Somewhat understandably, interest in pollination biology of members of the Chenopodiaceae has been scant (see Percival, 1965, who made no mention of the family), or else has focused on the allergic reaction caused by some members of the family (see Homan, 1963, discussion of Chenopodium album as a secondary factor during the ragweed season). Mode of pollination in chenopods is, we believe, open to question in many instances. The general supposition has apparently been that the family is more or less uniformly anemophilous (e.g., Wodehouse, 1935, 1945, 1971), this in association with an abundant, weedy habit. In accordance, Proctor and Yeo (1972) alluded to the significant presence of chenopodiaceous in the pollen rain. Perhaps the general impression is that chenopods are simply uninteresting in terms of pollination biology. However, if some literature is retraced, a rather different perspective may be gained. Volkens (1893) offered the proposition that most members of the family may actually be entomophilous. Knuth (1909) presented what remains as probably the most detailed account of pollination in the Chenopodiaceae, not to mention a number of other families. From his work one is left with the understanding that chenopods are generally either anemophilous or self-pollinated; however, Knuth did not exclude the possibility of insect visits to such taxa as Salsola kali L. More recently, Ponomarev and Lykova (1960) credited M. Iljin with the suggestion that entomophily is characteristic of the subfamily Spirolobeae (=Salsoloideae, cf. Blackwell, 1977), admitting, however, that the situation had not been adequately studied. Ponomarev and Lykova further credited Z. P. Bochantseva and T. Vitovich with establishing self-pollination in several taxa of chenopods, including certain species of Salsola in Asiatic desert-steppe areas. Ponomarev and Lykova themselves reported the existence of cleistogamy in Petrosimonia triandra (Pallas) Simonk and Salsola brachiata Pallas. However, they stated that cleistogamous flowers were actually no different structurally from chasmogamous ones, but rather, that the stamens in cleistogamous flowers simply did not become exserted (and consequently would shed internally within the flower). They believed that cleistogamy could be quantified (on a percentage basis) merely by counting the number of flowers with included versus exserted stamens. From the preceding brief account, it is obvious that pollination biology in the Chenopodiaceae is much in need of investigation, or reinvestigation as the case may be. Such studies might well result in views of pollination mechanisms in the family substantially different from those currently held. Whereas it is probably true that certain major segments of the family, e.g., a number of species of Atriplex, are predominantly wind-pollinated systems, anemophily may in fact not prove to be the overpowering rule for the Chenopodiaceae as a whole. Entomophily unquestionably plays a role in some genera. Although entomophily may