Professional Society Websites Research Articles

Assessing the accuracy and reproducibility of ChatGPT for responding to patient inquiries about otosclerosis.

Patients increasingly use chatbots powered by artificial intelligence to seek information. However, there is a lack of reliable studies on the accuracy and reproducibility of the information provided by these models. Therefore, we conducted a study investigating the ChatGPT's responses to questions about otosclerosis. 96 otosclerosis-related questions were collected from internet searches and websites of professional institutions and societies. Questions are divided into four sub-categories. These questions were directed at the latest version of ChatGPT Plus, and these responses were assessed by two otorhinolaryngology surgeons. Accuracy was graded as correct, incomplete, mixed, and irrelevant. Reproducibility was evaluated by comparing the consistency of the two answers to each specific question. The overall accuracy and reproducibility rates of GPT-4o for correct answers were found to be 64.60% and 89.60%, respectively. The findings showed correct answers for accuracy and reproducibility for basic knowledge were 64.70% and 91.20%; for diagnosis & management, 64.0% and 92.0%; for medical & surgical treatment, 52.95% and 82.35%; and for operative risks & postoperative period, 75.0% and 90.0%, respectively. There were no significant differences found between the answers and groups in terms of accuracy and reproducibility (p = 0.073 and p = 0.752, respectively). GPT-4o achieved satisfactory accuracy results, except in the diagnosis & management and medical & surgical treatment categories. Reproducibility was generally high across all categories. With the audio and visual communication capabilities of GPT-4o, under the supervision of a medical professional, this model can be utilized to provide medical information and support for otosclerosis patients.

ChatGPT for Addressing Patient-centered Frequently Asked Questions in Glaucoma Clinical Practice

Large language models such as ChatGPT-3.5 are often used by the public to answer questions related to daily life, including health advice. This study evaluated the responses of ChatGPT-3.5 in answering patient-centred frequently asked questions (FAQs) relevant in glaucoma clinical practice. Prospective cross-sectional survey. Twelve experts across a range of clinical, education and research practices in optometry and ophthalmology. Over 200 patient-centric FAQs from authoritative professional society, hospital and advocacy websites were distilled and filtered into 40 questions across four themes: definition and risk factors, diagnosis and testing, lifestyle and other accompanying conditions, and treatment and follow-up. The questions were individually input into ChatGPT-3.5 to generate responses. The responses were graded by the twelve experts individually. A 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree) was used to grade ChatGPT-3.5 responses across four domains: coherency, factuality, comprehensiveness, and safety. Across all themes and domains, median scores were all 4 ("agree"). Comprehensiveness had the lowest scores across domains (mean 3.7±0.9), followed by factuality (mean 3.9±0.9), and coherency and safety (mean 4.1±0.8 for both). Examination of the individual 40 questions showed that 8 (20%), 17 (42.5%), 24 (60%) and 8 (20%) of the questions had average scores below 4 (i.e. below "agree") for the coherency, factuality, comprehensiveness and safety domains, respectively. Free-text comments by the experts highlighted omissions of facts and comprehensiveness (e.g. secondary glaucoma) and remarked on the vagueness of some responses (i.e. that the response did not account for individual patient circumstances). ChatGPT-3.5 responses to FAQs in glaucoma were generally agreeable in terms of coherency, factuality, comprehensiveness, and safety. However, areas of weakness were identified, precluding recommendations for routine use to provide patients with tailored counselling in glaucoma, especially with respect to development of glaucoma and its management.

Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.

Adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) transitioning from pediatric to adult health care face a high-risk period associated with increased use of acute health care services and mortality. Although 59% of American citizens report using the internet for health care information, the quality of web-based, patient-facing resources regarding transition in SCD care has not been evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and readability of web-based health information on SCD, especially as it pertains to the transition to adulthood for inidividuals with SCD. The study also compared the readability and content scores of websites identified in 2018 to those from 2021 to assess any change in quality over time. Keywords representing phrases adolescents may use while searching for information on the internet regarding transition in SCD care, including "hydroxyurea" and "SCD transition," were identified. A web-based search using the keywords was conducted in July 2021 using Google, Yahoo, and Bing. The top 20 links from each search were collected. Duplicate websites, academic journals, and websites not related to SCD health care transition were excluded. Websites were categorized based on the source: health department, hospital or private clinician, professional society, and other websites. Websites were assessed using Health On the Net Foundation code of conduct (HONcode), Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FGL), Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP), and a novel SCD content checklist (SCDCC). EQIP and SCDCC scores range from 0- to 100. Each website was reviewed by 2 research assistants and assessed for interrater reliability. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Of the 900 websites collected, 67 (7.4%) met the inclusion criteria: 13 health department, 7 hospital or private clinician, 33 professional society, and 14 other websites. A total of 15 (22%) out of 67 websites had HONcode certification. Websites with HONcode certification had higher FRE and EQIP scores and lower FGL scores than those without HONcode certification, reflecting greater readability. Websites without HONcode certification had higher SCDCC scores, reflecting greater clinical content. Only 7 (10%) websites met the National Institutes of Health recommendation of a seventh-grade or lower reading level. Based on EQIP scores, 6 (9%) websites were of high quality. The mean SCDCC score was 20.60 (SD 22.14) out of 100. The interrater reliability for EQIP and SCDCC ratings was good (intraclass correlation: 0.718 and 0.897, respectively). No source of website scored significantly higher mean EQIP, FRE, FGL, or SCDCC scores than the others (all P<.05). Although seeking health care information on the web is very common, the overall quality of information about transition in SCD care on the internet is poor. Changes to current web-based health care information regarding SCD care transitions would benefit transitioning youth by providing expectations, knowledge, skills, and tools to increase self-efficacy.

Summary of the Best Evidence for Nutritional Support in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease

[Abstract] Objective: To retrieve, evaluate and integrate the best evidence summary of nutritional support for patients with acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at home and abroad. Methods: According to the “6S” model, domestic and foreign computer decision support systems, guideline networks, websites of relevant professional societies or institutions, professional books, and comprehensive databases were systematically searched to screen literatures related to nutritional support for patients with acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease, including guidelines, clinical decision-making, evidence summary, expert consensus, expert opinion, systematic review, and original research. The search time limit was from the establishment of the database to March 2023. Five researchers evaluated the quality of the literature, extracted evidence and integrated it. Results: A total of 12 articles were included, including 1 clinical decision, 4 guidelines, 1 evidence summary, 1 expert consensus, 3 systematic reviews, 1 cohort study, 1 expert opinion,. A total of 14 best evidences were summarized from 4 aspects, including scientific diet and tolerance assessment, nutrient selection, nutritional support method selection, and multidisciplinary cooperation. Conclusions: This study systematically integrates the relevant evidence of nutritional support in patients with acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease, and can provide evidence-based evidence for nutritional support in patients with acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. When applying evidence, it is recommended that clinical nurses comprehensively consider the actual clinical situation and the wishes of patients, and carefully select evidence. Keywords acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease，nutritional support，malnutrition，evidence-based nursing

Let's chat about cervical cancer: Assessing the accuracy of ChatGPT responses to cervical cancer questions

ObjectiveTo quantify the accuracy of ChatGPT in answering commonly asked questions pertaining to cervical cancer prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship/quality-of-life (QOL). MethodsChatGPT was queried with 64 questions adapted from professional society websites and the authors' clinical experiences. The answers were scored by two attending Gynecologic Oncologists according to the following scale: 1) correct and comprehensive, 2) correct but not comprehensive, 3) some correct, some incorrect, and 4) completely incorrect. Scoring discrepancies were resolved by additional reviewers as needed. The proportion of responses earning each score were calculated overall and within each question category. ResultsChatGPT provided correct and comprehensive answers to 34 (53.1%) questions, correct but not comprehensive answers to 19 (29.7%) questions, partially incorrect answers to 10 (15.6%) questions, and completely incorrect answers to 1 (1.6%) question. Prevention and survivorship/QOL had the highest proportion of “correct” scores (scores of 1 or 2) at 22/24 (91.7%) and 15/16 (93.8%), respectively. ChatGPT performed less well in the treatment category, with 15/21 (71.4%) correct scores. It performed the worst in the diagnosis category with only 1/3 (33.3%) correct scores. ConclusionChatGPT accurately answers questions about cervical cancer prevention, survivorship, and QOL. It performs less accurately for cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment. Further development of this immensely popular large language model should include physician input before it can be utilized as a tool for Gynecologists or recommended as a patient resource for information on cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment.

A Systematic Review of Quality Dementia Clinical Guidelines for the Development of WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation.

As part of the WHO Rehabilitation 2030 call for action, the WHO Rehabilitation Programme is developing its Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation (PIR) to support ministries of health around the globe in integrating rehabilitation services into health systems. As a vital step for this PIR development, we conducted a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for dementia to identify interventions for rehabilitation and related evidence. Following WHO Rehabilitation Programme and Cochrane Rehabilitation's methodology, quality CPGs published in English between January 2010 and March 2020 were identified using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, Google Scholar, guideline databases, and professional society websites. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (II). Of the 22 CPGs that met the selection criteria, 6 satisfied the quality evaluation. Three hundred and thirty rehabilitation-related recommendations were identified, mostly concentrated in the areas of cognition, emotion, and carer support. There were many strong interventions, with moderate- to high-quality evidence that could be easily introduced in routine practice. However, major limitations were found both in the quality of evidence and scope, especially in areas such as education and vocation, community and social life, and lifestyle modifications. Further rigorous research is needed to build quality evidence in dementia rehabilitation in general, and especially in neglected areas for rehabilitation. Future work should also focus on the development of CPGs for dementia rehabilitation. A multipronged approach is needed to achieve Universal Health Coverage for dementia rehabilitation.

Guidance documents for colorectal and anal cancer treatment: A systematic quality and reporting assessment.

Evidence-based medicine is essential for clinical practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs) ought to follow a consistent methodology to underpin high-quality healthcare. We systematically analysed the quality and reporting of colorectal (CRC) and anal cancer CPGs and CSs. Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and online sources (59 professional society websites and eight guideline databases) were systematically searched following prospective registration (PROSPERO no. CRD42021286146) by two reviewers independently, without language restrictions. CPGs and CSs about CRC and anal cancer treatment were included from January 2018 to November 2021 and were assessed using the AGREE II tool (per cent of maximum score) and the RIGHT tool (per cent of total 35 items) for quality and reporting respectively. The median overall quality and reporting of the 59 guidelines analysed were 55.0% (interquartile range 47.0-62.0) and 58% (interquartile range 50.0-67.9), respectively, with a proportion scoring less than half (<50%) for quality (20/59, 33.9%) and reporting (15/59, 25.4%). Guidance reported that following AGREE II methodology scored better on average than that without (AGREE II 77.7% vs. 47.6%, P=0.001; RIGHT 50.0% vs. 33.9%, P=0.001). Guidelines based on systematic reviews had better quality and reporting on average than those based on consensus (AGREE II 56.5% vs. 46.6%, P=0.001; RIGHT 36.9% vs. 35.4%, P=0.019). The quality and reporting of colorectal and anal cancer treatment CPGs and CSs were poor. Despite AGREE II and RIGHT inherent methodological limitations, few high-quality guidelines were found. Despite wide variability in scoring different domains, they merit urgent improvement in all areas. It has also been demonstrated that CPGs and CSs should be underpinned by systematic reviews collecting the best available clinical research findings.

A Critical Look at Race-Based Practices in Rheumatology Guidelines.

To assess how race has been incorporated into rheumatology practice guidelines, including how race is defined and used in diagnostic and treatment recommendations. We searched race and ethnicity terms in all clinical practice guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) that were published between 2010 and 2020 and publicly available on professional society websites. Findings were summarized and assessed through standardized data abstraction forms. Key themes were identified through a thematic analysis approach. A total of 23 ACR clinical practice guidelines and 42 EULAR recommendations were reviewed. In total, 16 of 65 (25%) of the guidelines used race terms in their text. No guideline clearly defined race, and race was often conflated with ethnicity and/or genetic ancestry. Reported racial categories varied substantially by guideline and often used classifications that oversimplified and excluded non-White races. Research with insufficient racial diversity was used to make race-based recommendations for Black patients that may not be generalizable. Additionally, recommendations using research on predominantly White populations reinforced data of White populations as normative and perpetuated race-based stereotypes, especially for rare diseases. Structural causes of identified racial disparities were not discussed in clinical guidelines. There is an urgent need for standardized race reporting in rheumatology. Recommendations are provided to enhance consistency and accuracy of race and ethnicity terms, mitigate conflation of race with ethnicity or genetic ancestry, encourage a critical reanalysis of race-based diagnostic tools and treatment options, and better address the structural causes of racial disparities.

Quality of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for the management of pain, sedation, delirium and iatrogenic withdrawal in pediatric intensive care: a systematic review protocol

IntroductionInadequate management of pain and sedation in critically ill children can cause unnecessary suffering and agitation, but also delirium and iatrogenic withdrawal. It is, therefore, important to address these four...

Clinical practice guidelines for management of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with noncardiac surgery: A critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.

Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), there are considerable differences in their recommendations in the perioperative management of stented patients who need elective noncardiac surgery. Our aim was to systematically review the quality of CPGs for perioperative management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and summarize the recommendations. A systematic search for perioperative DAPT guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Embase and websites of guideline organizations and professional societies until 4 February 2021. Independently, two assessors appraised the quality of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument and extracted the data. Recommendations were summarized, and a comparative study was conducted to analyse the consistency among guidelines. A total of 10guidelines fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The domain of scope and purpose and clarity of presentation obtained the highest median scores, while the domain of stakeholder involvement and rigour of development obtained the lowest median scores. Three guidelines (ACCP, ESC/ESA and ACC/AHA) with a score of at least 60% in most AGREE II domains were recommended. Recommendations across perioperative management of DAPT guidelines were inconsistent. The ACCP, ESC/ESA and ACC/AHA CPGs were recommended. There is a need for high-quality prospective studies assessing different management strategies on this issue. Given the lack of consensus, the results of this study will help to guide perioperative dual antiplatelet management strategies for patients with coronary stents who are undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Clinical practice guidelines and consensus for the screening of breast cancer: A systematic appraisal of their quality and reporting.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs) are being promoted to provide high-quality healthcare guidance. This systematic review has assessed the breast cancer (BC) screening CPGs and CSs quality and reporting. A search of bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and CDSR), 12 guideline databases and 51 professional society websites was performed without language restrictions from January 2017 to June 2020, following prospective registration (Prospero no.: CRD42020203807). AGREE II (% of maximum score) and RIGHT (% of total 35 items) appraised quality and reporting individually, extracting data in duplicate; reviewer agreement was 98% and 93%, respectively. Forty guidances with median overall quality and reporting 51% (interquartile range [IQR] 39-63) and 48% (IQR 35-65), respectively. Twenty-two (55%) and 20 (50%) did not reach the minimum standards (scores <50%). The guidances that deployed systematic reviews had better quality (74.2% vs. 46.9%; p = 0.001) and reporting (80.5% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.001). Guidances reporting a tool referral scored better (AGREE II: 72.8% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.002; RIGHT: 75.0% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.004). BC screening CPGs and CSs suffered poor quality and reporting. More than half did not reach the minimum standards. They would improve if systematic reviews were used to underpin the recommendations made.

Guideline recommendations for antimicrobial stewardship education for clinical nursing practice in hospitals: A scoping review.

Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a proactive healthcare intervention to improve patient outcomes by optimising antimicrobial use. Although nursing involvement is a recognised necessity, bedside nurses may not yet possess competencies to fulfil this role. Objectives To identify recommendations for AMS education for the bedside nurse in key global AMS guidelines. Methods Scoping review methodology was used to systematically search published and ‘grey’ literature in PubMed, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, government websites and websites of professional societies and organisations. Search dates were from 1990 to 2020. Inclusion criteria were English language AMS guidelines for hospitals. Results Literature searches retrieved 1 824 articles, with 43 meeting the review inclusion criteria. Reference was made to AMS nursing education in 23 (53.4%) of the articles. Educational opportunities for nurses were recommended: inclusion of AMS concepts/content into undergraduate and postgraduate nursing curricula (n=12; 27.9%), in-hospital training (n=14; 32.5%) and continuing professional development (n=6; 13.9%). Recommendations for nursing education were as follows: role of AMS in preventing antimicrobial resistance (n=7; 16.2%), infection prevention and control (n=3; 6.9%), diagnostics in AMS (n=5; 11.6%), pharmacology (n=11; 25.5%) and collaboration (n=2; 4.6%). Identified nursing educational gaps were: nurses not recognising their role within AMS (n=5; 11.6%), inadequate nursing resources and expertise for dosing, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic strategies and managing possible drug incompatibilities with extended/prolonged infusions (n=3; 6.9%), and inappropriate nurse disposal of antibiotic waste (n=1; 2.3%). Conclusion Although recommendations for nursing education were found in many key AMS guidelines, few guidelines provided detailed descriptions of the nursing competencies that were required for this role. Contributions of the study This study serves to compile and highlight previously little-known recommendations within key international antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) guidelines for the education of clinical nurses in their AMS role. It provides a summary of expected clinical nurse competencies. It adds to current discussion within the literature on how to improve and support this critical nursing role.

Supporting caregivers of people with dementia: A systematic review of guidelines.

Caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) frequently experience poor physical, mental and social health. Over the past decade, several guidelines have offered recommendations on supporting caregivers to improve their health outcomes. This systematic review aimed to assess the quality and evidence base of guidelines on supporting caregivers of PwD and review the content of their recommendations on caregiver support to facilitate the adoption and implementation of a specific guideline among policymakers and practitioners. A systematic search for guidelines on supporting caregivers of PwD was performed using journal databases, websites of guideline development organisations and professional dementia-related societies from inception to 30 June 2020. Four independent reviewers performed the quality assessment of the included guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. A thematic synthesis was used to analyse the content of recommendations on caregiver support extracted from the included guidelines by two independent reviewers. The strength of recommendations and level of evidence were reclassified and analysed. Literature searches identified nine guidelines. Their quality was variable. The applicability domain on AGREE II yielded the lowest median score (62.2%; range: 18.6%-86.6%), suggesting that some guidelines lacked applicability in certain fields, leaving them open to interpretation. Most evidence underlying the extracted recommendations was rated as Levels 3 (51.3%) and 4 (31.1%). High-quality evidence is required to fortify these recommendations. The nine guidelines covered six themes-assessment, education, skill training, information provision, psychosocial support and general support policies-which can guide future policies and interventions of caregiver support. The recommendations extracted were consistent across guidelines, but each guideline failed to cover all six themes. Thus, more applicable and comprehensive guidelines that fully address all themes of support for caregivers of PwD are needed.

Mental health during pregnancy and early childhood: recommendations from evidence-based guidelines

Abstract Background Mental health problems are common during pregnancy and after birth and are therefore often addressed in the context of antenatal and postnatal care. The project is an update of previous work and aimed at identifying and summarising screening and counselling recommendations from evidence-based guidelines. Mental health was defined broadly and included topics such as substance use and domestic violence. Methods Relevant guidelines were identified by searching 2 databases (G-I-N, TRIP Database) and websites of relevant institutions and professional societies. Guidelines, that were published or updated within the last 5 years and fulfilled methodological quality criteria, were included. Results A total of 52 guidelines from 16 different institutions fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The guidelines (predominantly) advocate the following mental health screenings: Interviewing about psychosocial stress factors and support needs during pregnancy and after birth; screening for postpartum depression and anxiety disorders; interviewing pregnant women about substance use (smoking, alcohol, drugs) and appropriate counselling. With regard to domestic violence and child welfare risks, some guidelines recommend routine screening and some recommend increased awareness of signs and symptoms by health workers. Routine screening for specific mental and behavioural disorders in children is not recommended by included guidelines; however, if there are indications and symptoms, clarification should take place and attention should be paid to signs and symptoms during preventive examinations. Conclusions The included guidelines recommend screening and/or counselling for the majority of the topics addressed. The results of the report can be used as a basis for decision-making for updating national antenatal care and screening programmes. Key messages The majority of the included evidence-based guidelines strongly recommend addressing mental health issues during pregnancy and after birth by offering screening and/or counselling. The recommendations from evidence-based guidelines can serve as a decision support for developing national antenatal and postnatal care programmes.

Guidelines for the hospital role of the clinical nurse in antimicrobial stewardship: A scoping review.

Background Antimicrobial stewardship aims to optimise the use of antimicrobial medicines to preserve the efficacy of these medicines and to contain antimicrobial resistance where possible. Nurses constitute the largest group of healthcare workers; however, the role played by nurses within current antimicrobial stewardship strategies is largely unacknowledged despite nurses being at point-of-care at the hospital bedside. Objectives To identify recommendations for the antimicrobial stewardship role of the bedside nurse in key global antimicrobial stewardship guidelines. Methods Scoping review methodology was used to systematically search published and ‘grey’ literature in PubMed, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, government websites, and websites of professional societies and organisations. Search dates were 1990 to 2020. Inclusion criteria were English language antimicrobial stewardship guidelines for hospitals. Screening was conducted in two stages for title and abstract and then full text relevancy and documented according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Results Of the 1 824 articles that were retrieved, only 43 met the inclusion criteria. Inclusion of the bedside nurse on the antimicrobial stewardship team occurred in 13.9% (n=6) of the papers. A role for the bedside nurse was recommended in antibiotic stewardship (32.5%; n=14), infection prevention and control (23.2%; n=10), and administration of antimicrobial medicines (20.9%; n=9) of reviewed documents. Other recommendations included the use of evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship (20.9%; n=9), collaboration with other healthcare staff (11.6%; n=5), facilitation of transition of care (18.6%; n=8), and nurse prescription of antibiotics (4.6%; n=2). Conclusion This scoping review highlights a slow but incremental increase in recognition of the role of the bedside nurse within the operational hub of antimicrobial stewardship strategies. Contributions of the study The present study was undertaken to fill the gap in the literature on clinical nurses’ contribution in antimicrobial stewardship. The findings of the review largely demonstrate that multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship guidelines fail to view the bedside nurse as a contributor within antimicrobial stewardship strategies.

Antibiotic prescribing in UK out-of-hours primary care services: a realist-informed scoping review of training and guidelines for healthcare professionals

BackgroundAntibiotic overuse has contributed to antimicrobial resistance, which is a global public health problem. In the UK, despite the fall in rates of antibiotic prescription since 2013, prescribing levels remain high in comparison with other European countries. Prescribing in out-of-hours (OOH) care provides unique challenges for prudent prescribing, for which professionals may not be prepared.AimTo explore the guidance available to professionals on prescribing antibiotics for common infections in OOH primary care within the UK, with a focus on training resources, guidelines, and clinical recommendations.Design & settingA realist-informed scoping review of peer-reviewed articles and grey literature.MethodThe review focused on antibiotic prescribing OOH (for example, clinical guidelines and training videos). General prescribing guidance was searched whenever OOH-focused resources were unavailable. Electronic databases and websites of national agencies and professional societies were searched following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. Findings were organised according to realist review components, that is, mechanisms, contexts, and outcomes.ResultsIn total, 46 clinical guidelines and eight training resources were identified. Clinical guidelines targeted adults and children, and included recommendations on prescription strategy, spectrum of the antibiotic prescribed, communication with patients, treatment duration, and decision-making processes. No clinical guidelines or training resources focusing specifically on OOH were found.ConclusionThe results highlight a lack of knowledge about whether existing resources address the challenges faced by OOH antibiotic prescribers. Further research is needed to explore the training needs of OOH health professionals, and whether further OOH-focused resources need to be developed given the rates of antibiotic prescribing in this setting.

Neurosurgical residency adaptations for the residency application cycle amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Acute on chronic sequelae

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has transformed medical education, including the upcoming residency application cycle. External rotations have been restricted, but virtual opportunities for applicants have not yet been assessed. Objective(s)To describe how neurosurgical residency programs are adapting to the 2021 application cycle through augmented social media usage and establishment of virtual sub-I’s and open houses. MethodsOne hundred fifteen separate programs were identified on ERAS. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, residency websites, and the Visiting Student Application Service (VSAS) were reviewed for virtual open house and sub-I opportunities. Professional neurosurgery society websites were also reviewed. All data is updated as of February 14 th, 2021. ResultsEighty-eight (77%) programs had some social media presence. Fourty-three (30%) departmental accounts were created in 2020. Twenty-four (57%) of the residency program accounts were created in 2020. Programs offered 35 (18%) open house opportunities on Twitter, 19 (17%) on Facebook, and 23 (20%) on Instagram. Nineteen (17%) virtual sub-I opportunities were on Twitter, 9 (8%) on Facebook, and 10 (9%) on Instagram.Virtual opportunities were updated on 13 (12%) residency websites. The National Neurosurgery MedEd website had the most website listings of virtual opportunities with 34 (30%) programs listing open houses and 18 (16%) programs listing virtual sub-I’s. No program specific virtual opportunities were found on the AANS or CNS websites. VSAS identified only 4 (4%) virtual sub-internships. ConclusionMany neurosurgical residency programs increased their virtual presence amid the COVID-19 pandemic. More programs could utilize these platforms to mitigate applicant restriction in upcoming neurosurgery residency application cycles.

Guidelines informing counseling on female age-related fertility decline: a systematic review.

To identify, appraise, and assess clinical practice guidelines informing patient counseling on female age-related fertility decline. Searched electronic database records from January 1, 2006, to September 10, 2018, and professional society websites. The search terms included iterations of "guideline," "counseling," "preconception," "age-related fertility decline," and "reproductive life planning." English-language professional organization guidelines addressing patient counseling on age-specific reproductive health topics were included. Assessed the methodological quality of included guidelines using the AGREE II instrument. Guidelines were categorized as high quality or low quality based on AGREE II scores. Extracted age-specific reproductive health recommendations of high-quality guidelines. The search identified 2918 records. Nineteen records addressed counseling on age-related fertility decline; only 6 focused only on reproductive aging, with the remaining 13 covering related topics. Eleven met criteria for high quality. All high-quality guidelines had high "rigor of development" scores on AGREE II. Ten high-quality guidelines stated an age at which female fertility declines, ranging from 30 to "late 30s." One recommended a specific age at which patients should be counseled. Five of eleven high-quality guidelines did not discuss the obstetric and perinatal risks of advanced maternal age. Few high-quality guidelines address counseling on female age-related fertility decline, and existing guidance on reproductive aging counseling is inconsistent and incomplete. Greater rigor of development and incorporation of age-specific counseling recommendations into clinical practice guidelines could lead to improved patient anticipatory guidance and more informed reproductive choices.

Radiology in the News: A Content Analysis of Radiology-Related Information Retrieved From Google Alerts

IntroductionRadiology topics receive substantial online media attention, with prior studies focusing on social media platform coverage. We used Google Alerts, a content change detection and notification service, to prospectively analyze new radiology-related content appearing on the internet. Materials and MethodsAn automated notification was created on Google Alerts for the search term “radiology,” sending the user emails with up to 3 new links daily. All links from November 2019 through April 2020 were assessed by 2 of 3 independent raters using a coding system to classify the content source and primary topic of discussion. The top 5 primary topics were retrospectively evaluated to identify prevalent subcategories. Content viewing restrictions were documented. Results526 links were accessed. The majority (68%) of links were created by non-radiology lay press, followed by radiology-related lay press (28%), university-based publications (2%), and professional society websites (2%). The primary topic of these links most frequently related to market trends (28%), promotional material (20%), COVID-19 (13%), artificial intelligence (8%), and new technology or equipment (5%). 15% of links discussed a topic sourced from another article, such as a peer-reviewed journal, though only 2 linked directly to the journal itself. 8% of links had content viewing restrictions. ConclusionNew radiology content was largely disseminated via non-radiology news sources; radiologists should therefore ensure their research and viewpoints are presented in these outlets. Google Alerts may be a useful tool to stay abreast of the most current public radiology subject matters, especially during these times of social isolation and rapidly evolving clinical practice.

A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for recurrent miscarriage

Recurrent miscarriage (RM) was recently re-defined by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) as the loss of two or more consecutive pregnancies. Before this, and indeed still in some countries, RM was defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses. While the incidence of RM depends on the definition employed and population studied, it is generally accepted to affect 1-6% of women of reproductive age. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for RM have been published by some professional organisations. While there are CPGs on miscarriage in Ireland, there are none concerning RM specifically. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and describe published CPGs for the management, investigation and/or follow-up of RM within high-income countries. Electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid ®; 1946), Embase ® (Elsevier; 1980), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost; 1994), Web of Science™ (Thomson Reuters), Scopus (Elsevier; 2004), and Open Grey (INIST-CNRS; 2011)), selected guideline repositories, and the websites of professional societies will be searched to identify CPGs, published within the last 20 years, for potential inclusion. Two reviewers will review abstracts and full texts independently against the eligibility criteria. Characteristics and recommendations of included CPGs will be extracted by one reviewer and double-checked by another. Two reviewers will use the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation version 2 (AGREE II) instrument independently to assess the quality of the included CPGs. Narrative synthesis will be conducted to appraise and compare CPGs and their recommendations or guidance therein. The identification, appraisal and description of published CPGs in other high-income countries will be a valuable first step in informing efforts to promote the optimisation and standardisation of RM care.