AbstractThe aim of this study was to elucidate the functional performance of the most abundant protein component in meat, ie myosin, which is recognised as important for binding in meat products. As several genetic variants of skeletal myosin exist, myosins from two bovine muscles of different fibre type composition, M masseter and M cutaneus trunci were compared with respect to filament forming properties and denaturation characteristics. The principal methods used were turbidimetric measurements, which were used to monitor filament formation, calorimetry and rheology. The myosin systems were examined at two different salt levels (0.2 and 0.6 M NaCl) and at pH 5.5–7.0. The method of preparing myosin suspensions/solutions was also examined. Differences in the filament‐forming process for the two myosins were detected. Measurements of turbidity revealed that at conditions of low pH and low ionic strength white myosin had a higher ultimate turbidity compared with red myosin. Early in the transition from low to high turbidity, red myosin had a higher turbidity than white myosin corresponding to reduced solubility. The turbidity increased with time of storing the myosin suspensions/solutions. This change was attributed to formation of filaments and further association of filaments. White myosin had a smaller apparent enthalpy of denaturation than red myosin. The calorimetric measurements recorded in 0.2 M NaCl suggested that the head and the rod of white myosin were less stable than the corresponding parts of red myosin. However, exceptions to this rule were found at pH 6.0. In 0.6 M NaCl the identification of the transitions for red myosin was more difficult. The method of preparing myosin suspensions affected calorimetric and rheological measurements. In 0.6 M NaCl and pH 6.0 calorimetric thermograms of both myosins were affected by the preparation method. At pH 5.5 this change was interpreted as caused by denaturation promoted by the dilution/rapid titration technique compared with dialysing the systems to pH 5.5 from pH 7. Differences in the filaments formed might, however, also contribute to the variations seen in the calorimetric ther‐mograms. The gelling properties of white myosin were most sensitive to the preparation method used. Systems prepared by dialysis gave stronger heat‐induced gels than those prepared by ‘dilution’. White myosin always produced stronger gels than red myosin independent of the preparation technique. The rheological properties (at 80°C) of red myosin were less affected by the preparation method than were those of white myosin. At lower temperatures, however, there was more variation in the shapes of the rheological thermograms (Ǵ versus temperature) for red myosin than in the corresponding thermograms of white myosin.