WHO Pharmacovigilance Database Research Articles

Characteristics and outcomes of patients developing pulmonary hypertension associated with proteasome inhibitors.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has been described in patients treated with proteasome inhibitors (PI). To evaluate the association between PI and PAH. Characteristics of incident PAH cases previously treated with Carfilzomib or Bortezomib were analyzed from the French PH Registry and the VIGIAPATH program from 2004 to 2023, concurrently with a pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis using the WHO's global database, and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eleven incident cases of PI associated PAH were identified (6 with Carfilzomib and 5 with Bortezomib) with a female: male ratio of 2.7:1, a median age of 61 years, and a median delay between PI first exposure and PAH of 6 months. Four patients died (2 from right heart failure, 1 from respiratory distress, and 1 from an unknown cause). At diagnosis, 6 were in NYHA-Fc III/IV with severe hemodynamic impairment (median mean pulmonary artery pressure of 39 mmHg, cardiac index 2.45 L/min·m-2, and pulmonary vascular resistance of 7.2 WU). In the WHO pharmacovigilance database, 166 cases of PH associated with PI were reported since 2013 with significant statistics of disproportionate reporting (SDR) for Carfilzomib, regardless of the definition of cases or control group. However, SDR for Bortezomib was inconsistent. The systematic review identified 17 clinical trials, and Carfilzomib was associated with a significantly higher risk of dyspnea, severe dyspnea and PH compared to Bortezomib. PI may induce PAH in patients undergoing treatment, with Carfilzomib emitting a stronger signal than Bortezomib, and these patients should be monitored closely.

Drugs associated with epidermal necrolysis in children: A World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database analysis.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare life-threatening mucocutaneous reactions most often induced by drugs. To date, no large pharmacovigilance study has been conducted in the paediatric population. To describe the spectrum of drugs associated with SJS-TEN in children through the analysis of cases reported in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase). Disproportionality study using data from VigiBase. All paediatric (age under 18 years) cases reported between January 1, 1967, and July 6, 2022, were included. For each molecule, a case-non-case study was performed to assess a potential pharmacovigilance signal by computing the lower end of the 95% credibility interval for the information component (IC025). We performed sensitivity analyses, (i) taking into account only cases reported by physicians and (ii) taking into account only cases reported in the last 10 years. Among 31,376,783 adverse drug reactions reported in VigiBase, 2,248,727 were paediatric cases and 7342 were encoded as paediatric SJS-TEN. Significant statistical pharmacovigilance signals were observed for 165 drugs. The two most represented drug classes were antiepileptics and anti-infectious drugs. The five drugs with the highest IC025 were lamotrigine (IC025 4.99), carbamazepine (IC025 4.88), phenobarbital (IC025 4.67), phenytoin (IC025 4.52) and nimesulide (IC025 4.23). Acetaminophen was significantly associated with paediatric SJS-TEN (IC025 2.85) and we also described various new suspected drugs. Vaccines had no significant pharmacovigilance signal. These results were confirmed with the sensitivity analyses. This study updates the spectrum of drugs potentially associated with paediatric SJS-TEN.

Association between direct acting agents used for chronic hepatitis C virus infection and the occurrence of acute leukaemia – A disproportionality analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMSA recent single-center study reported a significant increase in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cases, including mixed-phenotype acute leukaemia (MPAL), after exposure to direct acting agents (DAA). We investigated whether DAA use increased the risk of AML in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODSWe conducted a disproportionality analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance database Vigibase up to 2020. Queries focused on all DAAs, subclasses, combinations or each DAA separately as well as interferon and ribavirin as negative controls. The primary outcome was AML. Secondary outcomes were AML without MPAL, MPAL, acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) and acute leukemia (AL, high-level term encompassing AML, ALL, MPAL and unspecified acute leukemia [UAL]). The information component (IC0.25) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR0.25) were computed to assess a potential pharmacovigilance signal. RESULTSWe identified 49 notifications reporting any AL occurrence after anti-HCV treatments from June 1997 to December 2020: 23 (47%) involved a DAA, 24 (49%) interferon and 12 (24%) ribavirin. The DAAs sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were suspected in 74% (n = 17) and 39% (n = 9) of cases. The events reported were AML (n = 22), ALL (n = 11), AML and ALL (n = 1) and UAL (n = 15) and no MPAL. DAA, interferon or ribavirin were not significantly associated with AML, ALL or AL. CONCLUSIONThis study did not find any association between DAA exposure and the occurrence of AML. Nevertheless, vigilance should remain, particularly for MPAL, which may not have been well captured in our study because of its rareness and high risk of misclassification.

Safety of Biological Therapies for Severe Asthma: An Analysis of Suspected Adverse Reactions Reported in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.

The management of uncontrolled severe asthma has greatly improved since the advent of novel biologic therapies. Up to August 2022, five biologics have been approved for the type 2 asthma phenotype: anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab), and anti-IL4 (dupilumab) monoclonal antibodies. These drugs are usually well tolerated, although long-term safety information is limited, and some adverse events have not yet been fully characterized. Spontaneous reporting systems represent the cornerstone for the detection of potential signals and evaluation of the real-world safety of all marketed drugs. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of safety data of biologics for severe asthma using VigiBase, the World Health Organization global pharmacovigilance database. We selected all de-duplicated individual case safety reports (ICSRs) attributed to five approved biologics for severe asthma in VigiBase, up to 31st August 2022 (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab and dupilumab). Descriptive frequency analyses of ICSRs were carried out both as a whole class and as individual products. Reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the measure of disproportionality for suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with the study drugs compared with either all other suspected drugs (Reference Group 1, RG1) or inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β-agonists (ICSs/LABAs) (Reference Group 2, RG2) or with oral corticosteroids (OCSs) (Reference Group 3, RG3). Overall, 31,724,381 ICSRs were identified in VigiBase and 167,282 (0.5%) were related to study drugs; the remaining reports were considered as RG1. Stratifying all biologic-related ICSRs by therapeutic indication, around 29.4% (n = 48,440) concerned asthma use; omalizumab was mainly indicated as the suspected drug (n = 20,501), followed by dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and reslizumab. Most asthma ICSRs concerned adults (57%) and women (64.1%). Asthma biologics showed a higher frequency of serious suspected ADR reporting than RG1 (41.3% vs 32.3%). The most reported suspected ADRs included asthma, dyspnea, product use issue, drug ineffective, cough, headache, fatigue and wheezing. Asthma biologics were disproportionally associated with several unknown or less documented adverse events, such as malignancies, pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with omalizumab; alopecia and lichen planus with dupilumab; alopecia and herpes infections with mepolizumab; alopecia, herpes zoster and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis related to benralizumab; and alopecia with reslizumab. The most frequently reported suspected ADRs of asthma biologics in VigiBase confirmed the presence of well-known adverse effects such as general disorders, injection-site reactions, nasopharyngitis, headache and hypersensitivity, while some others (e.g. asthma reactivation or therapeutic failure) could be ascribed to the indication of use. Moreover, the analysis of signals of disproportionate reporting suggests the presence of malignancies, effects on the cardiovascular system, alopecia and autoimmune conditions, requiring further assessment and investigation.

Impact of the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 campaign on disproportionality indicator from the WHO pharmacovigilance database: A competition bias study from case/non-case analysis

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination campaign has resulted in numerous pharmacovigilance's safety reports which were recorded in the World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) and represent in July 2022 more than 10% of cases recorded. The information component (IC) is a statistical disproportionality measure based on the observed and expected numbers of case reports. A positive value of the lower endpoint of a 95% credibility interval for the information component (IC0.25) suggests a possible causal relationship between the drug and the adverse reaction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the wave of COVID-19 vaccines safety declarations on IC0.25 from Vigilyze and thus illustrate with a concrete example the competition bias. We arbitrarily selected 21 adverse drug reactions using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms (PTs), divided in two types: PTs known to be related to COVID-19 vaccines ("expected") and others (type "unexpected"). Data were extracted from VigiLyze. We created two groups: V+ (the full database, including COVID-19 vaccines reports) and V- (the same extraction without COVID-19 vaccine reports). IC0.25 was recomputed for the group V- and we compared the positive signal evolution in the two settings of selection (V+ and V- groups). The number of positive potential signals was significantly different in the groups V+ and V- for IC0.25. We observed that most of the "unexpected" PTs lost potential signal after the withdrawal of COVID-19 reports. On the contrary, the majority of 'expected' PTs had potential new signals after the withdrawal of COVID-19 reports. This study is one of the first to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 vaccines reporting on Automated Signal Detection of Pharmacovigilance. In this study, we observed that a wave of pharmacovigilance reporting can affect disproportionality estimators such as IC0.25 and then have an impact on automated signal detection; some signals disappear (almost with all PTs related to COVID-19 vaccines) and others appear (mostly with PTs not related to COVID-19 vaccines), illustrating the competition bias. We show that a health crisis involving a change in drug use can affect adverse drug reactions reporting and pharmacovigilance databases, leading to competition bias and a change in the disproportionality analyses. For health professionals who use quantitative disproportionality analysis, it is important not only to use the crude values of indicators but also the kind of PTs and the evolution of the signal over time (take into account major events such as crises).

Arterial hypertension associated with PARPi: A meta-analysis of 41 placebo randomized controlled trials combined with a World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance study.

Arterial hypertension has been recently reported from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi). In a context of increasing use of PARPi, it is crucial to properly assess risk and incidence of this adverse event for clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov up to January 4, 2023 with an ongoing surveillance up to June 7, 2023. RCTs comparing PARPi to placebo in adult patients with solid tumors were included if hypertension was reported. The primary outcome was the summary risk ratio (RR, with 95% CIs) of any hypertension of PARPi class in placebo RCTs. Secondary outcomes were the summary risk and incidence of hypertension of each individual PARPi. To provide clinical features of PARPi-associated hypertension, we independently queried the WHO's pharmacovigilance database, up to September 1, 2022. In total, 41 placebo RCTs (n = 15 264 adult patients) were included. PARPi class was not associated with an increased risk of hypertension compared with placebo. In individual analyses, the risk of hypertension was lower with olaparib than placebo (RR 0.77 [95% CI: 0.68-0.86], P < 0.01; I2 = 19%, χ2 P = 0.26). Niraparib monotherapy increased the risk of any (RR 2.84 [95% CI: 1.76-4.57], P < 0.01; I2 = 66%, χ2 P = 0.01) hypertension with a summary incidence of 19.87% (95% CI: 15.23-25.50). In real-life setting, niraparib-associated hypertension occurs within 20 days and was serious in 66%. Co-prescription of at least one antihypertensive or therapy-induced hypertension was reported in 20.5% or 14.4% of cases, respectively. In a context of extensive assessment of niraparib in combination, these data reinforce the need of a close monitoring of this adverse event to preserve its clinical benefit on patients' survival.

Drug-induced depressive symptoms: An update through the WHO pharmacovigilance database

BackgroundDepression is a highly incident condition and some drugs have been described as inducing or worsening depression. However, literature on this topic is rare and possibly outdated. MethodsWe performed disproportionality analyses using VigiBase®, the largest pharmacovigilance database worldwide to identify drugs associated with depression. Then we excluded drugs already known as depressogenic according to American Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). We then reviewed drug mechanism of action, scientific literature and European SPC for each drug identified to assess a level of plausibility. We measured Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) statistically significant and superior to 1, suggesting a significant association between a drug and the reporting of depressive symptoms. ResultsOut of the 5237 drugs extracted on VigiBase®, we have retained 89 new drugs associated with depression. More than half of drugs of interest are from nervous system. Opicapone (ROR: 20.66 95 %CI: 15.62–27.33), and gadoversetamide (ROR 18.62, 95 %CI 9.63–35.95) were the drugs with the highest ROR. Among the 89 drugs, 38 were considered already described such as suvorexant or ivacaftor, 20 likely associated such as anti-migraines drugs or new antipsychotic drugs and 31 potentially associated. LimitationsPharmacovigilance studies have many inherent limitations, such as under-reporting bias, notoriety effect and protopathic bias. These results are not intended to establish a causal link, only a statistical association. ConclusionWe found a strong statistical signal and pharmacological plausibility for 58 new depressogenic drugs. This update list of suspected drugs may prove useful for doctors faced with potential cases of drug-induced depression or to stay aware in case. Other studies are needed to confirm the list.

Identification of anticancer drugs associated with heart failure: A WHO pharmacovigilance database analysis

Identification of anticancer drugs associated with heart failure: A WHO pharmacovigilance database analysis

Real World Experience of Ibrutinib in an Ethnically Diverse Canadian Community Hospital

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is an indolent lymphoproliferative disorder commonly managed in community centers. Ibrutinib revolutionized the management of patients with CLL (2). Ibrutinib was initially considered an easy to administer, well tolerated oral medication with excellent efficacy. It was the first clinically available Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitor widely used to treat CLL (3). Recently there have been concerns about cardiovascular toxicities leading to the use of alternative BTK inhibitors (5). Where alternative BTK inhibitors are available these toxicity concerns have led to a decline in the use of ibrutinib to treat CLL. The population served is ethnically diverse consisting of 52% South East Asian with a significant population of African origin. We suspected that the concerns regarding Ibrutinib toxicity were not seen in our patient population prompting a retrospective review of our experience. Ibrutinib therapy A total of 106 CLL patients treated with Ibrutinib were identified from which data was extracted. The mean age was 63.4 years. Patients with CLL treated with Ibrutinib from 2014 to 2021 were identified using OPIS and Meditech and data was extracted manually. Table 1 60% of patient received their initial drug funding through compassionate access, 2% via private insurance and the remaining 38% through the provincial health system. The majority of patients who received funding through compassionate access were eventually transitioned to the provincial health system for drug funding. Toxicity and outcomes Table 2 81% of treated patients never required a dose adjustment of Ibrutinib. The majority of dose reductions were of a temporary nature. We were unable to obtain accurate response data in our retrospective review. 82 of the 106 patients continue on ibrutinib therapy. It is presumed that these patients continue to benefit from therapy without disease progression although response data details were poorly recorded in the medical record. Conclusions There is a lack of data of community real world experience with Ibrutinib particularly in the Canadian setting. Community centers generally are lacking in information technology required to do retrospective audits. Our data shows that ibrutinib therapy for CLL is a reasonable and effective option with good tolerability in a patient population with high cardiovascular risk. The data is limited by the retrospective data collection. The efficacy of therapy is likely comparable to that of the published literature. These data suggest that the tolerability of Ibrutinib therapy seems better than that of the published literature (1) with a low incidence of atrial fibrillation, dose adjustments and low drug discontinuation rate. Of note Richter's transformation was also uncommon in our patient population. This is particularly of interest as our study did capture patients in the early days of ibrutinib therapy when there were concerns that Richter's transformation was more common than seen today. Many of the patients who were treated with ibrutinib would not have received the drug today because of cardiovascular concerns (4). At that time, it was the only available oral targeted agent for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Other agents such as Venetoclax, Acalabrutinib, Zanubrutinib and novel combinations were unavailable at that time or were not funded. These lack of options likely contribute to the persistence of Ibrutinib therapy in our patients. These data suggest that ibrutinib can be used in a high cardiovascular risk population with good efficacy and tolerability. 1.Alloucjery, M., Tomowiak, C., Lombard, T., &amp; et al. (2021). Safety Profile of Ibrutinib: An Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database. Front Pharmacology, 12:769315. 2.Byrd, J. C., Brown, J. R., O'Brien, S., &amp; et al. (2014). Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. NEJM, 371(3):213-223. 3.Byrd, J. C., Furman, R. R., &amp; Coutre, S. S. (2013). Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. NEJM, 369(1):32-42. 4.Lovell, A. R., Jammal, N., &amp; Bose, P. (2022). Selecting the optimal BTK inhibitor therapy in CLL: rationale and practical considerations. Therapueltic Advances in Hematology, 13:1177/20406207221116577. 5.Salem, J. E., Manouchehri, A., &amp; Bretagne, M. (2019). Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Am Coll Cardiol, 74:1667-1678.

The Neuropsychiatric Safety Profile of Lasmiditan: A Comparative Disproportionality Analysis with Triptans.

Migraine constitutes the world's second-leading cause of disability. Triptans, as serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, remain the first-line treatment, despite discouraged use in individuals at high cardiovascular risk. Lasmiditan, a selective lipophilic 5-HT1F agonist without vasoconstrictive effects, is an emerging option. We aimed to investigate the safety profile of lasmiditan in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) using a comparative disproportionality analysis with triptans. VigiBase® was queried for all reports involving lasmiditan and triptans. Disproportionality analyses relied on the calculation of the information component (IC), for which 95% confidence interval (CI) lower bound positivity was required for signal detection. We obtained 826 reports involving lasmiditan. Overall, 10 adverse drug reaction classes were disproportionately reported with triptans, while only neurological (IC 1.6; 95% CI 1.5-1.7) and psychiatric (IC 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.7) disorders were disproportionately reported with lasmiditan. Sedation, serotonin syndrome, euphoric mood, and autoscopy had the strongest signals. When compared with triptans, 19 out of 22 neuropsychiatric signals persisted. The results of our analysis provide a more precise semiology of the neuropsychiatric effects of lasmiditan, with symptoms such as autoscopy and panic attacks. The cardiovascular adverse drug reaction risk with triptans was confirmed. In contrast, caution is warranted with lasmiditan use in patients with neurological or psychiatric comorbidities or serotonin syndrome risk. Our study was hindered by pharmacovigilance flaws, and further studies should help in validating these results. Our findings suggest that lasmiditan is a safe alternative for migraine treatment, especially when the neuropsychiatric risk is outweighed by the cardiovascular burden.

Assessment of Reported Adverse Events After Interchanging Between TNF-α Inhibitor Biosimilars in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.

Observational studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients interchanging between tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor biosimilars withdraws from the new treatment because of adverse effects. We aim to analyze adverse events related to interchanging from tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor reference products to biosimilars and between biosimilars reported in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database. We extracted all cases reporting the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term "Product substitution issue (PT)" for TNF-α inhibitors. Then, we analyzed and categorized all adverse events reported in more than 1% of cases. We compared the adverse events reported according to reporter qualification, type of switch, and type of TNF-α inhibitor using Chi2 tests. We conducted a network analysis coupled with a clustering approach to identify syndromes of co-reported adverse events. In the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, 2543 cases and 6807 adverse events related to TNF-α inhibitor interchangeability have been reported up to October 2022. Injection-site reactions were the most reported adverse events with 940 cases (37.0%), followed by modifications in drug effect in 607 cases (23.9%). Musculoskeletal, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal disorders linked to the underlying disease were reported in 505 (20.0%), 145 (5.7%), and 207 (8.1%) cases, respectively. Adverse events non-related to the underlying disease were nonspecific (n = 458, 18.0%), neurologic (n = 224, 8.8%), respiratory (n = 132, 5.2%), and psychological disorders (n = 64, 2.5%). Injection-site reactions and infection-related symptoms (e.g., nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection) were more reported by non-healthcare professionals while adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., drug ineffective, arthralgia, psoriasis) were more reported by healthcare professionals. The proportions of injection-site reactions were higher when switching between biosimilars of the same reference product, but the proportions of adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., psoriasis, arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy) were more reported when switching from a reference product. The main differences in the proportions of reported cases between adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept were driven by symptoms related to the underlying targeted diseases, except for a higher reporting rate of injection-site pain with adalimumab. Adverse events evocative of hypersensitivity reactions were reported in 192 (7.6%) cases. Most of the network clusters concerned non-specific adverse events or were related to reduced clinical efficacy. This analysis highlights the burden of patient-reported adverse events when interchanging between TNF-α inhibitor biosimilars, notably injection-site reactions, non-specific adverse events, and symptoms related to reduced clinical efficacy. Our study also highlights differences in reporting patterns between patients and healthcare professionals and depending on the type of switch. The results are limited by missing data, the lack of precision of the coded Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms, and by the variability of reporting rate of adverse events. Thus, incidence rates of adverse events cannot be inferred from these results.

Rhabdomyolysis and statins: a pharmacovigilance comparative study between statins.

Rhabdomyolysis is a serious Adverse Drug Reaction of statins. There are few studies comparing the risk of rhabdomyolysis between the different statins. Using the WHO pharmacovigilance database, Vigibase®, we compared the risk of rhabdomyolysis reporting of seven statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, cerivastatin excluded). All reports of rhabdomyolysis in Vigibase® in adults with statins until 31/12/2022 were included. Results are expressed as Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR, 95% CI). Among 10 657 reports with rhabdomyolysis with statins, simvastatin was the highest risk statin in comparison with others: ROR=2.20 (2.11-2.29). The risk was higher in men, after 74 years and in case of drug interactions.

Rhabdomyolysis with Co-Administration of Statins and Antiplatelet Therapies-Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.

While statins and antiplatelet therapies are largely prescribed together worldwide, limited information is available on the safety of their association regarding rhabdomyolysis occurrence. We aimed to assess the reporting of rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with a combination of statin and antiplatelet therapy, compared to statin alone. We used the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) to compare the rhabdomyolysis reporting between statin (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin) plus antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor) groups versus statin alone groups, for each statin and antiplatelet therapy. Study setting was restricted to patients aged 45 or older, including reports up until 1st September, 2021. We computed reporting Odds-Ratio (ROR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) to quantify the disproportionality between groups, adjusted on age and sex. Among the 11,431,708 reports of adverse reactions, we extracted 9,489 cases of rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with statins, of whom 2,464 (26%) were also treated with antiplatelet therapy. The reporting of rhabdomyolysis was increased when ticagrelor was associated with atorvastatin (ROR 1.30 [1.02-1.65]) or rosuvastatin (ROR 1.90 [1.42-2.54]) compared to the respective statin alone but did not change when aspirin, clopidogrel or prasugrel were considered. Rhabdomyolysis reporting was increased when ticagrelor -but not other antiplatelet agents- was notified with the most prescribed statins in practice. This finding needs to be considered by physicians especially in high-risk patients.

Cardiovascular Toxicities Associated with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors: A Disproportionality Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase).

Recently, cases of cardiovascular toxicities, such as pericarditis, caused by anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors have been reported; however, whether these adverse events are common among all ALK inhibitors remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the cardiovascular toxicity profile of ALK inhibitors using an adverse event spontaneous report database. We analyzed data from VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual safety reports, from its inception in 1968 to December 2021. We calculated the reporting odds ratio to evaluate the association between ALK inhibitors (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) and 21 cardiovascular adverse events. Time to onset of pericarditis from ALK inhibitor administration was analyzed. Of the 27,994,584 reports, 19,911 involved treatment with ALK inhibitors. Among the 21 cardiovascular toxicities, only pericarditis signals were detected with all five ALK inhibitors (crizotinib [reporting odds ratios (ROR), 4.7; 95% CI 3.63-6.15], ceritinib [ROR, 12.9; 95% CI 9.37-17.79], alectinib [ROR, 4.8; 95% CI 3.15-7.42], brigatinib [ROR, 3.5; 95% CI 1.33-9.46], and lorlatinib [ROR, 6.4; 95% CI 3.60-11.22]). For torsade de pointes/QT prolongation, signals were detected with crizotinib (ROR, 5.0; 95% CI 3.72-6.77) and ceritinib (ROR, 4.2; 95% CI 2.17-8.05), whereas for hypertension, they were identified only with brigatinib (ROR, 3.9; 95% CI 2.88-5.20), and for heart failure, they were detected with alectinib (ROR, 2.2; 95% CI 1.60-2.90), crizotinib (ROR, 2.1; 95% CI 1.72-2.48), and lorlatinib (ROR, 2.0; 95% CI 1.27-3.23). Regarding time-to-onset analysis from drug administration to adverse event reporting, for pericarditis, it ranged from 52.5 days for alectinib to 166.5 days for crizotinib. Systematic evaluation of ALK inhibitor-associated adverse events revealed differences in the cardiotoxicity profiles among ALK inhibitors. Understanding the differences in the cardiovascular toxicity profile of each ALK inhibitor will contribute to safe drug therapy when switching between ALK inhibitors.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid®): French pharmacovigilance survey 2022

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid®) is currently one of the few therapeutic options for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) curative treatment in non-oxygen-requiring adult patients at-high risk of progressing to severe disease. This recently approved boosted antiviral therapy presents a significant risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI). As part of the enhanced surveillance program in France for COVID-19 drugs and vaccines, the French national pharmacovigilance database (BNPV [base nationale de pharmacovigilance]) was queried in order to better characterize the drug safety profile, with a special focus on DDI. The aim of the study was to describe the adverse drug reactions reported through the BNPV. All nirmatrelvir/ritonavir reports validated in the BNPV from the first authorization in France (January, 20th 2022) to December, 3rd 2022 (date of the query) were considered. An analysis of the scientific literature (PubMed®) and from the WHO pharmacovigilance database (Vigibase) was also performed. Over this period (11 months), 228 reports (40% of serious reports) were registered with a sex ratio of 1.9 female/1 male and a mean age of 66 years old. DDI reports account for more than 13% of reports (n=30) and were mainly related to immunosuppressive drugs overexposure (n=16). A total of 10/228 reports with fatal outcomes were reported in complex clinical settings. The main reported unexpected adverse drug reaction (ADRs) were high blood pressure (n=7), confusion (n=5), acute kidney injuries (AKI, n=7) and various skin reactions (n=22). Apart from situations of disease recurrence (not found in this analysis), data from Pubmed® and Vigibase also reported the above-mentioned events of interest. Overall, this analysis shows that nirmatrelvir/ritonavir safety profile was conform to current summary of product characteristics (SmPC). The main concern was the risk of DDI. Therefore, SmPC and expert recommendations should be systematically consulted before initiation of this antiviral, which is particularly indicated in polypharmacy patients. A case-by-case multidisciplinary approach including a clinical pharmacologist is required in these complex situations. Blood pressure elevation, confusion, cutaneous reactions and AKIs were the main unexpected ADRs of interest to follow, but need to be confirmed with a qualitative approach over time and new reports.

Drug-induced radiation recall reactions and non-anticancer drugs: A descriptive analysis from VigiBase®.

Radiation recall reactions are inflammatory reactions confined to previously irradiated tissues, often of drug-induced etiology, particularly with anticancer therapies. Other drugs, in particular COVID-19 vaccines, may also be involved. To describe radiation recall reactions under non-anticancer drugs more precisely, we extracted the cases of radiation recall reactions associated with non-anticancer drugs from WHO pharmacovigilance database VigiBase®. We performed two analyses from this extraction: a global analysis and an analysis focusing on vaccination-related issues. We extracted 120 cases corresponding to 269 drugs, of which 130 were non-anticancer (22 vaccines). Among the non-anticancer drugs, tozinameran was the most reported treatment (4.46% of cases), followed by levofloxacin (2.97%) and folinic acid (2.60%), dexamethasone (2.23), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and prednisone (1.86% each). Among vaccines, tozinameran (54.55% of cases) was the most reported, followed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (22.73%), HPV and inactivated influenza vaccine (9.09% each), and elasomeran (4.55%). Our study first describes the occurrence of radiation recall reactions during non-anticancer treatment. It also highlights a potential safety signal with COVID-19 vaccines.

Antipsychotic Abuse, Dependence, and Withdrawal in the Pediatric Population: A Real-World Disproportionality Analysis.

Antipsychotic drugs (APs) aim to treat schizophrenia, bipolar mania, and behavioral symptoms. In child psychiatry, despite limited evidence regarding their efficacy and safety, APs are increasingly subject to off-label use. Studies investigating addictology-related symptoms in young people being scarce, we aimed to characterize the different patterns of AP misuse and withdrawal in children and adolescents relying on the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®, Uppsala Monitoring Centre, Sweden). Using the standardized MedDRA Query 'drug abuse, dependence and withdrawal', disproportionality for each AP was assessed with the reporting odds ratio and the information component. A signal was detected when the lower end of the 95% confidence interval of the information component was positive. Results revealed mainly withdrawal symptoms in infants (under 2 years), intentional misuse in children (2 to 11 years), and abuse in adolescents (12 to 17 years). Olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, and quetiapine were disproportionately reported in all age groups, with quetiapine being subject to a specific abuse signal in adolescents. Thus, in adolescents, the evocation of possible recreational consumption may lead to addiction-appropriate care. Further, in young patients with a history of AP treatment, a careful anamnesis may allow one to identify misuse and its role in the case of new-onset symptoms.

Drug-associated acquired hemophilia A: an analysis based on 185 cases from the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune hemorrhagic disease occurring in several underlying conditions. Drug-associated AHA (D-AHA) is poorly addressed nowadays. This work aims to identify and characterize which drugs are associated with AHA using the WHO global database of reported potential effects of medicinal products (VigiBase). First, we realized a disproportionality analysis using the information component (IC) to identify D-AHA in VigiBase. IC compares observed- and expected-values in order to find associations between drugs and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) using disproportionate Bayesian reporting. IC025 is the lower end of a 95% credibility interval for the IC. Then, we collected cases of drugs significantly associated with AHA from July 2004 to November 2021. 14 drugs with IC025 > 0 were identified representing a total of 185 cases. D-AHA occurred more frequently in men (59%) than women (41%). The median (min-max) age at onset was 75 years (8-98). The median [Q1-Q3] time to onset of D-AHA from the start of the suspected drug was 30 days [9.5-73.75] and 10% of cases resulted in a fatality. The drugs associated with the highest IC025 (IC025 > 2) were Clopidogrel, Alemtuzumab, Omalizumab. This study retrieved for the first time three usually used drugs (3/14) that exhibit a significant pharmacovigilance signal for D-AHA. This worldwide pharmaco-epidemiologic study updates the list of the drugs associated with AHA. The clinician should be aware of these possible severe ADR, which might require larger epidemiological and pathophysiologic studies.

Recovery from mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis

Historically, smallpox and anthrax vaccines have been associated with acute myocarditis.1 Among 790 cases reported in the WHO pharmacovigilance database between 1967 and 2020,1 vaccine-associated myocarditis primarily affected young male adults (median age 24 years; 84% male individuals). Recently, the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have also been associated with myocarditis. In the USA, 1626 cases of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis were reported between December, 2020, and August, 2021, through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

Interstitial lung disease associated with anti-HER2 anti-body drug conjugates: results from clinical trials and the WHO's pharmacovigilance database

ABSTRACT Background Interstitial lung disease (ILD) events associated with anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have aroused wide attention. Research design and methods In meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed literatures, and the outcomes were the proportion and risk of ILD related to anti-HER2 ADCs. A disproportionality analysis based on data from VigiBase was conducted to characterize the main features of anti-HER2 ADC-related ILD/pneumonitis. Results Two hundred and forty-five all-grade and 47 grade ≥ 3 ILD events with the proportion of 4.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) [2.0%, 6.8%]) and 0.5% (95% CI [0.3%, 0.8%]) were observed for anti-HER2 ADCs, respectively. Trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan and trastuzumab duocarmazine significantly increased the risk of all-grade and grade ≥ 3 ILD events with Peto odd ratios of 2.62 (95% CI [1.71, 4.04], P < 0.0001) and 2.82 (95% CI [1.07, 7.42], P = 0.04), respectively. In VigiBase, 271 cases of ILD/pneumonitis related to trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan were extracted. The median time to the onset of event was 86 days and 54.95% of events occurred within 3 months. Conclusions Trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan and trastuzumab duocarmazine increased the risk of ILD, which can lead to serious outcomes and tends to occur early.