Exergy estimations based on biomass and information for organisms can with good approximation be found as: Ex = βc, where c is the concentration of biomass and β the weighting factor, that accounts for the information that the organisms carry [Jørgensen, S.E., 2002. Integration of Ecosystem Theories: A Pattern, vol. 432, 3rd ed. Kluwer Academic Publishing Company, Dordrecht, The Netherlands]. The determination of β for various organisms has been based on the number of coding genes, but recent research has shown that some of the non-coding genes are crucial for the control, maintenance and development of the organisms. The results [Eichler, E.E., Sankoff, D., 2003. Structural dynamics of eukaryotic chromosome evolution. Science 301, 793–797.] of ongoing whole-genome projects have therefore be applied in order to obtain more accurate β-values. These new β-values are several times bigger than the previously applied values. The number of amino acids coding per gene has probably been underestimated in the previous calculations. However, applications of the former values, for instance in ecosystem health assessment, where exergy is used as ecological indicator (referred as exergy index) and in the development of structurally dynamic models, are still valid. Because the exergy calculations were applied only as relative measures. This paper presents several indirect methods to determine β-values. It is shown that the β-values are well correlated to the age of the organisms (mya), to the number of cell types, to the minimum DNA-content, to the ratio non-coding genes versus total number of genes [Mattick, J.S., 2003. Challenging the dogma: the hidden layer of non-protein-coding RNAs in complex organisms. Bioassays 25, 930–939.] and to the β-values, determined by Fonseca et al. on basis of the total amount of DNA. Indirect determinations were therefore able to expand and improve the previous list of β-values. The previous list had only 19 values, while the list based on the whole-genome project has 16 β-values. The expanded list presented in this paper contains 56 β-values. To reduce the uncertainty of the values, although assuming an apparent loss of discriminating power, it was decided to lump some organisms together in one group when it was know from the evolutionary tree that the organisms were closely related. It implies that the averages of β-values determined by different methods were applied, which should give a higher certainty. The result is a list with 45 β-values, that hopefully will improve the use of β-values to calculate the exergy for assessment of ecosystem health and for the development of structurally dynamic models.
Read full abstract