WHO VigiBase Research Articles

Clinical and radiological pattern of olaparib-induced interstitial lung disease

BackgroundPARP inhibitors (PARPi) are used in the treatment of ovarian, breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Pneumonitis has been identified as a potential side effect, with a higher meta-analysis-assessed risk for olaparib versus other PARPi. Olaparib-induced interstitial lung disease (O-ILD) was first described within the Japanese population, with few information available for Caucasian patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study by pooling data from the French and Belgian pharmacovigilance databases from 2018 to 2022. Patients with O-ILD were included following a central review by: 1) pharmacologists using the French drug causality assessment method; 2) senior pneumologists or radiologists, using the Fleischner Society’s recommendations.ResultsFive patients were identified and analysed. All were females, with ovarian or breast cancer. Median age at O-ILD diagnosis was 71 (38–72) years old, with no smoking history. Median delay between treatment initiation and symptom occurrence was 12 (6–33) weeks. Pneumonitis severity assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5 was Grade 3 (n = 4) or 2 (n = 1). CT-scan review (n = 3) described hypersensitivity pneumonitis reaction as a common pattern. Bronchioalveolar lavage (n = 4) revealed lymphocytic alveolitis. Treatments relied on olaparib discontinuation (n = 5) and glucocorticoid intake (n = 4), with no fatal issue. Safe re-challenge with PARPi occurred in two patients. Forty additional O-ILD cases were identified in the WHO VigiBase database, including one fatal case.ConclusionsPARPi-ILD is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease, presenting as a hypersensitivity pneumonitis pattern within 3 months of PARPi initiation. Treatment primarily relies on medication discontinuation. Re-challenging with another PARPi could be considered.Clinical trial numberCEPRO #2023–010.

A replication study using the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) to evaluate whether an association between ketamine and esketamine and alcohol and substance misuse exists

Background and objectivesKetamine and esketamine are increasingly prescribed in the treatment of resistant mood disorders and persons at risk of suicide. Ketamine is a drug of misuse with increasing non-therapeutic use in the general population. Herein, our aim was to determine whether ketamine and/or esketamine are disproportionately associated with reports of substance and/or alcohol misuse. MethodsReplicating a similar analysis recently conducted using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we identified cases of “alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder (SUD), substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder and drug abuse” in association with ketamine and esketamine reported to the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database (WHO VigiBase). We searched the database from inception to January 2024. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) of each of the aforementioned parameters was calculated; acetaminophen was used as the control. The numerator of the equation represents the number of cases (n) and the denominator represents the total cases of psychiatric disorders (N). Significance was obtained when the lower limit of the 95 % confidence (CI) > 1.0. ResultsThe RORs for ketamine was increased for most parameters (i.e., alcohol abuse (3.24), substance dependence (12.48), substance use disorder (170.44), substance abuse (2.94), drug dependence (2.88), drug use disorder (11.54) and drug abuse (2.85), respectively). With respect to esketamine, the RORs were observed to be different from ketamine insofar as we observed a reduction in the RORs for three parameters (i.e., substance abuse (0.41), drug dependence (0.083) and drug abuse (0.052), respectively). The IC025 values were significant for ketamine in cases of alcohol abuse (0.35), substance dependence (0.50), substance use disorder (2.77), substance abuse (0.83), drug dependence (0.97), drug use disorder (1.95) and drug abuse (0.94). Additionally, oxycontin showed significant IC025 values for substance use disorder (0.0014), substance abuse (0.042), and drug dependence (0.17). ConclusionEsketamine was not associated with an increased ROR for any parameter of alcohol and/or substance use disorder. Mixed results were observed with ketamine with some RORs increased and others decreased. Estimating RORs using a pharmacovigilance database does not establish causation in the case of elevated RORs and cannot be assumed to be a therapeutic effect when lower RORs were observed.

Drug-Associated Acute Kidney Disease: Data From a World Pharmacovigilance Database.

Background Drugs are a frequent cause of nephrotoxicity, especially in the context of acute kidney disease (AKD), with a significant number of cases being drug-associated. The WHO's VigiBase is a powerful tool for identifying drugs described and associated with the development of AKD. Methods We retrieved data from the period 1968 to 2022 regarding notifications of adverse drug reactions (ADR). The extracted medications were evaluated for their nephrotoxicity based on the bibliographic score (BS)developed through pre-selected references. The main medications involved were classified as 'non-nephrotoxic', 'potentially nephrotoxic', and 'nephrotoxic'. We utilized the IC025 and reporting odds ratio (ROR) disproportionality indexes to study the relationship between medications and the odds of being included in an AKD notification. Results During the period, a total of 33,932,051 notifications were obtained, revealing 435,677 cases related to drug-associated AKD following MedDRA term filtering, predominantly affecting males aged 45-64. We identified 8,991 active ingredients or suspected combinations associated with AKD development, with the ATC class A - Alimentary Tract and Metabolism being the most frequently described. Among the medications most strongly associated with this phenotype, classes J and N stood out. Among the most notable medications collected, 8.3% were classified as "non-nephrotoxic," 16.7% as "potentially nephrotoxic," and 75% as "known nephrotoxic." Notable active ingredients included cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil (IC025 8.7; ROR 786.96), inotersen (IC025 7.7; ROR 604.57), emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil (IC025 7.9; ROR 432.36), esomeprazole (IC025 6.8; ROR 184.23), and pantoprazole (IC025 6.3; ROR 109.86), with proton pump inhibitors dominating the top four positions among the most frequently involved medications. Conclusion AKD is a frequent adverse reaction in VigiBase, with a significantly high reported mortality rate. Evaluation of the notifications revealed medications with a high disproportionality index and a strong association with AKD. We also highlight the potential nephrotoxic role of less suspected medications. This study emphasizes the need to consider AKD as a condition potentially associated with iatrogenic etiology, highlighting various medications and their respective involvement in the various possible manifestations of AKD.

Exploring Adverse Events of Remdesivir in Covid-19 Patients: A Comprehensive Global Analysis

Background: The emergence of COVID-19, stemming from SARS-CoV-2, has triggered a global pandemic, urging rapid therapeutic interventions. Remdesivir, a nucleotide analog prodrug, garnered attention for its potential against COVID-19 due to in vitro efficacy against coronaviruses. This study reviews Remdesivir’s adverse effects in COVID-19 patients. Methodology: While Remdesivir shows promise, recent studies raise efficacy concerns. Adverse drug event (ADE) documentation is vital due to limited pre-pandemic ADE data. WHO VigiBase® analysis (2015-2020) and COVID-19 ADE studies were undertaken, focusing on age, severity, region, and organ impact. 1086 ADEs emerged from 439 case reports by July 19, 2020, in VigiBase®, reducing to 1004 after duplicates were removed. ADEs primarily related to COVID-19 patients (92.5%), notably from the Americas (67.7%). Mainly in males above 45, ADEs were serious (82.5%). Key ADEs encompassed elevated hepatic enzymes (32.1%), renal damage (14.4%), increased creatinine levels (11.2%), and respiratory failure (6.4%). Conclusion: Liver and kidney function deterioration emerged as frequent ADEs, underscoring the need for vigilance during Remdesivir treatment. These findings align with regulatory documents. In sum, COVID-19 has prompted swift therapeutic responses, with Remdesivir being explored as a potential treatment. This study sheds light on associated ADEs, highlighting the importance of monitoring and informed decision-making

Analyses of Dupilumab-Related Ocular Adverse Drug Reactions Using the WHO's VigiBase.

Dupilumab is a drug that inhibits the action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 and is a potent therapeutic drug for allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis. Although its use has been associated with significant ocular adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the IL-4 and IL-13 inhibition may also have favorable therapeutic effects. The aim of this study was to determine the disease spectrum in which the use of dupilumab may have been associated with an increase or decrease of ocular ADRs. We searched the World Health Organization's VigiBase for ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab for data up to 12 June 2022. The number of all ADRs that were retrieved was compared with the number of ocular ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab. Disproportionate reporting was assessed by calculating the information component (IC) values and odds ratios. Since the introduction of dupilumab, 100,267 ADRs have been reported. Of all the ADRs associated with dupilumab, 28,522 ADRs were ocular complications, and it ranked fourth in the ocular complications by organ level. By assessments of the IC for age ≤ 44years, the most significantly associated ADRs were dry eye followed by blepharitis including eyelid crusting and dryness and conjunctivitis. Crusting and dryness of the eyelids were the most significant ADRs for all age groups. Other ocular ADRs reported include meibomian gland dysfunction, keratitis, glaucoma, and retinal disorders. In contrast, periorbital edema, neuro-ophthalmic disorders, optic neuritis, and macular edema were significantly reduced by the use of dupilumab. Dupilumab-related ADRs included an increase or decrease of various ocular disorders. The results indicate that dupilumab also has potential therapeutic effects.

Suspected cutaneous adverse drug reactions reported with traditional medicines: analysis of data for United Nations Asia region from WHO VigiBase.

Background: Data on traditional medicine-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is very scarce. The current secondary analysis based on the WHO database (VigiBase) of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) focuses on the suspected cutaneous ADRs linked to traditional medicines (TMs). Methods: All the ICSRs reported between 1st January 2016 and 30th June 2021 from the UN Asia region in VigiBase where at least one TM was suspected to cause cutaneous ADRs were included in the study. Data regarding demographic details, suspected drug, adverse reaction as per MedDRA term, the seriousness of the reaction, de-challenge, re-challenge, and clinical outcome for suspected cutaneous ADRs associated with TM were obtained from VigiBase and analyzed for frequency of reported events and suspected medicines. Findings: Total 3,523 ICSRs with 5,761 ADRs related to "skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders" were included in the analysis. Amongst these, 6.8% of ICSRs were reported as serious. Pruritus (29.6%), rash (20.3%), urticaria (18.9%), and hyperhidrosis (3.3%) were commonly reported ADRs. Artemisia argyi H.Lév. and Vaniot. (14.9%), Ginkgo biloba L. (5.1%), Vitis vinifera L. (4%), Vitex agnus-castus L. (3.8%), Silybum marianum (L.), Gaertn (3.5%), and Viscus album L. (2.7%) were some commonly suspected TMs for cutaneous ADRs. There were 46 cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis reported with TMs during the study period. Death was reported in 5 ICSRs. Interpretation: TMs are linked with various cutaneous ADRS ranging from pruritus to toxic epidermal necrolysis which may have serious consequences. TMs listed as suspected offending agents in this analysis, should be kept in mind while dealing with suspected cutaneous ADRs. Clinicians should be more vigilant in detecting and reporting events associated with TMs.

Exploring Adverse Events of Remdesivir in Covid-19 Patients: A Comprehensive Global Analysis

Background: The emergence of COVID-19, stemming from SARS-CoV-2, has triggered a global pandemic, urging rapid therapeutic interventions. Remdesivir, a nucleotide analog prodrug, garnered attention for its potential against COVID-19 due to in vitro efficacy against coronaviruses. This study reviews Remdesivir’s adverse effects in COVID-19 patients. Methodology: While Remdesivir shows promise, recent studies raise efficacy concerns. Adverse drug event (ADE) documentation is vital due to limited pre-pandemic ADE data. WHO VigiBase® analysis (2015-2020) and COVID-19 ADE studies were undertaken, focusing on age, severity, region, and organ impact. 1086 ADEs emerged from 439 case reports by July 19, 2020, in VigiBase®, reducing to 1004 after duplicates were removed. ADEs primarily related to COVID-19 patients (92.5%), notably from the Americas (67.7%). Mainly in males above 45, ADEs were serious (82.5%). Key ADEs encompassed elevated hepatic enzymes (32.1%), renal damage (14.4%), increased creatinine levels (11.2%), and respiratory failure (6.4%). Conclusion: Liver and kidney function deterioration emerged as frequent ADEs, underscoring the need for vigilance during Remdesivir treatment. These findings align with regulatory documents. In sum, COVID-19 has prompted swift therapeutic responses, with Remdesivir being explored as a potential treatment. This study sheds light on associated ADEs, highlighting the importance of monitoring and informed decision-making

Increased risk of severe cutaneous adverse reactions when cladribine is used together with other medications with a propensity for skin reactions

Cladribine is a purine analog used in first-line treatment of hairy cell leukemia and in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic anemia. Although cladribine is typically associated with mild, self-limited skin reactions, there is increasing evidence that cladribine may increase the risk of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) when combined with drugs classically associated with SCAR (e.g. allopurinol) beyond what would be expected for either drug alone, possibly due to cladribine-induced lymphopenia. We analyzed all SCAR cases reported for cladribine in Janssen’s Global Safety Database and found that 26/35 (74.3%) reported concomitant drugs known to be associated with SCAR, most commonly sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) and allopurinol. In addition, a review of the WHO VigiBase showed that several drugs, including penicillins, SMX/TMP, and allopurinol had a statistically significant contribution to cladribine-associated SCAR. These results lend further support that cladribine may increase the propensity of these drugs to cause SCARs.

Ocular surface disorders associated with the use of dupilumab based on WHO VigiBase

Dupilumab is a dual inhibitor of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 and is mainly used to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Post-marketing safety data related to dupilumab have been accumulated, and it has been found that ocular surface diseases are closely associated with dupilumab treatment. The aim of this study was to detect dupilumab-related signals and to determine the safety characteristics of dupilumab with respect to eye disorders using real-world big data. Data on dupilumab use until December 29, 2019 were collected. The data were mined by calculating three indices: proportional reporting ratios, reporting odds ratios, and information components. The detected signals were classified using the primary system organ class in MedDRA terminology. Among 21,161,249 reports for all drugs, 20,548 reports were recorded for dupilumab. A total of 246 signals in the preferred terms were detected for dupilumab. Among the 246 positive signals obtained, 61 signals were related to eye disorders, which accounted for the largest percentage (24.8%), and 38 signals were anatomically related to the ocular surface. Dupilumab may cause extensive eye disorders; however, the underlying mechanisms and risk factors remain unclear. Our findings may facilitate broad safety screening of dupilumab-related eye disorders using real-world big data.

Research on Beers Criteria and STOPP/START Criteria based on the FDA FAERS database.

Inappropriate medication criteria for the elderly have played an important role in ensuring the safety of medications for the elderly. Too few drugs included in the criteria cannot guarantee the safety of medication for the elderly. Too many drugs included in the criteria will result in less selective medication for the elderly. This paper uses real-world data to evaluate the relationship between antihypertensive drugs and falls, so as to provide references for experts and scholars to revise the criteria of potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly and clinical safe medication. We use the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FDA FAERS) to evaluate the association between specific antihypertensive drugs in six categories (alpha-1 receptor blockers (α-1 blockers), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-receptor blockers (β-blockers), and diuretics) and falls by data mining algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and the empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) and compared with the relevant drugs included in the Beers Criteria and STOPP/START Criteria. There are a total of 5,157,172 co-occurrences found in 973,447 reports aged 65years or older from 2016 to 2019 in the FDA FAERS database, and the number of co-occurrences of falls is 5917 for the six categories of 51 antihypertensive drugs. Four kinds of mining methods overlap detection of 12 kinds of positive signal drugs, none of which are not included in the Beers Criteria and 7 drugs are included in the STOPP/START Criteria; 1-3 kinds of mining methods overlap detection of positive signal drugs, a total of 12 kinds, and one drug is included in the Beers Criteria and 5 drugs are included in the STOPP/START Criteria; 22 drugs have fall adverse events, but no positive signal is detected, and 13 drugs are included in STOPP/START Criteria; and 5 drugs have no fall adverse events and 3 drugs are included in the STOPP/START Criteria. The FAERS database was used to confirm the potential connection between some antihypertensive drugs and fall adverse events through data mining algorithms. The Beers Criteria did not clearly indicate the antihypertensive drugs that caused falls, and the antihypertensive drugs included in the STOPP/START Criteria were too extensive and did not include β-blockers and diuretics. It is recommended that experts and scholars use real-world data (such as FAERS, EudraVigilance, WHO VigiBase, and so on) to further explore the relationship between specific antihypertensive drugs and falls in the elderly, so as to revise and improve the criteria for inappropriate medications for the elderly.

Higher Rates of COVID-19 but Less Severe Infections Reported for Patients on Il-4/Il-13 Blocker: A Big Data Analysis of the WHO Vigibase

Background: Dupilumab (Dupixent®) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling used for the treatment of allergic diseases. Whilst biological therapy is generally associated with an increased risk of infectious disease, prior studies have suggested Dupilumab may be protective. Objective: We investigated the link between Dupilumab therapy and SARS-CoV-2 infection.Methods: We carryied out a comprehensive data-mining and disproportionality analysis of the WHO global pharmacovigilance database. One asymptomatic COVID-19 case, 106 cases of symptomatic COVID-19, and 2 cases of severe COVID-19 pneumonia were found. Results: Dupilumab treated patients were at higher risk of COVID-19 (with an IC0.25 of 3.05), even though infections were less severe (IC0.25 of -1.71). The risk of developing COVID-19 was significant both among males and females (with an IC0.25 of 0.24 and 0.58, respectively). The risk of developing COVID-19 was significant in the age-group of 45-64 years (with an IC0.25 of 0.17). Limitations: Limitations include: the heterogeneous nature of the database sources. Furthermore, a direct causal relationship cannot be inferred from the current investigation.Conclusion: Dupilumab use was found to reduce COVID-19 related severity. Further studies are needed to better understand the immunological mechanisms and clinical implications of these findings.

Five Years of Sacubitril/Valsartan-a Safety Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials and Real-World Pharmacovigilance.

In PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan showed a significant reduction in mortality and hospitalization for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Despite proven efficacy, sacubitril/valsartan has moderate uptake in clinical practice. This study explores the safety profile of sacubitril/valsartan by comparing adverse events in RCT and real-world use. We studied hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema associated with sacubitril/valsartan in RCTs and pharmacovigilance databases. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed with six RCTs investigating sacubitril/valsartan vs. control/comparators in heart failure patients. WHO's VigiBase, FAERS, and EMA's EudraVigilance were mined to obtain spontaneously reported real-world adverse events. Disproportionality analysis was performed with the FDA's OpenVigil 2.0. Six RCTs enrolled 15,538 patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fractions. There was no statistical difference for the composite of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema between sacubitril/valsartan and its comparators viz. ACEi or ARBs (OR 1.23, CI 0.98-1.56; p = 0.08). A total of 103,038 adverse events were registered in the spontaneous reporting systems. Hypotension was the most reported adverse event. Proportions of composite adverse events were 20% in VigiBase, 17% in FAERS, and 39% with EudraVigilance. Disproportionality analysis showed a lower risk of adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan than other guideline-directed heart failure medications used in clinical practice. With increased uptake of sacubitril/valsartan, risks of hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, and angioedema appear low and acceptable in RCTs and global clinical practice.

Performance of preclinical models in predicting drug-induced liver injury in humans: a systematic review

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) causes one in three market withdrawals due to adverse drug reactions, causing preventable human suffering and massive financial loss. We applied evidence-based methods to investigate the role of preclinical studies in predicting human DILI using two anti-diabetic drugs from the same class, but with different toxicological profiles: troglitazone (withdrawn from US market due to DILI) and rosiglitazone (remains on US market). Evidence Stream 1: A systematic literature review of in vivo studies on rosiglitazone or troglitazone was conducted (PROSPERO registration CRD42018112353). Evidence Stream 2: in vitro data on troglitazone and rosiglitazone were retrieved from the US EPA ToxCast database. Evidence Stream 3: troglitazone- and rosiglitazone-related DILI cases were retrieved from WHO Vigibase. All three evidence stream analyses were conducted according to evidence-based methodologies and performed according to pre-registered protocols. Evidence Stream 1: 9288 references were identified, with 42 studies included in analysis. No reported biomarker for either drug indicated a strong hazard signal in either preclinical animal or human studies. All included studies had substantial limitations, resulting in “low” or “very low” certainty in findings. Evidence Stream 2: Troglitazone was active in twice as many in vitro assays (129) as rosiglitazone (60), indicating a strong signal for more off-target effects. Evidence Stream 3: We observed a fivefold difference in both all adverse events and liver-related adverse events reported, and an eightfold difference in fatalities for troglitazone, compared to rosiglitazone. In summary, published animal and human trials failed to predict troglitazone’s potential to cause severe liver injury in a wider patient population, while in vitro data showed marked differences in the two drugs’ off-target activities, offering a new paradigm for reducing drug attrition in late development and in the market. This investigation concludes that death and disability due to adverse drug reactions may be prevented if mechanistic information is deployed at early stages of drug development by pharmaceutical companies and is considered by regulators as a part of regulatory submissions.

Rapid review of suspected adverse drug events due to remdesivir in the WHO database; findings and implications

ABSTRACT Objectives: Remdesivir has shown promise in the management of patients with COVID-19 although recent studies have shown concerns with its effectiveness in practice. Despite this there is a need to document potential adverse drug events (ADEs) to guide future decisions as limited ADE data available before the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Interrogation of WHO VigiBase® from 2015 to 2020 coupled with published studies of ADEs in COVID-19 patients. The main outcome measures are the extent of ADEs broken down by factors including age, seriousness, region and organ. Results: A total 1086 ADEs were reported from the 439 individual case reports up to July 19, 2020, in the VigiBase®, reduced to 1004 once duplicates were excluded. Almost all ADEs concerned COVID-19 patients (92.5%), with an appreciable number from the Americas (67.7%). The majority of ADEs were from males > 45 years and were serious (82.5%). An increase in hepatic enzymes (32.1%), renal injury (14.4%), rise in creatinine levels (11.2%), and respiratory failure (6.4%) were the most frequently reported ADEs. Conclusions: Deterioration of liver and kidney function are frequently observed ADEs with remdesivir; consequently, patients should be monitored for these ADEs. The findings are in line with ADEs included in regulatory authority documents.

Safety of direct oral anticoagulant exposure during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists in many indications for anticoagulation. Prescribed to millions of patients, including women of reproductive age, exposure to DOACs in early pregnancy is not uncommon, but data on the embryotoxic risks are scarce. We aimed to assess the risk of DOAC embryotoxicity in a large sample of reported cases. In this retrospective cohort study, we collected individual case reports of DOAC exposure in pregnancy from gynaecologists, haematologists, and vascular specialists starting from May, 2015. We obtained exports in April and October, 2017, August, 2018, and December, 2019, from the pharmacovigilance databases of the DOAC manufacturers, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the German drug authority, and searched the homepage of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for pregnancy exposure reports. Data from the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) registry were obtained in August, 2018, and on July 21, 2020; data from the Teratology Information Service in Ulm, Germany, were received July 22, 2020. We also ran a systematic literature search on July 22, 2020, for cases of DOAC exposure. These data were compiled with those from our 2016 risk assessment and duplicate reports were excluded. Fetal or neonatal abnormalities were classified as a major birth defect according to the European Concerted Action on Congenital Anomalies and Twins (EUROCAT) classification and adjudicated into four categories: relation to DOAC exposure likely, possible, unlikely, or unrelated. We identified 1193 reports of DOAC exposure during pregnancy: 49 from physicians, 48 from the ISTH registry, 29 from the Teratology Information Service, 62 from the German drug authority, 536 from Bayer (extracted from the Bayer pharmacovigilance system, the WHO VigiBase, and from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System), 87 from Boehringer Ingelheim, 16 from Daiichi Sankyo, 98 from the literature search, two from the FDA homepage search, ten from the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Review, and 256 from the EMA reports. After excluding potential duplicates, we identified 614 unique cases of DOAC exposure in pregnancy occurring between Feb 1, 2007, and July 9, 2020, that consisted of rivaroxaban in 505 (82%) pregnancies, dabigatran in 36 (6%), apixaban in 50 (8%), and edoxaban in 23 (4%). The median duration of DOAC exposure was 5·3 weeks (IQR 4·0-7·0) into pregnancy. Information on pregnancy outcome was available in 336 (55%) of 614 pregnancies: 188 (56%) livebirths, 74 (22%) miscarriages, and 74 (22%) elective pregnancy terminations. 21 (6%; 95% CI 4-9) of 336 showed fetal abnormalities, of which 12 (4%; 2-6) were adjudicated as major birth defects potentially related to DOAC exposure. Although reports of pregnancy outcomes after DOAC exposure are missing important details and predominantly describe rivaroxaban exposures, the available data do not suggest that DOAC exposure in pregnancy carries a high risk of embryopathy. The 2016 ISTH guidance against elective pregnancy termination for fear of DOAC embryotoxicity and the recommendation in favour of close pregnancy surveillance is still valid. Pregnancy outcome data are inconsistently captured in pharmacovigilance databases, indicating a strong need for a more robust system of reporting. None.

Thromboembolic safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib: An observational analysis of the WHO VigiBase

Thromboembolic safety of tofacitinib and baricitinib: An observational analysis of the WHO VigiBase

Lessons to be Learnt from Real-World Studies on Immune-Related Adverse Events with Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Clinical Perspective from Pharmacovigilance.

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) caused a paradigm shift both in drug development and clinical practice; however, by virtue of their mechanism of action, the excessively activated immune system results in a multitude of off-target toxicities, the so-called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), requiring new skills for timely diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach to successfully manage the patients. In the recent past, a plethora of large-scale pharmacovigilance analyses have characterized various irAEs in terms of spectrum and clinical features in the real world. This review aims to summarize and critically appraise the current landscape of pharmacovigilance studies, thus deriving take-home messages for oncologists. A brief primer to study design, conduction, and data interpretation is also offered. As of February 2020, 30 real-world postmarketing studies have characterized multiple irAEs through international spontaneous reporting systems, namely WHO Vigibase and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. The majority of studies investigated a single irAE and provided new epidemiological evidence about class-specific patterns of irAEs (i.e. anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 [CTLA-4] versus anti-programmed cell death 1 [PD-1] receptor, and its ligand [PD-L1]), kinetics of appearance, co-occurrences (overlap) among irAEs, and fatality rate. Oncologists should be aware of both strengths and limitations of these pharmacovigilance analyses, especially in terms of data interpretation. Optimal management (including rechallenge), predictivity of irAEs (as potential biomarkers of effectiveness), and comparative safety of ICIs (also in terms of combination regimens) represent key research priorities for next-generation real-world studies.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s11523-020-00738-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Thromboembolic Safety Reporting of Tofacitinib and Baricitinib: An Analysis of the WHO VigiBase.

The Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib are new treatments for rheumatic diseases. Recent concerns regarding the risk of thrombosis have led to warnings by competent authorities. We therefore aimed to examine the thromboembolic safety signal for tofacitinib and baricitinib. Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) for tofacitinib and baricitinib were retrieved from the World Health Organization global database VigiBase in April 2019. Primary outcomes were deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thrombosis (PT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Patient demographics were summarized and then stratified by outcome. Disproportionality analyses were conducted by estimating the reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) worldwide, and stratified by either Europe or the US. In both the tofacitinib (n = 40,017) and baricitinib (n = 2138) ICSRs, patients with reported DVT or PT/PE were older and had higher reporting of prothrombotic medications or antithrombotic treatments, suggesting a pre-existing thromboembolic risk/event. In Europe, tofacitinib was associated with increased reporting for DVT (ROR 2.37, 95% CI 1.23-4.56) and PT/PE (ROR 2.38. 95% CI 1.45-3.89). For baricitinib, a threefold increased reporting odds was observed for DVT (ROR 3.47, 95% CI 2.18-5.52) and PT/PE (ROR 3.44, 95% CI 2.43-4.88) in Europe. In the US, tofacitinib was only associated with an elevated ROR of PT (ROR 2.05, 95% CI 1.45-2.90) and no baricitinib ICSRs were reported. This study supports the current recommendation for cautious use of tofacitinib in patients with high thromboembolic risk. Moreover, with a similar patient profile and elevated reporting for baricitinib, a potential class effect of JAK inhibitors cannot be ruled out.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: WHO VigiBase Report Analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy but may also trigger autoimmune adverse drug reactions (ADRs) referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although endocrinopathies are among the most common form of irAEs, primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) is infrequent and has only been published in case reports. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize the main features of PAI-irAE. Suspected PAI-irAE cases were identified using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database of individual case safety reports. From September 2, 2008, through October 5, 2018, a total of 50,108 ICI-associated ADRs were reported. Since 2008, there were 451 cases of PAI-irAE identified of which 45 were "definite PAI" and 406 "possible PAI." Patients were mainly male (58.1%) with a median age of 66 years (range, 30-95). Indications of ICI were predominantly for melanoma (41.2%) and lung cancer (28.6%). The majority of patients were treated with ICI monotherapy (nivolumab: 44.3%, pembrolizumab: 11.7%, ipilimumab: 23.6%), and 17.9% were treated with ICI combination therapy. These events occurred with a median time to onset of 120 days (range, 6-576). ICI-associated PAI was associated with significant morbidity (≥90% severe) and mortality (7.3%). Fatality rates were similar in the subgroups of combination therapy versus monotherapy. There were no relevant differences in clinical or demographical characteristics and outcomes between "definite" versus "possible" PAI group. Our study represents the largest clinical description and characterization of PAI-irAE. Although ICI-associated PAI is a rare adverse event, early recognition is important to implement corticosteroid treatment. Further studies are required to elucidate risk factors and reversibility of this rare but severe irAE. Clinical trial identification number. NCT03492242 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) is a rare adverse event that is important to recognize because it may be severe and life-threatening, requiring emergent and often lifelong hormonal replacement therapy. Awareness regarding this ICI-related endocrinopathy is strongly encouraged among clinicians in addition to patient education about common PAI symptoms that should prompt urgent medical evaluation. In clinical practice, close monitoring and investigation for PAI is crucial to allow for early management and to further define the pathophysiology and prognosis of ICI-PAI. Corticotrophin (adrenocorticotrophic hormone) circulating level evaluation may be often lacking but should be considered as part of the diagnostic workup to differentiate PAI from secondary (central) adrenal insufficiency.

Safety Profiles and Pharmacovigilance Considerations for Recently Patented Anticancer Drugs: Cutaneous Melanoma.

Malignant melanoma is a skin cancer responsible for 90% of cutaneous cancer- related deaths. In recent years, breakthroughs in treatment strategy have revolutionized the prognosis in both early and advanced melanoma patients. In particular, treatment with monoclonal antibodies targeting co-inhibitory checkpoints or specific molecular pathways leads to a new era of promising options, by prolonging the survival time of these patients. Moreover, unlike the chemotherapy that was used until some time ago, these new drugs have a good and more manageable toxicity profile. However, because of the recent introduction in clinical practice of the new agents, there is a learning curve among physicians regarding early recognition and management of the associated side effects. The analysis of the toxicity profiles of the different agents currently studied for the treatment of early and advanced melanoma, and the description of several relevant recent patents in this field, are the aims of this review. This is a systematically conducted review based on current clinical guidelines and on international Pharmacovigilance databases (AERS-Eudravigilance - WHO Vigibase). Our systematic analysis outlines a comprehensive overview of the pharmacology, clinical application and the safety of recent anticancer drugs to treat melanoma, which can be an essential instrument for health professionals and researchers. The new oncological therapies against melanoma are based on increasingly specific biological and immunological targets. For this reason, the potential toxicities that are expected from patients would be less relevant than the systemic "classical" chemotherapy. However, the new therapies are not free from the risk of causing adverse reactions, some of which must be managed promptly and appropriately; moreover, the multiplicity of the metabolic pathways exposes the new target therapies to relevant potential interactions. This review can help to understand how important it is not to underestimate potential adverse drug reactions related to new targeted therapies.