Volume-targeted Ventilation Research Articles

Long-term myocardial effects of noninvasive ventilation in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome

IntroductionChronic effects of noninvasive ventilation on myocardial function in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) are scarcely understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term effects of volume-targeted bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation (BiPAP) on cardiac parameters and myocardial biomarkers in patients with OHS. MethodsClinically stable patients with OHS referred to the tertiary center for the initiation of long-term BiPAP therapy were consecutively enrolled. At baseline, all participants underwent overnight cardiorespiratory polygraphy. BiPAP therapy using volume-targeted spontaneous/timed mode delivered via an oro-nasal mask was initiated. Beat-to-beat noninvasive monitoring by impedance cardiography was used to assess heart function at baseline and after 3 and 12 months of BiPAP use. Serum troponin 1, N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-ProBNP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were monitored. ResultsThirteen patients (10 men; mean age, 55.8 ± 9.8 years; mean body mass index of 47.8 ± 5.9 kg/m2) were recruited. From baseline to 3, and to 12 months of BiPAP use, left ventricular stroke volume (SV), ejection time (LVET), and ejection time index significantly increased (P = 0.030; P < 0.001; P = 0.003, respectively), while heart rate and systolic time ratio significantly decreased (P = 0.004; P = 0.034, respectively). Reductions in serum NT-proBNP, IL-6 and TNF-α were observed (P = 0.045; P = 0.018; P = 0.003, respectively). No significant changes in serum troponin were detected throughout the study. ConclusionsThe present findings of increased SV, in association with lengthening of LVET, reductions of NT-proBNP and reductions in circulatory inflammatory markers in patients with stable OHS and chronic moderate-to-severe daytime hypercapnia treated with BiPAP over 1 year support the role of this therapeutic mode in such patients.

Ventilation practices in the neonatal intensive care units in Saudi Arabia, survey of the utilization of volume-targeted ventilation among practicing neonatologists.

To assess the current practice in using volume-targeted ventilation among neonatologists working at the Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) of Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was provided electronically to 153 practicing Neonatologists working in 39 NICUs. The survey's results were received and statistically analyzed. One hundred nineteen (119) responses were received with, a 78% response rate. Volume Targeted Ventilation (VTV) was used routinely by 67.2%, whereas 21.8% still use only pressure control (PC)/pressure limited (PL) mode. During the acute phase of ventilation support, Assist Control was the most popular synchronized mode, whereas Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) with pressure support (PS) or PSV were the two most common modes during the weaning phase, 31.8%, and 31% respectively. The majority of the neonatologists used a tidal volume of 4 ml/kg as the lowest and 6 ml/kg as the highest. The major reasons for not implementing VTV were the limited availability of ventilator devices that have an option of VTV, followed by lack of experience. VTV is the predominant ventilation practice approach among neonatologists working in the KSA. Limited availability and lack of experience in using are the main challenges. Efforts to equip NICUs with the most advanced ventilation technology, enhance practitioners' experience and sufficient training in its use are warranted.

Respiratory Support Effects over Time on Regional Lung Ventilation Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Premature Infants.

Background and objectives: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) frequently necessitates respiratory support. While non-invasive methods are typically the preferred approach, mechanical ventilation becomes necessary for patients with insufficient response. Our study aimed to compare two common respiratory support modes, volume-targeted mechanical ventilation and non-invasive ventilation continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), using electrical impedance tomography. Materials and Methods: Infants with very low birth weight and gestational ages of less than 32 weeks were eligible for inclusion in the study. All enrolled infants were beyond the transitional period (>72 h of age). The infants were divided into two groups: infants receiving invasive respiratory support through an endotracheal tube and infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support. We used electrical impedance tomography to assess end-expiratory lung impedance (EELZ), DeltaZ, heterogeneity, and regional ventilation distribution. Patients were evaluated at 0, 30, and 60 min after assuming the supine position to examine potential time-related effects. Results: Our study initially enrolled 97 infants, and the final analysis included a cohort of 72 infants. Ventilated infants exhibited significantly larger EELZ compared to their non-invasive counterparts (p = 0.026). DeltaZ was also greater in the invasive respiratory support group (p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was higher in the non-invasive group and did not change significantly over time. The non-invasive group demonstrated significantly greater ventilation in the dependent lung areas compared to intubated patients (p = 0.005). Regional distribution in the left lung was lower than in the right lung in both groups; however, this difference was significantly more pronounced in intubated patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study revealed that volume-targeted mechanical ventilation results in higher EELZ and DeltaZ compared to spontaneously breathing infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support. However, lung heterogeneity was lower during mechanical ventilation. Our study also reaffirmed that spontaneous breathing promotes greater involvement of the dependent lung compared to mechanical ventilation.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Implementing Volume-Targeted Compared to Pressure-Limited Ventilation in a Single-Center, Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Oman.

Background The use of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) in neonatology has been introduced in the last decade. This study was performed to determine the impact of clinical implementation of volume-targeted conventional mechanical ventilation using the volume guarantee mode in mechanical ventilation of all neonates needing mechanical ventilation compared to pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) modes. The mortality rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were the primary outcomes of the study. Methodology This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level III-VI neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) within a tertiary academic hospital in Oman. All intubated neonates admitted to the NICU within two time periods, i.e., the PLV cohort: January 2011 to December 2013 (three years), and the VTV cohort: January 2017 to December 2019 (three years), were eligible for inclusion in the study. Neonates were excluded if they had multiple congenital anomalies, tracheostomy, and those with a Do Not Resuscitate status. A predetermined data set was collected retrospectively from electronic records. The PLV and VTV cohorts were compared, and SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Results A total of 290 neonates were included (PLV: n = 138, and VTV: n = 152). The two cohorts were statistically similar in their baseline characteristics, including gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, indications for mechanical ventilation, age at intubation, need for surfactant therapy, and age at extubation. The VTV cohort had a significantly lower mortality rate (n (%) = 10 (6.6%) vs. 21 (15.3%), p = 0.02). An insignificant trend of lower duration of ventilation was observed in the VTV cohort (34.5 vs. 50.5 hours, p = 0.24). There was no significant difference in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (16 (21.3%) vs. 12 (17.8%), p = 0.18). VTV was associated with a significant reduction in pulmonary hemorrhage (1 (0.7%) vs. 8 (5.7%), p = 0.04), episodes of hypocapnia (2 vs. 3/patient, p = 0.04), and episodes of hypercapnia (0 vs 1/patient, p = 0.04). Conclusions The implementation of VTV in clinical practice in our level III-VI NICU was associated withsignificant advantages, including reduction in mortality, pulmonary hemorrhage, and episodes of hypercapnia and hypocapnia. A large prospective, randomized, and multicenter trial is recommended to confirm these findings.

Volume-targeted ventilation

Despite strong evidence of important benefits of volume-targeted ventilation, many high-risk extremely preterm infants continue to receive traditional pressure-controlled ventilation in the United States and elesewhere. Reluctance to abandon one's comfort zone, lack of suitable equipment and a lack of understanding of the subtleties of volume-targeted ventilation appear to contribute to the relatively slow uptake of volume-targeted ventilation. This review will underscore the benefits of using tidal volume as the primary control variable, to improve clinicians’ understanding of the way volume-targeted ventilation interacts with the awake, breathing infant and to provide information about evidence-based tidal volume targets in various circmstances. Focus on underlying lung pathophysiology, individualized ventilator settings and tidal volume targets are essential to successful use of this approach thereby improving important clinical outcomes.

Comparison of positive pressure ventilation devices during compliance changes in a neonatal ovine model.

To compare tidal volume (VT) delivery with compliance at 0.5 and 1.5 mL/cmH2O using four different ventilation (PPV) devices (i.e., self-inflating bag (SIB), T-Piece resuscitator, Next Step (a novel Neonatal Resuscitator), and Fabian ventilator (conventional neonatal ventilator) using a neonatal piglet model. Randomized experimental animal study using 10 mixed-breed neonatal piglets (1-3 days; 1.8-2.4 kg). Piglets were anesthetized, intubated, instrumented, and randomized to receive positive pressure ventilation (PPV) for one minute with a SIB with or without a respiratory function monitor (RFM), T-Piece resuscitator with or without an RFM, Next Step, and Fabian Ventilator with both compliance levels. Compliance changes were achieved by placing a wrap around the piglets' chest and tightened it. Our primary outcome was targeted VT delivery of 5 mL/kg at 0.5 and 1.5 mL/cmH2O lung compliance. At 0.5 mL/cmH2O compliance, the mean(SD) expired VT with the Next Step was 5.1(0.2) mL/kg compared to the Fabian 4.8(0.5) mL/kg, SIB 8.9(3.6) mL/kg, SIB + RFM 4.5(1.8) mL/kg, T-Piece 7.4(4.3) mL/kg, and T-Piece+RFM 6.4(3.1) mL/kg. At 1.5 mL/cmH2O compliance, the mean(SD) expired VT with the Next Step was 5.2(0.6) mL/kg compared to the Fabian 4.4(0.7) mL/kg, SIB 12.1(5.3) mL/kg, SIB + RFM 9.4(3.9) mL/kg, T-Piece 8.6(1.5) mL/kg, and T-Piece+RFM 6.5 (1.6) mL/kg. The Next Step provides consistent VT during PPV, which is comparable to a mechanical ventilator. Current guidelines recommend fixed peak inflation pressure in resuscitation, linked to lung and brain injury. The Next Step Neonatal Resuscitator, a cost-effective device, offers volume-targeted positive pressure ventilation with consistent tidal volumes. With two different compliances, the Next Step Neonatal Resuscitator delivered a consistent tidal volume which was similar to a mechanical ventilator. The Next Step Neonatal Resuscitator outperformed self-inflating bags and T-Pieces in delivering targeted tidal volumes. The Next Step Neonatal Resuscitator could be an alternative ventilation device for neonatal resuscitation.

Single center experience with first-intention high-frequency jet vs. volume-targeted ventilation in extremely preterm neonates.

To examine whether first-intention high-frequency jet ventilation (HFVJ), compared to volume-targeted ventilation (VTV), in extremely preterm infants is associated with lower incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and other adverse clinical outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating neonates with gestational age (GA) ≤28 weeks, who received first-intention HFJV (main exposure) or VTV (comparator), between 11/2020 and 3/2023, with a subgroup analysis including neonates with GA ≤26 weeks and oxygenation index (OI) >5. We identified 117 extremely preterm neonates, 24 (GA 25.2 ± 1.6 weeks) on HFJV, and 93 (GA 26.4 ± 1.5 weeks, p = 0.001) on VTV. The neonates in the HFJV group had higher oxygenation indices on admission, higher inotrope use, and remained intubated for a longer period. Despite these differences, there were no statistically significant differences in rates of BPD, survival, or other adverse outcomes between the two groups. In subgroup analysis of 18 neonates on HFJV and 39 neonates on VTV, no differences were recorded in the GA, and duration of mechanical ventilation, while neonates in the HFJV group had significantly lower rates of BPD (50% compared to 83%, p = 0.034), and no significant differences in other adverse outcomes compared to neonates in the VTV group. In neonates ≤26 weeks of GA with OI >5, HFJV was significantly associated with lower rates of BPD (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05-0.92), and combined BPD or death (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03-0.85), after adjusting for birth weight, and Arterial-alveolar gradient on admission. In extremely preterm neonates ≤26 weeks of GA with OI >5, first-intention HFJV, in comparison to VTV, is associated with lower rates of BPD.

Predictors of successful extubation from volume-targeted ventilation in extremely preterm neonates.

To identify variables associated with extubation success in extremely preterm neonates extubated from invasive volume-targeted ventilation. We retrospectively evaluated 84 neonates ≤28 weeks' gestational age, on their first elective extubation. The primary outcome of successful extubation was defined as non-reintubation within seven days. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis. We identified 58 (69%) neonates (mean gestational age of 26.5 ± 1.4 weeks, birthweight 921 ± 217 g) who met the primary outcome. Female sex (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-9.10), higher pre-extubation weight (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05-1.59), and pH (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.54-4.19), and lower pre-extubation mean airway pressure (MAP) (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33-0.73) were associated with successful extubation. In preterm neonates, female sex, higher pre-extubation weight and pH, and lower pre-extubation MAP were predictors of successful extubation from volume-targeted ventilation. Evaluation of these variables will likely assist clinicians in selecting the optimal time for extubation in such vulnerable neonates.

Volume-targeted ventilation as an invasive home ventilation strategy: Asingle-center experience.

Volume-targeted ventilation as an invasive home ventilation strategy: Asingle-center experience.

Volume-targeted mask ventilation during simulated neonatal resuscitation

ObjectiveMask positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in the delivery room is routinely delivered with set peak inflation pressures. To aid mask PPV, stand-alone respiratory function monitors (RFMs) have been used in...

Management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in Japan: A nationwide survey

BackgroundThe incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and respiratory management practices for extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWIs) widely vary among institutions and countries. AimsTo clarify the variation and characteristics of the current practices of Japanese neonatologists managing patients with BPD. Study designQuestionnaire-based survey. ParticipantsLevel II and III perinatal centers certified by the Japan Society of Perinatal and Neonatal Medicine. Outcome measuresPolicies of the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) regarding respiratory care and medications for BPD prevention and treatment. ResultsA total of 76 % of facilities (207/274) responded to our survey. The response rates of level III and II facilities were 91 % (102/112) and 35 % (105/296), respectively. INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation and Less Invasive Surfactant Administration methods were performed in 23 % (47/206) and 1 % (3/206) of facilities, respectively. For the prophylactic purpose, systemic and inhaled steroids were administered “frequently” or “occasionally” in 14 % (28/205) and 42 % (86/204) of NICUs, respectively. For the therapeutic purpose, systemic and inhaled steroids were administered “frequently” or “occasionally” in 84 % (171/204) and 29 % (59/204) of NICUs, respectively. Approximately half of the NICUs (99/202) used volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) “frequently” or “occasionally” in progressing BPD. High-frequency oscillation ventilation (HFOV) was used for progressing BPD “frequently” and “occasionally” in 89 % (180/202) of the facilities. ConclusionsOur study provided an overview and characteristics of BPD management in Japan in recent years. Noninvasive approaches with surfactant administration remain not widely used in Japan. HFOV is a widely accepted management for progressing BPD.

Volume-targeted ventilation vs pressure-controlled ventilation for very low birthweight infants: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundMechanical ventilation (MV) is essential in the management of critically ill neonates, especially preterm infants. However, inappropriate or prolonged use of invasive MV may result in ventilator-associated lung injury. A systemic review comparing pressure control ventilation (PCV) with volume-targeted ventilation mode (VTV) approved that VTV reduces the incidence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in neonates; however, this study did not analyze subgroups of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the use of VTV and PCV in VLBW infants and to provide clinical evidence for reducing mortality and complications of MV in VLBW infants.MethodA single-center randomized controlled trial will be performed. All eligible infants will be randomized and assigned to either VTV or PCV group with 1:1 ratio using sealed envelopes. Death or BPD at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age will be used as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include BPD, death, length of invasive MV, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, and oxygen use, length of hospital stay, failure of conventional MV, rate of using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) as rescue therapy, rate of reintubation within 48 h, and hospital expenses.DiscussionSystemic review suggested that VTV decreases the incidence of death or BPD in neonates compared to PLV; however, this study did not specifically analyze subgroups of VLBW infants. We designed this single-center randomized controlled trials (RCT) to add a significant contribution regarding the benefits of VTV for VLBW patients.

Interventions to Reduce Severe Brain Injury Risk in Preterm Neonates

Interventions to reduce severe brain injury risk are the prime focus in neonatal clinical trials. To evaluate multiple perinatal interventions across clinical settings for reducing the risk of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (sIVH) and cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL) in preterm neonates. MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases were searched from inception until September 8, 2022, using prespecified search terms and no language restrictions. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated perinatal interventions, chosen a priori, and reported 1 or more outcomes (sIVH, cPVL, and severe brain injury) were included. Two co-authors independently extracted the data, assessed the quality of the trials, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the Cochrane GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Fixed-effects pairwise meta-analysis was used for data synthesis. The 3 prespecified outcomes were sIVH, cPVL, and severe brain injury. A total of 221 RCTs that assessed 44 perinatal interventions (6 antenatal, 6 delivery room, and 32 neonatal) were included. Meta-analysis showed with moderate certainty that antenatal corticosteroids were associated with small reduction in sIVH risk (risk ratio [RR], 0.54 [95% CI, 0.35-0.82]; absolute risk difference [ARD], -1% [95% CI, -2% to 0%]; number needed to treat [NNT], 80 [95% CI, 48-232]), whereas indomethacin prophylaxis was associated with moderate reduction in sIVH risk (RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.52-0.79]; ARD, -5% [95% CI, -8% to -3%]; NNT, 20 [95% CI, 13-39]). Similarly, the meta-analysis showed with low certainty that volume-targeted ventilation was associated with large reduction in risk of sIVH (RR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.36-0.72]; ARD, -9% [95% CI, -13% to -5%]; NNT, 11 [95% CI, 7-23]). Additionally, early erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (RR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57-0.83]; ARD, -3% [95% CI, -4% to -1%]; NNT, 34 [95% CI, 22-67]) and prophylactic ethamsylate (RR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.48-0.97]; ARD, -4% [95% CI, -7% to 0%]; NNT, 26 [95% CI, 13-372]) were associated with moderate reduction in sIVH risk (low certainty). The meta-analysis also showed with low certainty that compared with delayed cord clamping, umbilical cord milking was associated with a moderate increase in sIVH risk (RR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.03-3.21]; ARD, 3% [95% CI, 0%-6%]; NNT, -30 [95% CI, -368 to -16]). Results of this study suggest that a few interventions, including antenatal corticosteroids and indomethacin prophylaxis, were associated with reduction in sIVH risk (moderate certainty), and volume-targeted ventilation, early erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and prophylactic ethamsylate were associated with reduction in sIVH risk (low certainty) in preterm neonates. However, clinicians should carefully consider all of the critical factors that may affect applicability in these interventions, including certainty of the evidence, before applying them to clinical practice.

Supporting all breaths versus supporting some breaths during synchronised mechanical ventilation in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundNational Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness (NICE), UK, guideline published in 2019 recommends the use of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV). It recommends synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) over the modes...

Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Extremely premature infants are at high risk for developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). While noninvasive support is preferred, they may require ventilator support. Although volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) has been shown to be beneficial in preventing BPD, no data exists to guide ventilator management of infants with evolving BPD. Thus, clinicians employ a host of ventilator strategies, traditionally time-cycled pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) and more recently volume-guarantee ventilation (VGV) (a form of VTV). In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that use of VGV in evolving BPD is associated with improved clinical and pulmonary outcomes when compared with PLV. Single-center, retrospective cohort review of premature infants born less than 28 weeks inborn to a Level 4 NICU from January 2015 to December 2020. Data abstracted included demographics, maternal and birth data, and ventilator data until death or discharge. Exposure to either VGV or PLV was also examined, including ventilator "dose" (number of time points from DOL 14, 21 and 28 the patient was on that particular ventilator) during the period of evolving BPD. Of a total of 471 patients with ventilation data available on DOL 14, 268 were not ventilated and 203 were ventilated. PLV at DOL 21 and 28 was associated with significantly higher risk of BPD and the composite outcome of BPD or death before 36 weeks compared to VGV. Both increasing VGV and PLV doses were significantly associated with higher odds of BPD and the composite outcome. For each additional time point of VGV and PLV exposure, the predicted length of stay (LOS) increased by 15.3 days (p < 0.001) and 28.8 days (p < 0.001), respectively. Our study demonstrates the association of use of VGV at DOL 21 and 28 with decreased risk of BPD compared to use of PLV. Prospective trials are needed to further delineate the most effective ventilatory modality for this population with "evolving" BPD.

Efficacy of volume-targeted ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

To study the clinical efficacy of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on the medical data of 140 neonates with severe NRDS who were admitted from September 2016 to February 2022, with 55 neonates in the VTV group and 85 in the HFOV group. The neonates in the VTV group received conventional mechanical ventilation and target tidal volume, and those in the HFOV group received HFOV. Arterial blood gas parameters were collected at 48 hours after admission, and related indices during hospitalization were recorded, including mortality rate, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, and the incidence rates of complications. Compared with the VTV group, the HFOV group had significantly lower incidence rates of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ periventricular-intraventricular hemorrhage and neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (P<0.05), and there were no significant differences between the two groups in the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, the duration of oxygen therapy, mortality rate, and the incidence rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, hypocapnia, hypercapnia, periventricular leukomalacia, and retinopathy of prematurity (P>0.05). HFOV has a better clinical efficacy than VTV in the treatment of NRDS.

Respiratory support strategies in the management of severe, longstanding bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Despite efforts to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury, some preterm infants require positive pressure support after 36 weeks' post-menstrual age. Infants with severe BPD typically experience progressive mismatch of ventilation and perfusion, which manifests as respiratory distress, hypoxemia in room air, hypercarbia, and growth failure. Lung compliance varies, but lung resistance generally increases with prolonged exposure to positive pressure ventilation and other sources of inflammation. Serial lung radiographs reveal a heterogeneous pattern, with areas of both hyperinflation and atelectasis; in extreme cases, macrocystic changes may be noted. Efforts to wean the respiratory support are often unsuccessful, and trials of high frequency ventilation, exogenous corticosteroids, and diuretics are common. The incidence of pulmonary hypertension increases with the severity of BPD, as does the mortality rate. Therefore, periodic screening and efforts to mitigate the risk of PH is fundamental to the management of longstanding BPD. Failure of conventional, lung-protective strategies (e.g., high rate/low tidal-volume and/or high frequency ventilation) warrants consideration of ventilatory strategies individualized to the disease physiology. Non-invasive modes of respiratory support may be successful in infants with mild to moderate BPD phenotypes. However, infants with moderate to severe BPD phenotypes often require invasive respiratory support, and pressure-limited or volume-targeted conventional ventilation may be better suited to the physiology than high-frequency ventilation. The consistent provision of adequate support is fundamental to the management of longstanding BPD and is best achieved with a stepwise increase in ventilator support until comfortable spontaneous respirations are achieved. Adequately supported infants typically experience improvements in both oxygenation and ventilation, which, if sustained, may arrest and generally reverses the course of a potentially lethal lung disease. Care should be individualized to address the most likely pulmonary mechanics, including variable lung compliance, elevated airway resistance, and variable airway obstruction.

Effects of volume-targeted pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation on functional residual capacity and dead space in obese patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

The effect of inverse inspiration:expiration (I:E) ratio on functional residual capacity (FRC) during pneumoperitoneum is unclear. We hypothesised that volume-targeted pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation (vtPC-IRV) would increase FRC by increasing the level of auto-PEEP in low respiratory compliance situations. During robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, 20 obese patients were sequentially ventilated with four different settings for 30 min in each setting: (1) control, I:E ratio of 1:2 and baseline airway pressure (BAP) of 5 cm H2O; (2) IRV2, I:E ratio of 2:1 and BAP off; (3) IRV3, I:E ratio of 3:1 and BAP off; and (4) IRV4, I:E ratio of 4:1 and BAP off. The changes in FRC were identified and compared among these settings. The FRC significantly increased as the I:E ratio increased. The FRC values expressed as median (inter-quartile range) during control, IRV2, IRV3, and IRV4 were 1149 (898-1386), 1485 (1018-1717), 1602 (1209-1775), and 1757 (1337-1955) ml, respectively. Auto-PEEP increased significantly as the I:E ratio increased and correlated with FRC (rho=0.303; P=0.006). Shunt and physiological dead space were significantly lower in all IRV groups than in the control group; however, there were no significant differences among the IRV groups. vtPC-IRV with shortened expiratory time and increased auto-PEEP effectively increases FRC during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in obese patients. FRC increases progressively as the I:E ratio increases from 1:2 to 4:1; however, an I:E ratio higher than 2:1 does not further improve the dead space. UMIN000038989.

Adaptive Support Ventilation and Lung-Protective Ventilation in ARDS.

Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a partially closed-loop ventilation mode that adjusts tidal volume (VT) and breathing frequency (f) to minimize mechanical work and driving pressure. ASV is routinely used but has not been widely studied in ARDS. The study was a crossover study with randomization to intervention comparing a pressure-regulated, volume-targeted ventilation mode (adaptive pressure ventilation [APV], standard of care at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) set to VT 6 mL/kg in comparison with ASV mode where VT adjustment is automated. Subjects received standard of care (APV) or ASV and then crossed over to the alternate mode, maintaining consistent minute ventilation with 1-2 h in each mode. The primary outcome was VT corrected for ideal body weight (IBW) before and after crossover. Secondary outcomes included driving pressure, mechanics, gas exchange, mechanical power, and other parameters measured after crossover and longitudinally. Twenty subjects with ARDS were consented, with 17 randomized and completing the study (median PaO2 /FIO2 146.6 [128.3-204.8] mm Hg) and were mostly passive without spontaneous breathing. ASV mode produced marginally larger VT corrected for IBW (6.3 [5.9-7.0] mL/kg IBW vs 6.04 [6.0-6.1] mL/kg IBW, P = .035). Frequency was lower with patients in ASV mode (25 [22-26] breaths/min vs 27 [22-30)] breaths/min, P = .01). In ASV, lower respiratory-system compliance correlated with smaller delivered VT/IBW (R2 = 0.4936, P = .002). Plateau (24.7 [22.6-27.6] cm H2O vs 25.3 [23.5-26.8] cm H2O, P = .14) and driving pressures (12.8 [9.0-15.8] cm H2O vs 11.7 [10.7-15.1] cm H2O, P = .29) were comparable between conventional ventilation and ASV. No adverse events were noted in either ASV or conventional group related to mode of ventilation. ASV targeted similar settings as standard of care consistent with lung-protective ventilation strategies in mostly passive subjects with ARDS. ASV delivered VT based upon respiratory mechanics, with lower VT and mechanical power in subjects with stiffer lungs.

Work of breathing at different tidal volume targets in newborn infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) results in varying degrees of pulmonary hypoplasia. Volume targeted ventilation (VTV) is a lung protective strategy but the optimal target tidal volume in CDH infants has not previously been studied. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that low targeted volumes would be better in CDH infants as determined by measuring the work of breathing (WOB) in CDH infants, at three different targeted tidal volumes. A randomised cross-over study was undertaken. Infants were eligible for inclusion in the study after surgical repair of their diaphragmatic defect. Targeted tidal volumes of 4, 5, and 6 ml/kg were each delivered in random order for 20-min periods with 20-min periods of baseline ventilation between. WOB was assessed and measured by using the pressure–time product of the diaphragm (PTPdi). Nine infants with a median gestational age at birth of 38 + 4 (range 36 + 4–40 + 6) weeks and median birth weight 3202 (range 2855–3800) g were studied. The PTPdi was higher at 4 ml/kg than at both 5, p = 0.008, and 6 ml/kg, p = 0.012.Conclusion: VTV of 4 ml/kg demonstrated an increased PTPdi compared to other VTV levels studied and should be avoided in post-surgical CDH infants.What is Known:• Lung injury secondary to mechanical ventilation increases the mortality and morbidity of infants with CDH.• Volume targeted ventilation (VTV) reduces ‘volutrauma’ and ventilator-induced lung injury in other neonatal intensive care populations.What is New:• A randomised cross-over trial was carried out investigating the response to different VTV levels in infants with CDH.• Despite pulmonary hypoplasia being a common finding in CDH, a VTV of 5ml/kg significantly reduced the work of breathing in infants with CDH compared to a lower VTV level.