Weed Management Programs Research Articles

Planting soybean green: how cereal rye biomass and preemergence herbicides impact Amaranthus spp. management and soybean yield

Abstract Cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop and preemergence herbicides are important components of an integrated weed management program for waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer] and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) management in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Accumulating adequate cereal rye biomass for effective suppression of Amaranthus spp. can be challenging in the upper Midwest due to the short window for cereal rye growth in a corn–soybean rotation. Farmers are adopting the planting green system to optimize cereal rye biomass production and weed suppression. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of planting soybean green when integrated with preemergence herbicides for the control of Amaranthus spp. under two soybean planting time frames. The study was conducted across 19 site-years in the United States over the 2021 and 2022 growing seasons. Factors included cover crop management practices (“no-till,” “cereal rye early-term,” and “cereal rye plant-green”), soybean planting times (“early” and “late”), and use of preemergence herbicides (“NO PRE” and “YES PRE”). Planting soybean green increased cereal rye biomass production by 33% compared with early termination. Greater cereal rye biomass production when planting green provided a 44% reduction in Amaranthus spp. density compared with no-till. The use of preemergence herbicides also resulted in a 68% reduction in Amaranthus spp. density compared with NO PRE. Greater cereal rye biomass produced when planting green reduced soybean stand, which directly reduced soybean yield in some site-years. Planting soybean green is a feasible management practice to optimize cereal rye biomass production, which, combined with preemergence herbicides, provided effective Amaranthus spp. management. Soybean stand was a key factor in maintaining soybean yields compared with no-till when planting green. Farmers should follow best management recommendations for proper planter and equipment setup to ensure effective soybean establishment under high levels of cereal rye biomass when planting green.

Simulated herbicide mixtures delay both specialist monogenic and generalist polygenic resistance evolution in weeds.

Evolution of herbicide-resistant weed populations is a major challenge to world food production. Using different herbicides in rotation and/or using different herbicides together as mixtures are strategies that may delay the selection of resistance. This study used simulation modelling to investigate whether mixtures and rotations can delay the selection of both generalist polygenic and specialist monogenic herbicide resistance, and whether these strategies are more likely to lead to the selection of generalist resistance in weed types with varying biological characteristics. Our simulations suggest that well-designed effective herbicide mixtures should delay evolution of both polygenic and monogenic resistance better than rotations and single herbicides across all weed types. Both mixture and rotation strategies increased the likelihood of polygenic resistance compared to single-herbicide use, and the likelihood of polygenic resistance increased as the fecundity and competitiveness of the weed increased. Whether monogenic or polygenic resistance occurred in each case depended most on the relative initial allele frequencies. We did not find that herbicide mixtures were more likely than rotations to lead to the selection of generalist polygenic resistance. The simulated efficacy of mixtures over rotations decreased if components were used at reduced rates or when individual components had already been used solo. Herbicide rotations and particularly well-designed mixtures should delay evolution of both polygenic and monogenic resistance, especially if used as part of an effective integrated weed management programme. However, herbicide mixtures and rotations may also increase the risk that resistance will be generalist polygenic rather than specialist monogenic. © 2024 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Poa annua control in golf course putting green collars via fraise mowing

AbstractPoa annua L. control on golf courses is challenging, particularly in collars adjacent to putting greens where herbicide options are limited. Field research was conducted in Knoxville, TN from 2022 to 2024 to evaluate P. annua control efficacy following summer fraise mowing of putting green collars. Plots were arranged in a hybrid bermudagrass [C. dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt‐Davy, cv. ‘Tifway’] collar adjacent to a creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) putting green. A walk‐behind fraise mower (RR600 HDX; SISIS) was used to fraise mow plots (0.6 × 3 m) to depths of 8 or 15 mm. A non‐fraise‐mowed check (0 mm) was included for comparison. Plots were fraise mowed on June 20, 2022 and July 10, 2023 with recovery visually assessed thereafter relative to non‐fraise‐mowed check plots in each replication. Poa annua control was visually assessed 133 and 233 days after treatment relative to non‐fraise‐mowed check plots as well. In the absence of herbicide, summer fraise mowing of hybrid bermudagrass collars provided effective control (>89%) of P. annua for 133 days. Hybrid bermudagrass recovery from this mechanical control method was swift, which suggests that it could be incorporated into a weed management program with pre‐ and postemergence herbicides similar to harvest weed seed control methods used in crop production.

Two-Pass Weed Management Programs for White Bean

It is essential to implement effective weed management programs to minimize white bean yield loss from weed interference. Four field experiments were conducted during 2022 and 2023 to determine the efficacy of one-pass compared to two-pass weed control programs. This study evaluated trifluralin + S-metolachlor + imazethapyr or trifluralin + S-metolachlor + halosulfuron applied preplant incorporated (PPI), bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop-p-ethyl applied postemergence (POST), and trifluralin + S-metolachlor + imazethapyr or trifluralin + S-metolachlor + halosulfuron applied PPI followed by (fb) bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop-p-ethyl applied POST in white bean. There was minimal white bean injury (≤ 5%) with the herbicide programs evaluated. Weed interference decreased white bean yield 44%. Weed interference with bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop-p-ethyl applied POST resulted in a 24% decrease in white bean seed yield compared to the weed-free control; however, all other PPI and PPI fb POST herbicide programs resulted in white bean seed yield that was similar to the weed-free control. Weed interference with the one-pass herbicide programs (PPI or POST) resulted in 17% lower white bean seed yield compared to the two-pass herbicide programs (PPI fb POST). Trifluralin + S-metolachlor + imazethapyr, applied PPI, controlled velvetleaf 85%, common ragweed 35%, common lambsquarters 96%, and green foxtail 80% at 8 weeks after the POST application (WAT). Trifluralin + S-metolachlor + halosulfuron, applied PPI, controlled velvetleaf 68%, common ragweed 87%, common lambsquarters 94% and green foxtail 56% at 8 WAT. Bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop-p-ethyl, applied POST, controlled velvetleaf 86%, common ragweed 97%, common lambsquarters 34%, and green foxtail 29% at 8 WAT. Trifluralin + S-metolachlor + imazethapyr, applied PPI, followed by bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop-p-ethyl, applied POST, controlled velvetleaf, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, and green foxtail 98, 97, 96, and 94%, respectively at 8 WAT. Trifluralin + S-metolachlor + halosulfuron, applied PPI, followed by bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop-p-ethyl, applied POST, controlled velvetleaf, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, and green foxtail 97, 99, 97 and 93%, respectively at 8 WAT. Based on orthogonal contrast, the two-pass herbicide programs provided 17, 21, 20, and 38% greater control of velvetleaf, common ragweed, common lambsquarters, and green foxtail in comparison to the one-pass herbicide programs, respectively at 8 WAT. This study concludes that the two-pass herbicide programs of trifluralin + S-metolachlor + imazethapyr or trifluralin + S-metolachlor + halosulfuron applied PPI followed by bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop-p-ethyl applied POST provides the most consistent weed control in white bean in Ontario.

A 4-year field study monitoring the evolution of Trp574Leu-resistant plants in an Echinochloa crus-galli population under different crop rotation and herbicide programs in maize.

A 4-year experiment evaluated the effects of different integrated weed management (IWM) programs on the evolution of a Echinochloa crus-galli population resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors in a maize cropping system. The programs included the continued use of ALS inhibitors, mixing them with alternative herbicides, or without ALS-inhibitors, in all cases under maize monocrop or a biennial crop rotation. IWM programs that relied solely on non-ALS-inhibitors usually achieved high control levels across years (> 90%). Additionally, Trp574Leu-resistant plants became prevalent (> 90%) in programs only using ALS inhibitors, while in the rest the frequency of susceptible plants did not substantially decrease below 40%. Regarding the other monitored grass weeds, Digitaria sanguinalis and Panicum dichotomiflorum were effectively controlled in programs using ALS-inhibitors without soybean rotation or in programs without ALS-inhibitors altogether, excepting the program relying on an 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibitor under maize monocrop for the latter species (0%). At the end of the experiment, the only IWM programs that reduced infestation levels were the one without ALS-inhibitors under soybean rotation, and the one with standard pre-emergence treatments. These findings highlight the effectiveness of crop rotation and alternative herbicides both pre- or post-emergence in controlling E. crus-galli. ALS-inhibitors, while challenged by resistance in E. crus-galli, remain valuable tools for managing other grass weed species in maize. It is crucial to adapt IWM strategies for herbicide-resistant E. crus-galli and other grass weed populations to mitigate the further evolution of resistance. © 2024 Corteva Agriscience. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Effect of Zero Tillage and Different Weed Management Practices in Direct Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Indo Gangetic Plains: A Review

Millions of rural and urban residents depend on the rice-wheat cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic plains (IGP) for their food security and means of subsistence. About 18 million hectares (m ha) of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) are rotated across Asia, of which 13.5 m ha are in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of India. This agricultural system’s viability is currently in jeopardy due to static yields of both wheat and rice and a decline in total factor productivity. The North West IGP's high input crop culture has allowed weeds to dominate the weed flora, including P. minor in wheat and Echinochloa crus-galli L. in rice. Farmers in North West India have largely used zero tillage for growing wheat, and recently, farmers in the eastern IGP have done the same. Perennial weeds in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain, such Cynodon dactylon L. and Cyperus rotundus L. can occasionally be a nuisance under zero tillage. As an alternative to puddled transplanted rice, the focus is currently on dry direct-seeded rice and machine transplanting of non-puddled rice. As a result of changes in tillage, crop establishment techniques, water use, and weed control brought on by the switch from transplanted rice to direct seeded rice, weed composition and diversity frequently vary. In nations where DSR is frequently used, weedy rice has become a significant concern. Using the Zero Tillage DSR system, certified seed, cultivars that are weed-competitive, stale seedbed procedures, living mulches, and chemical and biological weed control might change weed-crop competition in the crop's favour. However, more research on emergence characteristics and mulching effects of different crop residues on key weeds under zero tillage, cover cropping, and breeding crops for weed suppression will strengthen nonchemical weed management programs. In this review, we examine the extent of weed infestation, weed flora shift and the non-chemical alternative weed management in DSR.

Two-Pass Weed Management Programs for Identity-Preserved Soybean

Weed management is a challenge in Identity-Preserved (IP) soybean in Ontario, Canada. Six experiments were established in southwestern Ontario, Canada during 2021 and 2022 to evaluate weed control and soybean yield with preemergence (PRE), early postemergence (EPOST), and PRE followed by (fb) late POST (LPOST) herbicide programs. At 8 weeks after LPOST herbicide applications, S-metolachlor/metribuzin, pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone, and flumioxazin/metribuzin/imazethapyr applied PRE provided 7, 49, and 99% control of velvetleaf; 65, 98, and 100% control of green pigweed; 7, 8, and 82% control of common ragweed; 25, 68, and 98% control of common lambsquarters; 91, 77, and 89% control of barnyardgrass; and 62, 68, and 93% control of green foxtail, respectively. Imazethapyr + bentazon applied EPOST provided 91% control of velvetleaf; 91% control of green pigweed; 78% control of common ragweed; 95% control of common lambsquarters; 76% control of barnyardgrass; and 79% control of green foxtail. S-metolachlor/metribuzin, pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone, and flumioxazin/metribuzin/imazethapyr applied PRE fb bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop applied LPOST provided 61, 86, and 100% control of velvetleaf; 97, 99, and 100% control of green pigweed; 94, 88, and 99% control of common ragweed; 96, 98, and 100% control of common lambsquarters; 97, 95, and 97% control of barnyardgrass; and 97, 96, and 99% control of green foxtail, respectively. There was minimal and transient soybean injury (6% or less) with all PRE or EPOST herbicide treatments, however, S-metolachlor/metribuzin, pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone, or flumioxazin/metribuzin/imazethapyr applied PRE fb bentazon + fomesafen + quizalofop LPOST caused up to 22% injury in soybean. Weed interference reduced soybean yield 40%. Weed interference with S-metolachlor/metribuzin and pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone applied PRE reduced soybean yield 25 and 31%, respectively. Reduced weed interference with flumioxazin/metribuzin/imazethapyr applied PRE, imazethapyr + bentazon applied EPOST, and the two-pass programs of a PRE fb LPOST herbicide resulted in soybean yield that was similar to the weed-free control. This study concludes that there are many effective weed management programs in IP soybean; however, the two-pass weed control programs are recommended since they provide good to excellent weed control, minimize soybean yield loss from weed interference, and ensure the use of multiple herbicide modes of action which reduces the selection intensity for the evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds.

Planting date and dicamba‐based herbicide programs influence soybean production in the Southern Great Plains

AbstractThe interplay of management decisions involving soybean (Glycine max L.) planting date, herbicide programs, and herbicide application timings is critical to optimize soybean performance and weed control in Southern Great Plains soybean production systems. This research sought to evaluate soybean yield potential and the level of weed control as influenced by early‐, delayed‐, and late‐ planting dates and various combinations of preemergence (PRE), early‐postemergence (EPOST), and mid‐postemergence (MPOST) weed management programs. A field study was established in Bixby, OK in 2017 and 2018 under irrigated conditions and in Perkins, OK in 2017 under dryland conditions, consisting of three planting windows (early, delayed, and late) of XtendFlex soybean, with or without a PRE (chlorimuron + flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone + glyphosate + dicamba) combined with EPOST or EPOST + MPOST (glyphosate + dicamba) versus no in‐season applications. The gap in late‐planted soybean yield potential, compared to early‐planted soybean, was exacerbated in the dryland systems (1346 kg ha−1) versus an irrigated system (2311 kg ha−1). Use of PRE provided 60% weed control until MPOST and increased yields by 657 kg ha−1 and 457 kg ha−1 for delayed and late‐planted soybean, respectively. Late‐planted soybean with EPOST + MPOST provided up to 50% weed control, but lack of biomass production for cultural control reduced weed control by 29% compared to early‐ and delayed‐planted soybean. From an agronomic management standpoint, the time of soybean planting is influential on the success of weed control measures and soybean yields in double‐cropping system in the Southern Great Plains, particularly with late‐planted soybean.

Elucidating waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) suppression from cereal rye cover crop biomass

AbstractCereal rye (Secale cereale L.) as a cover crop can be an effective nonchemical tool for waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer] suppression in crop production. Previous studies have evaluated A. tuberculatus suppression by cereal rye as part of weed management programs but have not investigated the underlying mechanism of suppression by the cover crop. This study aimed to investigate the effect of cereal rye biomass on A. tuberculatus emergence and development, and on soil environmental parameters (temperature, moisture, and light transmittance) that are key triggers of A. tuberculatus germination to elucidate the mechanism of suppression by the cover crop. A dose–response study was conducted under field conditions in Brooklyn and Janesville, WI, from 2021 to 2023. Cereal rye biomass from a fall-planted field was harvested at anthesis in the spring and dried to constant weight at 60 C to provide 0.0, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, 7.2, 9.6, and 12.0 Mg ha−1 of dry biomass that was evenly distributed over 1.9 m−2 plots. Increasing cereal rye biomass reduced A. tuberculatus height, biomass, and density. An average ED50 of 5.2 Mg ha−1 of biomass was needed to reduce A. tuberculatus density by 50%. Low levels of biomass (≤2.38 Mg ha−1) augmented A. tuberculatus density due to an increase in soil moisture underneath the mulch compared with bare soil. Cereal rye biomass decreased the amount of sunlight reaching the soil, which resulted in lower mean soil temperature and temperature amplitude throughout the day (9.3 and 2.7 C temperature amplitude at 0 and 12.0 Mg ha−1, respectively). Prevention of A. tuberculatus germination by this thermal effect is likely the main mechanism of A. tuberculatus suppression from the cereal rye cover crop. Our results support biomass from cereal rye cover crop effectively suppressing A. tuberculatus and contributing to the integrated management of A. tuberculatus.

Soil C:N impacts on soil biological health and consequences on weed control in soybean and corn systems

Abstract Nitrogen availability has an important influence on agricultural weed growth, because many weeds in annual cropping systems are more competitive in high-nitrogen soils. A potential method to control nitrogen availability is through soil carbon amendments, which stimulate soil microbial growth and immobilize nitrogen. Additionally, carbon amendments may alter soil microbial community composition, increase soil biological functioning, and improve soil health. In a 2-yr field experiment in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], we implemented five amendment treatments to test their ability to alter weed and crop growth through soil nitrogen availability and soil biological functioning. The treatments included: an untreated control, an unamended weed-free control, rye hay adding 3,560 kg C ha−1 and 3,350 kg C ha−1 in 2020 and 2021, respectively, sawdust adding 5,030 kg C ha−1 and 4,350 kg C ha−1 in 2020 and 2021, respectively, and a rye hay and sawdust combined treatment adding 8,590 kg C ha−1 and 7,700 kg C ha−1 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. Each treatment was replicated five times in corn and six times in soybean. Each season, we explored correlations between crop and weed biomass and weed community composition and nitrogen immobilization measured through soil respiration and nitrogen availability. We also explored changes to the soil microbial community composition and soil health as a secondary result of the carbon amendment treatments. Nitrogen availability was lowest in plots treated with the highest C:N amendment. Increasing carbon improved soil health metrics, but the microbial community composition was most affected by the rye hay treatment. Amendments with high C:N reduced weed growth in both soybean and corn plots but only selected for specific weed communities in soybean, leading to improved soybean competitiveness against weeds. In corn, crop growth and weed community composition remained consistent across amendment treatments. Targeted nitrogen immobilization may improve leguminous crop competition in some weed communities as part of an integrated weed management program.

The first record of milk thistle (Silybum marianum, Asteraceae) as an alien invasive weed species in Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia.

Abstract Since 2020, milk thistle Silybum marianum, an invasive weed species, has been widely observed in urban green spaces and roadsides in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia. To plan future management activities, this study aimed to determine the current distribution status of the weed in urban green areas of Addis Ababa city. Weed surveys were conducted across 42 urban green sites located in Yeka, Lemi Kura, Bole, Nifas Silk-Lafto, Kolfie Keraniyo, Akaky Kality, and Gullele sub-cities during the main rainy season from June to September 2023. Urban green areas were selected using purposive sampling techniques. Field observations confirmed that Silybum marianum can invade and colonize a wide range of habitats and is highly competitive, posing a threat to important native plant species. High weed density rates and dense stands of weeds were recorded in the 34 urban green areas surveyed. The survey results strongly suggest implementing fast integrated weed management options such as mowing/tilling, weeding before the plant goes to seed, cutting (stems and/or seed heads), and burning (collected plant parts and/or seed heads) into a prepared burrow to minimize the spread of the weed and its ecological impacts. The purpose of this survey study is to provide information about Silybum marianum to minimize or avoid its distribution and associated impacts by following sustainable invasive weed management programs in the city before spreading to other cities in the country.

Confirmation of a four-way herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) population in Iowa

Abstract Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) was first reported in Iowa in 2013 and has continued to spread across the state over the last decade. Importantly, A. palmeri is widely recognized as one of the more economically important weeds in production agriculture. The presence of A. palmeri in Iowa is concerning as the species has evolved resistance to nine herbicide sites of action, however, no formal characterization has been conducted on Iowa populations. Therefore, herbicide assays were conducted on an A. palmeri population collected in Harrison County, Iowa in 2023 (Southwest Palmer Amaranth, SWPA) and a known herbicide-susceptible population collected from Nebraska in 2001 (Palmer Amaranth Susceptible, PAS). The two populations were treated with preemergence and postemergence herbicides commonly used in Iowa. The treatments included preemergence applications of atrazine, metribuzin, and mesotrione and postemergence applications of atrazine, imazethapyr, glyphosate, lactofen, mesotrione, glufosinate, 2,4-D and dicamba at 1x and 4x the labeled rates. Survival frequency of SWPA was >90% when treated postemergence with 1x rates of imazethapyr, atrazine, glyphosate, and mesotrione compared to ≤6% for PAS. Both SWPA and PAS had 0% survival when treated with lactofen, glufosinate, 2,4-D, and dicamba at the 1x or 4x rates. Plant population density reduction for SWPA was 53% and 40% in response to 1x rates of preemergence-applied mesotrione and atrazine, respectively. Metribuzin applied preemergence reduced SWPA plant population density by >90% at both rates. Dose-response experiments revealed the 50% effective doses (ED50) of mesotrione, glyphosate, imazethapyr, and atrazine for SWPA were 9.5-,8.5-, 71- and 40-fold greater than for PAS, respectively. The results confirm that SWPA is four-way multiple herbicide-resistant. Amaranthus palmeri infestations are likely to continue to spread within Iowa, therefore diversified weed management programs that include early detection, rapid response, and effective multi-tactic management strategies will be required for control.

Reproductive strategy, management, and medicinal uses of field horsetail (Equisetum arvense)

Abstract Field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) is a perennial weed native to many areas of the northern hemisphere. Like other horsetail species, field horsetail is a spore-bearing plant from an ancient clade. Unlike some other horsetails, field horsetail is a problematic agricultural weed. It is especially difficult to control in low-tillage cropping systems. Neither chemical nor mechanical tactics are likely to achieve full control in a single operation. However, these tactics may be successfully combined in an integrated weed management program. This review summarizes available information about the biology, ecology, and management of field horsetail. We also note its potential value as a source of pharmaceutical compounds.

Investigation of management practices to optimize cereal rye cover crop-based weed mitigation in Canadian sweet corn production

Abstract Fall-sown cereal rye has gained popularity as a cover crop in vegetable production due to its weed-suppressive capabilities. However, previous research has shown that replacing preemergence and/or postemergence herbicide applications with roller-crimped rye has variable success at controlling weeds and maintaining vegetable cash crop yields. The objective of this research was to determine whether roller-crimped rye can provide season-long weed control and maintain sweet corn yield. Two rye cultivars (early vs. standard maturity) were compared at three seeding rates (150, 300, and 600 seeds m−2) for their effect on weed control and sweet corn yield. The trial was conducted at three locations: Harrow, ON, and St. Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, from 2019 to 2021; and Agassiz, BC, in 2019 and 2021. Results suggest that although the early-maturing cultivar allowed for earlier roller crimping in some locations, it was inferior at weed control and resulted in lower sweet corn yield than local standard cultivars. The average rye biomass was lower than the current literature recommendations, and the resulting level of weed control was not high enough to prevent sweet corn yield loss in cover crop treatments. Weed control provided by roller-crimped rye peaked between crimping and 8 wk after crimping and was highest in the standard cultivars sown at 300 and 600 seeds m−2. Preliminary testing of supplemental postemergence weed control showed evidence for sweet corn yields comparable to the weed-free no-cover crop check. However, more research is needed. Overall, with the cultivars and seeding rates tested, roller-crimped rye is not a suitable stand-alone weed control option in sweet corn production. Given the benefits of cover crops, further research should evaluate its potential as a component of an integrated weed management program.

Phosphorus influence on the critical period of weed control in sweet corn

Abstract Understanding the effect of phosphorus (P) fertilization on weed interference with sweet corn is important for deciding appropriate fertilization levels and weed control programs. Field experiments were conducted in 2020 and 2021 in Belle Glade, FL, to determine the influence of P fertilization levels (0 or residual P, 62.5, and 120 kg P2O5 ha−1) on the critical period of weed control (CPWC) in sweet corn on organic soils. Experimental plots were subjected to increased duration of weed interference and weed-free period treatments for each P fertilization level. The beginning and end of the CPWC based on 5% and 10% acceptable yield loss (AYL) levels were determined by fitting log-logistic and Gompertz models to represent the increasing duration of weed interference and duration of the weed-free period, respectively. The log-logistic curves did not estimate the beginning of the CPWC at 5% AYL for 0 and 125 kg P2O5 ha−1 because the estimated upper limits of the curves were lower than the 95% relative yield used for estimation of 5% AYL. Based on a 10% AYL level, the length of the CPWC in sweet corn under optimum P fertilization levels was estimated to be 27 d, from the 6- to 7-leaf stage until the silking stage of growth. Reducing P fertilization by 50% increased the CPWC to 36 d, from the 5-leaf stage until the silking to blister stage of growth. Lack of P fertilization increased the CPWC to 64 d, from sweet corn emergence until the blister to milk stage of growth. These results show that the beginning of the CPWC in sweet corn is delayed and the end is shortened as P fertilization level increases. Therefore reduction in P fertilization will require a more intensive weed management program for sweet corn because of the prolonged duration of the CPWC.

Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control affected by weed size and herbicide spray solution with nozzle type pairings

Abstract Palmer amaranth can grow 4.2 mm in height per degree day; hence, delays of a few days in weed control deployment can result in applications of herbicides to weeds that are larger than those for which the herbicide label recommends. Therefore, it is critically necessary to understand the effect of plant size at the time of herbicide application in conjunction with herbicide spray solution and nozzle type pairings on the effectiveness of weed management programs in the Enlist E3 and XtendFlex production systems. Field experiments were conducted in 2020, in no-crop conditions, at two locations in Arkansas, to evaluate the influence of Palmer amaranth size on its control with glufosinate, dicamba, and 2,4-D applied alone and in mixture with specific nozzle pairings as mandated by label requirements. Also, a laboratory experiment was conducted to evaluate the droplet size and velocity of the spray solutions and nozzles used in the field experiments. A 5- and 10-percentage point reduction in control was observed when dicamba (66%) and 2,4-D (63%) were applied alone, respectively, compared with those herbicides mixed with glufosinate (71% and 73%, respectively). Palmer amaranth density increased to 55, 73, 100, 115, and 140 plants m−2 when plants were sprayed at heights of 15, 25, 41, 61, and 76 cm, respectively, compared with plants that were sprayed when they were 5 cm tall (9 plants m−2). Nozzle type did not affect weed control or density. The percentage of driftable fines increased when a mixture of glufosinate and 2,4-D were used compared with 2,4-D alone. Effective short-term and long-term chemical control of Palmer amaranth will require growers to correctly time their weed management practices and overlay residuals, and expect the need for sequential applications.

Hybridization in agricultural weeds: A review from ecological, evolutionary, and management perspectives.

Agricultural weeds frequently hybridize with each other or with related crop species. Some hybrid weeds exhibit heterosis (hybrid vigor), which may be stabilized through mechanisms like genome duplication or vegetative reproduction. Even when heterosis is not stabilized, hybridization events diversify weed gene pools and often enable adaptive introgression. Consequently, hybridization may promote weed evolution and exacerbate weed-crop competition. However, hybridization does not always increase weediness. Even when viable and fertile, hybrid weeds sometimes prove unsuccessful in crop fields. This review provides an overview of weed hybridization and its management implications. We describe intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence hybrid fitness in agroecosystems. We also survey the rapidly growing literature on crop-weed hybridization and the link between hybridization and invasiveness. These topics are increasingly relevant in this era of genetic tools for crop improvement, intensive and simplified cropping systems, and globalized trade. The review concludes with suggested research priorities, including hybridization in the context of climate change, plant-insect interactions, and redesigned weed management programs. From a weed management perspective, hybridization is one of many reasons that researchers and land managers must diversify their weed control toolkits.

The potential of invasive species Praxelis clematidea extract as a bioherbicide for Asystasia gangetica

Abstract. Wardini TH, Afifa IN, Esyanti RR, Astutiningsih NT, Pujisiswanto AH. 2023. The potential of invasive species Praxelis clematidea extract as a bioherbicide for Asystasia gangetica. Biodiversitas 24: 4738-4746. The occurrence of weeds in agriculture directly impacts crop productivity, and the reliance on synthetic herbicides to solve the problem has raised concerns about the increasing environmental damage. Using bioherbicides to control weeds is necessary to reduce the negative impact of synthetic herbicides. Bioactive compounds derived from plants can be utilized to develop eco-friendly herbicides. Praxelis clematidea extract was reported to exhibit allelopathic activity against weeds. This study aims to evaluate the potential of P. clematidea extract as a bioherbicide to control seed germination and seedling growth of Asystasia gangetica weed. P. clematidea water extract was screened for its chemical compounds and determined its phytotoxic effects on Asystasia gangetica. The results showed that P. clematidea water extract contained phenolics, alkaloids, and terpenoids. P. clematidea extract suppressed seed germination, the time needed for seed germination, sprout length, number of leaves, biomass, and total chlorophyll contents. LC50values for the seed germination, seedling, root, and shoot growth were calculated at 9%, 25%, 11%,and 37% (v/v), respectively. Thus, P. clematidea could be used as an A. gangetica weed biocontrol agent and might be integrated into weed management programs.

Intoxication of newly implanted coffee plants by simulated drift of the dicamba herbicide

After the release of soybean cultivars resistant to the herbicide dicamba, this product should be used more frequently in weed management programs, which may increase the risk of drift to neighboring crops, since the molecules are volatile and might cause damage in non-target plants. This work was developed to evaluate the effects of sub-doses of the herbicide dicamba on young coffee plants, simulating a drift situation. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse, with a randomized block design of eight treatments and five replications. Each plot consisted of a 4 L pot, filled with sieved clayey soil and tanned manure (3:1 v/v), with a seedling of Catuaí IAC 144 coffee. The treatments used were: 0 (control), 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 g ha−1 of dicamba. Plant's percentual phytotoxicity was evaluated up to 49 days after application (DAA), SPAD index (14, 28, and 42 DAA), and dry matter biomass, at 49 DAA. In all evaluations, no differences were observed regarding phytotoxicity for dicamba sub-doses of up to 0.01 g ha−1. The highest doses of dicamba caused visual injuries of up to 31%. At 49 DAA, there were no differences regarding dry matter biomass. Leaf symptoms caused by the herbicide were observed, such as curling, wrinkling, and epinasty. No plant death was observed. Compared to other crops, coffee might be considered more tolerant to sub-doses of dicamba, with adequate recovery capacity for reduced doses of this herbicide.

The joint action of glyphosate, clethodim, and imazethapyr to control cogongrass (Imperata cylinderica L. Beauv) in the margin of the irrigation canals (A case study using two different approaches)

Cogongrass (Imperata cylinderica L. Beauv) is a cosmopolitan invasive weed which may impact the ecological and economic integrity of our agro-ecosystems. In order to the optimum control of cogongrass and prevent the production of possible herbicide-resistant species, the use of glyphosate with selective herbicides can be considered as an important strategie in modern weed management programs. Therefore, two field experiments were performed to determine the joint action of glyphosate, clethodim, and imazethapyr using the additive dose model (ADM) as a reference model, based on a randomized complete block factorial design with 50 treatments and three replications on the margin of the irrigation canals in North Khuzestan Sugarcane Cultivation and Industry Company in 2021–2022. The treatments included five pure and mixed doses of the herbicides at five mixing ratios as 0:100, 25:75, 50:50, 75:25, and 100:0. The results showed that the different responses of herbicides binary mixtures were affected by various factors, such as the weed species and the physicochemical incompatibilities of the herbicide formulation. According to the results, the mixture of glyphosate:clethodim, followed the Hewlett model and synergized cogongrass control. While, the concentration addition (CA) model had a better fit for glyphosate:imazethapyr, i.e. showed additive effect. According to the visual observations, the herbicides used doses were reduced at the 4-6-leaf stage of cogongrass. The mixture of glyphosate:clethodim controlled about 90% of cogongrass at different ratios, while more than 81% control of cogongrass was achieved by mixing glyphosate:imazethapyr. Therefore, it concluded that we could combin glyphosate:clethodim and/or imazethapyr to control cogongrass without causing any antagonistic effect on each other's efficiency. On the other hand, the combonation of glyphosate, clethodim, and imazethapyr allows long-term control of broad-range cogongrass and delays in the resistance in the margin of irrigation canals.