-day run-in of binimetinib or simultaneous initiation of all study drugs, to explore whether MEK inhibition may increase tumor immunogenicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in all patients combined (by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1). Fifty patients received study drug treatment; 54% were male with a median age of 55 years (range, 31-79). The primary endpoint, ORR, was 12.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5%-24.3%], which was not statistically different than the historical control data of 5% (P = 0.038, exceeding prespecified threshold of 0.025). The disease control rate was 70.0% (95% CI, 55.4%-82.1%), the median progression-free survival 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.2-8.7 months), and the median overall survival 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.7-12.2 months). No difference in efficacy was observed between the randomized cohorts. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were observed in 56% and 8% of patients, respectively; the most common were rash (12%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (12%). Pembrolizumab, binimetinib, and bevacizumab failed to meet its primary endpoint of higher ORR compared with historical control data, demonstrated a high disease control rate, and demonstrated acceptable tolerability in refractory MSS mCRC.

Final results of a phase 2 study of tucatinib and trastuzumab for HER2-positive mCRC (MOUNTAINEER).

3509 Background: HER2 overexpression/amplification (HER2+) occurs in ~3%-5% of pts with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and up to ~10% of pts with RAS/BRAF wild-type (WT) mCRC. The primary results of the MOUNTAINEER study (NCT03043313) demonstrated that the combination of tucatinib (TUC), a highly selective HER2-directed TKI, and trastuzumab (Tras) was well tolerated with clinically meaningful activity in pts with chemo-refractory HER2+ mCRC. Confirmed ORR was 38.1%, median DOR was 12.4 months, and median OS was 24.1 months. Here, we present results from the final analysis of MOUNTAINEER. Methods: MOUNTAINEER is a multi-center, open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial. Eligible pts had HER2+ and RAS WT mCRC with progression on or intolerance to last systemic therapy. Previous HER2-directed therapies were not permitted. The trial consisted of Cohort A, comprising pts treated with TUC (300 mg PO BID) + Tras (8 mg/kg IV then 6 mg/kg IV Q3W), as well as pts randomized 4:3 to receive TUC+Tras (Cohort B) or TUC monotherapy (Cohort C). Pts randomized to Cohort C were allowed to crossover and receive TUC+Tras on radiographic progression or if they did not achieve a complete or partial response by Week 12. Study endpoints evaluated at final analysis include DOR per BICR, PFS per BICR, OS, and safety. Results: The median duration of follow-up was 32.4 months (IQR, 25.1-46.7), with an additional 16.1 months of follow-up since the primary analysis (data cutoff, 02-Nov-2023). A total of 116 pts received at least 1 dose of study treatment (Cohorts A+B, N = 86; Cohort C, N = 30). In Cohorts A+B, median DOR per BICR was 15.2 months (95% CI, 8.9-20.5), median PFS per BICR was 8.1 months (95% CI, 4.2-10.2), and median OS was 23.9 months (95% CI, 18.7-28.3). In Cohort C post-crossover (N = 28), median DOR was not reached (95% CI, 2.8 months-NE). Median OS in Cohort C was 21.1 months (95% CI, 17.0-NE). The most common TEAEs in Cohorts A+B were diarrhea (66.3%), fatigue (44.2%), and nausea (34.9%). The majority of TEAEs were low grade, and rates were stable with longer follow-up. The most common grade ≥3 TEAE was hypertension (7.0%). TEAEs leading to TUC discontinuation in Cohorts A+B occurred in 5.8% of pts, which was unchanged from the primary analysis. In Cohort C, the most common TEAEs post-crossover were diarrhea (39.3%), back pain (21.4%), and pyrexia (21.4%); the most common grade ≥3 TEAE was AST increase (10.7%). No deaths resulted from TEAEs in any cohort and no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: TUC+Tras continued to be well tolerated with sustained efficacy in pts with chemo-refractory RAS WT HER2+ mCRC, demonstrating clinically meaningful activity of the combination on longer follow-up. TUC+Tras is an important chemotherapy-free treatment option in HER2+ mCRC. TUC+Tras is being further evaluated in the first-line setting in combination with chemotherapy in the ongoing phase 3 MOUNTAINEER-03 trial (NCT05253651) for pts with HER2+ mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03043313 .

Therapeutic implications of acquired high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) after targeted therapy (TT) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

3542 Background: mCRC treated w/ TT can acquire a high number of mutations at progression. TMB is used as a proxy of neoantigen load for predicting benefit from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). In TMB-H CRC, benefit to ICB is restricted to microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) hypermutated or POL-D/E ultramutated tumors. We asked whether TT can sensitize microsatellite stable (MSS) CRCs to ICB by inducing an acquired TMB-H state. Methods: We screened the MSK-IMPACT dataset for mCRC patients (pts) who received TT and underwent pre-treatment (pre-TT) and post-progression (post-TT) tissue or liquid biopsies (LBx). We included pts who received TT against EGFR, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, or HER2. DNA sequencing of tissue and LBx was performed w/ MSK-IMPACT and Guardant 360. MSI status was assessed with algorithms measuring somatic changes in length of repetitive sequences (e.g., MSIsensor). Due to known discrepancies between tissue TMB (tTMB) and blood TMB (bTMB), we defined acquired TMB-H as: 1) tTMB &lt;10 mut/Mb or bTMB &lt;20 mut/Mb pre-TT; 2) ≥5-fold increase in TMB post-TT; 3) tTMB ≥10 mut/Mb or bTMB ≥40 mut/Mb post-TT. Results: We identified 26 pts w/ paired samples that had been sequenced w/ determination of TMB. 4/26 (15%) met criteria for acquired TMB-H. None had detectable pathogenic mismatch repair or DNA damage repair alterations pre-TT. All 4 post-TT samples were LBx only. One pt’s tumor acquired a somatic MLH1 mutation and converted from MSS to MSI-H. In all cases, the majority of acquired mutations were subclonal w/ many at variant allele frequencies (VAF) of ≤1% (Table). After detection of acquired TMB-H, 2/4 pts received ICB. Pt 1 had RAS wild type mCRC w/ pre-TT tTMB 6.9. She received irinotecan + panitumumab for 25.8 months. Post-TT bTMB was 40.19 and met criteria for MSI-H. She received pembrolizumab and experienced clinical + radiographic progression of disease (POD) within 49 days. Pt 2 had KRASG12C-mutant mCRC w/ pre-TT bTMB 13.4 and tTMB 4.9. She received sotorasib + panitumumab for 3.2 months w/ post-TT bTMB 145.34. She received pembrolizumab + regorafenib and experienced clinical + radiographic POD within 37 days. Conclusions: In CRC, acquisition of TMB-H at progression w/ predominantly low VAF mutations suggests activation of enhanced mutagenesis due to therapeutic pressure from exposure to TT. In this context, TMB may not be an accurate reflection of tumor immunogenicity as it does not distinguish between clonal and subclonal alterations. Our data suggest that pts w/ acquired TMB-H following TT are unlikely to benefit from ICB. [Table: see text]

Combined amphiregulin and epiregulin expression as a prognostic and predictive biomarker of panitumumab (Pmab), fluorouracil, and folinic acid (FU/FA) or FU/FA maintenance therapy following Pmab+FOLFOX induction in RAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): PANAMA trial (AIO-KRK-0212).

3528 Background: mRNA expression of amphiregulin ( AREG) and epiregulin ( EREG) as ligands of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were associated with response to anti-EGFR directed antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Their role for maintenance treatment remained unclear yet and was investigated in the PanaMa trial (panitumumab (Pmab) and fluorouracil/folinic acid (FU/FA) vs. FU/FA alone after Pmab+FOLFOX induction therapy in RAS wild-type mCRC). Methods: Gene expression was measured after mRNA isolation in 196 of 248 patients of the full analysis set. The analysis was conducted using a customized Nanostring PanCancer Progression Panel. AREG and EREG mRNA expression was dichotomized by median. High combined expression was defined as mRNA expression of AREG and EREGequal or above the median. Median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since start of maintenance were estimated by Kaplan-Meier-method and Cox-regression, using the log rank test. Objective response rates (ORR) of maintenance therapy were compared by Fisher’s exact test. Treatment interaction was tested by Cox regression. Results: In 196 patients with available mRNA expression data, high AREG, EREG and combined AREG / EREG expression were observed in 103 (52.6%), 97 (49.5%) and 84 (42.9%), respectively. Regardless of treatment, high combined AREG / EREG expression was associated with prolonged PFS (7.7 vs. 5.8 months, HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.51 – 0.93), P=0.016), OS (30.1 vs. 24.4 months, HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.41 – 0.82), P=0.002) and increased ORR of maintenance treatment (39.3% vs. 28.6%, P=0.13), compared to low expression. Tumors with high combined AREG / EREG expression were associated with numerical longer PFS, OS and higher ORR when treated with Pmab+FU/FA maintenance (Table). Significant interaction of combined AREG / EREG expression with treatment was observed in terms of PFS ( P=0.003) and OS ( P=0.016). Conclusions: Combined AREG and EREG mRNA expression was confirmed as prognostic biomarker for mCRC patients receiving maintenance treatment. Efficacy of maintenance treatment might potentially be higher for Pmab+FUFA maintenance in mCRC with high combined AREG / EREG expression in the PanaMa trial. [Table: see text]

Phase IB/II first line panitumumab, irinotecan, trifluridine/tipiracil in RAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: PIT study.

e15532 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (TT) is an oral fluoropyrimidine (FP) currently used in later line therapy. Preclinical data have demonstrated synergistic activity when panitumumab (Pmab) or irinotecan (Ir) are combined with TT supporting use in combination schedules in early line protocols. PIT was a phase IB/II study determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and tolerability of substituting FP with TT, combined with Pmab and Ir in RAS wild-type mCRC. Methods: Phase IB 3+3 design dose escalation study (Dose level 1: TT 20mg/m2 oral BD, Ir 150mg/m2 IV, Pmab 6mg/m2). Primary objective was MTD of the combination in RAS WT mCRC patients, either 1st or 2nd line. Treatment was administered in 14-day cycles. Pmab and Ir were administered intravenously on day 1 with TT dosed orally, bid, days 1-5. Once MTD was established the phase II expansion study was to enrol 50 previously untreated mCRC patients. Primary endpoint was modified to toxicity. Results: The study closed due to slow recruitment. 14 patients were enrolled from 6/18 to 10/21. Med follow up 23 months. Med age 59 yrs (range 37-74yrs). 60% were male. One patient each was BRAF MT and right sided. ECOG 0/1 50%/50%. Thirteen patients had PIT as first line, 57% had prior adjuvant therapy. There was one DLT in first 3 patients however based on additional toxicity data (Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 1:1555) a decision was made to not dose escalate beyond level 1 and commence phase II. Overall Gd 3 toxicity: Acne/rash 46%, Diarrhoea 31%, Fatigue 8%, neutropenia 15%, hypomagnesaemia 23%. One patient had Gd 4 neutropenia and there was one treatment related death (neutropenic sepsis). 12 patients had evaluable disease, 58% PR, 42% SD. Survival: Med PFS 14.1 mths, Med OS 40.6mths and 12 mth OS 64%. Conclusions: The MTD was deemed TT 20mg/m2, irinotecan 150mg/m2 and panitumumab 6mg/kg. Toxicity was manageable however significant grade 3 diarrhoea and rash was seen. There was one toxic death contributed to therapy. Small numbers do make interpretation difficult however there is a signal of activity. The slow recruitment illustrates difficulty in exploring novel combinations in early lines and potentially the reluctance to consider first line anti-EGFR therapy. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12617001190392.

FU/FA maintenance therapy with or without panitumumab (pmab) in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (PanaMa, AIO KRK 0212): Updated efficacy analyses.

3506 Background: The randomized open-label phase II PanaMa trial compared FU/FA with or without pmab maintenance after mFOLFOX6+pmab induction for RAS wild-type mCRC. Updated efficacy results of the Full Analysis Set are presented. Methods: Median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), PFS of re-induction (PFS re-ind.), time to failure of strategy (TFS), and objective response rates (ORR) were compared by log-rank test / Cox regression and Fisher’s exact test. Results: PFS was significantly (8.8 vs. 5.8 months, HR=0.73 (95%CI 0.56 – 0.94), P=0.015) and OS numerically longer (29.9 vs. 24.7 months, HR=0.85 (95%CI 0.64 – 1.12), P=0.24). PFS re-ind. was significantly shorter after pmab maintenance (4.1 vs. 7.4 months, HR=1.93 (95%CI 1.33 – 2.82), P&lt;0.001). TFS was comparable (17.1 vs. 15.7 months, HR=0.98 (95%CI 0.68 – 1.42), P=0.92). Molecular subgroups are displayed in Table 1. ORR of FU/FA+pmab was comparable to FU/FA during induction (74.4% vs. 76.4%, P=0.77), higher during maintenance (40.8% vs. 29.3%, P=0.06), but lower at re-induction (8.0% vs. 35.9%, P&lt;0.001). Conclusions: PFS remained improved by the addition of pmab to FU/FA maintenance therapy, while OS was not significantly longer. Re-induction of pmab+mFOLFOX6 did not provide benefit following pmab maintenance regarding PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT01991873 . [Table: see text]

Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Pooled analysis of the randomized trials FIRE-1, FIRE-3, XELAVIRI, and PanaMa.

3529 Background: CMS were associated with prognostic relevance in RAS WT mCRC, while their role as predictive biomarker is debatable. We aimed to assess the predictive impact of CMS on treatment with anti-EGFR vs. anti-VEGF antibodies vs. cytotoxic treatment alone in a pooled analysis. Methods: Available CMS data (called by predictedCMS method) of the randomized controlled trials FIRE-1 (FUFIRI vs. mIrOx); FIRE-3 (FOLFIRI+ cetuximab vs. bevacizumab), XELAVIRI (sequential vs. initially combined FOLFIRI+bevacizumab) and PanaMa (FOLFOX+panitumumab followed by FU/FA +/- panitumumab) of RAS WT mCRC were included. Non-evaluable CMS were excluded. Kaplan-Meier estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis (including all baseline characteristics) was used to calculate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: 1147 tumors had available CMS data and 746 (65.0%) were RAS wild-type (WT): CMS1, n=89; CMS2, n=346; CMS3, n=71; CMS4, n=240. CMS were significant prognostic biomarkers in terms of PFS (median months, CMS1, 6.7; CMS2, 11.1; CMS3, 8.1; CMS4, 10.0, P&lt;0.001) and OS (median months: CMS1, 14.8; CMS2, 28.7; CMS3, 19.5; CMS4, 26.5; P&lt;0.001). CMS remained significant in a multivariate backward elimination Cox regression analysis including all baseline characteristic variables and BRAF status with regard to PFS ( P=0.03) and OS ( P=0.04) Interaction of CMS and treatment was significant regarding OS ( P&lt;0.001) and PFS ( P=0.001). The longest OS was observed using anti-VEGF antibodies in CMS1 and anti-EGFR antibodies in CMS2 or CMS4 RAS WT tumors (Table). Conclusions: CMS were confirmed as prognostic biomarkers and might contain predictive information for the choice of anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF antibodies in RAS WT mCRC. Prospective validation remains mandatory. [Table: see text]

Rechallenge with Anti-EGFR Treatment in RAS/BRAF wt Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in Real Clinical Practice: Experience of the GITuD Group.

There are few third- and fourth-line therapeutic options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) mCRC previously treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) (first-line) and relapsed after a good response, retreatment with anti-EGFR (rechallenge) emerges as a therapeutic alternative. The aim was to show the activity and safety of anti-EGFR rechallenge in RAS/BRAF wt mCRC in real-world practice. A multicenter, retrospective, observational study (six hospitals of the Galician Group of Research in Digestive Tumors) was conducted. Adult patients with RAS/BRAF wt mCRC, evaluated by liquid biopsy, were included. They received anti-EGFR rechallenge (cetuximab, panitumumab) as monotherapy, or combined with chemotherapy, in third- or subsequent lines. Efficacy (overall response rate [ORR], disease control rate [DCR], overall survival [OS], and progression-free survival [PFS]) and safety (incidence of adverse events [AEs]) were assessed. Thirty-one patients were analyzed. Rechallenge (median 6 cycles [range 1-27], mainly cetuximab [80.7%]), started at a median anti-EGFR-free time of 18.4 months (1.7-37.5months) after two (38.7%) or more (61.3%) lines of treatment; 64.5% of patients received a full dose. Median OS and PFS were 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.2-11.4) and 2.6 months (95% CI 1.7-3.4), respectively. ORR was 10%, and DCR was 30%. The most common AEs were diarrhea (35.5%), anemia (29%), emesis (6.4%), and neutropenia (6.4%); <5% grade ≥3; 48.4% of patients reported anti-EGFR-related skin toxicity (grade >1). Hypomagnesemia required supplements in 29% of patients. Dose delays (≥3 days) and reduction (≥20%) were reported in 11 (35.5%) and seven patients (22.6%), respectively. In RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients, an anti-EGFR rechallenge provides a feasible therapeutic option with clinical benefit (survival) and a manageable safety profile.

Chinese expert consensus on maintenance treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (2024 edition)

For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who achieve disease control during first-line standard therapy, post-induction strategies should emphasize on quality of life improvement while maintaining disease control. Chemotherapy combined with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody is the standard first-line treatment for RAS wild-type mCRC patients. After anti-EGFR-based first-line induction therapy achieves at least stable disease, anti-EGFR-based maintenance treatment could maintain disease control while keeping a good safety profile. Based on research evidence and clinical practice, the Chinese expert consensus on anti-EGFR-based maintenance strategy for RAS wild-type mCRC aims to futher clarify the treatment timing, regimen options, adverse reaction management and follow-up strategy, providing standardized guidance to maximize the clinical benefit in RAS wild-type mCRC.

Impact of Systemic Treatments on Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with RAS-Positive Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

This systematic review critically evaluates the impact of systemic treatments on outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, with studies published up to December 2023 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. From an initial pool of 1345 articles, 11 relevant studies were selected for inclusion, encompassing a diverse range of systemic treatments, including panitumumab combined with FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRI, irinotecan paired with panitumumab, regorafenib followed by cetuximab ± irinotecan and vice versa, and panitumumab as a maintenance therapy post-induction. Patient demographics predominantly included middle-aged to elderly individuals, with a slight male predominance. Racial composition, where reported, showed a majority of Caucasian participants, highlighting the need for broader demographic inclusivity in future research. Key findings revealed that the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy (FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI) did not significantly compromise QoL while notably improving disease-free survival, with baseline EQ-5D HSI mean scores ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 and VAS mean scores from 70.1 to 74.1. Improvements in FACT-C scores and EQ-5D Index scores particularly favored panitumumab plus best supportive care in KRAS wild-type mCRC, with early dropout rates of 38-42% for panitumumab + BSC. Notably, cetuximab + FOLFIRI was associated with a median survival of 25.7 months versus 16.4 months for FOLFIRI alone, emphasizing the potential benefits of integrating targeted therapies with chemotherapy. In conclusion, the review underscores the significant impact of systemic treatments, particularly targeted therapies and their combinations with chemotherapy, on survival outcomes and QoL in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, and the need for personalized treatment.

Feasibility of implementation of the early tumor shrinkage as a potential predictive marker to daily clinical practice in patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer, treated with cetuximab - a non-interventional observational study.

With the aim to show the feasibility of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) concept implementation into daily clinical practice in the Czech Republic, a non-interventional, multicentric, single arm, prospective study in real world set-up was performed. The study objectives were to explore the time interval from the treatment starting date to the date of the first radiographic control (TFRC) and evaluate the proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 20% tumor regression within the first 8 weeks of first-line therapy, in the real-world settings. The medians of TFRC in all individual participating centers were &gt; 12 weeks (range 14.0-36.4 weeks). TFRC ≤ 8 weeks was reported for only 3% of patients in the cohort with first-line therapy, and there were only 3 patients (1%) who achieved tumor regression of ≥ 20% by day 60 (8.6 weeks). These findings indicate that the basic time parameter of ETS could not realistically be employed in routine oncology care of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the Czech Republic, unless there would be a strict request to perform TRFC by week 8 since the initiation of the therapy. In addition, the frequency of objective tumor response to first-line therapy with cetuximab + chemotherapy was evaluated. Based on the relative regression in the sum of diameters of measurable metastatic lesions, unconfirmed partial responses were achieved in 42.4 % and unconfirmed complete response in 8.6% of patients, altogether corresponding to the overall response rate of 51% with first-line therapy. The frequency of responses was higher among patients with left than right sided primary tumors. It seems that the regimen of cetuximab/FOLFOX might be more active in frontline therapy of right sided RAS wild type mCRC than cetuximab/FOLFIRI.

Abstract 5844: Landscapes of acquired EGFR and VEGF resistance alterations in colorectal cancer: findings from the PARADIGM biomarker study

Abstract Introduction: Resistance mechanisms to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment, such as panitumumab (PAN), in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) depend on the diversity of acquired gene alterations and clonal variation. To explore resistance mechanisms and emerging genomic alterations during PAN treatment, we analyzed the circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples from the PARADIGM trial (NCT02394795), which demonstrated survival benefits of PAN over bevacizumab (BEV), an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, in combination with first-line chemotherapy in pts with RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC. Methods: cfDNA from blood samples were obtained pre- and post-treatment and analyzed for gene alterations using the custom PlasmaSELECT-R 91 PGDx panel (NCT02394834). We analyzed the landscapes of acquired alterations and their association with functional pathways in mCRC according to The Cancer Genome Atlas signaling classification. Result: Among the enrolled 802 pts, 390 discontinued treatment due to progressive disease, of which 276 (70.8%) had evaluable pre- and post-treatment cfDNA samples (PAN, n=126; BEV, n=150). Though the proportion of pts with acquired alterations in any of 30 RTK-RAS-related genes was similar in PAN vs BEV (44.4% vs 42.7%), known EGFR resistance-related genes were observed more frequently in PAN compared with BEV: KRAS (19.1 vs 2.7%), NRAS (9.5 vs 2.7%), BRAF (11.1 vs 0.7%), MAP2K1 (5.6 vs 0.7%), and EGFR (5.6 vs 3.3%). These acquired mutations clustered at hotspots within those genes in the PAN group, unlike in the BEV group. Furthermore, the co-occurrence rates of acquired alterations among the RTK-RAS pathway of the individual cases were higher in PAN (25.4%) vs BEV (9.3%), suggesting an increased subclonal complexity in PAN. There were few acquired alterations predominantly observed in BEV, and their biological significance remains unclear. Conclusion: These results suggest that PAN treatment, compared with BEV, more commonly induces multiple resistant subclones in specific pathways under selective treatment pressure. Our findings provide valuable insight for further investigations into the mechanisms of acquired and resistance associated with PAN and BEV. Citation Format: Katsuya Tsuchihara, Riu Yamashita, Takayuki Yoshino, Kohei Shitara, Jun Watanabe, Hirofumi Yasui, Hisatsugu Ohori, Manabu Shiozawa, Kei Muro, Kentaro Yamazaki, Eiji Oki, Takeo Sato, Takeshi Naitoh, Yoshito Komatsu, Takeshi Kato, Kazunori Yamanaka, Ikuo Mori, Masamitsu Hihara, Junpei Soeda, Kouji Yamamoto, Kiwamu Akagi, Atsushi Ochiai, Victor E. Velculescu, Hiroyuki Uetake. Landscapes of acquired EGFR and VEGF resistance alterations in colorectal cancer: findings from the PARADIGM biomarker study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5844.

Abstract 925: Continuing anti-EGFR treatment prolonged survival in mCRC patients receiving conversion liver resection

Abstract Introduction: Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody plus doublet chemotherapy is the mainstay of first-line treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Some of these patients might undergo secondary resection. However, there is no standardized suggestion on whether colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients should keep target therapy after secondary resection. NCCN guidelines suggest chemotherapy only in patients receiving primary liver resection. Whether we could spare the use of target therapy after secondary resection is the main aim of our study. Methods: Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we established a cohort of KRAS wild-type mCRC patients treated with first-line anti-EGFR therapy plus doublet chemotherapy between 2013 and 2018. Secondary surgery was defined as either resection of liver metastases or radiofrequency ablation. Results: 5694 stage IV mCRC patients received anti-EGFR MAb plus doublet chemotherapy as a first-line treatment between 2013 and 2018. 174 patients were enrolled in the final analysis, with 153 continuing anti-EGFR MAb after secondary resection and 21 patients without anti-EGFR MAb. Compared with those who without anti-EGFR therapy after secondary resection, patients who continued anti-EGFR MAb exhibited significantly longer overall survival (OS; median, 43.8 vs. 31.9 months, p = 0.031) but not in time to treatment failure (TTF; median, 22.2 vs. 26.6 months, p = 0.841). The OS benefits of continuing anti-EGFR MAb remained regardless of left-sided or right-sided primary tumors (40.9 vs. 43.0 months, p = 0.980). The patient cohort from 2016 to 2018 showed more prolonged survival than from 2012 to 2015 (not reached vs. 40.450, p = 0.0305). TTF has no statistical difference when considering patient cohort or primary tumor location. In multivariate analyses, continuing first-line anti-EGFR MAb therapy after secondary resection remained an independent predictor of longer OS. Conclusion: For mCRC patients who received secondary resection after first-line anti-EGFR and doublet chemotherapy, continuing anti-EGFR MAb after resection was associated with significantly longer OS regardless of primary tumor sidedness. Citation Format: Yao-Yu Hsieh, Chin-Wen Tsai, T-CARE Group, Yi-Hsieh Liang. Continuing anti-EGFR treatment prolonged survival in mCRC patients receiving conversion liver resection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 925.