Background: Standard colonoscopy (SC) is unable to detect up to 27% of small adenomas. It is therefore essential to optimize SC technique to be able to increase polyp detection. Recently, a new colonoscope with high-resolution and Wide-angle vision has been commercialized. Aim: To compare the performance of colonoscopy using a high-resolution, wide-angle endoscope (HRE) versus a SC for the detection of colorectal neoplasia, in a non-selected population.Patients and methods: All consecutive consenting adult patients referred from primary care centers for outpatient colonoscopy between September 2006 and July 2007 were included. Exclusion criteria were polyposis syndromes or hereditary nonpolyposis CRC, previous surgical resection of the colon or rectum, or inflammatory bowel disease. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to undergo HRE or SC. Times to reach and withdraw from the cecum were measured using a stopwatch The quality of preparation was graded. The morphology, size, and location of each polyp as well as the pathological diagnosis were recorded. A sample size calculation was performed, assuming from the most recent previous data that the mean number of adenomas per patient in the control group would be 0.5 ± 0.9. The study was powered to establish a 30% significant increase in the rate of adenoma detection in the HRE group (alpha error = 0.05, beta error = 0.1, drop-outs = 10%). Data obtained have been compared using the Student's t-test or the Chi-squared test, depending on whether quantitative or qualitative variables, respectively, were involved. Results: A total of 693 consecutive patients referred from primary care centers and attending for outpatient colonoscopy fulfilled all inclusion criteria but 73 had to be excluded from further analysis due to insufficient bowel preparation. Tree hundred and ten patients were included in each arm with no basal characteristic differences. Time to reach the cecum was slightly superior for SC but the difference was not statistically significant (8,9 ± 4,8 vs 8,2 ± 4,5 min. p = 0,05). In total, 518 lesions were identified (272 adenomas and 106 hyperplasic). There was no difference between the 2 arms of the study in the detection rates of overall polyps (0,84 ± 1,59 vs 0,83 ± 1,3), overall adenomas (0,45 ± 1,07 vs 0,43 ± 0,87), small adenomas, flat adenomas, hyperplasic polyps or adenomas distribution along the colonConclusion: HRE did not detect significantly more adenomas than SC. In addition, no statistically significant difference was detected in the overall detection of polyps, in the ratio of flat or small adenomas, or in the identification of patients at higher risk for developing CRC.
Read full abstract