Attempting total knee arthroplasty in patients with preoperative periarticular soft-tissue defects can result in disastrous postoperative complications. Orthopaedic surgeons often fail to appropriately evaluate and plan the management of these skin defects, which can lead to skin sloughing, necrosis, exposed total knee arthroplasty hardware, and the need for additional intervention. As expected, the results from salvage soft-tissue protocols are mixed1-9. Salvage soft-tissue procedures are undertaken in the setting of well-fixed total knee arthroplasty hardware and a compromised soft-tissue envelope rather than in the preoperative state. Infection risk is substantially higher once hardware has been placed, and the results are often poor with regard to functional rehabilitation and recovery10,11. Because of less than optimal results, some surgeons have attempted to prophylactically treat such soft-tissue defects. Expanders have been used to stretch tissue to increase soft-tissue coverage prior to total knee arthroplasty, but this approach has an increased risk of infection12,13. Simultaneous flap coverage in the setting of total knee arthroplasty has also been reported with good results14. Additionally, there are a few reports on prophylactic soft-tissue coverage in a staged fashion several months prior to total knee arthroplasty10,11. These studies discuss many benefits from treating the soft-tissue deficit prior to implantation. The local soft-tissue environment dictates the choice of coverage. The gold standard for coverage about the knee is the gastrocnemius rotational flap, which has excellent results, especially in a setting of infection1-4,7,15. Free flaps are considered in situations where local tissue is inadequate13,16. Free-flap options for the lower extremity include the rectus abdominis muscle, latissimus dorsi muscle, anterolateral thigh, and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), among others. We present a …