In recent years, artificial intelligence applications have proved useful for analyzing petrophysical data and characterizing subsurface formations. Conventional reservoir characterization employs core data measurements and local correlations between porosity and permeability as input data for reservoir property modeling. The vertically and laterally sparse nature of core and well-log data respectively present challenges in developing three-dimensional models of subsurface properties. In addition, a strong correlation between porosity and permeability as well as reliable core measurements are not always available. The complex interrelationship within the dataset is further evidenced through the application of parametric and nonparametric approaches, which are commonly utilized in conventional regression methods. The parametric method yielded an RMSE value of 0.335 and the nonparametric, 0.418, necessitating the implementation of an algorithm capable of modeling the complex relationship within the dataset. The proposed approach uses an improved machine learning (ML) workflow to generate and evaluate the performance of different porosity and permeability models from integrated well-log and core data, comparing the performance to traditional methods. The workflow combines a suite of unsupervised and supervised ML methods in establishing the relationship between porosity and permeability for different zones. Unsupervised ML algorithms such as K-means, K-median, and hierarchical clustering are applied to the data to generate groups with similar trends. Supervised ML regression methods such as Gaussian process regression (GPR), neural network regression, support vector machine (SVM) regression, and ensemble regression are implemented to predict permeability based on gamma ray, bulk density, and deep resistivity logs. This method demonstrated enhanced dataset modeling, as indicated by the decrease in RMSE values when using the GPR following the hierarchical clustering technique. This recorded RMSE values as low as 0.125, which is roughly 34% lower than those observed with traditional methods. Two of the predicted models were assessed using a history-matching process, which showed an almost perfect fit for nearly all the wells, thereby confirming the accuracy of the regression.
Read full abstract