Wexner Incontinence Score Research Articles

Preoperative anorectal manometry as a predictor of function after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Since the ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) was first described, anorectal manometry (ARM) has been used to study its physiology and function. Few studies have investigated if preoperative ARM can predict pouch function. Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Papers detailing preoperative ARM results and postoperative functional outcomes of patients with IPAA were included. Meta-analysis with meta-regression was performed, assessing the relationship between preoperative manometric results and objective postoperative functional outcomes including frequency, seepage, pad usage and medications, and functional scoring systems including Wexner Incontinence and Oresland Scores. Results from 31 studies were analysed. Mean resting pressure (MRP) decreased significantly (- 23.16mmHg, 95%CI - 27.98 to - 18.35, p < 0.01) after pouch formation but before ileostomy reversal, with subsequent minor increase (3.51mmHg, 95%CI 0.93 to 6.09, p = 0.01) by 6months after reversal of ileostomy. Pooled bowel frequency was 5.4 per 24h (4.90-5.91), day and night-time soiling, incontinence, and pad usage rates were 16% (9-24%), 26% (19-33%), 12% (4-20%), and 21% (13-30%) respectively. Pooled Oresland and Wexner Scores were 3.81 (2.92-4.70) and 3.45 (2.71-4.19). A significant association between preoperative MRP and Wexner Score was observed (p < 0.001). As a result of risk of bias, study heterogeneity, and variation in manometry systems, certainty of evidence was low or very low. Preoperative predictors of function inform patient and clinician decision-making. Further investigations into the association between preoperative MRP and Wexner Score using modern ARM techniques are warranted.

A prospective observational study on functional outcomes and condition-specific quality of life after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer

Objective: To investigate functional outcomes and condition-specific quality-of-life (CSQoL) after intersphincteric resection (ISR) in patients with low rectal cancer using traditional and exploratory questionnaires. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Characteristic Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army Rocket Force. Patients with low rectal cancer who underwent ISR with ileostomy reversal from May 2020 to April 2023 were enrolled. An electronic self-assessment survey was sent to enrolled patients at 3 to 6, 12, and 24 to 36 months after reversal, and differences in functional and CSQoL results between the 3 groups were analyzed with generalized estimation equations. Functional outcomes were determined by the Wexner incontinence score (WIS) and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. In line with the five frequency responses ranging from never (score 0) to always (score 4) defined by the WIS, an exploratory survey was used to measure the severity of 16 LARS-specific variables confirmed by the latest international Delphi consensus. Furthermore, CSQoL was evaluated using the fecal incontinence quality-of-life scale (FIQL) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Results: A total of 90 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 64 males and 26 females, aged (58.6±10.4) years (range: 28 to 79 years). The median distance from the distal tumor margin to the anal verge(M(IQR)) was 3.0 (1.5) cm (range: 1.0 to 5.0 cm). There were 55 patients who completed the questionnaires at 3 to 6 months, 59 patients at 12 months, and 40 patients at 24 to 36 months of follow-up, respectively. The summary score of FIQL and VAS improved significantly after reversal (2.33±0.69 vs. 2.40±0.66 vs. 2.79±0.76, χ2=11.703,P=0.003; 5.31±1.65 vs. 5.61±1.90 vs. 6.58±1.92, χ2=12.781,P=0.002), but the differences in the WIS and LARS score did not reach statistical significance (both P>0.05). The survey responses for the LARS-specific variables indicated that "emptying difficulties" and "dissatisfaction with the bowels" were the most frequent symptom and consequence after ISR, respectively. The exploratory severity score for LARS improved significantly among the 3 time periods(34 (14) vs. 31 (13) vs. 23 (17), χ2=13.952,P=0.001). Furthermore, the FIQL summary score was strongly correlated with the LARS severity score (rs=-0.72, P<0.01). Conclusions: Although a high prevalence of LARS may persist for years, patients reported an improvement in CSQoL and functional outcomes after ISR. The highest priorities recommended by the international consensus might provide better assessments the severity of LARS.

Evagination method for rectovaginal fistulas

AIM: to assess early and late results of the evagination method for the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) in patients with anal incontinence due to muscle defect in the anterior semicircle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: the study included 45 patients. The prevailing etiology of RVF was delivery lesion in 19/45(42.2 %). The median follow-up was 6 (4; 8.5) months. On day 30 after surgery, the outcome was assessed clinically. Late outcomes were assessed in all patients 3–12 months including clinical control, transanal ultrasound and sphincterometry. RESULTS: recurrence occurred in 9/45 (20 %) patients. The significant improvement of continence was revealed: in mean pressure in rest (p = 0.004), in maximum contraction pressure (p &lt; 0.0001), in Wexner incontinence score (p &lt; 0.0001). With a fistula opening less than 16 mm, the recurrence risk increases (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: the evagination method is effective option in extent septal defects and correcting additional analsphincter insufficiency.

Comparative Evaluation Between Cutting of the Intersphincteric Space vs Cutting Seton in High Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study compared the efficacy of cutting of the intersphincteric space (COIS) with cutting seton (CS) procedure in treating high anal fistula. Patients diagnosed with high anal fistula were allocated into groups, who randomly received COIS and CS procedures. The primary outcome was wound healing time. Secondary outcomes included surgical parameters (operation time, hospital stay, and hospitalization expense), anal sphincter function, wound pain, wound size, clinical efficacy, recurrence after 12 months of follow-up, and complications. A total of 72 patients participated (36 in each group). The wound healing time was notably shorter in the COIS group than the CS group (35.75 ± 11.15 vs. 55.69 ± 13. 42 days; P< 0.001). The COIS group also demonstrated superior basic surgical parameters compared to the CS group (P< 0.001). Postoperatively, the COIS group exhibited significantly higher anal resting pressure and anal maximum contractile pressure than the CS group at 3 months postoperatively (58.39 ± 6.72 vs. 51.25 ± 4.33 mmHg; P< 0.001 and 143.72 ± 8.25 vs. 126.75 ± 11.49 mmHg; P< 0.001). The Wexner incontinence score at 3 months post-operation in the COIS group was significantly lower than in the CS group (0.50;0.00,1.00 vs. 3.00; 3.00,4.00; P< 0.001). The recurrence rate was 2.78% in the COIS group and 8.33% in the CS group without statistically difference (P= 0.607). In comparison to the CS procedure, COIS appears to be an effective treatment option for high anal fistulas, offering quicker wound healing time, enhanced sphincter function, less pain, minimal invasiveness, and cost-efficiency, while maintaining a high healing rate and low recurrence rate.

Long-term outcomes of fistula-tract laser closure for complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease.

Fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaC™) has shown promising outcomes in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD). However, most studies assessed a mixed cohort encompassing pfCD and cryptoglandular fistulas during a short follow-up period. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term treatment outcomes of FiLaC™ in patients with complex pfCD. Data from patients with complex pfCD who underwent FiLaC™ during deep remission of Crohn's disease between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, surgery history, and medication strategy were registered before surgery. Follow-ups were scheduled at 1, 2, and 3months after FiLaC™, and at 2-month intervals thereafter. The primary endpoint was clinic healing, while clinic remission/unhealed/recurrence were classified as unhealed. Additionally, adverse events and Wexner fecal incontinence score were documented. Forty-nine patients (40 men and 9 women) with a median age of 26.0 (19.0-35.5) years were included with a median follow-up of 50.0 (39.5-54.0) months. Of these, 31 (63.3%) patients achieved fistula healing, 3 (6.1%) experienced improvement, 3 (6.1%) remained unhealed, and 12 (24.5%) experienced recurrence. Montreal A category was lower in the healed group (P < 0.001). No major complications, such as bleeding or fecal or urinary incontinence, were observed, and pain was transient. The Wexner incontinence score decreased significantly at the last available follow-up, indicating an intact postoperative continence function (P = 0.014). PCDAI scores were significantly higher in the unhealed group (P = 0.041). FiLaC™ is an efficient and safe sphincter-saving procedure for patients with complex pfCD.

Long-Term Results of 2-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer

In patients operated on for low rectal cancer, 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis provides benefits in terms of postoperative morbidity compared with standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis associated with diverting ileostomy and further ileostomy reversal. To compare long-term results of these 2 techniques after ultralow rectal resection for rectal cancer. In this randomized multicenter clinical trial, neither patients nor surgeons were blinded for technique. Patients were recruited in 3 centers. Patients undergoing ultralow anterior rectal resection needing hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis were randomly assigned to 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (n = 46) or standard hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis associated with diverting ileostomy (n = 46). All patients underwent ultralow anterior resection. Patients assigned to the 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through group underwent exteriorization of a segment of left colon through the anal canal. After 6 to 10 days, the exteriorized colon was resected and a delayed hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis performed. For patients assigned to standard coloanal anastomosis, the hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis was performed with diverting ileostomy during the first operation. Ileostomy closure was scheduled after adjuvant treatment was completed in about 6 to 8 months. The study aimed to compare the differences between the 2 groups in terms of long-term surgery-related morbidity, functional, and oncological outcomes at 3 years postoperatively. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2018, through October 31, 2021. The 92 patients randomized in the first study were included for the 3-year follow-up. The overall morbidity rate in the 2 groups showed that 15 patients (16.3%) had complications with a difference of 6.52 (95% CI, -8.93 to 21.79). Nine patients (19.6%) and 6 patients (13.0%) in the 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through group and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis group, respectively, had complications without statistically significant differences (P = .57). Oncological results were comparable between the groups. Long-term fecal continence in the CCA and TCA groups, respectively, assessed using the Wexner Incontinence Score was 10.9 (5.50-15.5) vs 13.0 (7.25-16.0; P = .92), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score was 32.0 (21.0-37.0) vs 34.0 (23.2-38.5; P = .76), and Colorectal Functional Outcome score was 38.5 (23.0-47.1) vs 40.8 (23.3-58.2; P = .30). In this study, after a 3-year follow-up period, 2-stage Turnbull-Cutait anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer could be considered as a surgical alternative that has the valuable benefit of avoiding a temporary stoma with similar results in terms of morbidity, fecal continence, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and oncological outcomes when compared with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis with ileostomy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01766661.

Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation After Rectal Cancer Surgery One-year follow-up of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (FORCE trial).

This study aims to evaluate the effects of pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) after low anterior resection (LAR) at one-year follow-up. After LAR, with restoration of bowel continuity, up to 90% of patients develop anorectal dysfunction, significantly impacting their quality of life. However, standardized treatment is currently unavailable. The FORCE trial demonstrated the beneficial effects of PFR after three months regarding specific domains of the Fecal Incontinence QoL (FIQL) questionnaire and urgency compared to usual care. The FORCE trial is a multicenter, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. All patients undergoing LAR were randomly assigned to receive either usual care or a standardized PFR program. The primary outcome measure is the Wexner incontinence score, and the secondary endpoints included the LARS score, the EORTC colorectal-specific QoL questionnaire, and health- and fecal incontinence-related QoL. Assessments were conducted at baseline before randomization, at three months and one-year follow-ups. A total of 86 patients were included (PFR: n=40, control: n=46). After one year, PFR did not significantly improve Wexner incontinence scores (PFR: -3.33, 95% CI -4.41 to -2.26, control: -2.54, 95% CI -3.54 to -1.54, P=0.30). Similar to the three-month follow-up, patients without near-complete incontinence at baseline showed sustained improvement in fecal incontinence (PFR: -2.82, 95% CI -3.86 to -1.76, control: -1.43, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.50, P=0.06). Significant improvement was reported in the FIQL domains Lifestyle (PFR: 0.51, control: -0.13, P=0.03) and Coping and Behavior (PFR: 0.40, control: -0.24, P=0.01). At one-year follow-up, no significant differences were found in fecal incontinence scores; however, PFR was associated with improved fecal incontinence related QoL compared to usual care.

Emergency Haemorrhoidectomy in Acute Haemorrhoidal Crisis: A Tertiary Centre Experience

Acute haemorrhoidal crisis refers to painful, irreducible prolapsed haemorrhoids. On the best of hand, surgical treatment of acute haemorrhoidal crisis could still risk complications of bleeding and worse, incontinence. Our study aimed to look at the short-term outcomes of emergency excisional haemorrhoidectomy for acute haemorrhoidal crisis at a colorectal centre. This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary centre in the northern state of Malaysia from January 2015 to December 2020. The medical record was traced from the medical record unit and the operation theatre list for all patients with surgical treatment for an acute haemorrhoidal crisis. Sociodemographic data and complications rate were collected with 12 months follow-up. There were 51 patients identified from the registry and 29 out of those were male. The median age was 41 (20-82) years old. In addition, 26% (n=13) of the females were pregnant at presentation. Five patients had previous haemorrhoidal procedures performed. The median operating time was 35 (15-143) minutes with the length of hospital stays of 4 (2-10) days. The early complications were seen in 17 patients with bleeding (5.9%) and urinary retention (27%). The 12-month recurrence rate was 7.8% with median Wexner incontinence scores of 0 (0-3). The emergency excisional haemorrhoidectomy in acute haemorrhoidal crisis is safe and effective for immediate symptomatic relief with an acceptable low self-limiting complication rate.

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life of Patients After Sphincter Preservation Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Background After anterior resection (AR), one of the most debilitating complications is low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) seenin about 64% of patients. The severity of the LARS score wassignificantly correlated with neoadjuvant treatment, the extent of rectal surgery, complication by the anastomotic leak, female gender, and age < 64 years. In this study, weanalyzed the impact of various clinical factors on LARS and also the various domains of quality of life (QoL). Purpose To assess the incidence of LARS in patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer after the patient starts long-term defecating per anus, change in the QoL, and relation to LARS and factors affecting it. Methods One year before, 72 patients who had undergone AR in the Regional Cancer Centre were interviewed by a trained interviewer and data was collected from the file. Thequestionnairesused were the Wexner Incontinence score, LARS Malayalam Questionnaire, and European Organisation For Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 Malayalam translations. Statistical measures The LARS score wasused to categorize patients into three grades. The scores werecompared with clinical and social factors using the χ2 test for association. Continuous variables were compared by the Spearman Rho test. Results Details of patients were studied(male: 55.6% (40) andfemale: 44.4% (32)). Fifty patientsunderwent low anterior resection (LAR). The mean LARSscore was 25.61, with 47.2% of patients having severe LARS score. The mean Wexner score was 6.84. The relation withtype of surgery, approach (laparoscopic vs open), or type of neoadjuvant therapy was not found to be significant. A higher LARS score did not impact overall QoL as assessed by FACT-C. Insomnia and diarrhea symptoms scores were significantly worsened. The pain score was worse for those undergoing stapler anastomosis. Wexner's score was worse for those who had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Role functioning score was better for AR compared to low anterior resection (LAR). Only distance from the anal verge was found to be a significant cause of LARS and was negatively correlated. Discussion LARS of severe degrees were seen in most patients. No modifiable risk factors were significantly found to affect the chance of LARS. However, LARS did not have a significant impact on QoL, neither did the type of surgery. So sphincter preservation can be offered to the patients, but all patients undergoing LAR should be counseled well about the risk ofLARS before surgery.

Comparative study of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy versus perineal stapler resection for external full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients: enhanced outcomes and reduced recurrence rates—a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundIn elderly patients with external full-thickness rectal prolapse (EFTRP), the exact differences in postoperative recurrence and functional outcomes between laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) and perineal stapler resection (PSR) have not yet been investigated.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study on 330 elderly patients divided into LVMR group (n = 250) and PSR (n = 80) from April 2012 to April 2019. Patients were evaluated before and after surgery by Wexner incontinence scale, Altomare constipation scale, and patient satisfaction questionnaire. The primary outcomes were incidence and risk factors for EFTRP recurrence. Secondary outcomes were postoperative incontinence, constipation, and patient satisfaction.ResultsLVMR was associated with fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.001), lower prolapse recurrence (p < 0.001), lower Wexner incontinence score (p = 0.03), and lower Altomare’s score (p = 0.047). Furthermore, LVMR demonstrated a significantly higher surgery–recurrence interval (p < 0.001), incontinence improvement (p = 0.019), and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) than PSR. Three and 13 patients developed new symptoms in LVMR and PSR, respectively. The predictors for prolapse recurrence were LVMR (associated with 93% risk reduction of recurrence, OR 0.067, 95% CI 0.03–0.347, p = 0.001), symptom duration (prolonged duration was associated with an increased risk of recurrence, OR 1.131, 95% CI 1.036–1.236, p = 0.006), and length of prolapse (increased length was associated with a high recurrence risk (OR = 1.407, 95% CI = 1.197–1.655, p < 0.001).ConclusionsLVMR is safe for EFTRP treatment in elderly patients with low recurrence, and improved postoperative functional outcomes.Trial registrationClinical Trial.gov (NCT05915936), retrospectively registered on June 14, 2023.

Comparative long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is currently widely used in left-sided colorectal cancer. Some clinical comparative studies have been conducted, providing evidence of its safety and oncological benefits. However, these studies are typically characterized by small sample sizes and short postoperative follow-up periods. Consequently, in this research, the authors adopt the propensity score matching method to undertake a large-scale retrospective comparative study on NOSES colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer, with the goal of further augmenting the body of evidence-based medical support for NOSES. This retrospective study involved patients who underwent NOSES colectomy and conventional laparoscopic (CL) colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer between January 2014 and April 2021. In the NOSES group, specimens were extracted through the anus with the help of a Cai tube (homemade invention: ZL201410168748.2). The patients were matched at a ratio of 1:1 according to age, sex, BMI, tumor diameter, tumor location (descending and splenic flexure colon/ sigmoid colon/ middle and upper rectum), tumor height from anal verge, ASA grade, previous abdominal surgery, clinical pathologic stage, preoperative CEA. After matching, 132 patients in the NOSES group and 132 patients in the CL group were eligible for analysis. Compared with CL group, NOSES group was associated with decreased postoperative maximum pain score (2.6±0.7 vs. 4.7±1.7, P=0.000), less additional analgesia required (6.8 vs. 34.8%, P=0.000), faster time to passage of flatus (2.3±0.6 days vs. 3.3±0.7 days, P=0.000), less wound infection (0.0 vs. 6.1%, P=0.007), and longer operative time (212.5±45.8min vs. 178.0±43.4min, P=0.000). No significant differences were observed in estimated blood loss, time to resume regular diet, postoperative hospital stay, conversion to open surgery or conventional minilaparotomy, total morbidity, readmission, mortality, pathologic outcomes, and Wexner incontinence score between groups. After a median follow-up of 63.0 months, the 5-year overall survival rates were 88.3 versus 85.0% (P=0.487), disease-free survival rates were 82.9 versus 83.6% (P=0.824), and the local recurrence rates were 4.4 versus 4.0% (P=0.667) in the NOSES and CL groups, respectively. This study suggests that NOSES colectomy using a Cai tube for left-sided colorectal cancer is a safe and feasible option with better cosmetic results, less pain, faster recovery of gastrointestinal function, and comparable long-term clinical and oncologic outcomes to CL colectomy.

Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is a viable option for sphincter preservation in early ultra-low rectal cancer, but postoperative anal dysfunction remains a concern. This study evaluates the outcomes of robotic ISR with coloanal anastomosis in early ultra-low rectal cancer, comparing its efficacy and safety with laparoscopic ISR. Retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 74 consecutive patients undergoing robotic intersphincteric resection (R-ISR) for early ultra-low rectal cancer between January 2017 and December 2018 (R-ISR group), matched with 110 patients undergoing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (L-ISR). After 1:1 propensity score matching, each group comprised 68 patients. Comparative analyses covered surgical outcomes, complications, long-term results, and anal function. The R-ISR group showed longer total operative time than the L-ISR group (211.7 ± 25.3min vs. 191.2 ± 23.0min, p = 0.001), but less intraoperative bleeding (55.2 ± 20.7ml vs. 69.2 ± 22.9ml, p = 0.01). R-ISR group had fewer conversions to APR surgery (6/8.8% vs. 14/20.6%). Other perioperative indicators were similar. R-ISR exhibited a smaller tumor margin, superior mesorectal integrity, and comparable histopathological outcomes. Postoperative complications, 3-year and 5-year DFS, and OS were similar. At the 1-year follow-up, the Wexner Incontinence Score favored R-ISR (9.24 ± 4.03 vs. 11.06 ± 3.77, p = 0.048). Although R-ISR prolongs the operative time, its surgical safety and oncological outcomes are similar to conventional ISR procedures. Furthermore, it further shortens the margin of anal preservation, reduces the rate of conversion to APR surgery, and improves postoperative anal function.

Conformal sphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer located below the dentate line: A pilot report.

Sphincter-sparing surgery can be achieved in most cases of low rectal cancer with the development of intersphincteric resection. However, abdominoperineal resection is still inevitable for patients with tumours located below the dentate line. To address this, we have developed a procedure called conformal sphincteric resection (CSR) in which the corresponding part of the subcutaneous portion of the external anal sphincter and the perianal skin on the tumour side is removed to achieve a safe distal resection margin and lateral resection margin while the dentate line and the internal anal sphincter on the tumour-free side are preserved as much as possible, to achieve sphincter preservation without compromising oncological safety and functional acceptability, and to render tumour location no longer a contraindication for sphincter-sparing surgery. This is the first study to describe the concept, indication and surgical procedure of CSR and to report its preliminary surgical, oncological and functional results. This is a retrospective, single-centre, single-arm pilot study conducted at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University. Demographic, clinicopathological, oncological and functional follow-up data were collected from 20 consecutive patients with rectal tumours located below the dentate line who underwent laparoscopic CSR by the same surgical team from June 2018 to March 2022. The mean distance of the tumour's lower edge from the anal verge was 13.1 ± 6.0 mm. The mean distal resection margin was 10.6 ± 4.3 mm. All circumferential resection margins were negative. There were no instances of perioperative mortality. The complication rate was 25% but all were Clavien-Dindo Grade I. Among the 20 cases, 17 were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, one with squamous cell carcinoma and two with adenoma featuring high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Pathological TNM staging revealed two, seven, five, five and one case(s) in Stages 0, I, II, III and IV, respectively. The median follow-up period was 20 months (interquartile range 22 months), with no withdrawals. The overall and disease-free survival rates were both 95%. The mean Wexner incontinence score and low anterior resection syndrome score recorded 18 months following diverting ileostomy closure were 6.3 ± 3.8 and 27.3 ± 3.6, respectively. This study has proposed the CSR procedure for the first time, which is a technically feasible, oncologically safe and functionally acceptable procedure for carefully selected patients with rectal tumours located below the dentate line.

Evaluation of the mechanical properties and clinical application of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy anal fistula clip.

The study investigates the mechanical properties of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy anal fistula clip (NiTi-AFC), studies the surgical method of treating anal fistula, and evaluates its clinical efficacy. The anal fistula clip was formed in nickel-titanium alloy with a titanium content of 50.0%-51.8%. The mechanical properties and chemical properties were tested. A total of 31 patients with anal fistula were enrolled between 1 January 2020 and 1 January 2023. All patients underwent internal orifice closure surgery using NiTi-AFC, and anorectal magnetic resonance or ultrasound was performed before surgery and 6 months after surgery for diagnosis and evaluation. Fistula cure rates, length of stay, perianal pain, and Wexner incontinence scores were retrospectively compared between patients treated with NiTi-AFC and patients treated with other surgical methods. NiTi-AFC has a density of 6.44-6.50 g·cm-3, with a shape-restoring force of 63.8 N. The corrosion rate of NiTi-AFC in 0.05% hydrochloric acid solution at atmospheric pressure and 20°C is approximately 6.8 × 10-5 g·(m·h)-1. A total of 31 patients (male/female: 19/12, age: 43.7 ± 17.8 years) were included. Among them, 22.6% (7) had multiple anal fistula, 16.1% (5) had high anal fistula, and 48.3% (15) had perianal fistula Crohn's disease. In total, 12.9% (4/31) did not achieve primary healing, underwent fistula resection, and eventually recovered. A retrospective analysis showed that the fistula healing rate, length of stay, and anal pain of NiTi-AFC treatment were similar to those of other traditional surgeries, but the Wexner incontinence score was significantly lower. NiTi-AFC has shape memory properties, corrosion resistance, superelastic effect, and surface cell adhesion. It is applied to internal orifice closure surgery of anal fistula, with good therapeutic effect, and can protect the anal function.

Should anorectal manometry be routine before stoma reversal in patients after an intersphincteric resection?

Anorectal manometry (ARM) is sometimes performed before ostomy reversal in patients with an intersphincteric resection (ISR) to predict bowel function. However, no clinical predictive data exist regarding its utility. The single-centre, retrospective data of ISR patients who had an ARM prior to ostomy reversal, and bowel functional assessment with the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and Wexner incontinence scores at least 6 months after reversal, were considered. Correlation statistics were performed with each of the manometric parameters and functional outcome categories. Eighty-nine patients were included. The median basal and squeeze pressures were 41 and 100 mmHg, respectively. Any LARS (score ≥20) and major incontinence (score ≥11) was observed in 51.7% and 16.9%, respectively. None of the manometric parameters (median basal or maximum squeeze pressure, anal canal length, volume at urge and the ability to expel) correlated with LARS or incontinence. Anorectal manometry (ARM) before ostomy reversal to predict bowel function at 6 months or beyond was not helpful in patients with an ISR and diverting stoma. No manometric parameter correlated with the LARS or Wexner incontinence scores.

Transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Anus-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer has always been a serious difficulty for surgeons. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) are commonly used Anus-preserving surgeries for low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical use of two surgical methods. A total of 152 patients with low rectal cancer were treated with taTME in 75 cases and ISR in 77 cases. After propensity score matching, 46 patients in each group were included in the study. Perioperative outcomes, anal function scores (Wexner incontinence score) and quality of life scores (EORTC QLQ C30, EORTC QLQ CR38) at least 1year after surgery were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgical outcomes, pathological examination of surgical specimens, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications, except for patients in the taTME group who had their indwelling catheters removed later. Anal Wexner incontinence score was lower in taTME group than ISR group (P < 0.05). On the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, the physical function and role function scores in the ISR group were lower than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05), while the fatigue, pain symptoms, and constipation scores in the ISR group were higher than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05). On the EORTC QLQ-CR38 scale, the scores of gastrointestinal symptoms and defecation problems in the ISR group were higher than those in the taTME group (P < 0.05). Compared with ISR surgery, taTME surgery is comparable in terms of surgical safety and short-term efficacy, and has better long-term anal function and quality of life. From the perspective of long-term anal function and quality of life, taTME surgery is a better surgical method for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

Internal Orifice Alloy Closure: A New Procedure for Treatment of Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND The high recurrence rate of perianal fistula Crohn's disease (PFCD) increases the need to protect the anal sphincter during each surgical treatment of fistulas. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of internal orifice alloy closure in patients with PFCD. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifteen patients with PFCD were enrolled in the study between July 6, 2021, and April 27, 2023. All patients underwent preoperative colonoscopy and anal magnetic resonance examination for diagnosis and evaluation. Internal orifice alloy closure (IOAC) was performed only when Crohn's disease was in remission. The external sphincter had not been severed. Perianal magnetic resonance imaging examination was used for postoperative evaluation after 6 months. Fistula cure rate, length of stay, perianal pain, and Wexner incontinence score were retrospectively compared between 15 patients treated with IOAC and 40 patients treated with other surgical methods. RESULTS Fifteen patients (male/female: 9/6, age: 23.6±14.3 years) with PFCD were included (follow-up: 24 months). In total, 20.0% (3) had multiple tracts, and 13.3% (2) had a high anal fistula. Among them, 10 patients received biologics for induction for mucosal healing before surgery. The fistula healed completely in 80.0% (12/15) and did not heal in 20.0% (3/15). Three patients who did not heal underwent fistulotomy and eventually recovered. IOAC is not superior in terms of fistula healing rates, length of stay, and anal pain, but its Wexner incontinence scores are significantly lower than with other surgical methods. CONCLUSIONS IOAC is a novel sphincter-saving surgery that is effective and safe for the treatment of PFCD.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy versus TME followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in very low-lying clinical (c) T3 rectal cancer (NAIR): A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2/3 trial.

3519 Background: Chemoradiotherapy and total neoadjuvant therapy are the standard treatments for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Although radiotherapy (RT) is an integral part of treatment, it negatively impacts anal function after TME for cases of very low-lying LARCs. This trial examined the efficacy, safety, and influence on postoperative anal function of NAC without RT in patients (pts) with very low-lying cT3 LARCs. Methods: Pts with cT3N0-2M0 adenocarcinomas located within 5 cm from the anal verge, whose anuses were expected to be preserved, were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the NAC group (preoperative chemotherapy with six cycles of mFOLFOX6 or four cycles of CAPOX followed by TME; then, postoperative identical regimen) or the TME group (upfront TME followed by postoperative chemotherapy with 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6 or 8 cycles of CAPOX), stratified by cN stage, center, and sex. The primary endpoint was the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), which was compared between groups using a stratified log-rank test at a one-sided alpha level of 20%. Results: Between February 2013 and March 2019, 130 pts were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group. A total of 127 pts were evaluable (65 in the NAC group and 62 in the TME group). All but one patient with early progression completed preoperative chemotherapy in the NAC group, and all pts in both groups underwent TME. After a median follow-up of 37.4 months (IQR 36.5-40.5), the 3-year RFS was 75.5% (95% CI 62.5-84.5) in the NAC group vs. 70.9% (95%CI 57.2-80.9) in the TME group (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.34-1.32; P = 0.098), and the primary endpoint was met. There were no differences in the occurrence of grade 3 or higher postoperative complications (20% in the NAC group vs. 21% in the TME group [P = 1.000]), chemo-associated grade 3 or higher adverse events (28% in the NAC group vs. 23% in the TME group [P = 0.551]), or any grade of peripheral sensory neuropathy lasting for 3 years (22.7% in the NAC group vs. 38.5% in the TME group in pts treated with mFOLFOX6 [P = 0.3163], 7.1% in the NAC group vs. 33.3% in the TME group in pts treated with CAPOX [P = 0.1038]), between the groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either of the groups. At 3 years after randomization, 61 pts in the NAC group (93.8%) and 52 pts in the TME group (83.9%) could defecate via their anuses (P = 0.092). The median Wexner incontinence score was 11.0 in the NAC group and 10.0 in the TME group (P = 0.3405). Conclusions: For pts with very low-lying cT3 LARC, NAC followed by TME and adjuvant chemotherapy achieved significantly better RFS and anus-preserving rates compared to upfront TME followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, without deteriorating postoperative complications or postoperative anal function. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009510 .

Comparison of functional and oncological outcome of conformal sphincter preservation operation, low anterior resection, and abdominoperineal resection in very low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study with propensity score matching.

Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) procedure is a sphincter preservation procedure for preserving the anal canal function for very low rectal cancers. This study investigated the functional and oncological outcome of conformal sphincter preservation operation by comparing with low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR). This is a retrospective comparative study. Patients who received conformal sphincter preservation operation (n=52), low anterior resection (n=54), or abdominoperineal resection (n=69) were included between 2011 and 2016 in a tertiary referral hospital. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust the baseline characteristics which may influence the choice of the surgical procedure. Twenty-one pairs of conformal sphincter preservation operation vs. low anterior resection and 29 pairs of conformal sphincter preservation operation vs. abdominoperineal resection were selected. The first group had a higher tumor location than the second group. Compared with the low anterior resection group, the conformal sphincter preservation operation group had shorter distal resection margins; however, no significant differences were identified in daily stool frequency, Wexner incontinence score, local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival between both groups. Compared with the abdominoperineal resection group, the conformal sphincter preservation operation group had shorter operative time and shorter postoperative hospital stay. No significant differences were identified in local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Conformal sphincter preservation operation is oncologically safe compared to APR and LAR, and has similar functional findings to LAR. Studies comparing CSPO with intersphincteric resection should be performed.

Robotic-assisted rectosigmoid resection rectopexy with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE): technical notes, short-term results, and functional outcome

Rectosigmoid resection rectopexy has been established as an effective therapy for obstructive defecation syndrome. The addition of the NOSE-technique provides an even less invasive approach avoiding minilaparotomy, but can be technically challenging. Application of a robotic platform has been proposed to facilitate the specimen extraction and fashioning of the intracorporeal anastomosis and has been proven to be effective in left-sided colectomies. After establishing laparoscopic rectosigmoid-resection-rectopexy with NOSE, we modified our technique by addition of the robotic platform. Whenever robotic capacity was available, elective patients scheduled for rectosigmoid resection rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome were operated robotically assisted. Demographic and intraoperative data were prospectively collected. Follow up was assessed using the Wexner constipation score, Wexner incontinence score, and Altomare ODS score. The NOSE-RRR technique was completed in all 31 patients. The mean operative time was 166 min (range 67-230). No conversion was required. The median hospital stay was 5 days (range 3-28). Four patients had minor complications (Clavien I). Two patients were reoperated (Clavien IIIb). Functional scores improved significantly postoperatively. Mean Wexner incontinence score was 7.1 preoperatively, 6.9 after 1 month, and decreased significantly to 3.93 after 3 months (p < 0.001). Mean Altomare ODS score was 17.47 preoperatively and 6.93/5.03 after 1/3 months (p < 0.001). Wexner constipation score (12.83) also showed a significant improvement after 1/3 months (6.97/6.67; p < 0.001). NOSE-RRR can be performed safely with a low rate of manageable complications. The technique provides a significant improvement for ODS-Symptoms.