Studies of the pollination biology of the southern African species of Lapeirousia subg. Lapeirousia have indicated the need for several taxonomic changes in the alliance. Lapeirousia simulans is a new species, until now confused with L. arenicola, a fairly widespread species of the Cape west coast: L. simulans occurs sympatrically with L. arenicola, but subtle differences in flower patterning, capsule and seed morphology, and bract size separate the two. New evidence indicates that varieties spinosa and tenuis of L. divaricata should both be treated as separate species, and they are recognized here as L. spinosa and L. tenuis. The former is an allopatric vicariant of L. divaricata, differing in its compact growth form and larger flowers. Lapeirousia tenuis, however, appears to be more closely related to L. dolomitica, from which it differs in flower size, tepal color, and length of the perianth tube. Examination of living plants matching the type of L. macrospatha indicates that the species was incorrectly treated as conspecific with L. barklyi. The two differ consistently in flower color and markings, the length of the perianth tube, and the shape of the floral bracts, and are most likely not immediately related. Lastly, populations of the widespread L. pyramidalis with a dark blue, purple, or red perianth, a longer perianth tube, and odorless flowers are segregated here as subspecies regalis. Subspecies regalis is most likely adapted to a different pollinator than subspecies pyramidalis, which has a pale blue, pink, or white perianth, a shorter perianth tube, and a strong floral odor. The tropical and southern African genus Lapeirousia Pourret comprises some 40 species currently segregated in two subgenera (Goldblatt & Manning, 1990, 1992). Subgenus Lapeirousia, with 21 species, is centered in the coastal and near interior parts of southwestern Africa but includes two tropical African species (Goldblatt, 1990). Subgenus Paniculata Goldblatt & Manning, with 19 species, comprises the largely tropical African section Paniculata (14 species), with one species in the southwestern part of southern Africa, and section Fastigiata Goldblatt (5 species), restricted to the southwestern Cape region of South Africa (Goldblatt & Manning, 1992). Field studies of the pollination biology of subgenus Lapeirousia, conducted over the past two years, have yielded new information about the genus and indicated the need for substantial taxonomic revision. Sixteen southern African species were included in subgenus Lapeirousia by Goldblatt (1972), who then treated it as section Lapeirousia. One cryptic species, included in L. arenicola Schlechter, is now understood to be a distinct species, here described as L. simulans. Lapeirousia divaricata N. E. Brown, treated by Goldblatt (1972) as comprising three varieties, is now reconstituted. Variety spinosa Goldblatt, raised to species rank as L. spinosa, differs consistently from L. divaricata in its ecology and morphology and merits separate species status. Variety tenuis Goldblatt, now L. tenuis, appears to be more closely related to L. dolomitica Dinter than to L. divaricata. It has broadly conic corms with spiny margins identical to those of L. dolomitica a d can be distinguished from this species largely by its short-tubed flower with narrow tepals and noninflated floral bracts. In the widespread Lapeirousia pyramidalis (Lamarck) Goldblatt, patterns of floral variation suggest the need for the recognition of two subspecies. Typical subspecies pyramidalis has strongly scented white, pale blue, or pale pink flowers with a perianth tube of intermediate length. What we recognize here as subspecies regalis is restricted to the northwestern Cape and has darkly pigmented, red, purple, or v olet flowers with a long perianth tube and no scent. Lastly, it is now apparent that L. barklyi Baker and L. macrospatha Baker were incorrectly united by NOVON 4: 339-346. 1994. This content downloaded from 207.46.13.131 on Sat, 15 Oct 2016 04:26:09 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Read full abstract