Weight Loss Intervention Research Articles

Preoperative weight loss interventions before total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

The high co-prevalence of obesity and end-stage osteoarthritis requiring arthroplasty, with the former being a risk factor for complications during arthroplasty, has led to increasing interest in employing preoperative weight loss interventions such as bariatric surgery and diet modification. However, the current evidence is conflicting, and this study aimed to investigate the effect of weight loss intervention before arthroplasty in prospective randomized controlled trials. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for prospective randomized controlled trials that compared weight loss interventions with usual care from inception to October 2023 by following the PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE framework were used to assess the quality of the studies. Meta-analyses were performed when sufficient data were available from 2 or more studies. Three randomized controlled trials involving 198 patients were identified. Two studies employed diet modification, and one study utilized bariatric surgery. All three studies reported significant reductions in body weight and body mass index (BMI), and intervention groups had fewer postoperative complications. There was no difference in the length of stay between the intervention group and the control group. Variable patient-reported outcome measures were used by different research groups. Weight loss intervention can achieve significant reductions in body weight and body mass index before arthroplasty, with fewer postoperative complications reported. Further studies with different populations could confirm the effect of these interventions among populations with different obesity characteristics.

Comparing the Efficacy of Digital and In-Person Weight Loss Interventions for Patients with Obesity and Glycemic Disorders: Evidence from a Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

Comparing the Efficacy of Digital and In-Person Weight Loss Interventions for Patients with Obesity and Glycemic Disorders: Evidence from a Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

Intentional weight loss in overweight and obese patients with heart failure: A systematic review.

Approximately 30-49% of heart failure (HF) patients are living with obesity. The recommended body mass index (BMI) for the general population is 18.5-24.9 kg/m2. The obesity paradox suggests that HF patients with obesity (HFpwO) have a better prognosis compared to normal BMI. Guideline recommendations on ideal BMI for HFpwO are limited. This systematic review aims to examine the evidence base for intentional weight loss in HFpwO on the following parameters: mortality, hospitalization, symptoms, quality of life (QOL), effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and adverse events. A total of 22 studies were identified: lifestyle intervention (n = 9), pharmacotherapy (n = 3), bariatric surgery (n = 10). Mortality and hospitalization, symptoms, QOL, and LVEF were reported in 8, 15 and 14 studies, respectively. All studies had moderate to high risk of bias except one randomized controlled trial (RCT) which evaluated semaglutide in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. Semaglutide resulted in weight loss with improvement in QOL. Lifestyle intervention led to weight loss, minimal adverse events, and improvement in symptoms in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HFpEF patients. In six observational studies, bariatric surgery in HFrEF patients achieved weight loss and improvement in LVEF safely in most patients but some patients developed worsening HF perioperatively. There is a need for high-quality adequately powered RCTs on intentional weight loss in HFpwO with survival and hospitalization outcomes. All forms of weight loss intervention studied in this review were likely to result in significant weight loss, improved symptoms and QOL. Careful monitoring is required due to an increase in certain adverse events.

Low-Income Participants' Preference Between Financial Incentives for Behavioral Goals vs Weight Loss Targets and Associations With Behavioral Goal Adherence.

Examine associations between whether participants' were matched to their preferred financial incentive design and behavioral goal adherence in a weight management intervention. Secondary quantitative analysis incorporating qualitative survey data. Primary care clinics in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in New York City and Los Angeles. 668 participants (mean age 46.9 years, 81.0% female, 97.7% Hispanic) with obesity were enrolled in the Financial Incentives foR Weight Reduction (FIReWoRk) intervention. We explored qualitatively participant's reasons for hypothetically choosing a behavioral goal-directed vs a weight loss outcome-based financial incentive program. Additionally, behavioral adherence to different goals was collected at the 6-month timepoint, categorized by match to preferred financial incentive design. Logistic regression was used to examine if participants with certain demographic and higher psychosocial factors were more likely to choose goal-directed over outcome-based incentives. Additionally, logistic regression was used to test for associations between preference and behavioral adherence, using incentive type as an interaction term. 60.1% of participants preferred the goal-directed incentive, with the majority stating that it was more structured. Married participants were more likely to prefer goal-directed incentives (OR = 1.57, CI = 1.06-2.33, P = .025). Moderation analysis revealed that participants who preferred goal-directed and were matched to goal-directed had greater rates of behavioral adherence for program attendance and self-weighing, but not dietary tracking and physical activity tracking, compared to those who preferred outcome-based and were matched to outcome-based. Receiving one's preferred incentive design may not play a strong role in behavioral goal adherence during financially incentivized weight loss interventions.

Weight loss treatment for COVID-19 in patients with NCDs: a pilot prospective clinical trial

COVID-19 comorbid with noncommunicable chronic diseases (NCDs) complicates the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, and increases the mortality rate. The aim is to evaluate the effects of a restricted diet on clinical/laboratory inflammation and metabolic profile, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and body composition in patients with COVID-19 comorbid with NCDs. We conducted a 6-week open, pilot prospective controlled clinical trial. The study included 70 adult patients with COVID-19 comorbid with type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension, or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Interventions: a restricted diet including calorie restriction, hot water drinking, walking, and sexual self-restraint. Primary endpoints: COVID-19 diagnosis by detecting SARS-CoV-2 genome by RT-PCR; weight loss in Main group; body temperature; C-reactive protein. Secondary endpoints: the number of white blood cells; erythrocyte sedimentation rate; adverse effects during treatment; fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP); blood lipids; ALT/AST, chest CT-scan. In Main group, patients with overweight lost weight from baseline (− 12.4%; P < 0.0001); 2.9% in Main group and 7.2% in Controls were positive for COVID-19 (RR: 0.41, CI: 0.04–4.31; P = 0.22) on the 14th day of treatment. Body temperature and C-reactive protein decreased significantly in Main group compared to Controls on day 14th of treatment (P < 0.025). Systolic/diastolic BP normalized (P < 0.025), glucose/lipids metabolism (P < 0.025); ALT/AST normalized (P < 0.025), platelets increased from baseline (P < 0.025), chest CT (P < 0.025) in Main group at 14 day of treatment. The previous antidiabetic, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, and other symptomatic medications were adequately decreased to completely stop during the weight loss treatment. Thus, the fast weight loss treatment may be beneficial for the COVID-19 patients with comorbid T2D, hypertension, and NASH over traditional medical treatment because, it improved clinical and laboratory/instrumental data on inflammation; glucose/lipid metabolism, systolic/diastolic BPs, and NASH biochemical outcomes, reactive oxygen species; and allowed patients to stop taking medications.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05635539 (02/12/2022): https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05635539?term=NCT05635539&draw=2&rank=1.

An Adaptive Behavioral Intervention for Weight Loss Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lifestyle interventions for weight loss are difficult to implement in clinical practice. Self-managed mobile health implementations without or with added support after unsuccessful weight loss attempts could offer effective population-level obesity management. To test whether a wireless feedback system (WFS) yields noninferior weight loss vs WFS plus telephone coaching and whether participants who do not respond to initial treatment achieve greater weight loss with more vs less vigorous step-up interventions. In this noninferiority randomized trial, 400 adults aged 18 to 60 years with a body mass index of 27 to 45 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo 3 months of treatment initially with WFS or WFS plus coaching at a US academic medical center between June 2017 and March 2021. Participants attaining suboptimal weight loss were rerandomized to undergo modest or vigorous step-up intervention. The WFS included a Wi-Fi activity tracker and scale transmitting data to a smartphone app to provide daily feedback on progress in lifestyle change and weight loss, and WFS plus coaching added 12 weekly 10- to 15-minute supportive coaching calls delivered by bachelor's degree-level health promotionists viewing participants' self-monitoring data on a dashboard; step-up interventions included supportive messaging via mobile device screen notifications (app-based screen alerts) without or with coaching or powdered meal replacement. Participants and staff were unblinded and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment randomization. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in 6-month weight change, with the noninferiority margin defined as a difference in weight change of -2.5 kg; secondary outcomes included between-group differences for all participants in weight change at 3 and 12 months and between-group 6-month weight change difference among nonresponders exposed to modest vs vigorous step-up interventions. Among 400 participants (mean [SD] age, 40.5 [11.2] years; 305 [76.3%] women; 81 participants were Black and 266 were White; mean [SD] body mass index, 34.4 [4.3]) randomized to undergo WFS (n = 199) vs WFS plus coaching (n = 201), outcome data were available for 342 participants (85.5%) at 6 months. Six-month weight loss was -2.8 kg (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.0) for the WFS group and -4.8 kg (95% CI, -5.5 to -4.1) for participants in the WFS plus coaching group (difference in weight change, -2.0 kg [90% CI, -2.9 to -1.1]; P < .001); the 90% CI included the noninferiority margin of -2.5 kg. Weight change differences were comparable at 3 and 12 months and, among nonresponders, at 6 months, with no difference by step-up therapy. A wireless feedback system (Wi-Fi activity tracker and scale with smartphone app to provide daily feedback) was not noninferior to the same system with added coaching. Continued efforts are needed to identify strategies for weight loss management and to accurately select interventions for different individuals to achieve weight loss goals. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02997943.

Obesity.

Obesity is a common condition and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Fortunately, weight loss treatment can reduce obesity-related complications. This review summarizes the evidence-based strategies physicians can employ to identify, prevent, and treat obesity, including best practices to diagnose and counsel patients, to assess and address the burden of weight-related disease including weight stigma, to address secondary causes of weight gain, and to help patients set individualized and realistic weight loss goals and an effective treatment plan. Effective treatments include lifestyle modification and adjunctive therapies such as antiobesity medications and metabolic and bariatric surgery.

Text Messages With Financial Incentives for Men With Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Effective weight loss interventions are needed for men with obesity. To determine whether an intervention that combined text messaging with financial incentives attained significant weight loss at the 12-month follow-up compared with the control group and whether an intervention of text messaging alone attained significant weight loss at the 12-month follow-up compared with the control group. An assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted in Belfast, Bristol, and Glasgow areas in the UK. A total of 585 men with body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more were enrolled between July 2021 and May 2022. Final follow-up occurred June 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to 12 months of behavioral focused text messages combined with financial incentives (n = 196), 12 months of behavioral focused text messages alone (n= 194), or a waiting list (control group; n= 195). The financial incentive consisted of a monetary reward that was lost if weight loss targets were not met. All participants received weight management information and a pedometer at baseline. The 2 primary comparisons were the 12-month comparison of within-participant weight change between the text messaging with financial incentive group and the control group and the comparison between the text messaging alone group and the control group (minimum clinically important difference, 3%). The P value defined for statistical significance was P < .025 for each comparison. Of the 585 men (mean [SD] age, 50.7 [13.3] years; mean weight, 118.5 [19.9] kg; mean BMI, 37.7 [5.7]; 525 [90%] White), 227 (39%) lived in postal code areas with lower socioeconomic status, and 426 (73%) completed the 12-month follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up, compared with the control group, the mean percent weight change was significantly greater in the text messaging with financial incentive group (mean difference, -3.2%; 97.5% CI, -4.6% to -1.9%; P < .001) but was not significantly greater in the text messaging alone group (mean difference, -1.4%; 97.5% CI, -2.9% to 0.0, P = .05). The mean (SD) weight changes were -5.7 (7.4) kg for the text messaging with financial incentives group, -3.0 (7.5) kg for the text messaging alone group, and -1.5 (6.6) kg for the control group. The 12-month mean (SD) percentage weight changes from baseline were -4.8% (6.1%) for the text messaging with financial incentives group, -2.7% (6.3%) for text messaging alone group, and -1.3% (5.5%) for the control group. Of 366 adverse events reported, the most common were infections (83 [23%]). Of the 23 serious adverse events (6.3%), 12 (52%) occurred in the text messaging with financial incentives group, 5 (22%) in the texts messaging alone group, and 6 (26%) in the control group. None were considered related to participating in a trial group. Among men with obesity, an intervention with text messaging with financial incentive significantly improved weight loss compared with a control group, whereas text messaging alone was not significantly better than the control condition. These findings support text messaging combined with financial incentives to attain weight loss in men with obesity. isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN91974895.

Differences in weight-loss outcomes among race-gender subgroups by behavioural intervention delivery mode: An analysis of the POWER trial.

Prior in-person behavioural intervention studies have documented differential weight loss between men and women and by race, with Black women receiving the least benefit. Remotely delivered interventions are now commonplace, but few studies have compared outcomes by race-gender groups and delivery modality. We conducted a secondary analysis of POWER, a randomized trial (NCT00783315) designed to determine the effectiveness of 2 active, lifestyle-based, weight loss interventions (remote vs. in-person) compared to a control group. Participants with obesity and at least one cardiovascular disease risk factor (N = 415) were recruited in the Baltimore, MD area. Data from 233 white and 170 Black individuals were used for this analysis. Following an intention-to-treat approach, we compared the mean percent weight loss at 24 months by race-gender subgroups using repeated-measures, mixed-effects models. Everyone lost weight in the active interventions however, weight loss differed by race and gender. white and Black men had similar results for both interventions (white: in-person (-7.6%) remote (-7.4%); Black: in-person (-4.7%) remote (-4.4%)). In contrast, white women lost more weight with the in-person intervention (in-person (-7.2%) compared to the remote (-4.4%)), whereas Black women lost less weight in the in-person group compared to the remote intervention at 24 months (-2.0% vs. -3.0%, respectively; p for interaction <.001). We found differences between the effectiveness of the 2 weight loss interventions-in-person or remote-in white and Black women at 24 months. Future studies should consider intervention modality when designing weight loss interventions for women.

Retrospective study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Obesity modified as FIRE method (CBT-F) in combination with medication for weight loss.

Obesity rates continue to rise globally, posing a significant public health concern. Current treatments often lack long-term effectiveness, necessitating the exploration of new approaches. This study examines the effectiveness of a modified treatment method called Cognitive Behavioral Therapy modified as FIRE method (CBT-F), which combines cognitive behavioral therapy with pharmacotherapy. The study involves 62 women seeking weight loss treatment, divided into a CBT-F group and a control group receiving only pharmacotherapy. Anthropometric measures and blood chemistry data were collected over an average follow-up period of 68.5 days. The results demonstrate that the CBT-F group achieved significantly greater weight loss compared to the control group. No notable differences were observed in blood chemistry data. The combination of CBT-F and pharmacotherapy offers a comprehensive and planned approach to obesity treatment by addressing psychological factors and leveraging the effects of medication. Modules specifically designed to handle medication side effects and changes in eating behavior may contribute to treatment success and sustainability. Although this study focused on women, future research should examine the effectiveness of CBT-F in diverse populations. CBT-F shows promise as an alternative or complementary treatment option for individuals who have undergone CBT for extended periods or struggle with lifestyle changes. Overall, the findings suggest that CBT-F, with its shorter treatment duration and immediate effects of pharmacotherapy, holds potential as an effective and sustainable approach to obesity treatment. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings and expand the evidence base for this novel treatment.

Dropout in cognitive behavioral treatment in adults living with overweight and obesity: a systematic review

Obesity is a chronic, complex, and multifactorial disease resulting from the interaction of genetic, environmental, and behavioral factors. It is characterized by excessive fat accumulation in adipose tissue, which damages health and deteriorates the quality of life. Although dietary treatment can significantly improve health, high attrition is a common problem in weight loss interventions with serious consequences for weight loss management and frustration. The strategy used to improve compliance has been combining dietary prescriptions and recommendations for physical activity with cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) for weight management. This systematic review determined the dropout rate and predictive factors associated with dropout from CBT for adults with overweight and obesity. The data from the 37 articles selected shows an overall dropout rate between 5 and 62%. The predictive factors associated with attrition can be distinguished by demographics (younger age, educational status, unemployed status, and ethnicity) and psychological variables (greater expected 1-year Body Mass Index loss, previous weight loss attempts, perceiving more stress with dieting, weight and shape concerns, body image dissatisfaction, higher stress, anxiety, and depression). Common reasons for dropping out were objective (i.e., long-term sickness, acute illness, and pregnancy), logistical, poor job conditions or job difficulties, low level of organization, dissatisfaction with the initial results, lack of motivation, and lack of adherence. According to the Mixed Methods Appraisal quality analysis, 13.5% of articles were classified as five stars, and none received the lowest quality grade (1 star). The majority of articles were classified as 4 stars (46%). At least 50% of the selected articles exhibited a high risk of bias. The domain characterized by a higher level of bias was that of randomization, with more than 60% of the articles having a high risk of bias. The high risk of bias in these articles can probably depend on the type of study design, which, in most cases, was observational and non-randomized. These findings demonstrate that CBT could be a promising approach for obesity treatment, achieving, in most cases, lower dropout rates than other non-behavioral interventions. However, more studies should be conducted to compare obesity treatment strategies, as there is heterogeneity in the dropout assessment and the population studied. Ultimately, gaining a deeper understanding of the comparative effectiveness of these treatment strategies is of great value to patients, clinicians, and healthcare policymakers.Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022369995 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022369995.

Effect of combined GLP-1 analogue and bupropion/naltrexone on weight loss: a retrospective cohort study

Effect of combined GLP-1 analogue and bupropion/naltrexone on weight loss: a retrospective cohort study

Lipid profile in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. Characteristics and effects of the program. The importance of small and dense LDL (LDLpd)

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Recently it has been shown that not all lipid risk for atherosclerosis is due to LDL cholesterol. Both remnant particles and small and dense LDL (LDLpd) have been associated with a higer risk of the first cardiovascular events and recurrences. Methods We analyzed the lipid profile at admission of patients undergoing a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program in a tertiary referral hospital, in association with other analytical parameters, clinical characteristics and outcomes of CR in these patients. We collected data from patients who completed the programme between January 2022 and March 2023 on admission and at the end of the programme. Clinical and anthropometric data and the results of the stress tests were collected. We defined a TG/HDL ratio greater than 2 as being associated with the presence of small and dense LDL. Results 170 patients who had complete analytical profiles at hospital admission were included, 80.5% were male with a mean age 57.9+/-9 years, 92.5% were referred after an acute coronary syndrome, 25.6% were diabetic, 56.6% were smokers and 37.7% were obese. LDLpd at hospital admission was present in 73.4% of the patients. Male gender was more likely (86.3 vs. 68.9%, p=0.01, p=0.01) as well as being obese (83.9 vs 68.8%, p=0.04). No differences were found in terms of age, presence of DM, smoking or peripheral arterial disease. Nor did functional capacity or baseline quality of life. Less improvement was found in the SF 36 questionnaire (-6 vs +20, p=0.011), but similar in ergometry. Basal lipid profile was associated with higher total Ch values (173 vs 149, p=0.002), Ch LDL (104 vs 79, p=0.000), remnants (32 vs 14, p=0.000). As for baseline LDL, 51.6% with LDLpd,had it high LDL Ch&amp;gt;100 mg/dl, compared to 22.2% of those without LDLpd (P=0.002). As for the profile at discharge, we found that 63.5% still had LDLpd at discharge from the CR program ( vs. 15.9% of those without elevated LDLpd, P=0.000) and 22% had elevated remnants (P=0.002). After CR, these patients still had higher TG values (128 vs 81, p=0.000), lower HDL-C (44 vs 56, p=0.003) and higher remnants (24 vs 17, p=0.000) despite the fact that a greater decrease in remnants and TG/HDL in this group. Conclusions More than one third of the patients who undergo a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in our centre have LDLpd. Initially, male and obese patients have higher LDL and remnants. A weaker effect of the CR program in improving the lipidic profile has been observed in those patients. Consideration should be given to enhance lipid-lowering and intensive weight-loss treatments to decrease cardiovascular risk in this population.

A prospective 12-month structured weight loss intervention in women with severe obesity and polycystic ovary syndrome: Impact of weight loss on eating behaviors.

The knowledge regarding eating behavior and disorders in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and severe obesity is limited. This study aimed to assess eating behavior and lifestyle factors in women with severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), with and without PCOS, and the effect of weight loss on these behaviors. A prospective clinical trial with participants screened for PCOS using National Institutes of Health criteria. Participants completed the Food Frequency Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, and Questionnaire of Eating and Weight Patterns-revised, and were evaluated regarding binge eating disorder using DSM-5 criteria before and after a 12-month weight loss intervention. gov: NCT01319162. 246 women were included (PCOS n = 63, age 33.0 ± 8.4, BMI 39.9 ± 4.7; non-PCOS n = 183, age 37.7 ± 8.7, BMI 39.6 ± 4.3). Women with PCOS showed elevated baseline scores in cognitive restraint eating (50.0 [33.3-63.2]) compared to women without PCOS (38.9 [27.8-55.6]; p = 0.012). No differences were observed between groups in emotional and uncontrolled eating. In both groups, cognitive restraint eating was negatively correlated with energy intake (PCOS: r = -0.315, p < 0.05; non-PCOS: r = -0.214, p < 0.001), while uncontrolled eating displayed a positive correlation with energy intake (PCOS: r = 0.263, p = 0.05; non-PCOS: r = 0.402, p < 0.001). A positive correlation was found between emotional eating and energy intake only in women without PCOS (r = 0.400, p < 0.001). Baseline self-reported energy intake and physical activity did not differ between groups. At 12-month follow-up, women with PCOS reported reduced fat intake. Women without PCOS reported reduced energy intake, carbohydrates and sugar, increased protein, reduced scores for emotional and uncontrolled eating, and heightened scores for cognitive restraint eating. Comparing changes from baseline to follow-up, differences were found between groups in cognitive restraint, intake of fat, carbohydrates, and sugar. The mean weight loss was 12-14 kg, with no between-group difference (p = 0.616). Women with severe obesity and PCOS showed elevated cognitive restraint eating behaviors compared to women without PCOS. Although significant weight loss was seen in both groups, alterations in eating behavior more favorable for weight loss were only seen in women without PCOS.

Real-world persistence and adherence to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists among obese commercially insured adults without diabetes.

In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist product, liraglutide injection, for obesity treatment. Many GLP-1 obesity treatment clinical trials report significant weight loss and medication adherence at more than 85%. Little is known about the real-world GLP-1 obesity treatment adherence, persistence, and switch rates. To measure GLP-1 therapy persistence, adherence, and switch rates in a real-world cohort of members without diabetes using these drugs for obesity treatment. Integrated pharmacy and medical claims data from 16.5 million average monthly commercially insured membership were used to identify obese members without diabetes newly initiating GLP-1 therapy between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Members were required to be continuously enrolled 1-year before and after the GLP-1 therapy start date and aged 19 years of age or older. Persistence was measured as no greater than or equal to 60-day gap with allowance for GLP-1 switching. Adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC) and members with a PDC greater than or equal to 80% were considered adherent. GLP-1 product switching was also assessed descriptively. 4,066 commercially insured obese members without diabetes that newly initiated GLP-1 therapy met all study criteria. The mean age was 46 years, and 81% were female. Overall, GLP-1 persistence was 46.3% at 180 days and 32.3% at 1 year. The highest and lowest persistence rates at 1 year were observed for semaglutide (Ozempic) at 47.1% and liraglutide (Saxenda) 19.2%, respectively. Average PDC during the 1-year assessment was 51.0% with 27.2% adherent to therapy and 11.1% switched GLP-1 drugs. This GLP-1 weight loss treatment real-world analysis, among obese individuals without diabetes, found poor 1-year persistence and adherence and low rates of switching between products. These findings will aid in assessing products cost-effectiveness, understanding obesity care management program needs, forecasting future GLP-1 use and cost trends, and negotiating GLP-1 pharmaceutical manufacturer value-based purchasing agreements.

The effects of different weight-loss interventions on Bile acid and FGF-19 metabolism and correlation with metabolic improvement

The effects of different weight-loss interventions on Bile acid and FGF-19 metabolism and correlation with metabolic improvement

Abstract PO5-14-01: Weight loss and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intervention in overweight and obese peri- and postmenopausal women with increased breast cancer risk modifies the gut microbiome and is associated with circulating biomarkers

Abstract Background: Obesity-associated gut microbiome dysbiosis is thought to increase risk for postmenopausal breast cancer through alteration of estrogen metabolism and an increase in pro-inflammatory microbe abundance. Many studies have reported an increase in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes phyla ratio as a biomarker of obesity and is associated with adverse metabolic outcomes. Marine omega-3 eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) fatty acids are thought to have favorable metabolic and inflammation resolving properties resulting in reduced risk for several epithelial cancers. One possible mechanism is the effect of EPA and DHA on the gut microbiome. We assessed the effect of weight loss and/or omega-3 supplementation on the gut microbiome and circulating molecular breast cancer risk factors. Methods: 46 peri/postmenopausal overweight and obese women at increased risk for breast cancer were enrolled into a weight-loss intervention and after 2 weeks randomized to 3.25 g/day combined EPA and DHA or placebo (PMC8416797). Fecal samples were collected at 0, 2-weeks and 6-months, with matched fecal samples for all timepoints available for 26 patients. Fecal samples at 6-months were available for 34 patients. 12M read depth metagenomic sequencing was performed on DNA isolated from feces to determine shifts in the gut microbiome. Fasting and non-fasting blood was also collected for circulating biomarker analysis. Body composition by DXA scan were also performed at baseline and 6-month time points. Results: Mean baseline BMI was 32 kg/m2. There was no significant difference between arms in age, baseline BMI, % body fat, or baseline Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. We identified gut microbiota species (A. hadrus and P. faecium) that correlated with metabolic parameters (% body fat, adiponectin/leptin ratio, and fasting insulin), species (P. dorei and B. ovatus) that correlated with estradiol levels, and mucin-degrading species (D. formicigenerans and R. gnavus) whose abundance correlated with inflammation (as measured by circulating monocyte-chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1)). Median 6-month weight change for all randomized subjects was -10% from baseline. Favorable change in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was associated both with the degree of weight loss and with omega-3 supplementation, although significant species modification differed between weight loss and omega-3 PUFA groups. Women with both &amp;gt;10% weight loss and omega-3 supplementation had a significantly reduced Firmicutes abundance and lower Firmicute/Bacteroidetes ratio than other groups. Species abundance shifts appear to differ between weight loss and omega-3 supplementation with 3 species modified by weight loss and 12 species shifted by omega-3 PUFA administration. Omega-3 PUFA supplementation significantly reduced proportional abundance of Dorea formicigenerans, which was a microbe associated with inflammation. Conclusions: Omega-3 supplementation at 3.25 g/day compared to placebo had a greater net effect on changing the gut microbiome in overweight and obese women at increased risk for breast cancer undergoing a weight loss intervention. Change in the gut microbiome may serve as a useful response biomarker in Phase II prevention trials of omega-3 fatty acid and weight loss. Citation Format: Katherine L. Cook, Erin Giles, Amy Kreutzjans, Shahid Umar, Christie Befort, Bruce Kimler, Stephen Hursting, Carol Fabian. Weight loss and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intervention in overweight and obese peri- and postmenopausal women with increased breast cancer risk modifies the gut microbiome and is associated with circulating biomarkers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-14-01.

A very-low-calorie ketogenic diet normalises obesity-related enhanced levels of erythropoietin compared with a low-calorie diet or bariatric surgery.

Nutritional ketosis synergistically with body-weight loss induced by a very-low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) has proven to be effective in improving obesity-related pathophysiology. Recently, growing attention has been focused on the relation between erythropoietin (EPO) and obesity. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether nutritional ketosis and weight loss induced by a VLCKD modify the circulating levels of EPO in patients with obesity in comparison with the effect of low-calorie diet (LCD) or bariatric surgery (BS). EPO levels, iron status and body composition parameters were evaluated in 72 patients with overweight or obesity and 27 normal-weight subjects at baseline and after the three different weight-reduction therapies (VLCKD, LCD and BS) in 69 patients with excess body weight. β-hydroxybutyrate levels were also measured in the VLCKD group. The follow-up was established at 2-3months and 4-6months. It was found that EPO levels were higher in morbid obesity and correlated with higher basal weight, fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the overall sample. High baseline EPO levels were also correlated with higher impact on the course of weight loss and changes in FM and FFM induced by the three weight-loss interventions. Furthermore, the VLCKD induced a decrease in EPO levels coinciding with maximum ketosis, which was maintained over time, while statistically significant changes were not observed after LCD and BS. The obesity-related increased EPO levels are restored after VLCKD intervention at the time of maximum ketosis, suggesting a potential role of the nutritional ketosis induced by the VLCKD. Baseline EPO levels could be a biomarker of response to a weight-loss therapy.

Weight management using meal replacements and cardiometabolic risk reduction in individuals with pre-diabetes and features of metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This review synthesized the evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of meal replacements (MRs) as part of a weight loss intervention with conventional food-based weight loss diets on cardiometabolic risk in individuals with pre-diabetes and features of metabolic syndrome. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched through January 16, 2024. Data were pooled using the generic inverse variance method and expressed as mean difference [95% confidence intervals]. The overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Ten trials (n= 1254) met the eligibility criteria. MRs led to greater reductions in body weight (-1.38 kg [-1.81, -0.95]), body mass index (BMI, -0.56 kg/m2 [-0.78, -0.34]), waist circumference (-1.17 cm [-1.93, -0.41]), HbA1c (-0.11% [-0.22, 0.00]), LDL-c (-0.18 mmol/L [-0.28, -0.08]), non-HDL-c (-0.17 mmol/L [-0.33, -0.01]), and systolic blood pressure (-2.22 mmHg [-4.20, -0.23]). The overall certainty of the evidence was low to moderate owing to imprecision and/or inconsistency. The available evidence suggests that incorporating MRs into a weight loss intervention leads to small important reductions in body weight, BMI, LDL-c, non-HDL-c, and systolic blood pressure, and trivial reductions in waist circumference and HbA1c, beyond that seen with conventional food-based weight loss diets.

Thyroid Hyperplasia and Neoplasm Adverse Events Associated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System: Retrospective Analysis.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are one of the most commonly used drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical guidelines recommend GLP-1 RAs as an adjunct to diabetes therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease, presence or risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and obesity. The weight loss observed in clinical trials has been explored further in healthy individuals, putting GLP-1 RAs on track to be the next weight loss treatment. Although the adverse event profile is relatively safe, most GLP-1 RAs come with a labeled boxed warning for the risk of thyroid cancers, based on animal models and some postmarketing case reports in humans. Considering the increasing popularity of this drug class and its expansion into a new popular indication, a further review of the most recent postmarketing safety data was warranted to quantify thyroid hyperplasia and neoplasm instances. GLP-1 RA patient reports from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System database were analyzed using reporting odds ratios and 95% CIs. In this study, we analyzed over 18 million reports from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and provided evidence of significantly increased propensity for thyroid hyperplasias and neoplasms in patients taking GLP-1 RA monotherapy when compared to patients taking sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor monotherapy. GLP-1 RAs, regardless of indication, are associated with an over 10-fold increase in thyroid neoplasm and hyperplasia adverse event reporting when compared to SGLT-2 inhibitors.