While exploring and developing oil and gas, well kick and overflow accidents are inevitable. In such an accident, if the drilling bit is not at the bottom of the well, the drilling tool is blocked, or the reservoir contains toxic gases such as hydrogen sulfide, the traditional technique for well control is no longer suitable, and the bullheading method must be adopted to kill the well. However, during bullheading, the flow patterns of gas and liquid are intricate, making gas velocity hard to predict. To solve these problems, a set of visual simulation experimental device for directional well bullheading was built to find out the effects of wellbore inclination, liquid viscosity, gas and liquid velocities, and bubble size on bubble migration characteristics in gas–liquid countercurrent (gas flowing in opposite direction to the liquid). Prediction models of bubble distribution coefficient and rising velocity considering liquid viscosity, bubble size, and wellbore inclination angle were worked out. The experimental results show that small bubbles are mainly located in the center of the wellbore and large bubbles tend to approach the wellbore wall in gas–liquid countercurrent. Increasing wellbore inclination, viscosity, and the velocity of the liquid flowing against the bubbles results in a gradual decrease in Taylor bubble migration speed, which promotes the bubbles' pressing-back, as inhibiting the upward movement of large bubbles is essential for effective bullheading operations. The prediction models of distribution coefficient and bubble migration velocity have an error of less than 10% and 9. 78%, respectively.
Read full abstract