This research examines common problems in open and closed transition channels, including hydraulic instability due to changes in channel shape that cause cross flow at constrictions or widenings. Closed channels experience turbulence at the outlet, require additional blocks to balance the flow, and can cause damage in downstream rivers due to suboptimal energy absorbers, requiring annual maintenance. Energy dissipators handle energy loss due to elevation differences. The research method involved modeling and testing at the ITS Water Resources and Ocean Engineering Laboratory with several alternatives. The results show that the ratio of Y2 and Y1 and the hydraulic jump length affect the efficiency of the stabilization pond. In the study, the negative Stepp stair model had an energy dissipation ratio of 67.30% and an efficiency of 32.70%. The water level test on the USBR III model shows the difference in elevation between the USBR type and the Stepp stair. The USBR III Stilling Basin had the lowest elevation of +1.65 and the highest of +16.95, while the Stepp stair model had the lowest elevation of +1.65 and the highest of +17.95. The velocities of the Stepp stair model are in a lower range than the USBR Type III Stilling Basin model. The velocities in the USBR Type III model ranged from 19.17 m/s to 29.80 m/s, while those in the Stepp Stair model ranged from 17.42 m/s to 28.14 m/s. If this model is applied later, it will reduce erosion symptoms downstream of the stilling basin due to lower velocities. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/tjjpt.v45.i01.5648
Read full abstract