My purpose in this paper is to examine in the light of recent field work some of the material on the Magar tribe of Nepal,1 in particular on the problem of the sub-tribes within this community. In the literature the number of sub-tribes accorded Magar status is variable, and the authenticity of others is questioned. It is not possible to completely clarify the situation. But with data from West No. 4 and southern Baglung districts in central Nepal where there are concentrations of the tribe, it is possible to resolve some of the confusions and delineate more sharply the kind of problem which remains. A major source of information about the Magars has been British army officers in Gurkha regiments of the British Indian Army. A difficulty they faced was lack of information derived from contact with the Magars in their home country, since their studies for the most part had to be conducted in regiments and recruiting depots. (One fairly large body of data was collected in Europe in a German prisoner of war camp during the First World War by a German official.2) Another problem was the levelling effect produced by the army itself. This arose in part because informants were living in a highly standardized environment, where differences which would be maintained in the hills were smoothed away. It also was a result of the seeping back into Nepal of knowledge (real or assumed) of British standards for recruitment and advancement. In a manual published in 1944, Major H. R. K. Gibbs of the British Indian Army wrote: