Weeks Of Intensive Insulin Therapy Research Articles

Effect of short-term intensive insulin therapy on α-cell function in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

The effect of intensive insulin therapy on hyperglucagonemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and its associations with β-cell function, has not been elucidated. This study assessed the effect of 12 weeks of intensive insulin therapy on hyperglucagonemia in newly diagnosed T2DM and its associations with β-cell function, with reference to the effects of 12 weeks of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs).One hundred eight patients with newly diagnosed T2DM were enrolled from January 2015 to December 2015. The patients were randomly divided to receive, for 12 weeks, either intensive insulin therapy or OHAs. Meal tolerance tests were conducted at baseline before treatment (0 week), at 12 weeks (end of treatment), and 12 months after the initiation of treatment. The levels of glucagon, proinsulin, C-peptide (CP), and blood glucose were measured at timepoints 0, 30, and 120 minutes during the meal tolerance test.Intensive insulin treatment was associated with a decrease in glucagon levels (at 0, 30, and 120 minutes) and proinsulin/CP, and an increase in the insulin-secretion index ΔCP30/ΔG30 and ΔCP120/ΔG120, at 12 weeks and 12 months during the follow-up, compared with the corresponding effects of OHAs. Intensive insulin therapy could reduce but failed to normalize glucagon levels at 12 weeks. There were no correlations between the change of percentages in total area under the curve of glucagon and other glycemic parameters (proinsulin/CP; ΔCP30/ΔG30; or ΔCP120/ΔG120). Patients who received intensive insulin therapy were more likely to achieve their target glycemic goal and remission, compared with those who received OHAs.Short-term intensive insulin therapy facilitates the improvement of both β-cell and α-cell function in newly diagnosed T2DM mellitus. Decline of β-cell secretion and concomitant α-cell dysfunction may both be involved in the pathogenesis of T2DM.

Intermittent Intensive Insulin Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: Effects on Hypoglycemia, Weight Gain, and Quality of Life Over 2 Years

Objective: In early type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the administration of short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) can induce glycemic remission for a year thereafter, but this effect ultimately wanes. In this context, intermittently repeating short-term IIT could provide a strategy for maintaining the otherwise transient benefits of this intervention. However, the viability of this strategy would be contingent upon not inducing undesirable effects of insulin therapy such as excessive hypoglycemia and fat deposition. We thus sought to evaluate the effect of administering short-term IIT every 3 months on hypoglycemia, weight gain, and quality of life in early T2DM. Methods: In this 2-year pilot trial, 24 adults with T2DM of 2.0 ± 1.7 years duration and hemoglobin A1c of 6.4 (46 mmol/mol) ± 0.1% were randomized to 3 weeks of IIT (glargine, lispro) followed by either (1), repeat IIT for up to 2 weeks every 3 months or (2), daily metformin. IIT was titrated to target near-normoglycemia (premeal glucose 4 to 6 mmol/L; 2-hour postmeal <8 mmol/L). Participants were assessed every 3 months, with quality of life (QOL) evaluated annually. Results: The rate of hypoglycemia (<3.5 mmol/L) was low in the metformin and intermittent IIT arms (0.37 versus 0.95 events per patient-year; P = .28). There were no differences between the groups in changes over time in overall, central, or hepatic fat deposition (as reflected by weight [P = .10], waist-to-hip ratio [P = .58], and alanine aminotransferase [P = .64], respectively). Moreover, there were no differences between the groups in QOL at 1- and 2-years. Conclusion: Intermittent short-term IIT may be safely administered in early T2DM without excessive adverse impact on hypoglycemic risk, anthropometry, or QOL. Abbreviations: ALT = alanine aminotransferase; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; IIT = intensive insulin therapy; ISSI-2 = insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; QOL = quality of life; SF-36 = medical outcomes study 36-item short-form health survey; T2DM = type 2 diabetes.

Probing the Meaning of Persistent Propeptide Release in Type 1 Diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes is well recognized to be immune mediated, resulting in destruction of β-cells. That this eradication is not always complete was evident in an early report from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) showing that 11% of adult participants with type 1 diabetes for more than 5 years had measurable C-peptide in the fasting state and following mixed-meal stimulation, while no adolescents had evidence of such (1). Further, in participants with measurable C-peptide responses, C-peptide declined in all after a year of randomized therapy, with this decline being less in those who received intensive insulin therapy. Subsequently, it was shown in adolescents that 2 weeks of intensive insulin therapy, compared with conventional therapy, resulted in improved β-cell function a year later along with superior glucose control (2). In addition to C-peptide, proinsulin has also been shown to be circulating in individuals with type 1 diabetes at the time of diagnosis and to be still measurable 30 months later (3,4). Thus, there is long-standing evidence that at the time of diagnosis and subsequently, individuals with type 1 diabetes have β-cells still capable of synthesizing proinsulin, and many can process it to C-peptide and insulin. In the current issue of Diabetes Care , Sims et al. (5) report longitudinal findings on proinsulin secretion in type 1 diabetes using a large number of samples from the T1D Exchange. They divided their subjects into three groups based on stimulated C-peptide responses to a mixed meal. We have categorized these groups as having absent, intermediate, and high C-peptide responses, although the latter are a great deal lower than what is observed in healthy people. Individuals in the absent group had C-peptide responses that were below the reliable lower detection limit of the assay, and they were not studied further. These …

Effect of short-term intensive insulin therapy on the incretin response in early type 2 diabetes

AimsShort-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) and gastric bypass surgery are both interventions that can improve beta-cell function, reduce insulin resistance and induce remission of type 2 diabetes. Whereas gastric bypass yields an enhanced glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) response that may contribute to its metabolic benefits, the effect of short-term IIT on the incretin response is unclear. Thus, we sought to evaluate the impact of IIT on GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) secretion in early type 2 diabetes. MethodsIn this study, 63 patients (age 59±8.3 years, baseline A1c 6.8±0.7%, diabetes duration 3.0±2.1 years) underwent 4 weeks of IIT (basal insulin detemir and pre-meal insulin aspart). GLP-1, GIP and glucagon responses were assessed by the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of these hormones on oral glucose tolerance tests at baseline and 1-day after the completion of therapy. Beta-cell function was assessed by Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2), with insulin resistance measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA-IR). ResultsAs expected, comparing the post-therapy oral glucose tolerance test to that at baseline, IIT increased ISSI-2 (P=0.02), decreased HOMA-IR (P<0.001), and reduced AUCglucagon (P<0.001). Of note, however, IIT had no significant impact on AUCGLP-1 (P=0.24) and reduced AUCGIP (P=0.02). ConclusionDespite improving beta-cell function, insulin resistance and glucagonemia, short-term IIT does not change GLP-1 secretion and decreases the GIP response to an oral glucose challenge in early type 2 diabetes. Thus, the beneficial impact of this therapy on glucose homeostasis is not attributable to its effects on incretin secretion.

Predictors of sustained drug-free diabetes remission over 48 weeks following short-term intensive insulin therapy in early type 2 diabetes

ObjectiveIn early type 2 diabetes (T2DM), short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) for 2–4 weeks can decrease insulin resistance, reduce glucagonemia, improve β-cell function, and even induce a remission of diabetes...

Liraglutide and the preservation of pancreatic β-cell function in early type 2 diabetes: the LIBRA trial.

Clinical studies evaluating the effects of medications on β-cell function in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are compromised by an inability to determine the actual baseline degree of β-cell dysfunction independent of the reversible dysfunction induced by hyperglycemia (glucotoxicity). Short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) is a strategy for eliminating glucotoxicity before randomization. This study determined whether liraglutide can preserve β-cell function over 48 weeks in early T2DM following initial elimination of glucotoxicity with IIT. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 51 patients with T2DM of 2.6 ± 1.9 years' duration and an A1C of 6.8 ± 0.8% (51 ± 8.7 mmol/mol) completed 4 weeks of IIT before randomization to daily subcutaneous liraglutide or placebo injection, with serial assessment of β-cell function by Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2) on oral glucose tolerance test performed every 12 weeks. The primary outcome of baseline-adjusted ISSI-2 at 48 weeks was higher in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group (339.8 ± 27.8 vs. 229.3 ± 28.4, P = 0.008). Baseline-adjusted HbA1c at 48 weeks was lower in the liraglutide group (6.2 ± 0.1% vs. 6.6 ± 0.1%, P = 0.055) (44 ± 1.1 vs. 49 ± 1.1 mmol/mol). At each quarterly assessment, >50% of participants on liraglutide had an HbA1c ≤6.0% (42 mmol/mol) and glucose tolerance in the nondiabetic range. Despite this level of glycemic control, no difference was found in the incidence of hypoglycemia between the liraglutide and placebo groups (P = 0.61). Two weeks after stopping treatment, however, the beneficial effect on ISSI-2 of liraglutide versus placebo was entirely lost (191.9 ± 24.7 vs. 238.1 ± 25.2, P = 0.20). Liraglutide provides robust enhancement of β-cell function that is sustained over 48 weeks in early T2DM but lost upon cessation of therapy.

Glycemic Variability in Patients With Early Type 2 Diabetes: The Impact of Improvement in β-Cell Function

OBJECTIVE Increased glycemic variability has been reported to be associated with the risk of hypoglycemia and possibly diabetes complications and is believed to be due to β-cell dysfunction. However, it is not known whether improvement in β-cell function can reduce glycemic variability. Because short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) can improve β-cell function in early type 2 diabetes (T2DM), our objective was to determine whether the β-cell functional recovery induced by this therapy is associated with decreased glycemic variability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Sixty-one patients with T2DM of 3.0 years mean duration underwent 4 weeks of IIT, which consisted of basal insulin detemir and premeal insulin aspart. Glucose variability was assessed in both the first and the last week by the coefficient of variation of capillary glucose on daily 6-point self-monitoring profiles. β-Cell function before and after IIT was assessed with the Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2). RESULTS Between the first and the last week on IIT, 55.7% of patients had a reduction in glucose variability. Change in glucose variability was negatively correlated with the change in β-cell function (ISSI-2) (r = -0.34, P = 0.008). On multiple linear regression analyses, percentage change in ISSI-2 emerged as the only factor independently associated with the change in glucose variability (standardized β = -0.42, P = 0.03). Moreover, patients with an increase in ISSI-2 ≥25% experienced a reduction in glucose variability compared with their peers who had almost no change (-0.041 ± 0.06 vs. -0.0002 ± 0.04, respectively; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS In early T2DM, glycemic variability is a modifiable parameter that can be reduced by improving β-cell function with short-term IIT.

Effect of short‐term intensive insulin therapy on quality of life in type 2 diabetes

Short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) early in the course of type 2 diabetes can improve pancreatic beta-cell function and even induce normoglycemia that persists post-therapy. In spite of this benefit, insulin is often delayed until late in the course of disease partly because of its perceived negative impact on quality of life (QOL). Therefore, we sought to examine the effect of early implementation of short-term IIT on patient-reported QOL and treatment satisfaction. A total of 34 patients with type 2 diabetes (5.9 ± 6.6 years duration, on zero to two oral antihyperglycaemic agents) underwent 4-8 weeks of IIT consisting of basal detemir and pre-meal insulin aspart. Patient-reported QOL, treatment satisfaction and symptom distress were assessed at baseline and post-IIT using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Diabetes Quality of Life Measure (DQOL), and Diabetes Symptoms Checklist-Revised (DSC-R). There was a significant improvement in glycated haemoglobin post-IIT (mean 6.5% vs. 7%; P < 0.001). All 34 patients tolerated IIT well with no severe hypoglycaemia. Following IIT, the SF-36 showed a significant improvement compared to baseline in reported physical functioning (mean 88.2 vs. 83.3, P = 0.009), general health (69.4 vs. 65.6, P = 0.03), and general mental health (85.2 vs. 82.2, P = 0.04). The DQOL demonstrated a significant improvement in global health perception (P = 0.02), diabetes worry (P = 0.006) and treatment satisfaction (P = 0.007). The DSC-R revealed a significant improvement in the diabetes-related total symptom score (P = 0.01). Contrary to popular perception, a short course of IIT resulted in significant improvements in QOL and treatment satisfaction, demonstrating the patient acceptability of early insulin therapy.

Initial short‐term intensive insulin therapy as a strategy for evaluating the preservation of beta‐cell function with oral antidiabetic medications: a pilot study with sitagliptin

Studies evaluating the effects of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) on beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are confounded by an inability to establish the actual baseline degree of beta-cell dysfunction, independent of the deleterious effects of hyperglycaemia (glucotoxicity). Because intensive insulin therapy (IIT) can induce normoglycaemia, we reasoned that short-term IIT could enable evaluation of the beta-cell protective capacity of OADs, free from confounding hyperglycaemia. We applied this strategy to assess the effect of sitagliptin on beta-cell function. In this pilot study, 37 patients with T2DM of 6.0 + 6.4 years duration and A1c 7.0 + 0.8% on 0-2 OADs were switched to 4-8 weeks of IIT consisting of basal detemir and premeal insulin aspart. Subjects achieving fasting glucose <7.0 mmol/l 1 day after completing IIT (n = 21) were then randomized to metformin with either sitagliptin (n = 10) or placebo (n = 11). Subjects were followed for 48 weeks, with serial assessment of beta-cell function [ratio of AUC(Cpep) to AUC(gluc) over Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (AUC(Cpep/gluc) /HOMA-IR)] on 4-h meal tests. During the study, fasting glucagon-like-peptide-1 was higher (p = 0.003) and A1c lower in the sitagliptin arm (p = 0.016). Nevertheless, although beta-cell function improved during the IIT phase, it declined similarly in both arms over time (p = 0.61). By study end, AUC(Cpep/gluc) /HOMA-IR was not significantly different between the placebo and sitagliptin arms (median 71.2 vs 80.4; p = 0.36). Pretreatment IIT can provide a useful strategy for evaluating the beta-cell protective capacity of diabetes interventions. In this pilot study, improved A1c with sitagliptin could not be attributed to a significant effect on preservation of beta-cell function.

The response to short‐term intensive insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes

Although a short course of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) can improve beta-cell function and glycaemic control in most patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the impact of this intervention in diabetes of longer duration has not been carefully studied. Thus, we sought to evaluate the effect of short-term IIT in patients with established T2DM. Thirty-four patients, with diabetes of mean 5.9 +/- 6.6 years duration, underwent 4-8 weeks of IIT, with 4-h meal test administered at baseline and at 1 day post-IIT. A positive clinical response was defined as fasting glucose < 7.0 mmol/l off any antidiabetic therapy at the latter test. A positive response was achieved in 68% (n = 23) of the subjects. At baseline meal test, the responders had lower glucose levels than the non-responders from 120 to 240 min (all timepoints p < or = 0.0008) and higher late incremental area-under-the-C-peptide-curve (AUC(Cpep)), particularly from 60 to 150 min (all p < 0.005). Beta-cell function (ratio of AUC(Cpep) to AUC(gluc) divided by HOMA-IR) was similar between the groups at baseline (median 54.1 vs. 51.3, p = 0.62) but after IIT was significantly higher in the responders (109.3 vs. 57.4, p = 0.009). At baseline, the strongest predictors of the change in beta-cell function were glucose levels between 180 and 240 min (all r = -0.5, p = 0.005) and incremental AUC(Cpep) from 120 to 180 min (all r > or = 0.66, p < or = 0.0001), both reflecting late-phase insulin secretion. The clinical response to short-term IIT is variable, consistent with the heterogeneity of T2DM. However, preserved late-phase insulin secretion may identify those patients who can benefit from this intervention with improved beta-cell function.

Intensive insulin therapy reduces the urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 excretion in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

To observe the change of urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) excretion in the patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared to normal control group, and to investigate the effect and significance of insulin intensive therapy on the urinary ICAM-1 excretion. We examined the urinary ICAM-1 and creatinine (Cr) of random urine in 20 patients with T2DM and 20 normal subjects using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All diabetics were given intensive insulin therapy for 2 weeks, urinary ICAM- 1 and Cr was examined once again at the end of observation. Compared with the normal control group, not only the fasting blood glucose (FBG), post-prandial 2-h blood glucose (P2hBG), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), but also the urinary ICAM-1 to urinary Cr ratio in patients with T2DM increased significantly (p<0.01). The urinary ICAM-1/urinary Cr ratio of diabetics had a positive correlation with FBG (r=0.51, p<0.01), P2hBG (r=0.496, p<0.01), and HbA1c (r=0.478, p<0.05), respectively. After 2 weeks of intensive insulin therapy in Type 2 diabetics, both the level of blood glucose and the level of urinary ICAM-1/urinary Cr ratio had a remarkable decrease compared with the basal values (p<0.01). Intensive insulin therapy is capable of alleviating the enhanced local inflammation reaction of renal tissue under hyperglycemia state with the reduction of urinary ICAM-1 excretion.

The incretin system and its role in type 2 diabetes mellitus

The incretin hormones are released during meals from gut endocrine cells. They potentiate glucose-induced insulin secretion and may be responsible for up to 70% of postprandial insulin secretion. The incretin hormones include glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), both of which may also promote proliferation/neogenesis of beta cells and prevent their decay (apoptosis). Both hormones contribute to insulin secretion from the beginning of a meal and their effects are progressively amplified as plasma glucose concentrations rise. The current interest in the incretin hormones is due to the fact that the incretin effect is severely reduced or absent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In addition, there is hyperglucagonaemia, which is not suppressible by glucose. In such patients, the secretion of GIP is near normal, but its effect on insulin secretion, particularly the late phase, is severely impaired. The loss of GIP action is probably a consequence of diabetes, since it is also observed in patients with diabetes secondary to chronic pancreatitis, in whom the incretin effect is also lost. GLP-1 secretion, on the other hand, is also impaired, but its insulinotropic and glucagon-suppressive actions are preserved, although the potency of GLP-1 in this respect is decreased compared to healthy subjects. However, in supraphysiological doses, GLP-1 administration may completely normalize beta as well as alpha cell sensitivity to glucose. The impaired action of GLP-1 and GIP in T2DM may be at least partly restored by improved glycaemic control, as shown in studies involving 4 weeks of intensive insulin therapy. The reduced incretin effect is believed to contribute to impaired regulation of insulin and glucagon secretion in T2DM, and, in support of this, exogenous GLP-1 administration may restore blood glucose regulation to near normal levels. Thus, the pathogenesis of T2DM seems to involve a dysfunction of both incretins. Enhancement of incretin action may therefore represent a therapeutic solution. Clinical strategies therefore include the development of metabolically stable activators of the GLP-1 receptor; and inhibition of DPP-4, the enzyme that destroys native GLP-1 almost immediately. Orally active DPP-4 inhibitors and the metabolically stable activators, exenatide (Byetta), are now on the market, and numerous clinical studies have shown that both principles are associated with durable antidiabetic activity.

Effect of Strict Glycemic Control on Renal Hemodynamic Response to Amino Acids and Renal Enlargement in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

Many patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus have an increase in the glomerular filtration rate and renal enlargement early in the course of their disease. Both these changes may be risk factors for the later development of diabetic nephropathy. Their cause is not known, but they could be due to augmented renal responses to the increase in plasma amino acid concentrations that occurs when dietary protein intake is high, a factor known to increase glomerular filtration and renal blood flow in normal subjects. We measured the glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow after an overnight fast and during an infusion of amino acids in 12 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and 9 normal subjects. The diabetic patients were studied when they were hyperglycemic, when they were euglycemic after an insulin infusion for 36 hours, and after intensive insulin therapy for 3 weeks. Kidney volume was measured by ultrasonography before and after the period of intensive insulin therapy. The glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow were normal after fasting when the patients were hyperglycemic (mean [+/- SE] fasting plasma glucose level, 11.5 +/- 0.7 mmol per liter). After the amino acid infusion, these values increased more in the patients (glomerular filtration rate, 2.65 +/- 0.07 ml per second per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area; renal plasma flow, 13.30 +/- 0.68 ml per second per 1.73 m2; P less than 0.05 for both) than in the normal subjects (2.25 +/- 0.08 and 11.20 +/- 0.65 ml per second per 1.73 m2, respectively). The 36-hour infusion of insulin in the diabetic patients did not alter the glomerular filtration rate or renal plasma flow either before or during the amino acid infusion. After three weeks of intensive insulin therapy (fasting plasma glucose level, 5.3 +/- 0.2 mmol per liter), the glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow after the amino acid infusion (2.33 +/- 0.03 and 11.30 +/- 0.43 ml per second per 1.73 m2, respectively) were similar to those in the normal subjects. The kidney volumes in the normal subjects and the patients with diabetes were 219 +/- 14 and 312 +/- 14 ml per 1.73 m2, respectively (P less than 0.01); the volume decreased to 267 +/- 22 ml per 1.73 m2 (P less than 0.001) in the diabetic patients after three weeks of intensive insulin therapy, which was not significantly different from the volume in the normal subjects (P = 0.1). Conventionally treated diabetic patients who have normal renal function while fasting have augmented renal hemodynamic responses to increased plasma amino acid concentrations. The concomitant decrease in these hemodynamic responses and in kidney size with strict glycemic control suggests that these phenomena are related and influenced by the metabolic state.

Quantitation of forearm glucose and free fatty acid (FFA) disposal in normal subjects and type II diabetic patients: evidence against an essential role for FFA in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance.

This study was designed to quantitate glucose and FFA disposal by muscle tissue in patients with type II diabetes and to investigate the relationship between FFA metabolism and insulin resistance. The forearm perfusion technique was used in six normal subjects and two groups of normal weight diabetic patients, i.e. untreated (n = 8) and insulin-treated (n = 6). The latter received 2 weeks of intensive insulin therapy before the study. Plasma insulin levels were raised acutely [950-1110 pmol/L) (130-150 microU/mL)], while the blood glucose concentration was clamped at its basal value [4.9 +/- 0.1 (+/- SE) mmol/L in the normal subjects, 5.7 +/- 0.5 in the insulin-treated diabetic patients, and 5.5 +/- 0.3 in the untreated diabetic patients] by a variable glucose infusion. During the control period, arterial FFA concentrations were similar in the three groups, and they decreased to a comparable extent (less than 0.1 mmol/L) in response to insulin infusion. During the control period, the mean forearm FFA uptake was 2.5 +/- 0.5 mumol/L.min in the normal subjects, 2.9 +/- 0.5 in the insulin-treated patients, and 2.1 +/- 0.5 in the untreated diabetic patients. During the insulin infusion, FFA uptake was profoundly suppressed to similar levels in the normal subjects (0.9 +/- 0.1 mumol/L.min), the insulin-treated diabetic patients (1.1 +/- 0.3), and the untreated diabetic patients (0.9 +/- 0.1; P less than 0.001). Forearm glucose uptake was similar in the three groups during the control period. It increased during the insulin infusion, but the response in both diabetic groups was less than that in the normal subjects. The total amounts of glucose taken up by the forearm during the study period were 5.2 +/- 0.7, 2.6 +/- 0.5, and 2.1 +/- 0.6 mmol/L.min in the normal subjects, the insulin-treated diabetic patients, and the untreated diabetic patients, respectively (P less than 0.01). We conclude that 1) insulin-mediated glucose uptake by forearm skeletal muscle is markedly impaired in type II diabetes and improves only marginally after 2 weeks of intensive insulin therapy; 2) in contrast, no appreciable abnormality in forearm FFA metabolism is demonstrable in insulin-treated type II diabetic patients; and 3) FFA do not contribute to the insulin-treated skeletal muscle insulin resistance that occurs in patients with type II diabetes mellitus.

Modulation of insulin secretion by insulin and glucose in type II diabetes mellitus.

We studied the dose-response characteristics of insulin's ability to modulate its own secretion in normal and type II diabetic (NIDDM) subjects by measuring suppression of serum C-peptide levels during insulin infusions with the plasma glucose level held constant. In normal subjects at euglycemia, primed continuous insulin infusion rates of 15, 40, 120, and 240 mU/M2 X min acutely raised serum insulin to steady state levels of 37 +/- 2 (+/- SE), 96 +/- 6, 286 +/- 17, and 871 +/- 93 microU/ml, respectively. During each infusion, maximal suppression of C-peptide to 30% of basal levels occurred by 130 min. At the higher insulin levels (greater than or equal to 100 microU/ml), C-peptide levels fell rapidly, with an apparent t1/2 of 13 min, which approximates estimates for the t1/2 of circulating C-peptide in man. This is consistent with an immediate 70% inhibition of the basal rate of insulin secretion. At the lower insulin level (37 +/- 2 microU/ml), C-peptide levels fell to 30% of basal values less rapidly (apparent t1/2, 33 min), suggesting that 70% inhibition of basal insulin secretion rates was achieved more slowly. In NIDDM subjects, primed continuous insulin infusion rates of 15, 40, 120, and 1200 mU/M2 X min acutely raised serum insulin to steady state levels of 49 +/- 7, 93 +/- 11,364 +/- 31, and 10,003 +/- 988 microU/ml. During studies at basal hyperglycemia, only minimal C-peptide suppression was found, even at pharmacological insulin levels (10,003 +/- 988 microU/ml). However, if plasma glucose was allowed to fall during the insulin infusions, there was a rapid decrease in serum C-peptide to 30% of basal levels, analogous to that in normal subjects. Three weeks of intensive insulin therapy did not alter C-peptide suppression under conditions of hyperinsulinemia and falling plasma glucose. The following conclusions were reached. 1) In normal subjects, insulin (40-1000 microU/ml) inhibits its own secretion in a dose-responsive manner; more time is required to achieve maximal 70% suppression at the lower insulin level (40 microU/ml). 2) In NIDDM studied at basal hyperglycemia, insulin has minimal ability to suppress its own secretion. Thus, impaired feedback inhibition could contribute to basal hyperinsulinemia. 3) Under conditions of hyperinsulinemia and falling plasma glucose, insulin secretion is rapidly suppressed in NIDDM (analogous to that in normal subjects studied during euglycemia.