Wild Turkey Populations Research Articles

Population response of eastern wild turkey to removal of wild pigs

AbstractThere is insufficient understanding of interspecific interactions with the eastern wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) and wild pigs (Sus scrofa). Wild pigs compete with wild turkeys and predate nests and adults; however, population‐level effects on wild turkeys are not clear. Using cameras, we assessed responses of wild turkey populations to wild pig removal in central Alabama, USA, from 2018–2021. We compared wild turkey relative abundance and occupancy on 3 large‐scale pig‐removal treatment sites (3,407–5,531 ha) relative to a control site (2,510 ha) during 1 pre‐treatment year and 2 post‐treatment years, with analyses including a covariate expressing the cumulative number of pigs removed from each site standardized by the initial pig abundance on the site. We removed 1,851 wild pigs from the 3 treatment sites over 22 months. Based on N‐mixture modeling, when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates (i.e., 100% removal relative to initial population), there were 1.50 (95% CL = 1.01–2.23) times as many wild turkeys, and detection of wild turkeys was 2.01 (95% CL = 1.49–2.70) times as likely. Additionally, poults were 3.49 (95% CL = 1.12–10.89) times as likely to occupy an area when the number of pigs removed was equal to our baseline population estimates compared with poult occupancy at baseline pig abundance. Our data suggests that reduction of wild pig populations may lead to a localized increase in populations of wild turkeys.

Experimental infection of domestic turkeys with lymphoproliferative disease virus of North American origin.

Lymphoproliferative disease virus (LPDV) was first documented in wild turkeys in North America in 2009. LPDV infection is often subclinical but can manifest as lymphoid proliferation or round cell neoplasia. Despite high prevalence across many sampled areas corresponding to declining populations of wild turkeys, knowledge regarding LPDV pathogenesis, risk factors for disease development, and associated impacts on population dynamics are unknown. To understand transmission, viral shedding, and tissue tropism, we inoculated 21 domestic turkeys via the oral cavity, crop, nasal cavity, subcutis, or coelomic cavity. For 12 weeks, oropharyngeal swabs, cloacal swabs, and whole blood were collected weekly. At 1 week postinoculation, 3 turkeys (3/21; 14%) had detectable LPDV proviral DNA in blood by polymerase chain reaction, and 10 developed DNAemia (50%; 10/20) by 12 weeks. LPDV proviral DNA was intermittently detected in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs. Splenomegaly was the most consistent gross finding in DNAemic birds (8/11; 73%). Lymphoid hyperplasia in the spleen was the most significant microscopic finding (9/11; 82%). Three turkeys (3/11; 27%) developed round cell neoplasia characterized by sheets of pleomorphic, round to polygonal cells in the adrenal gland, bone marrow, skin, small intestine, and/or spleen. LPDV was detected in the spleen and bone marrow from all turkeys with DNAemia and all neoplasms. Our study establishes that infection and disease with North American LPDV from wild turkeys can be experimentally reproduced in domestic turkeys, laying the groundwork for future investigations into LPDV pathogenesis, development of diagnostic techniques, and understanding the impacts of LPDV on wild turkey populations.

Lymphoproliferative Disease Virus and Reticuloendotheliosis Virus Detection and Disease in Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo).

Lymphoproliferative disease virus (LPDV) and reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) are oncogenic retroviruses that can cause disease in wild and domestic fowl. Lymphoproliferative disease virus infections are common and widespread in Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in the US and east-central Canada, while REV has been detected worldwide in numerous avian host species. We tested tissues (spleen, liver, and/or bone marrow, plus neoplastic tissue, if present) from 172 Wild Turkeys that underwent necropsy from December 2018 through October 2021 for both viruses using PCR. We evaluated demographic, geographic, temporal, and seasonal data by chi-square test of independence and logistic regression for turkeys infected with LPDV and/or REV. At least one of these retroviruses was detected in 80.8% (139/172) of Wild Turkeys from 15 US states, with significantly more turkeys being positive for LPDV (72.1%, 124/172) versus REV (43.6%, 75/172; P<0.001). Both viruses (coinfections) were detected in 34.9% (60/172) of turkeys. Among LPDV-infected turkeys (including coinfections), bone marrow had the highest detection rate (38/58, 65.5%), significantly higher than spleen (30/58, 51.7%) and liver (20/58, 34.5%; P<0.001). In REV-infected turkeys, bone marrow had the highest detection rate (24/58, 41.4%). All three tissues (spleen, liver, bone marrow) concurrently tested positive in most (15/25, 60%) REV-infected turkeys. These results suggest LPDV tissue tropism for bone marrow, whereas REV may have broader tissue tropism. Histopathology consistent with lymphoid proliferation and/or neoplasia characteristic of lymphoproliferative disease was evident in 29/172 (16.9%) turkeys assessed, including two REV-only-infected turkeys. Season was significantly associated with LPDV prevalence (highest in winter); year and season were both significantly associated with REV prevalence (highest in 2020 and winter). These data contribute to optimizing diagnostic strategies that may aid in pathogen monitoring and improve detections to increase our understanding of the potential impacts of these viruses on Wild Turkey populations.

Inverse relationships between coyote and wild turkey population time series: Implications for future studies of predator–prey interactions

AbstractChanges in predator communities such as the emergence of new predators alter predator–prey interactions profoundly. Coyotes (Canis latrans) have expanded their geographic distributions from the western United States (US) to the Eastern US, potentially suppressing some prey populations as their relative abundance has increased. To assess the relationship between coyotes and one of their prey, the eastern wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris), we employed time series analysis and multivariate autoregressive state‐space models (MARSSMs) to a 23‐year capture per unit effort data set from both species in the state of Mississippi, US. The best MARSSM model indicated density dependence in each species. The competing MARSSM indicated that increases in coyote relative abundance reduced the population growth rate of wild turkeys. We recommend that future studies use long‐term time series of multiple coexisting predators and their alternative prey to assess the effects of the predator guild on the dynamics of prey populations.

Seasonal Resource Selection and Use of Hardwood Regeneration by Translocated Wild Turkeys in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley

Reforestation practices have intensified in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley (MAV) of the United States of America with the aid of Farm Bill programs during the past three decades. Increases in reforested land also enhance possibilities to restore once-abundant but currently sparse species, such as eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the MAV. However, it is unknown whether &lt;20-year-old hardwood regeneration provides a suitable habitat for re-establishing wild turkey populations in the MAV. We translocated wild turkeys to two study sites in reforested areas of the MAV. We monitored 74 wild turkeys’ habitat use and resource selection using radio telemetry from February 2009 to June 2010. We developed land use and land cover maps for the resource selection analysis of translocated wild turkeys. We found that turkey habitat use varied by site, sex, season, land cover type, and distance to mature hardwoods. Habitat use by wild turkeys decreased as distance to mature hardwood forest increased. Female wild turkeys used more hardwood regeneration during nesting and post-nesting seasons than during pre-nesting seasons. Although wild turkeys did not use regenerating and mature hardwood forests to the same extent, management of these forests appears critical to restoring wild turkeys in the MAV.

Review of range-wide vital rates quantifies eastern wild Turkey population trajectory.

Recent declines in eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) have prompted increased interest in management and research of this important game species. However, the mechanisms underlying these declines are unclear, leaving uncertainty in how best to manage this species. Foundational to effective management of wildlife species is understanding the biotic and abiotic factors that influence demographic parameters and the contribution of vital rates to population growth. Our objectives for this study were to (1) conduct a literature review to collect all published vital rates for eastern wild turkey over the last 50 years, (2) perform a scoping review of the biotic and abiotic factors that have been studied relative to wild turkey vital rates and highlight areas that require additional research, and (3) use the published vital rates to populate a life-stage simulation analysis (LSA) and identify the vital rates that make the greatest contribution to population growth. Based on published vital rates for eastern wild turkey, we estimated a mean asymptotic population growth rate (λ) of 0.91 (95% CI=0.71, 1.12). Vital rates associated with after-second-year (ASY) females were most influential in determining population growth. Survival of ASY females had the greatest elasticity (0.53), while reproduction of ASY females had lower elasticity (0.21), but high process variance, causing it to explain a greater proportion of variance in λ. Our scoping review found that most research has focused on the effects of habitat characteristics at nest sites and the direct effects of harvest on adult survival, while research on topics such as disease, weather, predators, or anthropogenic activity on vital rates has received less attention. We recommend that future research take a more mechanistic approach to understanding variation in wild turkey vital rates as this will assist managers in determining the most appropriate management approach.

Molecular Surveillance for Lymphoproliferative Disease Virus and Reticuloendotheliosis Virus in Rio Grande Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia) in Texas, USA.

Reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) and lymphoproliferative disease virus (LPDV) are avian retroviruses that can cause neoplastic disease and present with similar pathologies. Lymphoproliferative disease virus has been reported in the Eastern US and states bordering Texas, USA, but has not been previously detected within the state. In a prior study, we detected REV in native Rio Grande Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia) and an Eastern Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) originating from West Virginia. Given LPDV detection in states bordering Texas and our finding of an REV-positive Eastern Wild Turkey imported from a LPDV endemic region, we sought to determine LPDV prevalence in Texas and continue surveillance for REV. During 2018-20, dried blood spots from 373 individual Rio Grande Wild Turkeys from 20 different counties were tested for the presence of proviral REV or LPDV DNA. In affected counties, approximately 4% of individuals were infected with REV (7/197) or LPDV (10/273) and one bird was coinfected with both viruses. Phylogenetic analysis indicated a close relationship of the LPDV isolates to variants from other Southern and Central states. This study provides molecular evidence of LPDV in Texas, and continued surveillance is necessary to determine the potential effects of the virus on reproductive success, coinfections, and overall health of Wild Turkey populations.

Susceptibility of wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) to experimental West Nile virus infection

ABSTRACT Since the introduction of West Nile virus (WNV) to North America in 1999, WNV is estimated to have contributed to population-level declines in numerous avian species. However, the potential impacts of this virus on many free-ranging upland game bird species, including the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo), which is undergoing regional population declines, remain unknown. Herein, two age groups (∼5 to 6 weeks and ∼15 to 16 weeks post-hatch) of juvenile wild turkeys were subcutaneously inoculated with WNV, sampled daily from 1 to 7 days post-inoculation (dpi), and euthanized on 14 dpi. No clinical signs and minimal gross lesions were attributable to WNV infection. Peak viraemia titres were similar between age groups (<101.7 to 104.6 plaque-forming units [PFU]/ml), but the duration of viraemia was longer in the old group (3–4 days) than in the young group (0–3 days). Intermittent oral and/or cloacal viral shedding from 2 to 7 dpi was detected in both age groups. No infectious virus was detected in the heart, brain, kidney, skeletal muscle, spleen, and feathers from WNV-inoculated turkeys euthanized on 14 dpi. All WNV-inoculated birds seroconverted by 14 dpi, as well as two co-housed sham-inoculated birds. The most consistent microscopic lesions among all WNV-inoculated birds were mild lymphoplasmacytic myocarditis and encephalitis. Minimal immunohistochemical labelling was detected in tissues in addition to scant macrophages within the blood, spleen, and bone marrow. These data suggest WNV is unlikely to pose a significant risk to wild turkey populations, although the possibility remains that WNV may indirectly decrease fitness or predispose wild turkeys to other health stressors. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Clinical disease was not observed in wild turkeys experimentally infected with WNV. Pathology attributed to WNV was mild and included brain and heart inflammation. Viraemias suggest WNV-infected wild turkeys do not play a role in WNV transmission. No age-associated differences in WNV clinical disease or pathology were observed.

PATHOGEN SURVEY AND PREDICTORS OF LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISEASE VIRUS INFECTION IN WILD TURKEYS (MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO).

Growing populations of Wild Turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) may result in increased disease transmission among wildlife and spillover to poultry. Lymphoproliferative disease virus (LPDV) is an avian retrovirus that is widespread in Wild Turkeys of eastern North America, and infections may influence mortality and parasite co-infections. We aimed to identify individual and spatial risk factors of LPDV in Maine's Wild Turkeys. We also surveyed for co-infections between LPDV and reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV), Mycoplasma gallisepticum, and Salmonella pullorum to estimate trends in prevalence and examine covariance with LPDV. From 2017 to 2020, we sampled tissues from hunter-harvested (n=72) and live-captured (n=627) Wild Turkeys, in spring and winter, respectively, for molecular detection of LPDV and REV. In a subset of captured individuals (n=235), we estimated seroprevalence of the bacteria M. gallisepticum and S. pullorum using a plate agglutination test. Infection rates for LPDV and REV were 59% and 16% respectively, with a co-infection rate of 10%. Seroprevalence for M. gallisepticum and S. pullorum were 74% and 3.4%, with LPDV co-infection rates of 51% and 2.6%, respectively. Infection with LPDV and seroprevalence of M. gallisepticum and S. pullorum decreased, whereas REV infection increased, between 2018 and 2020. Females (64%), adults (72%), and individuals sampled in spring (76%) had higher risks of LPDV infection than males (47%), juveniles (39%), and individuals sampled in winter (57%). Furthermore, LPDV infection increased with percent forested cover (β=0.014±0.007) and decreased with percent agriculture cover for juveniles (β=-0.061±0.018) sampled in winter. These data enhance our understanding of individual and spatial predictors of LPDV infection in Wild Turkeys and aid in assessing the associated risk to Wild Turkey populations and poultry operations.

Spatial dynamic N‐mixture models with interspecific interactions

Abstract Interspecific interactions and movement are key factors that drive the coexistence of metapopulations in heterogenous landscapes. Yet, it is challenging to understand these factors because separating movement from local population processes relied on capture‐based data that are difficult to collect. Recent development of spatial dynamic N‐mixture models (SDNMs) made it possible to draw inferences on local population growth and movement using count data of unmarked populations. However, no SDNMs have been developed to account for interspecific interactions and double‐counting observation errors. In this study we further developed SDNMs to account for interspecific interactions and both false‐negative and double‐counting observation errors. We conducted simulation studies to evaluate the inferential performance of these models under different ecological systems (competition, predator–prey), observation processes (binomial, Poisson) and sampling situations including the number of surveyed sites, detection and the adoption of robust sampling design. We then illustrated the applications of these models with two case studies, one representing a competition system (mallard Anas platyrhynchos, northern pintail Anas acuta) with binomial observations and the other representing a predator–prey system (bobcat Lynx rufus, wild turkey Meleagris gallopavo) with Poisson observations. The results of the simulation studies showed that the models provide unbiased parameter estimates regardless of the ecological system, observation process and sampling situation. Case studies further demonstrated the capabilities of these models in revealing important ecological processes. More specifically, the first case study revealed a negative effect of the superior competitor, Mallard, on the population growth of the inferior competitor, pintail as well as different movement patterns between these species, whereas the second case study reveal a top‐down effect of bobcat abundance on wild turkey population growth and their differential habitat preferences. The models developed in this study could be used by themselves on count data or serve as population sub‐models in integrated modelling frameworks to provide insights about metapopulation dynamics of interacting species in heterogeneous landscapes. The flexible structures of these models made them highly adaptive and relevant in population and community ecology.

Effects of prescribed fire on prenesting movements of wild turkeys in Arkansas

AbstractThe restoration of historic disturbance regimes is an increasingly common management strategy to conserve disturbance‐dependent communities and species, and enhance resilience of ecosystems to climate change or plant and animal invasions. However, the reintroduction of frequent and wide‐scale disturbance may have unexpected consequences on species that are accustomed to an environment absent of frequent disturbance. Implementation of frequent prescribed fire for community restoration has coincided with population declines of eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) in the Ozark Highlands of Arkansas. We investigated whether there was evidence of linkage between wild turkey movement behavior and habitat use and the widespread use of prescribed fire that began in 2002 and continued through the end of our study in 2013. We fitted 67 female wild turkeys with satellite transmitters in 2012 and 2013 on the White Rock Ecosystem Restoration Area to estimate annual and seasonal home ranges and examine pre‐nesting habitat use at multiple spatial scales. Home range was larger for adults in 2013 (4,750 ha, SE = 946.2, n = 12) than in 2012 (2,703 ha, SE = 283.4, n = 19). Mean pre‐nesting ranges for adults were 1,633 ha (SE = 238.9, n = 23) in 2012 and 1,118 ha (SE = 158.8, n = 18) in 2013, smaller than those of sub‐adults, 1,761 ha (SE = 581.2, n = 3) in 2012 and 5,576 ha (SE = 2260, n = 8) in 2013. Habitat selection analyses for the pre‐nesting period indicated that wild turkeys used locations with more variability in canopy cover and vegetation height and in smaller patch sizes than expected based on availability. However, female wild turkeys selected nesting cover that had more variability in canopy cover and vegetation height but in larger patches. Differences in sub‐adults and adult home and seasonal ranges suggest that other factors such as density dependence or social hierarchy could be driving movements as opposed to prescribed fire application. Wild turkey females selected variable vegetation structure during the pre‐nesting and nesting periods with characteristics that could be a result of frequent prescribed fire or forest succession. However, we documented no direct evidence these characteristics or other aspects of the prescribed fire program were causing wild turkey population declines.

Using statistical population reconstruction to estimate demographics of wild turkey populations

AbstractAlthough the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo; hereafter, turkey) is one of the most popular game species in the United States, there is no consensus on how best to monitor turkey populations. Harvest data are readily available to state wildlife agencies but are often not coupled with other datasets (e.g., hunter effort) for demographic assessments. We described the utility of statistical population reconstruction (SPR) to unite disparate datasets and effectively monitor status and trends of key turkey demographic rates at spatial scales relevant to wildlife managers. We demonstrated SPR model development and associated assumptions, model selection, and model evaluation using male‐only models for turkeys in 2 regions of Missouri, USA, and compared model output to harvest‐based and non‐harvest‐based indices. Use of SPR led to a more comprehensive assessment of population dynamics than did indices alone. Moreover, inference based solely on indices would likely have led to different interpretations of which factors govern turkey population dynamics and ultimately which management practices should be implemented. Disparity of model output between regions demonstrates importance of auxiliary data in SPR model utility. As such, we encourage well‐planned and executed auxiliary studies to improve precision of demographic rates when using SPR models. Statistical population reconstruction provides a viable, useful tool to assess demographics of turkey populations and on which to base management decisions.

Status and distribution of wild turkeys in the United States in 2019

AbstractAfter increases following restoration efforts, the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) population appeared to decline during the early 2000s in many areas of the species' range. The 2014 status assessment indicated that estimated population size, harvest, and hunter numbers had declined since at least 2009. Several studies concurrently detailed regional declines in productivity of wild turkey populations. During 2019, we continued to monitor status of wild turkey populations in the United States by surveying state agency biologists charged with overseeing wild turkey management programs. We asked biologists to provide estimates of population abundance and distribution within their state. We also requested that each biologist provide data on turkey hunter numbers and harvest for both spring and fall hunting seasons, if those data were available. Based on agency biologist responses, wild turkey population size declined by ~3% across states that contributed data to both the 2014 and 2019 status updates. However, during our 2019 survey, abundance data were unavailable for 12 states that reported estimates for the 2014 assessment. We estimated that the number of wild turkey hunters declined by 18% between the 2014 and 2019 assessments, but note the 2019 estimate was confounded by missing data from 8 states that provided data during 2014. Across all reporting states, fall and spring harvests decreased by 31 and 12%, respectively, between the 2014 and 2019 assessments. Despite widespread recognition that standardization of monitoring methods across states would facilitate more consistent inferences about wild turkey abundance, further progress towards regional or national standardization is needed. Furthermore, the approach of converting harvest data to a population estimate by dividing harvest estimates by a constant percentage of estimated take should be revisited to ensure accuracy, especially given known spatial and temporal variation in harvest pressure, hunting activity, and hunter behavior. We encourage continued development of improved techniques to estimate wild turkey abundance and distribution, and recommend that all states and provinces consider standardized methods to accurately monitor and report harvest and hunter effort.

Recursive movements of eastern wild turkey broods in the southeastern United States

AbstractProductivity of wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) populations throughout the southeastern United States has declined over the past several decades. Although population trajectory is driven primarily by annual reproduction, wild turkey managers have little information regarding the behavioral ecology of broods immediately post‐hatch. Broods are known to revisit areas within their ranges, but revisitation behavior is poorly understood spatially and temporally. Thus, identifying patterns of visitation and revisitation can increase understanding of brood behavior. We monitored 94 brooding females until brood failure or 28 days after hatch to evaluate movements and to quantify landcover and vegetation density at revisited locations which we defined as a 100‐m radius circular buffer around each GPS location. Average time between revisitation was 1.05 days (SD = 2.01). Revisited areas were associated with increased proportions of open treeless, pine (Pinus spp.), and pine‐hardwood landcover types and decreased proportions of hardwood forest landcover. Our results indicate that broods frequently revisit areas, presumably due to understory structure that increases available forage and reduces predation risk. However, future research should evaluate recursion and its relationship to habitat selection as it could be driven by development (i.e., aging) of the brood over time.

Instances of intraspecific nest parasitism in eastern and Rio Grande wild turkeys

AbstractNest parasitism can play an important role in processes regulating population dynamics of both hosts and parasites. Inter‐ and intra‐specific nest parasitism are 2 alternative reproductive strategies observed to occur in about 1% of all bird species. Recently, low productivity in wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) populations has resulted in population declines across the southeastern United States. Reproductive output may be influenced by nest parasitism, but the extent of nest parasitism and how it may be related to productivity of wild turkey populations are poorly understood. Herein, we illustrate 6 unreported examples of intraspecific nest parasitism obtained using GPS telemetry data from female wild turkeys in Georgia and Louisiana during 2014−2018. Further, we report 3 occurrences of nest parasitism in Texas using photographic evidence. Our findings suggest that ≥6% of nests are potentially parasitized, and that multiple females may visit and parasitize a single nest. Given recent declines in reproductive output of wild turkeys throughout the southeastern United States, we encourage researchers to continue assessing potential for nest parasitism across wild turkey populations and how this potential may be influenced by predator abundance and activity.

Variation in eastern wild turkey nesting phenology at their northern range limit

AbstractLimiting the potential for disturbance of wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) breeding and nesting is often stated as a concern for management, particularly when associated with the spring hunting season. The timing of wild turkey nesting has been shown to vary with latitude, with spring phenology, and among individuals, but local information on nesting timing is needed to fully evaluate local harvest regulations. Our objectives were to characterize wild turkey nesting phenology and identify overlap with current hunting season timing and hunter effort in Maine, USA. We also identified sources of variation related to land cover and individual female characteristics such as body condition and pathogen infection status. Finally, we compared the temporal distributions of nest initiation across the 2 years of our study. We assessed nesting phenology of eastern wild turkeys (M. g. silvestris) in Penobscot, Hancock, and Cumberland counties, Maine, by monitoring females for nesting activity using VHF and GPS transmitters. During April–July 2018 and 2019, we located 69 nests from radiomarked females and 3 nests from unmarked females. Of the nests discovered, 56 were presumed first attempts, 12 were second attempts, and one was a third attempt. The median date of nest initiation (i.e., date first egg was laid) for first nests was April 27 in 2018 and May 5 in 2019. Females that nested in areas with greater residential and urban development initiated nests earlier than females that used more rural agricultural land covers. Despite a delay in the onset of nesting in 2019, the distribution of nest initiation among females did not change throughout the season. Our results indicate that the majority of male harvest occurred concurrently with egg laying. Thus, current hunting season timing likely limits risks associated with disturbance of mating. Given that Maine's wild turkey population is thought to be stable or increasing, our data support maintaining the current hunting season structure. However, breeding and nesting phenology of wild turkeys should continue to be monitored in relation to changing environmental conditions, trends in the turkey population, hunter numbers, and spring harvest, so that future changes can be incorporated into harvest management and decision making.

Active and passive disease surveillance in wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) from 2008 to 2018 in Pennsylvania, USA

AbstractThere are increasing concerns about the effects of disease on wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Yet, many management agencies lack adequate data on wild turkey diseases and pathogens to address this concern. Toward that end, the Pennsylvania Game Commission increased surveillance efforts on wild turkeys beginning in 2013 (referred to hereafter as the enhanced surveillance period). From 2008–2018, 121 wild turkeys from Pennsylvania were submitted for necropsy, with 102/121 (84.3%) submitted during the enhanced surveillance period (2013–2018). We examined cases to determine causes of morbidity/mortality through gross and microscopic examinations and ancillary tests. The most common causes of morbidity/mortality in the examined wild turkeys were avian pox (66/121; 54.5%), chronic dermatitis (15/121; 12.4%), and trauma (10/121; 8.3%). We diagnosed additional diseases for the first time or more frequently during the enhanced surveillance period, including histomoniasis (7/121; 5.7%) and infectious sinusitis (1/121; 0.8%). Skin lesions were the most common cause of submission (94/121; 77.7%) and were most often attributed to avian pox (66/94, 70.2%), chronic dermatitis (15/94; 16.0%), or lymphoproliferative disease (3/94; 3.2%). During 2013–2018, tissues and sera were collected from any diagnostic cases and hunter‐harvested turkeys to create a tissue repository. We used these samples to test for infection or exposure to specific pathogens. We found that 75.3% (61/81) of wild turkeys were positive for lymphoproliferative disease virus, 61.9% (52/84) for Heterakis gallinarum, 28.6% (10/35) for Toxoplasma gondii, and 15.6% (15/32) for Borrelia burgdorferi. We detected antibodies (indicating exposure) to avian paramyxovirus‐1 in 34.9% (22/63) of the wild turkeys and West Nile virus in 21% (13/62), but none were seropositive to influenza A viruses (0/62; 0%). The presence of diseases and pathogens in wild turkeys in Pennsylvania are being defined through active and passive surveillance approaches. Such data can begin to address the broader questions of disease impacts on wild turkey populations.

Effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on 2020 spring turkey hunting across the United States

Spring wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) hunting is a foundational activity for many hunters across North America. Managing turkey hunters and turkey hunting is, therefore, a priority for state and provincial fish and wildlife management agencies. Early stages of the current SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐19) pandemic in the United States coincided with 2020 spring turkey hunting seasons across the U.S. Potential effects of increases in peoples' time available for hunting on effort and turkey populations could have been substantial. We surveyed the primary wildlife biologist tasked with wild turkey management for each state and provincial jurisdiction with a huntable wild turkey population to determine turkey hunter and hunting dynamics before and during the spring 2020 turkey season. Biologists in 47 states responded to the survey. Results varied among states but hunting license sales, the number of hunters afield, harvest, total hunter‐days afield, and the number of days individual hunters were afield were greater in 2020 than the mean from the previous 3 years (2017–2019) in many states. Although hunting effort and total reported harvest increased in most states in 2020 from the previous 3‐year average, take‐per‐unit‐effort (i.e., harvest per hunter day) decreased in 93% of jurisdictions from which data were available, supporting the finding that increases in turkey harvest in spring 2020 were a result of a COVID‐related increase in participation and effort and not increases in turkey abundance. We recommend using these reference data for turkey population and turkey hunter monitoring pre‐ and post‐pandemic. Monitoring efforts should include wildlife population and habitat evaluations and study of hunter dynamics in a social science framework.

Detecting lymphoproliferative disease virus in wild turkeys using cloacal swabs

AbstractThe monitoring of infectious diseases in wildlife is crucial for assessing animal health, pathogen range expansion, and the risk of spillover to naive species, but may be resource and labor intensive. Lymphoproliferative disease virus (LPDV) is an avian oncogenic retrovirus that was first identified in wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) in 2009, though it historically caused mortality in domestic turkeys in Europe and Israel. Subsequent surveys detected a high prevalence and broad distribution throughout the eastern United States, warranting further research on LPDV in wild turkey populations. Current LPDV diagnostics require the collection of tissues, such as bone marrow from dead birds or blood during live capture. In our study, we assessed the sensitivity (true positive) and specificity (true negative) of cloacal swab samples as an alternative LPDV detection method. We compared results from cloacal swab samples with both postmortem detection from bone marrow and antemortem detection from blood, using a multi‐tube PCR approach with 3 replicates. Swab samples collected from live‐captured turkeys had a greater sensitivity (88%) than swabs collected from hunter‐harvested turkeys (31%), whereas specificity was similar for both collection approaches (live‐capture swabs = 75%, n = 85; hunter‐harvest swabs = 80%, n = 54). In live‐captured turkeys, the estimated LPDV prevalence using cloacal swab samples (73%) was not significantly different from the true prevalence determined using coupled blood samples (76%). However, in hunter‐harvested turkeys, the estimated prevalence using cloacal swab samples (28%) was different from the true prevalence estimated using coupled bone marrow samples (72%). In summary, cloacal swab samples can be used to reliably detect LPDV infection in live‐captured wild turkeys but should not be used for LPDV detection in hunter‐harvested wild turkeys.

Movement, spatial ecology, and habitat selection of translocated Gould's wild turkeys

AbstractTranslocations have aided restoration of wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) across North America and are used to help establish sustainable, local populations even now. Because successful restocking relies on individuals remaining close to the release site to reduce movement‐based mortalities, a close examination of behaviors and factors affecting site selection can improve survival of translocated birds and enhance translocation success. Therefore, we assessed movements and habitat selection following translocation of 16 Gould's wild turkeys (M. g. mexicana) radiotagged with GPS‐VHF transmitters in Arizona. We assessed daily distance traveled, range size, distance from release site, and habitat selection from release to 120 days post‐release. Turkeys increased space use ~35 days post‐release. After 70 days post‐release, individuals shifted their behaviors to exploitation and individual maintenance, which was characterized by decreasing movements and space use. Turkeys had high release site fidelity and remained 1,352.2 ± 318.7 m (x̄ ± SE) from the release site 120 days post‐release. Distance between daily roost sites stabilized around day 50, and turkeys were within 89.8 ± 49.9 m (x̄ ± SE) of the previous night's roosting site by day 120. Gould's wild turkeys selected for riparian areas throughout the study period and selected for pine (Pinus spp.)‐juniper (Juniperus spp.) woodland for the first 60 days post‐release; thereafter pine‐juniper woodland was used in proportion to availability. Gould's wild turkeys used open‐herbaceous areas and pine–oak (Quercus spp.) woodland in proportion to availability. Our results indicate that Gould's wild turkeys take about 70 days to integrate into a new local environment following translocation, and riparian areas are a critical component of Gould's wild turkey habitat within the southwestern United States. Managers should ensure riparian areas are protected and restored before translocating Gould's wild turkeys to facilitate translocation success and persistence of Gould's wild turkey populations.