Whole Brain Radiotherapy Group Research Articles

Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia and Its Impact on Survival in Patients with Brain Metastasis.

Differences in radiation-induced lymphopenia and prognosis between methods of radiotherapy (RT) for brain metastases remain unclear. In this retrospective analysis of patients who underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) for brain metastases, baseline total lymphocyte count (TLC) data were obtained within 2 weeks before RT initiation. Follow-up TLC data were evaluated at 0-2, 2-4, and 4-8 weeks after RT completion. Persistent lymphopenia was defined as <800/μL at any time point. Overall, 138 RT courses in 128 patients were eligible (94 WBRT; 44 SRS/SRT). In the WBRT courses, the median baseline TLC was 1325/μL (IQR: 923-1799). Follow-up TLC decreased significantly to 946/μL (626-1316), 992/μL (675-1291), and 1075/μL (762-1435) (p < 0.001). SRS/SRT courses showed no significant TLC decrease. Multivariate analysis revealed female sex, prior RT, baseline TLC < 800/μL, and WBRT use were significantly associated with persistent lymphopenia. In the WBRT group, overall survival was significantly different between those with and without persistent lymphopenia (median, 2.6 and 6.1 months; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in survival in the SRS/SRT group (p = 0.60). This study suggests SRS/SRT might be preferable for lymphocyte preservation in brain metastasis patients.

Neuroprotective effects of saxagliptin against radiation-induced cognitive impairment: Insights on Akt/CREB/SIRT1/BDNF signaling pathway

Radiation-induced cognitive impairment has recently fueled scientific interest with an increasing prevalence of cancer patients requiring whole brain irradiation (WBI) in their treatment algorithm. Saxagliptin (SAXA), a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor, has exhibited competent neuroprotective effects against varied neurodegenerative disorders. Hence, this study aimed at examining the efficacy of SAXA in alleviating WBI-induced cognitive deficits. Male Sprague Dawley rats were distributed into control group, WBI group exposed to 20 Gy ϒ-radiation, SAXA group treated for three weeks with SAXA (10 mg/kg. orally, once daily), and WBI/SAXA group exposed to 20 Gy ϒ-radiation then treated with SAXA (10 mg/kg. orally, once daily). SAXA effectively reversed memory deterioration and motor dysfunction induced by 20 Gy WBI during behavioural tests and preserved normal histological architecture of the hippocampal tissues of irradiated rats. Mechanistically, SAXA inhibited WBI-induced hippocampal oxidative stress via decreasing lipid peroxidation while restoring catalase antioxidant activity. Moreover, SAXA abrogated radiation-induced hippocampal neuronal apoptosis through downregulating proapoptotic Bcl-2 Associated X-protein (Bax) and upregulating antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) expressions and eventually diminishing expression of cleaved caspase 3. Furthermore, SAXA boosted hippocampal neurogenesis by upregulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression. These valuable neuroprotective capabilities of SAXA were linked to activating protein kinase B (Akt), and cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB) along with elevating the expression of sirtuin 1 (SIRT-1). SAXA successfully mitigated cognitive dysfunction triggered by WBI, attenuated oxidative injury, and neuronal apoptosis, and enhanced neurogenesis through switching on Akt/CREB/BDNF/SIRT-1 signaling axes. Such fruitful neurorestorative effects of SAXA provide an innovative therapeutic strategy for improving the cognitive capacity of cancer patients exposed to radiotherapy.

Incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal brain metastases and impact on hippocampal-avoiding radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and PurposeIn patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life. Here, we aim to estimate the incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs and the subsequent risk of local undertreatment in patients undergoing hippocampal sparing radiotherapy. Materials and MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the terms “Hippocampus”, “Brain Neoplasms”, and related terms. Trials reporting on the incidence of hippocampal and/or perihippocampal BMs or hippocampal failure rate after PCI or WBRT were included. ResultsForty records were included, encompassing a total of 5,374 patients with over 32,570 BMs. Most trials employed a 5 mm margin to define the HA zone. In trials reporting on BM incidence, 4.4 % (range 0 − 27 %) and 9.2 % (3 − 41 %) of patients had hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs, respectively. The most common risk factor for hippocampal BMs was the total number of BMs. The reported failure rate within the HA zone after HA-PCI or HA-WBRT was 4.5 % (0 − 13 %), salvageable with radiosurgery in most cases. SCLC histology was not associated with a higher risk of hippocampal failure (OR = 2.49; p = 0.23). In trials comparing with a conventional (non-HA) PCI or WBRT group, HA did not increase the hippocampal failure rate (OR = 1.90; p = 0.17). ConclusionThe overall incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs is considerably low, with a subsequent low risk of local undertreatment following HA-PCI or HA-WBRT. In patients without involvement, the hippocampus should be spared to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life.

Is reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy also feasible in primary CNS lymphoma for curative or salvage purpose?

Recently, reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been used to treat primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). However, whether reduced-dose WBRT is also an acceptable option for curative or salvage purposes has not yet been reported. We analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with PCNSL who received radiotherapy for curative or salvage purposes and compared the clinical outcomes according to the WBRT dose. A total of 66 patients were divided into two groups: those treated with 30Gy (2Gy per fraction) or less WBRT (low-dose WBRT, n = 34) and those treated with more than 30Gy WBRT (high-dose WBRT, n = 32). The median WBRT dose was 25.2 and 49.6Gy in low-dose and high-dose WBRT groups, respectively. The median total radiotherapy dose, including the boost dose, was 50Gy (range, 36.0-55.8Gy). The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 77.8% and 29.8%, respectively. Intracranial relapse occurred in 31 patients (47.0%) at a median of 27 months after RT. Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the two groups. The 3-year intracranial disease control rate did not differ between the two groups (35.2% vs. 41.6%, p = 0.300). Grade 3 or higher neurological toxicities were observed in six patients, of whom five were in the high-dose WBRT group. Reduced-dose WBRT in curative and salvage treatments for PCNSL had no significant negative effect on the intracranial disease control rate or survival. Therefore, without impaired efficacy, use of reduced-dose WBRT appears promising for reduction of neurotoxicity.

WBRT is Associated with Higher Rates of Hematologic Toxicity than Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Brain Metastasis Patients

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has historically been a standard of care in patients with multiple brain metastases. Studies show that WBRT may be associated with a transient detriment in hematological parameters because of exposure to a larger proportion of circulating lymphocytes, platelets and hematopoietic cells within the bone marrow of the cranium. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) may cause reduced hematologic toxicity in patients compared to WBRT. We retrospectively identified 100 patients treated for brain metastasis, with either SRS or WBRT from 2016 to 2019, and queried their pre- and post-treatment hematological parameters including hemoglobin, total white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count, and platelet count. CTCAE v5.0 was used for grading hematologic toxicities. Serial values were compared by treatment type and controlled for age, gender, and systemic therapy. Student t-test was used for intergroup comparison and p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Of 100 patients, median brain metastases was 3 (range 1-22), 51 received SRS and 49 received WBRT. We observed that patients treated with WBRT had a significantly higher post-treatment reduction in platelet count (-51.2 vs 9.8; p = 0.001) and higher incidence of any grade thrombocytopenia (31.2% vs 10%; p = 0.019) compared to patients treated with SRS. We also noted that compared with SRS, WBRT was associated with a higher post-treatment reduction in circulating lymphocytes (-0.80 vs 0.14; p = 0.071) and higher incidence of G3+ lymphopenia (43.2% vs 22.2%; p = 0.07). Numerical incidence of any G3+ hematological toxicity was also higher in the WBRT group but the difference was not statistically significant (40% vs 28%, p = 0.162). Hemoglobin count, WBC, and ANC were not meaningfully different pre- and post-treatment for either group. WBRT results in an increased amount and duration of radiation exposure to circulating intracranial blood volume. In our study, patients treated with WBRT experienced higher rates of clinically significant lymphopenia & thrombocytopenia compared to patients treated with SRS. In addition to the cognitive benefits of SRS compared to WBRT, there may be significant hematologic benefits as well. Further studies are warranted to clarify and validate these findings.

Rates of hematologic toxicity in WBRT vs SRS.

e14014 Background: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has historically been a standard of care in patients with multiple brain metastases. Studies show WBRT may be associated with a transient detriment in hematological parameters because of exposure to a larger proportion of circulating lymphocytes, platelets and hematopoietic cells within the bone marrow of the cranium. We tested the hypothesis that stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) has reduced hematologic toxicity in patients compared to WBRT. Methods: We retrospectively identified 100 patients treated for brain metastasis, with either SRS or WBRT from 2016 to 2019, and queried their pre- and post-treatment hematological parameters including hemoglobin, total white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count, and platelet count. CTCAE v5.0 was used for grading hematologic toxicities. Serial values were compared by treatment type and controlled for age, gender, &amp; systemic therapy. Student t-test was used for intergroup comparison and p-value &lt;0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of 100 patients, median brain metastases was 3 (range 1-22), 51 received SRS and 49 received WBRT. We observed that patients treated with WBRT had a significantly higher post-treatment reduction in platelet count (-51.2 vs 9.8; p=0.001) and higher incidence of any grade thrombocytopenia (31.2% vs 10%; p=0.019) compared to patients treated with SRS. We also noted that compared with SRS, WBRT was associated with a higher post-treatment reduction in circulating lymphocytes (-0.80 vs 0.14; p = 0.071) and higher incidence of G3+ lymphopenia (43.2% vs 22.2%; p=0.07). Numerical incidence of any G3+ hematological toxicity was also higher in the WBRT group but the difference was not statistically significant (40% vs 28%, p=0.162). Hemoglobin count, WBC, and ANC were not meaningfully different pre- and post-treatment for either group. Conclusions: WBRT results in an increased amount and duration of radiation exposure to circulating intracranial blood volume. In our study, patients treated with WBRT experienced higher rates of clinically significant lymphopenia &amp; thrombocytopenia compared to patients treated with SRS. In addition to the cognitive benefits of SRS compared to WBRT, there may be significant hematologic benefits as well. Further studies are warranted to clarify and validate these findings. [Table: see text]

Platelet-rich Plasma Improves Radiotherapy-induced Emotional Disorder and Cognitive Dysfunction, Neuroinflammation in Aged Rats by Inhibiting the Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasomes.

Although radiotherapy (RT) is the preferred treatment for elderly patients with brain tumors, certain negative effects can't be ignored. Fortunately, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) presents with a promising potential for the treatment of neurological diseases. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the effect of PRP on neuroinflammation, emotional disorder and cognitive dysfunction induced by RT in aged rats. Firstly, whole brain RT (WBRT) model was established by whole brain irradiation with 10Gy of 6-MeV electron beam in rats. Next, twenty 20-month-old female SD rats were divided into four groups (sham group, PRP group, WBRT group, and WBRT + PRP group) according different treatments. After that, the cognitive dysfunction and depression-like behavior of rats were examined by novel object recognition test (NORT), Morris water maze test (MWM), open field test (OFT) and elevated plus maze test (EPM). Besides, immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of microglial marker protein Iba-1 in rat hippocampus; enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to examine the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1 beta (IL-1β), IL-18, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in rat hippocampus; real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blot to measure the levels of neurotrophic factors brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), tropomyosin-related kinase B receptor (TrkB), and nerve growth factor (NGF) in rat hippocampus; and western blot also to observe the protein expression levels of NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), caspase-1, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC), and IL-1β in rat hippocampus. After experiments, some results obtained were shown as follows. PRP could significantly improve learning and memory ability and depression-like behavior, increase the level of neurotrophic factors, inhibit the activation of microglia and decrease the level of pro-inflammatory factors in WBRT rats. In addition, PRP significantly inhibited the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes. To sum up, PRP can ameliorate neuroinflammation, emotional disorder and cognitive dysfunction induced by RT in aged rats, and the mechanism may be related to its inhibitory effect on NLRP3 inflammasome activation.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy after resection of solitary brain metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveThe standard of care in patients with solitary brain metastasis involves surgical resection and postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). However, WBRT is associated with adverse effects, mainly neurocognitive deterioration. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a more targeted form of radiation therapy that could be as effective as WBRT without the detrimental neurocognitive decline. MethodsWe performed the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative SRS versus postoperative WBRT in patients with one resected brain metastasis. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for studies comparing the efficacy of the two radiation modalities in terms of local and distant brain control, leptomeningeal disease control, and overall survival. Additionally, we extracted patients’ neurocognitive function and quality of life after each postoperative radiation form. ResultsFour studies with 248 patients (128: WBRT, 120: SRS) were included in our analysis. There was no difference between SRS and WBRT in the risk of local recurrence (RR = 0.92, CI = 0.51–1.66, p = 0.78, I2 = 0%) and leptomeningeal disease (RR = 1.21, CI = 0.49–2.98, p = 0.67, I2 = 18%), neither in the patients’ overall survival (HR = 1.06, CI = 0.61–1.85, p = 0.83, I2 = 63%). Nevertheless, SRS appeared to increase the risk of distant brain failure (RR = 2.03, CI = 0.94–4.40, p = 0.07, I2 = 61%). Neurocognitive function and quality of life in the SRS group were equal or superior to the WBRT group. ConclusionsAlthough SRS may increase the risk of distant brain failure, it appears to be as effective as WBRT in terms of local control, risk of leptomeningeal disease, and overall survival while sparing the patients of the detrimental, WBRT-associated cognitive deterioration.

Leukoencephalopathy in patients with brain metastases who received radiosurgery with or without whole brain radiotherapy.

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs) is a common cause of radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy; however the safety of alternative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains unclear. This study examined the incidence of leukoencephalopathy in patients treated with SRS alone versus WBRT plus SRS for BMs with a focus on the relationship between prognostic factors and leukoencephalopathy. Analysis was performed between 2002 and 2021. The total enrollment was 993 patients with the distribution: WBRT plus SRS (n = 291) and SRS only (n = 702). Leukoencephalopathy was graded from 0 to 3 for changes in white matter indicated by the MRI after WBRT or SRS. Patient characteristics and SRS dosimetric parameters were reviewed to identify factors that contributed to the incidence of leukoencephalopathy or overall survival. The incidence of leukoencephalopathy was consistently higher in WBRT plus SRS group than in SRS alone group (p < 0.001). Leukoencephalopathy was also associated with a larger total tumor volume (≧28cm3; p = 0.028) and age (> 77years; p = 0.025). Nonetheless, the SRS integral dose to skull in the subgroup of WBRT plus SRS treatment was not demonstrated significance in development of leukoencephalopathy (p = 0.986 for integral dose 1-2J, p = 0.776 for integral dose > 2J). This study revealed that SRS is safe for oligo-BMs in terms of leukoencephalopathy development. Patient age and total tumor volume were identified as important factors in assessing the development of leukoencephalopathy. The additional of SRS (even at an integral dose > 2J) did not increase the incidence of leukoencephalopathy.

Survival and prognostic factors in patients undergoing the resection of solitary brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Neurosurgery is the standard of care for resectable solitary brain metastasis (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but still with a poor outcome. Postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was reported to reduce local recurrence, whether it could prolong survival was uncertain. In this study, we attempted to evaluate WBRT and other prognostic for overall survival (OS) in these patients. In this retrospective study, NSCLC patients with a solitary BM and controlled primary tumor who underwent neurosurgical resection were selected from the medical records database between January 2014 and December 2018. Clinical data, disease control/progression results and survival outcomes were obtained from the medical records, regular outpatient follow-up and telephone interviews. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses of potential prognostic factors including patients' characteristics, BM features, tissue-based parameters and postoperative treatments were conducted. OS was illustrated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and group differences were assessed using the log-rank test. The subgroup analysis compared each variable between the WBRT group and the untreated control by the hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 94 patients were included, with a median OS of 812 days. Univariable analysis showed that postoperative WBRT and targeted therapy were associated with OS. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that postoperative WBRT [P<0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.357], chemotherapy (P=0.008, HR 0.512), targeted therapy (P<0.001, HR 0.265), and smaller tumor size (P=0.018, HR 0.553) were independent prognostic factors for prolonged OS. However, tissue-based parameters (Ki67 tumor cell proliferation index, epidermal growth factor receptor, and checkpoint levels) were identified as statistically insignificant factors. In the subgroup analysis, the beneficial effect of WBRT was only observed in patients that did not receive systematic treatments. Postoperative WBRT and systematic treatments after solitary BM resection improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients with a controlled primary tumor. Postoperative WBRT could be considered, especially for those who not receive systematic chemotherapy or targeted therapy treatments, as they might be more likely to benefit from it.

P01.06.B Interim results from CAR-Study B: An ongoing randomized trial on the effect of SRS or WBRT on cognitive performance in patients with 11-20 brain metastases

Abstract Background Both stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) have proven to be effective treatments for multiple brain metastases (BM) with similar overall survival. Cognition and Radiation (CAR) Study B is a randomized trial on the effect of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) or WBRT on cognitive performance in patients with 11-20 BM. The primary and secondary aim of this interim analysis were to check whether Bayesian stopping rules for cognitive failure were met, and to compare cognitive changes after treatment respectively, for the first 45 patients enrolled. Material and Methods Patients with 11-20 newly diagnosed BM on a triple-dose contrast-enhanced MRI-scan, expected survival &amp;gt;3 months and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70, were stratified by age, histology, total BM volume, systemic treatment, KPS, and baseline Hopkins Verbal Learning total recall (HVLT-R TR) score, and randomized 1:1 (minimization) to GKRS or WBRT. Neuropsychological tests were administered before (T0) treatment (n=21 vs n=20), and at 3 (T3; n=16 vs n=14) and 6 (T6; n=9 vs n=9) months thereafter. A decline of ≥5 points in HVLT-R TR score was considered a cognitive failure. The trial would be halted if the posterior probability for a higher cognitive failure rate in one group versus the other was &amp;gt;0·975 at T3 or T6 according to the employed beta (2.09,2.91) prior (prior mean of 42%), based on the average failure rates at 4 months reported by Chang et al. (2009). Between-group differences in changes of test performances over 6 months were analyzed using mixed ANOVAs. Proportions of cognitive changes (T0-T6) at the individual level based on reliable change indices correcting for practice effects, were determined. Results HVLT-R TR failure rates in the GKRS versus WBRT group were 31% versus 29% at T3, and 0% versus 33% at T6. The observed failure rates after WBRT at T3 and T6 were lower than the average failure rates of Chang et al. (2009). Posterior probabilities were 0·451 at T3 and 0·918 at T6. Over 6 months, changes in performance on tests of immediate (p=·003) and delayed recall (p=·024), and information processing speed (p=·003) were significantly different between groups (large effect sizes), with significant declines after WBRT, but not after GKRS. Over 6 months, at the individual patient level, there were no declines in performances across all tests in the GKRS group (n=8) while performances declined in 4 out of 8 patients in the WBRT group. Conclusion The stopping rules were not met since the posterior probabilities did not cross the threshold. Other preliminary findings in this small sample suggest that cognitive decline, both at group and individual level, is more pronounced after WBRT compared to GKRS. Accrual is continued (NCT02953717; ZonMw 842003006).

Effectivity of involved-field radiotherapy for recurrent brain metastasis in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

To investigate the outcome difference of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients with recurrent brain metastases (BMs) after prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). A retrospective analysis was carried out in 68 LS-SCLC patients who underwent WBRT or IFRT owing to the occurrence of recurrent BMs after PCI from 2009 to 2020. The median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 11.43 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.39-13.48 months]. In the paired comparison of OS, the IFRT group had a significantly longer survival time than the WBRT group in all patients [17.80 months vs. 8.47 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.393, 95% CI, 0.213-0.728; P = 0.002] and 46 matched patients (18.23 months vs. 8.73 months; HR, 0.411, 95% CI, 0.195-0.865; P = 0.019). In terms of the intra-cranial progression-free survival (iPFS), there was no significant difference between the WBRT group and IFRT group before matching (5.93 months vs. 7.30 months; HR, 0.644, 95% CI, 0.373-1.112; P = 0.111); similarly, no statistical difference was detected between the WBRT group and IFRT group after matching (5.33 months vs. 8.10 months; HR, 0.623, 95% CI, 0.323-1.199; P = 0.152). Meanwhile, of the 41 patients with symptoms, 27 cases (65.9%) had symptom relief, showing tolerable toxicity without unexpected toxicity during the observation. Compared with WBRT, IFRT exhibits better survival benefits for LS-SCLC patients with recurrent BMs after PCI. Re-irradiation for BMs exhibits advantages of symptom relief and tolerable side effects.

Impact of socio-economic factors on radiation treatment after resection of metastatic brain tumors: trends from a private insurance database.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical bed of resected brain metastases is now considered the standard of care due to its advantages over whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Despite the upward trend in SRS adoption since the 2000s, disparities have been reported suggesting that socio-economic factors can influence SRS utilization. To analyze recent trends in SRS use and identify factors that influence treatment. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the Optum Commercial Claims and Encounters Database and included all patients from 2004 to 2021 who received SRS or WBRT within 60days after resection of tumors metastatic to the brain. A total of 3495 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 1998 patients in the SRS group and 1497 patients in the WBRT group. SRS use now supersedes WBRT by a wide margin. Lung, breast and colon were the most common sites of primary tumor. Although we found no significant differences based on race among the treatment groups, patients with annual household income greater than $75,000 and those with some college or higher education are significantly more likely to receive SRS (OR 1.44 and 1.30; 95% CI 1.18-1.76 and 1.08-1.56; P = 0.001 and 0.005, respective). Patients with Elixhauser Comorbidity Index of three or more were significantly more likely to receive SRS treatment. The use of post-surgical SRS for brain metastasis has increased significantly over time, however education and income were associated with differential SRS utilization.

Quality of life among patients with 4 to 10 brain metastases after treatment with whole-brain radiotherapy vs. stereotactic radiotherapy: a phase III, randomized, Dutch multicenter trial.

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an attractive treatment option for patients with brain metastases (BM), sparing healthy brain tissue and likely controlling local tumors. Most previous studies have focused on radiological response or survival. Our randomized trial (NCT02353000) investigated whether quality of life (QoL) is better preserved using SRT than whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for patients with multiple BM. Recently, we published our trial's primary endpoints. The current report discusses the study's secondary endpoints. Patients with 4 to 10 BM were randomly assigned to a standard-arm WBRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions) or SRT group (1 fraction of 15-24 Gy or 3 fractions of 8 Gy). QoL endpoints-such as EQ5D domains post-treatment, the Barthel index, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires, and the neurocognitive Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-were evaluated. Due to poor accrual resulting from patients' and referrers' preference for SRT, this study closed prematurely. The other endpoints' results were published recently. Twenty patients were available for analysis (n=10 vs. n=10 for the two groups, respectively). Significant differences were observed 3 months post-treatment for the mobility (P=0.041), self-care (P=0.028), and alopecia (P=0.014) EQ5D domains, favoring SRT. This self-care score also persisted compared to the baseline (P=0.025). Multiple EORTC categories reflected significant differences, favoring SRT-particularly physical functioning and social functioning. For patients with multiple BM, SRT alone led to persistently higher QoL than treatment with WBRT. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02353000.

NQPC-5 Does high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy for relapsed primary CNS lymphoma increase a risk of leukoencephalopathy with prior whole brain radiotherapy?

Backgrounds: Standard care for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) comprises high-dose (HD) methotrexate (MTX) -based chemotherapy with or without consolidation whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). HD-MTX administration following WBRT has been suggested to increase a risk of leukoencephalopathy. However, given that there are no other agents with efficacy similar to or better than MTX, patients with relapsed PCNSL may often be treated with regimens containing HD-MTX if the initial MTX treatment achieved a long-term complete remission. Here, we retrospectively analyzed prevalence and an extent of white mater damages in association with prior WBRT in patients with relapsed PCNSL treated with HD-MTX based therapy. Patients & methods: Among 79 patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL in a total of 162 patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL treated in our institution from April, 2000 to February, 2021, 35 patients were identified with evaluable KPS, MMSE, and Fazekas scale data at both baseline and follow-up periods. Of the 35 patients, 22 were treated with chemotherapy at a relapse (10 with prior WBRT, while 12 without WBRT), and were included in this preliminary study. Results: In the WBRT group (male/female: 5/5), median age was 65 years (range, 45–73), initial median KPS was 70 (40–90), and median WBRT dose was 27 Gy (23.4–40). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 11.8 months, and median overall survival (mOS) was not reached. In the non-WBRT group (M/F 8/4), median age 75 (62–84), initial mKPS 80 (50–90), mPFS 16.2 m, and mOS not reached. Initial KPS and MMSE score tended to be worse in WBRT group, presumably due to enrichment of patients with poorer performance status and more comorbidities. A decline in the Fazekas score was not associated with MMSE deterioration.Conclusions: The preliminary analysis was not informative enough, and further extensive imaging analysis will be exploited.

Effect of brain radiotherapy strategies on prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis

PurposeEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers have a high risk of developing brain metastases (BM). Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), local radiotherapy, and WBRT + Boost are frequently used for treatment of BM. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the difference in efficacy of these radiotherapy modes in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BMs. Further, we determined the optimal radiotherapy regimen for patients based on Lung-molGPA.Methods and materialsWe retrospectively enrolled 232 patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BMs. Patients were divided into three groups based on the different modes of brain radiotherapy: WBRT group, local radiotherapy group, and WBRT + Boost group. Graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung molGPA), overall survival (OS), and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were calculated. Kaplan–Meier was used to compare iPFS and OS in different groups.ResultsThe median OS for the WBRT (n = 84), local radiotherapy (n = 65), and WBRT + Boost (n = 83) cohorts was 32.8, 59.1, and 41.7 months, respectively (P = 0.0002). After stratification according to the Lung-molGPA score, the median OS for the WBRT (n = 56), local radiotherapy (n = 19), and WBRT + Boost (n = 28) cohorts was 32.5, 30.9, and 30.8 months, respectively, in subgroup with score 1–2 (P = 0.5097). In subgroup with score 2.5–4, the median OS for the WBRT (n = 26), local radiotherapy (n = 45), and WBRT + Boost (n = 54) cohorts was 32, 68.4, and 51 months, respectively (P = 0.0041).ConclusionThe present study showed that in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BM, local radiotherapy and WBRT + Boost perform similarly well both in the subgroups with low and high scores of Lung-molGPA. Considering the side effect caused by whole brain radiotherapy, we recommended local radiotherapy as optimal brain radiation mode for those subtype lung cancer patients.

Optimizing Whole Brain Radiotherapy Treatment and Dose for Patients With Brain Metastases From Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) compared to whole brain radiotherapy plus local radiation boost (WBRT + boost), and further identify whether higher biologically effective dose (BED) of WBRT + boost translates into a survival benefit in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM).MethodsSCLC patients with BM from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of prognostic factors for OS were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. The cutoff value of BED was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.ResultsAmong the 180 eligible patients, 82 received WBRT + boost and 98 received WBRT. Both OS and iPFS in the WBRT + boost group were significantly superior to those in the WBRT group (median OS: 20 vs. 14 months, p = 0.011; median iPFS: 16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.003). At a cutoff value of 58.35 Gy in the WBRT + boost group, 52 for the high-BED (>58.35 Gy) group, 30 for the low-BED (≤58.35 Gy) group. High BED was significantly associated with improved OS and iPFS compared with low BED in the WBRT + boost group (median OS: 23 vs. 17 months, p = 0.002; median iPFS: 17 vs. 10 months, p = 0.002).ConclusionsCompared with WBRT alone, WBRT + boost improved OS and iPFS in SCLC patients with BM. High BED (>58.35 Gy) for WBRT + boost may be a reasonable consideration for SCLC patients with BM.

Anlotinib in Combination With Whole Brain Radiotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases Progressive or Developed After at Least One Lines of Prior Treatment

Intracranial metastasis failed to standard systematic treatment is common in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Post Hoc analysis of a phase III randomized control trial (ALTER0303) has demonstrated that anlotinib can benefit patients with advanced NSCLC with brain metastases (BM) and is highly potent in the management of intracranial lesions. Here we report results of a comparative analysis of survival in patients with NSCLC with BM receiving whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with and without anlotinib, for whom intracranial disease had progressed or developed after at least one lines of prior systematic therapy.From 2019 to 2020, a total of 96 patients of NSCLC in our institution with BM failed to at least one lines of systematic treatment met inclusion criteria for the study. Patients were treated with concurrent anlotinib and WBRT followed by anlotinib consolidation (an-WBRT group) or WBRT with other regimens at the discretion of the treating physician (WBRT group) at intracranial progression. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were measured from the date of brain progression.The median lines of prior therapy are both 2 for an-WBRT and WBRT groups. The median OS for the an-WBRT (n = 26) and WBRT (n = 70) cohorts was 12.8 and 14.3 months, respectively (P = 0.82). The an-WBRT group has a longer iPFS than WBRT group (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.21-0.65), with median iPFS of 8.1 months and 4.0 months respectively.This retrospective analysis demonstrated that the combination of anlotinib and WBRT is associated with better iPFS than WBRT in NSCLC patients with intracranial metastasis failed to standard systematic treatment. Randomized, prospective studies are needed to further validate these findings.C. Kong: None. X. Zhu: None. M. Jiang: None. X. Song: None. P. Qian: None. J. Zhu: None. J. Xu: None. X. He: None.

Time Interval to Initiation of Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastasis

PurposePatients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have brain metastases require whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). When there is no emergent indication for WBRT, patients may receive systemic therapy first and WBRT afterward. In scenarios when systemic therapy is initiated first, it has not been previously investigated whether delaying WBRT is harmful. Methods and MaterialsThe National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2016) for patients with SCLC with brain metastases who received 30 Gy in 10 fractions of WBRT. Patients were divided into groups based on whether they received early WBRT (3-14 days after initiation of chemotherapy) or late WBRT (15-90 days after initiation of chemotherapy). Demographic and clinicopathologic categorical variables were compared between those who had early WBRT (3-14 days) and those who had late WBRT (15-90 days). Factors predictive for late WBRT were determined. Overall survival (OS), which was defined as days from diagnosis to death, was evaluated and variables prognostic for OS were determined. ResultsA total of 1082 patients met selection criteria; 587 (54%) had early WBRT and 495 (46%) received late WBRT. Groups were similarly distributed aside from days from initiating chemotherapy to initiating WBRT (P < .001). The early WBRT group had a median of 7 days (interquartile range [IQR], 5-10 days) from initiating chemotherapy to initiating WBRT and the late WBRT group had a median of 34 days (IQR, 21-57 days). On binary logistic regression analysis, a longer time interval between diagnosis and the start of systemic therapy was predictive for later WBRT. Median OS was 8.7 months for early WBRT and 7.5 months for late WBRT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.165; P = .008). Early WBRT (P = .02), female sex (P = .045), and private insurance (P = .04) were favorable prognostic factors for OS on multivariable analysis, whereas older age (P = .006) was an unfavorable prognostic factor. ConclusionsPatients with SCLC and brain metastases who received early WBRT were found to have a modest improvement in OS compared with patients who received late WBRT. These findings suggest that early WBRT should be offered to patients who have brain metastases, even in the absence of an indication for emergent WBRT.

Analysis Survival of Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases Treated with Different Fraction Whole Brain Radiotherapy Concomitant with Capecitabine

Introduction: Breast cancer is the second most frequent cancer worldwide. The main therapeutic modality for breast cancer with brain metastases is radiation. Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) is a treatment that provides moderate doses of radiotherapy to all brain tissue. Capecitabine was found to be effective for the treatment of breast cancer with metastases and its metabolites can cross the BBB in animal models.&#x0D; &#x0D; Objective: This study aims to determine the response and survival of breast cancer patient with brain metastases treated with different fractionation WBRT combined with capecitabine administration.&#x0D; &#x0D; Materials and methods: This is a prospective, randomized-blind cohort analytic study. Subjects were randomized into two groups by giving different fraction of WBRT (Group I WBRT 10x3Gy and Group II WBRT 20x2Gy) concomitant with capecitabine 850-1000mg/m2. OS was calculated from brain metastases diagnosis. Median follow-up was 5.6 months.&#x0D; &#x0D; Results: A total of 22 breast cancer patients with brain metastases participated in this study. Group I obtained results of 5 (45.5%) out of 11 are responding to therapy and median OS was 4.4 months. Whereas in group II found 11 (100%) out of 11 patients responded to therapy and median OS was 9.4 months. The results of statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences of response between the two groups with p value= 0.012. The differences of survival of each group also statistically significant with p value=0.004&#x0D; &#x0D; Conclusions: WBRT with 20x2Gy concomitant with Capecitabine gives a better response rate and OS.