KRAS Wild-type Tumors Research Articles

Molecular Characterization and Clinical Relevance of MGMT-Silenced Pancreatic Cancer.

The identification of actionable molecular targets of pancreatic cancer (PAC) is key to improving patient outcomes. We hypothesized O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) silencing may occur in a subset of PAC tumors, with unexplored clinical and molecular correlates. We leveraged sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium 3 (CPTAC-3), and the (Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative) PACA-AU cohorts to characterize MGMT-silenced PAC. Genomic, transcriptomic, methylation, and clinical data were investigated, and findings were validated in silico using methylation, transcriptomic and drug sensitivity data from Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) project, and in a real-world cohort of PAC patients profiled for MGMT status at Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan (INT). On the basis of Human Methylation 450k data, MGMT silencing was identified in ~6% of PAC cases and was enriched in tumors with non-ductal histology, with a trend toward longer overall survival. MGMT-silenced tumors were associated with a lower frequency of KRAS mutations and showed features of immune exclusion. In the INT cohort, MGMT-silencing was confirmed in ~7% of cases and prevalent in KRAS wild type tumors, with a favorable prognostic impact. In silico analysis suggested a higher sensitivity to alkylating and DNA damaging agents in MGMT-silenced PAC cell lines. MGMT silencing occurs in a small subgroup of PACs and is enriched in KRAS wild type cases, with a favorable prognostic impact. Our findings provide the rationale to explore combinations of alkylating with DNA damaging agents in MGMT-silenced PAC.

Prognostic value of KRAS G12C in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression treated with upfront immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aims to evaluate the prognostic role of the KRAS G12C mutation in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 expression ≥50% who are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. We conducted a systematic review of clinical studies fulfilling the following criteria: (1) enrolling patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 tumour expression receiving first-line therapy with anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors; (2) comparing the outcomes of patients with the KRAS G12C mutation to those without this mutation, and (3) reporting overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS). The electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar, along with reference lists, were systematically searched. We identified four publications that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 469 patients. Of these, two studies reported hazard ratios (HR) for PFS, resulting in a final pooled patient sample of 163 for the meta-analysis. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy, the presence of a KRAS G12C mutation was associated with improved PFS compared to patients with KRAS wild-type tumours, with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.39 and a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 0.25-0.63. Among all patients with KRAS mutations, those harbouring a KRAS G12C mutation had improved PFS compared to patients with any other KRAS mutation (pooled HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.57). Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have the KRAS G12C mutation and high PD-L1 expression demonstrate favourable PFS with first-line PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy compared to patients with KRASwt or other KRAS mutations and high PD-L1 expression.

A machine learning and drug repurposing approach to target ferroptosis in colorectal cancer stratified by sex and KRAS.

The landscape of sex differences in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) has not been well characterized with respect to the mechanisms of action for oncogenes such as KRAS. However, our recent study showed that tumors from male patients with KRAS mutations have decreased iron-dependent cell death called ferroptosis. Building on these findings, we further examined ferroptosis in CRC, considering both sex of the patient and KRAS mutations, using public databases and our in-house CRC tumor cohort. Through subsampling inference and variable importance analysis (VIMP), we identified significant differences in gene expression between KRAS mutant and wild type tumors from male patients. These genes suppress (e.g., SLC7A11 ) or drive (e.g., SLC1A5 ) ferroptosis, and these findings were further validated with Gaussian mixed models. Furthermore, we explored the prognostic value of ferroptosis regulating genes and discovered sex- and KRAS-specific differences at both the transcriptional and metabolic levels by random survival forest with backward elimination algorithm (RSF-BE). Of note, genes and metabolites involved in arginine synthesis and glutathione metabolism were uniquely associated with prognosis in tumors from males with KRAS mutations. Additionally, drug repurposing is becoming popular due to the high costs, attrition rates, and slow pace of new drug development, offering a way to treat common and rare diseases more efficiently. Furthermore, increasing evidence has shown that ferroptosis inhibition or induction can improve drug sensitivity or overcome chemotherapy drug resistance. Therefore, we investigated the correlation between gene expression, metabolite levels, and drug sensitivity across all CRC primary tumor cell lines using data from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) resource. We observed that ferroptosis suppressor genes such as DHODH , GCH1 , and AIFM2 in KRAS mutant CRC cell lines were resistant to cisplatin and paclitaxel, underscoring why these drugs are not effective for these patients. The comprehensive map generated here provides valuable biological insights for future investigations, and the findings are supported by rigorous analysis of large-scale publicly available data and our in-house cohort. The study also emphasizes the potential application of VIMP, Gaussian mixed models, and RSF-BE models in the multi-omics research community. In conclusion, this comprehensive approach opens doors for leveraging precision molecular feature analysis and drug repurposing possibilities in KRAS mutant CRC.

Prognostic value of liver metastases in colorectal cancer treated by systemic therapy: An ARCAD pooled analysis

BackgroundThe liver is the most frequent site of metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to assess the response rate and survival outcomes in metastatic CRC patients with non-liver metastases (NLM) compared to those with liver metastases (LM) across different lines of treatment. MethodsA total of 17,924 mCRC patients included in 26 trials from the ARCAD CRC database were analyzed. The analysis was conducted based on the presence or absence of LM across different treatment groups: chemotherapy (CT) alone, CT + anti-VEGF, CT + anti-EGFR in KRAS wild-type tumors, within the first-line (1 L) and second-line (2 L), and patients enrolled in third-line (≥3 L) trials treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib or placebo. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). ResultsOut of the 17,924 patients, 14,066 had LM (30.6 % with only liver involvement and 69.4 % with liver and other metastatic sites), while 3858 patients had NLM. In the CT alone and CT + anti-VEGF subgroups, NLM patients showed better OS and PFS in the 1 L and 2 L settings. However, in the CT + anti-EGFR 1 L and 2 L subgroups, there was no significant difference in OS and PFS between NLM and LM patients. In the ≥ 3 L subgroups, better OS and PFS were observed in NLM patients. ORRs were higher in LM patients than in NLM patients across all cohorts treated in the 1 L and only in the anti-EGFR cohort in the 2 L. ConclusionLM is a poor prognostic factor for mCRC increasing from 1 L to ≥ 3 L except for patients in 1 L and 2 L receiving CT+anti-EGFR. These data justify using LM as a stratification factor in future trials for patients with unresectable mCRC.

Exploratory biomarker analysis for predicting treatment effects of aflibercept in the VELOUR trial.

3592 Background: Second-line treatment with aflibercept and FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo [Hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71–0.93; P=0.003]1. However, colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogenous disease and the new intrinsic consensus molecular (iCMS) allows for tumours to be subtyped into unique genetic and transcriptional features2. We present a post hoc analysis of VELOUR patient data, to assess the impact of KRAS or BRAF mutation status and iCMS on efficacy parameters. Methods: Patient samples were classified as either KRAS or BRAF mutant or wild-type (WT) via a targeted mutation panel1. Gene expression data was used to classify samples as either iCMS2 or iCMS3 using a modified classifier based on iCMS signatures which are specifically up-regulated in tumour samples2. Results: Of the 439 patients with available RNA data, 54.9% (241/439) were classified as iCMS2; 45.1% (198/439) as iCMS3; 48.3% (212/439) as RAS mutant and 8.4% (37/439) as RAF mutant. A favourable aflibercept treatment effect was observed for patients within the KRAS WT group (Median OS from 11 to 17.7 months; HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.96, P=0.005), particularly for patients with KRAS WT iCMS2 tumours (Median OS from 15.5 to 30.4 months; HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.70-0.94, P=0.004). This is in comparison to the KRAS WT iCMS3 patients where no treatment benefit was seen (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.82-1.14, P=0.683). In addition, no treatment benefit was seen in the KRAS mutant group (OS HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.96-1.12, P=0.405). Progression-free survival (PFS) data followed the same trend. Aflibercept seemed to also strongly benefit the 37 patients with BRAF-mutated tumours, (PFS HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20-1.09; OS HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.29-1.48), although differences were not statistically significant. Irrespective of treatment, improved OS (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.48-0.75, P< 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94, P=0.011) were observed in all patients with iCMS2 versus iCMS3 tumours, as expected. Treatment-by-mutation status interaction tests (OS P=0.40, PFS P=0.33) indicated that the aflibercept benefit was not statistically different among the mutation sub-groups, although the small sample size limited the analysis. Conclusions: In the VELOUR study, the benefit of the addition of aflibercept to FOLFIRI appears to be primarily in patients with KRAS WT tumours, especially those with KRAS WT iCMS2. The improved OS and PFS seen in all patients with iCMS2 tumours in comparison to iCMS3 is prognostic but not predictive of aflibercept treatment response in addition to FOLFIRI. On the contrary, the addition of aflibercept to FOLFIRI provided a numerical benefit in BRAF-mutated tumours, however the P-values were not statistically significant.

Combining antivascular endothelial growth factor and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies: randomized phase II study of irinotecan and cetuximab with/without ramucirumab in second-line colorectal cancer (ECOG-ACRIN E7208).

Early studies showed promise of combined anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), yet this was later rejected as toxic and ineffective in studies not selected for RAS status. We studied advanced KRAS wild-type CRC, as second-line treatment, using irinotecan-cetuximab with or without the anti-VEGF receptor antibody ramucirumab. Patients with 1 prior regimen including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab, with KRAS wild-type tumors were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score, time since last chemotherapy, and progression on oxaliplatin to irinotecan-cetuximab (IC) (180 mg/m2 and 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks) vs modified ICR (irinotecan-cetuximab with ramucirumab 150 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2 plus 6 mg/kg, respectively). A total of 102 patients were compared for progression-free survival (PFS) as primary endpoint (85% power for 70% improvement in median PFS from 4.5 to 7.65 months). Of the 102 enrolled, 44 treated with irinotecan-cetuximab and 45 with modified ramucirumab were evaluable. Median PFS was 6.0 months vs 9.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.75, P = .07; statistically significant by study design for P < .128). Response rate was 23% vs 36% (P = .27), and disease-control rate was 52% vs 73% (P = .05). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was equivalent. Overall survival was not significantly different at approximately 19 months. Previous phase 3 trials without RAS genotyping rejected combining anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-VEGF drugs. In this randomized multicenter phase 2 study for KRAS wild-type CRC (all previously bevacizumab treated), the addition of ramucirumab to irinotecan and cetuximab improved PFS and disease control rate, showing the combination is feasible and effective. Further, phase 3 trials with appropriate patient-selection are required. (NCT01079780).

Clinical and molecular heterogeneity associated with tumor sidedness in colorectal liver metastasis: a multicenter propensity cohort study.

Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) exhibits highly heterogeneity, with clinically and molecularly defined subgroups that differ in their prognosis. The aim of this study is to explore whether left-sided tumors is clinically and gnomically distinct from right-sided tumors in CRLM. This retrospective study included 1,307 patients who underwent primary tumor and metastases resection at three academic centers in China from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2020. Propensity score matching with 1:1 ratio matching was performed. The prognostic impact of tumor sidedness was determined after stratifying by the KRAS mutational status. Moreover, whole-exome sequencing (WES) of 200 liver tumor tissues were performed to describe the heterogeneity across the analysis of somatic and germline profiles. The median follow-up was 68 months. Matching yielded 481 pairs of patients. Compared to right-sided CRLM, left-sided patients experienced with better 5-year overall survival (OS) in surgery responsiveness, with a 14.6 lower risk of death [hazard ratio (HR), 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-1.69, P=0.004]. Interaction between tumor sidedness and KRAS status was statistically significant: left-sidedness was associated with better prognosis among KRAS wild-type patients (HR 1.71; 95% CI: 1.20-2.45; P=0.003), but not among KRAS mutated-type patients. Integrated molecular analyses showed that right-sided tumors more frequently harbored TP53, APC, KRAS, and BRAF alterations, and identified a critical role of KRAS mutation in correlation with their survival differences. Higher pathogenic germline variants were identified in the right-sided tumors compared with left-sided tumors (29.3% vs. 15.5%, P=0.03). We demonstrated that the prognostic impacts of tumor sidedness in CRLM is restricted patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. Tumor sidedness displays considerable clinical and molecular heterogeneity that may associate with their therapy benefits and prognosis.

Abstract 5052: Novel drug resistance mechanisms and drug targets in BRAF mutated peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer

Abstract Objective: Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) have inferior prognosis and respond poorly to chemotherapy compared to other metastatic locations. This study aims to identify the molecular explanation for the observed clinical behavior and suggest novel treatment strategies in PM-CRC. Design: Tumor samples from a Norwegian national cohort of 230 patients undergoing surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with mitomycin C (MMC) for PM-CRC were subjected to targeted DNA sequencing, and associations between molecular findings and clinical data were analyzed. mRNA sequencing was conducted on a subset of thirty samples to compare gene expression in tumors harboring mutations in the BRAF or KRAS oncogenes and wild-type tumors. Results: Almost one-third of the patients had mutations in the BRAF oncogene, which were associated with RNF43/R-Spondin aberrations and low expression of negative Wnt regulators (ligand dependent Wnt activation). This molecular profile, with high abundance in PM, could be an underlying mechanism promoting aggressive tumor biology that facilitates metastasis to the peritoneal cavity, and could contribute to the observed poor overall survival of this patient subgroup. BRAF mutations were also associated with gene expression changes in transport solute carrier proteins and drug metabolism enzymes that could influence the efficacy of MMC and irinotecan, commonly used in PM-CRC treatment. BRAF-mutated tumors exhibited increased expression of BTN immune checkpoint molecules, and targeting these checkpoints in addition to ligand dependent Wnt activation could be two novel targeted therapy approaches. Conclusion: BRAF mutations were associated with particularly poor survival in this cohort, possibly related to altered drug transport and metabolism conferring resistance to MMC and irinotecan. Two potential novel therapeutic approaches were identified, suggesting specific targeting of BTN immune checkpoint molecules and the use of inhibitors to target ligand-dependent Wnt activation. Citation Format: Christin Lund-Andersen, Annette Torgunrud, Chakravarthi Kanduri, Vegar J. Dagenborg, Ida S. Frøysnes, Mette M. Larsen, Ben Davidson, Stein Larsen, Kjersti Flatmark. Novel drug resistance mechanisms and drug targets in BRAF mutated peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5052.

Critical appraisal of surgical margins according to KRAS status in liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: Should surgical strategy be influenced by tumor biology?

BackgroundKRAS mutation is a negative prognostic factor for colorectal liver metastases. Several studies have investigated the resection margins according to KRAS status, with conflicting results. The aim of the study was to assess the oncologic outcomes of R0 and R1 resections for colorectal liver metastases according to KRAS status. MethodsAll patients who underwent resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 with available KRAS status were enrolled in this multicentric international cohort study. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the outcomes of R0 and R1 colorectal liver metastases resections according to KRAS status: wild type versus mutated. The primary outcomes were overall survival and disease-free survival. ResultsThe analysis included 593 patients. KRAS mutation was associated with shorter overall survival (40 vs 60 months; P = .0012) and disease-free survival (15 vs 21 months; P = .003). In KRAS-mutated tumors, the resection margin did not influence oncologic outcomes. In multivariable analysis, the only predictor of disease-free survival and overall survival was primary tumor location (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). In KRAS wild-type tumors, R0 resection was associated with prolonged overall survival (74 vs 45 months, P < .001) and disease-free survival (30 vs 17 months, P < .001). The multivariable model confirmed that R0 resection margin was associated with prolonged overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.01–2.03) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.06–1.91). ConclusionsKRAS-mutated colorectal liver metastases showed more aggressive tumor biology with inferior overall survival and disease-free survival after liver resection. Although R0 resection was not associated with improved oncologic outcomes in the KRAS-mutated tumors group, it seems to be of paramount importance for achieving prolonged long-term survival in KRAS wild-type tumors.

Impact of KRAS mutations and co-mutations on clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

The relevance of KRAS mutation alleles to clinical outcome remains inconclusive in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a retrospective study of 803 patients with PDAC (42% with metastatic disease) at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Overall survival (OS) analysis demonstrated that KRAS mutation status and subtypes were prognostic (p < 0.001). Relative to patients with KRAS wildtype tumors (median OS 38 months), patients with KRASG12R had a similar OS (median 34 months), while patients with KRASQ61 and KRASG12D mutated tumors had shorter OS (median 20 months [HR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.0, p = 0.006] and 22 months [HR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3–2.3, p < 0.001], respectively). There was enrichment of KRASG12D mutation in metastatic tumors (34% vs 24%, OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.2–2.4, p = 0.001) and enrichment of KRASG12R in well and moderately differentiated tumors (14% vs 9%, OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.05–2.99, p = 0.04). Similar findings were observed in the external validation cohort (PanCAN’s Know Your Tumor® dataset, n = 408).

APC as a high-utility mutational biomarker that may identify subpopulations of patients with mutant RAS/BRAF and right-sided colorectal cancer (CRC) who derive benefit from EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi).

56 Background: Although, EGFRi including Cetuximab (CTX) and Panitumumab (PMB) is restricted to KRAS wild-type ( KRASWT) tumors, ~50% of patients still fail to respond to therapy. Using a transcriptional signature as a surrogate for cetuximab response, we previously reported that mutations in APC ( APCMUT) and TP53( TP53MUT) might predict cetuximab sensitivity, particularly in RASWT tumors (Yang M. et al., 2019). The current study aimed to use real world EGFRi treatment and survival data to independently validate these mutations as predictive, high-utility biomarkers of benefit to specific subpopulations of CRC. Methods: CTX/PMB-treated CRC specimens (n=1846) with clinical outcomes and NextGen Sequencing of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome sequencing) were tested at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). All analyses were performed in MSS tumors, determined by immunohistochemistry of MMR proteins and/or NGS. Tumors with likely pathogenic mutations in KRAS, NRAS or BRAF were considered as RASMUT /BRAFMUT, or RASWT /BRAFWT if no mutation was detected for each gene. Survival on EGFRi was calculated from the initiation of EGFRi to last contact (E-OS) or last dose of EGFRi (E-TOT) using Kaplan-Meir method. Results: While concurrent TP53MUT/ APCMUT were associated with improved E-OS compared to TP53MUT alone (hazard ratio [HR]=0.565, p&lt;0.00001), APCMUT tumors were associated with improved E-OS independent of TP53 mutation status. Compared to APCWT, APCMUT were associated with longer E-OS in RAS/BRAF mutant as well as wild-type subpopulations and in left- and right- sided tumors. Furthermore, APCMUT were associated with improved E-TOT in PMB treated tumors independent of RAS/BRAF mutation status and tumor sidedness (HR range:0.59-0.75, all p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggests that the simple application of a high-utility mutational biomarker ( APC), may increase the eligibility for successful EGFRi therapy in a substantial subpopulation of RAS/BRAF mt patients as well as right-sided CRC, potentially altering the standard of care. Further validation of this biomarker in a prospective clinical trial is warranted. [Table: see text]

Abstract IA15: What the surgeon has learned from pancreas cancer genomics, and vice versa

Abstract Recent advances in molecular profiling and fundamental science discoveries are impacting care of PDAC patients, including surgical decision making. Our multidisciplinary group at the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research and the Princess Margaret in Toronto has focused on elucidating both germline and somatic genomic changes in PDAC, with aims to understand genetic predisposition to the disease, foster early detection and conduct trials for improved selection of standard and novel therapies. Using laser capture microdissection overseen by expert pathologists, seamless tumor banking and aggressive biopsy of chemo-naïve and progressive metastases, we have generated high epithelial tumor cell content whole genomes and transcriptomes (WGTS) on over 600 PDAC patients with all stages of the disease. Germline sequencing of all PDAC patients should be considered standard of care to detect patients with uniquely actionable genomic changes due to less common mutational pathways. The genetic basis of familial pancreas cancer remains elusive and we continue to collaborate with the PACGENE Network spearheaded by colleagues at Mayo, Hopkins and McGill to discover novel genes in high risk cases. Our genomic work and others explains the clinical conundrum of late presentation of PDAC due to rapid punctuated evolution which challenges the ‘holy grail’ of early detection. Thus, screening high risk groups is still within the realm of investigational studies such as the PRECEDE consortium, of which we are an active member. Focused clinical trials (eg COMPASS and PASS-01) using WGTS has revealed both large scale changes in genomes (eg. HRD, tandem duplicators, etc) and transcriptomes (the Moffit ‘continuum’) and discreet mutations (eg BRAF mutations in Kras wild type tumors) that are important to identify as early as possible in the patient’s clinical course. Subspecialty PDAC surgeons need to keep abreast of recent developments of both prognostic and predictive transcriptomic biomarkers that will soon be important in selecting appropriate patients for appropriate neoadjuvant therapies. A few clinical vignettes will be shown to provide evidence for the importance of WGTS and other profiling approaches for almost all PDAC patients. Citation Format: Steven Gallinger. What the surgeon has learned from pancreas cancer genomics, and vice versa [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr IA15.

Abstract C104: Dual primary pancreas cancers – Related or independent lesions?

Abstract Background: Not infrequently, an apparent second pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is identified either synchronously or metachronously. To date, it remains unclear whether these individual PDACs represent intrapancreatic metastases or a new primary PDAC. Here, we sought to understand the clinicogenomic features of this patient population to provide insights on the underlying biology and management implications. Methods: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) institutional databases were searched for patients with two PDAC diagnoses and at least one pancreatic resection or patients who had undergone completion/total pancreatectomy and then manually curated. Detailed demographic and clinical information were abstracted from the medical record. Metachronous patients excluded if previous surgical margin positive for invasive or pre-invasive carcinoma. All patients were either consented to MSK IMPACT for somatic and germline sequencing (N=16), were approved for de-identified genomic analyses by IRB (N=3), or were excluded from genomic analysis (N=2). KRAS wild-type (WT) tumors were interrogated for targetable fusions with Archer FusionPlex solid tumor panel. Results: N=21 patients (pts) identified, N=6 synchronous, N=15 metachronous. Mean age at diagnosis of first PDAC (PDAC1): 67.1y (51.2–79.1y). PDAC risk factors: 52% (10/19) smoking history, 15% (2/13) with first degree relative with PDAC, 85% (11/13) with first degree relative with any malignancy, and 40% (8/20) with history of premalignant pancreas lesion. N=2 pts with pathogenic germline mutation in ATM. By morphology, 80% (4/5) of synchronous and 65% (11/17) of asynchronous lesions indistinguishable. Two lesions, both metachronous, demonstrated divergent histology while remaining cases demonstrated focal differences. Genomically, 40% (10/25) samples with mKRAS G12V, G12R (16%), G12D (12%), Q61H (8%), G12C (4%); 20% KRAS WT. Of available paired tumor samples, 71% (5/7) with identical KRAS alleles and additional driver mutations. N= 1 pt with different KRAS alleles also had divergent TP53 alleles and CDKN2A/B loss occur in metachronous lesions 14 m apart. N=1 pt with KRAS WT tumor had an actionable fusion involving FGFR2. For metachronous lesions, median interval PDAC1 to PDAC2: 5.1 y (1.1 – 15.2 y). At median follow-up of 7.2 y (0.2 – 15.4 y) from PDAC1, 90% (19/21) have undergone completion/total pancreatectomy and N=16 (76%) alive with 5-year survival rate of 93% (14/15). Conclusions: The clinical, pathologic, and genomic data strongly suggest that two PDAC, independent of disease interval, most often represent the same phylogenetic entity. KRAS allele variant adjudication was the single most important discriminator and was in concordance with other driver oncogenes. Pathogenic germline variants were rare and limited to gATM; notably no gBRCA/PALB2. Acknowledging the highly selected nature of this cohort, solitary intrapancreatic metastases demonstrate a more favorable biology and these patients may benefit from personalized management approaches beyond traditional paradigms. Citation Format: Joshua D. Schoenfeld, Hulya Sahan-Ozkan, Nadeem Bilani, Michael I. D'Angelica, William R. Jarnagin, Jeffrey Drebin, Diane Reidy-Lagunes, Alice C. Wei, Sree B. Chalasani, Anna M. Varghese, Fiyinfolu Balogun, Wungki Park, Kenneth H. Yu, Olca Basturk, Eileen M. O'Reilly. Dual primary pancreas cancers – Related or independent lesions? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr C104.

Abstract C002: Interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP) overexpression is associated with worse prognosis in PDAC and is targetable by nadunolimab

Abstract Introduction: The pancreatic tumor microenvironment (TME) is a major driver of tumor progression, chemoresistance and immune suppression, and the IL-1 axis has been implicated in tumor-promoting signaling networks. The IL1RAP-IL1R1 receptor complex is required for both IL-1α and IL-1β signaling and is expressed on tumor and stromal/immune cells. Nadunolimab is a fully humanized, ADCC-enhanced IgG1 antibody that targets IL1RAP and disrupts both IL-1α/IL-1β signaling. In the phase 1/2a trial CANFOUR (NCT03267316) in which 73 PDAC patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic PDAC received nadunolimab with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GN), encouraging preliminary data show median iPFS of 7.2 mo, median OS of 12.9 mo and 1-year survival of 58%. The present analyses investigated the correlation between IL1RAP expression and disease severity as well as therapeutic efficacy of nadunolimab/GN. Methods: Evaluable screening biopsies from 46 CANFOUR PDAC patients were stained for IL1RAP by immunohistochemistry. mRNA data was obtained from the GTEx, TCGA and Pancreatic Cancer Action Network’s Know Your Tumor (KYT) databases and correlated to patient data (TCGA, KYT) and mutational data (KYT). Results: IL1RAP expression was detected on tumor cells, fibroblasts, and infiltrating immune cells in tumor biopsies. Notably, all tumor cells expressed IL1RAP and stratification of evaluable samples into high or low tumor cell expression of IL1RAP revealed significantly prolonged median OS on nadunolimab/GN in IL1RAP high compared to IL1RAP low patients (14.2 vs 10.6 mo, p=0.017). This was also reflected in longer iPFS (8.0 vs 5.8 mo), 1-year survival (69 vs 40%) and iORR (52 vs 32%). Although varying in intensity, IL1RAP expression on stromal cells did not correlate significantly with treatment efficacy. In interrogating bulk RNA seq data from the GTEx, TCGA and KYT databases, IL1RAP was overexpressed in pancreatic cancer compared to normal tissue, with higher expression in advanced stage disease. Moreover, as KRAS mutations promote tumor inflammation and KRASG12D has been implicated in activating the IL-1 axis, we observed that KRASG12D tumors had a higher expression of IL1RAP and IL-1α, but not IL-1β, compared to KRAS-wildtype tumors. In both early and late-stage PDAC, high levels of IL1RAP strongly correlated with poor survival (both p&amp;lt;0.0001). Patients responding to GN tended to have lower IL1RAP levels than patients with progressive or stable disease, in stark contrast to the results with nadunolimab/GN. To understand the effects of nadunolimab/GN in the TME, spatial transcriptomics in screening and on-treatment biopsies are being analyzed with Nanostring GeoMx. Conclusion: IL1RAP is upregulated in pancreatic cancer, its expression correlates with oncogenic KRAS driver mutations and is strongly associated with poor survival. The IL1RAP-targeting antibody nadunolimab has shown promising target-dependent efficacy in combination with 1st line chemotherapy, indicating that IL1RAP is a both highly relevant and targetable protein in PDAC. Citation Format: Eric Van Cutsem, Kawther Abdilleh, Jashodeep Datta, Manuel Hidalgo, Camilla Rydberg Millrud, Petter Skoog, Annika Sanfridson, Dominique Tersago, David Liberg. Interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAP) overexpression is associated with worse prognosis in PDAC and is targetable by nadunolimab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr C002.

Precision medicine for KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinomas

BackgroundKRAS mutation is the most common molecular alteration in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and around 10% of patients harbor KRAS wild-type tumors (KRASWT). MethodsA retrospective chart review of clinical/molecular data was performed including all PDAC patients with a determined KRAS status (tumor molecular profiling on tissue or liquid biopsy). Results342 patients were included with 54 KRASWT PDAC (16%) compared to 288 patients with KRASm PDAC. Median age was 61 years [IQR:54.0;67.0] and 164 pts (48%) were female. At diagnosis, KRASWT patients (63%) were more frequently diagnosed at a non-metastatic stage compared to KRASm patients (41%) (p = 0.003). Regarding metastatic sites, liver was less frequent in KRASWT (39%, p < 0.0001).Median overall survival (mOS) from initial diagnosis was significantly higher in the KRASWT group compared to KRASm (50.8 months, CI95% [32.0-NR] vs 21.1 months, CI95% [18.9–23.4] (p < 0.004 after adjustment on age, ECOG and stage at diagnosis). In first-line systemic treatment, (mostly FOLFIRINOX) progression-free survival (PFS) was also higher in KRASWT.Based on ESCAT classification, a putative actionable alteration (ESCAT I-III) was identified in 19 (36%) KRASWT pts and 46 (16%) KRASm patients (p < 0.0001) with more alterations in FGFR2, BRAF(V600E), NRTK and more MSI tumors. KRASWT harbored also fewer alterations in TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4. 12 KRASWT patients received a molecularly-matched treatment with clinical benefit and improved outcomes compared to KRASm patients. ConclusionsKRASWT patients display distinct disease characteristics and outcomes with prolonged overall survival. KRASWT patients also harbor more actionable molecular alterations, leading to higher survival rates after receiving molecularly matched treatments.

Abstract LB_A25: Updated Phase 1 results from the PYNNACLE Phase 1/2 study of PC14586, a selective p53 reactivator, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a TP53 Y220C mutation

Abstract Background: Mutations in the TP53 gene leading to p53 inactivation are the most common mutational event across human cancers. PC14586 is a first-in-class p53 reactivator that selectively binds to the mutated p53 Y220C protein and restores p53 wild-type activity. Preclinical data support potential for activity of PC14586 across TP53 Y220C-bearing tumors, with enhanced activity in KRAS wild-type (WT) models, consistent with the important parallel roles for p53 inactivation and oncogenic KRAS in tumorigenesis. Preliminary analysis of Phase 1 data from the Phase 1/2 PYNNACLE trial (NCT04585750) evaluating PC14586 in patients with advanced TP53 Y220C solid tumors showed that PC14586 was well tolerated with preliminary clinical activity across multiple tumor types in the efficacious dose range (1150 mg QD to 1500 mg BID). This updated Phase 1 analysis assesses PC14586 in patients treated across the efficacious dose range. Methods: Eligible patients (≥12 years) with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with a TP53 Y220C mutation received increasing oral doses of PC14586 to evaluate safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy via RECIST v1.1, and to determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D). Tumor molecular profiling was assessed for the impact of KRAS status on response. Results: As of 1 May 2023, 61 patients were treated in the efficacious dose range (safety population): median age 63 (range 32-84) years, 62% female, and median of 3 (range 1–9) prior lines of systemic therapy. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (≥10%) were nausea (42.3%), vomiting (35.2%), diarrhea (19.7%), increased creatinine (18.3%), fatigue (14.1%), and increased AST and ALT (12.7% each); 3% of patients discontinued PC14586 due to TRAEs. Most TRAEs were grade 1 or 2; the most common grade 3 TRAEs were anemia (4.2%) and increased ALT (2.8%). PC14586 administered with food led to improvement in nausea and vomiting. Dose proportional and linear PK was observed with a median half-life of 19 hours. Among patients with measurable disease, 36 patients had KRAS WT and 15 patients had KRAS mutated tumors. A total of 12 PRs (ORR 33.3%) were observed (9 confirmed and 3 unconfirmed - pending confirmation) in patients with KRAS WT disease across multiple tumor types including ovarian, breast, prostate, small-cell lung, and endometrial cancer. The median duration of confirmed response was 7 months. In patients with a KRAS mutation, there were no confirmed responses, although clinical activity was observed. At 2000 mg QD, the ORR was 46.2% in patients with TP53 Y220C and KRAS WT tumors (n=13). A RP2D of 2000 mg QD was selected based on overall safety, PK and preliminary efficacy. Conclusions: PC14586 was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile. Efficacy was achieved in heavily pre-treated patients across multiple tumor types. The PYNNACLE registrational Phase 2 trial will assess PC14586 as monotherapy at the RP2D of 2000 mg QD in patients with TP53 Y220C and KRAS WT advanced solid tumors. Additional/updated data will be presented at the conference. Citation Format: Alison M Schram, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Melissa L Johnson, Anthony W. Tolcher, John A Thompson, Anthony B El-Khoueiry, Andrae L Vandross, Shivaani Kummar, Aparna R Parikh, Dale R Shepard, Ursula Garczarek, Kim LeDuke, Lisa Sheehan, Marc Fellous, Leila Alland, Ecaterina E Dumbrava. Updated Phase 1 results from the PYNNACLE Phase 1/2 study of PC14586, a selective p53 reactivator, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring a TP53 Y220C mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LB_A25.

Multiomic Characterization Reveals a Distinct Molecular Landscape in Young-Onset Pancreatic Cancer.

Using a real-world database with matched genomic-transcriptomic molecular data, we sought to characterize the distinct molecular correlates underlying clinical differences between patients with young-onset pancreatic cancer (YOPC; younger than 50 years) and patients with average-onset pancreatic cancer (AOPC; 70 years and older). We analyzed matched whole-transcriptome and DNA sequencing data from 2,430 patient samples (YOPC, n = 292; AOPC, n = 2,138) from the Caris Life Sciences database (Phoenix, AZ). Immune deconvolution was performed using the quanTIseq pipeline. Overall survival (OS) data were obtained from insurance claims (n = 4,928); Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for age- and molecularly defined cohorts. Significance was determined as FDR-corrected P values (Q) < .05. Patients with YOPC had higher proportions of mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high, BRCA2-mutant, and PALB2-mutant tumors compared with patients with AOPC, but fewer SMAD4-, RNF43-, CDKN2A-, and SF3B1-mutant tumors. Notably, patients with YOPC demonstrated significantly lower incidence of KRAS mutations compared with patients with AOPC (81.3% v 90.9%; Q = .004). In the KRAS wild-type subset (n = 227), YOPC tumors demonstrated fewer TP53 mutations and were more likely driven by NRG1 and MET fusions, whereas BRAF fusions were exclusively observed in patients with AOPC. Immune deconvolution revealed significant enrichment of natural killer cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, and M2 macrophages in patients with YOPC relative to patients with AOPC, which corresponded with lower rates of HLA-DPA1 homozygosity. There was an association with improved OS in patients with YOPC compared with patients with AOPC with KRAS wild-type tumors (median, 16.2 [YOPC-KRASWT] v 10.6 [AOPC-KRASWT] months; P = .008) but not KRAS-mutant tumors (P = .084). In this large, real-world multiomic characterization of age-stratified molecular differences in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, YOPC is associated with a distinct molecular landscape that has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Oncogenic Drivers and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in KRAS Wild-Type Pancreatic Cancer.

Approximately 8% to 10% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) do not harbor mutations in KRAS. Understanding the unique molecular and clinical features of this subset of pancreatic cancer is important to guide patient stratification for clinical trials of molecularly targeted agents. We analyzed a single-institution cohort of 795 exocrine pancreatic cancer cases (including 785 PDAC cases) with a targeted multigene sequencing panel and identified 73 patients (9.2%) with KRAS wild-type (WT) pancreatic cancer. Overall, 43.8% (32/73) of KRAS WT cases had evidence of an alternative driver of the MAPK pathway, including BRAF mutations and in-frame deletions and receptor tyrosine kinase fusions. Conversely, 56.2% of cases did not harbor a clear MAPK driver alteration, but 29.3% of these MAPK-negative KRAS WT cases (12/41) demonstrated activating alterations in other oncogenic drivers, such as GNAS, MYC, PIK3CA, and CTNNB1. We demonstrate potent efficacy of pan-RAF and MEK inhibition in patient-derived organoid models carrying BRAF in-frame deletions. Moreover, we demonstrate durable clinical benefit of targeted therapy in a patient harboring a KRAS WT tumor with a ROS1 fusion. Clinically, patients with KRAS WT tumors were significantly younger in age of onset (median age: 62.6 vs. 65.7 years; P = 0.037). SMAD4 mutations were associated with a particularly poor prognosis in KRAS WT cases. This study defines the genomic underpinnings of KRAS WT pancreatic cancer and highlights potential therapeutic avenues for future investigation in molecularly directed clinical trials. See related commentary by Kato et al., p. 4527.

Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Panitumumab, a fully human antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has activity in a subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although activating mutations in KRAS, a small G-protein downstream of EGFR, correlate with poor response to anti-EGFR antibodies in mCRC, their role as a selection marker has not been established in randomized trials. KRAS mutations were detected using polymerase chain reaction on DNA from tumor sections collected in a phase III mCRC trial comparing panitumumab monotherapy to best supportive care (BSC). We tested whether the effect of panitumumab on progression-free survival (PFS) differed by KRAS status. KRAS status was ascertained in 427 (92%) of 463 patients (208 panitumumab, 219 BSC). KRAS mutations were found in 43% of patients. The treatment effect on PFS in the wild-type (WT) KRAS group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.59) was significantly greater (P < .0001) than in the mutant group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.36). Median PFS in the WT KRAS group was 12.3 weeks for panitumumab and 7.3 weeks for BSC. Response rates to panitumumab were 17% and 0%, for the WT and mutant groups, respectively. WT KRAS patients had longer overall survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.82; treatment arms combined). Consistent with longer exposure, more grade III treatment-related toxicities occurred in the WT KRAS group. No significant differences in toxicity were observed between the WT KRAS group and the overall population. Panitumumab monotherapy efficacy in mCRC is confined to patients with WT KRAS tumors. KRAS status should be considered in selecting patients with mCRC as candidates for panitumumab monotherapy.

Prognostic value of liver metastases in colorectal cancer treated by systemic therapy: An ARCAD pooled analysis.

3554 Background: Approximately 30% of patients (pts) diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop liver metastases (LM). Liver is the most common organ of metastasis of CRC. The ARCAD database contains individual patient data of randomized trials that included CRC pts with initially unresectable metastases treated with systemic therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the response and survival outcomes in non-LM (NLM) vs LM across different lines of treatment. Methods: We analyzed survival outcomes of mCRC pts with either single site (SS) or multiple sites (MS) according to LM status in the following treatment groups: A: chemotherapy (CT) alone, B: CT + VEGF-antibodies, C: CT + EGFR-antibodies in KRAS wild-type tumors, within first-line (1L) and second line (2L) of therapy and D: pts enrolled on third line (≥3L) trials treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib and placebo. The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) which were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and adjusted Cox models on ECOG PS, age, and gender. Results: We included 26 trials with 17924 pts. 14066 pts had LM. Pts with LM had a higher rate of colon vs rectum as primary tumor (72 vs 62%; P &lt; .001) and less SS (31 vs 47%; P &lt; .001) than those with NLM. OS and PFS results in subgroups are reported in the table. In groups A and B, we found better OS and PFS outcomes in NLM pts as either SS or MS in 1L and 2L. In group C from 1L, we found better survival outcomes in pts with SS LM. In pts with MS, NLM superiority was observed in OS but not in PFS. However, these results were influenced by primary tumor sidedness. In group D, better OS and PFS was observed in pts without LM than those with LM whether in pts with SS or MS. Response rates were higher in LM than in NLM in most 1L and 2L subgroups. Conclusions: LM is a poor prognostic factor for mCRC increasing from the 1L to ≥3L. Survival with CT alone and CT + anti-VEGF according to LM and NLM differs significantly in 1L and 2L but not with CT + anti-EGFR. This data justifies using LM as a stratification factor at least in ≥3L trials. [Table: see text]