Volume-outcome Relationship Research Articles

Volume-outcome relationships for intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Background Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the major scenarios of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use, particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock. The utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices including IABP varies widely per hospital, while whether a higher IABP volume at each hospital is translated into better outcomes in acute MI is unclear. Purpose To evaluate the relationship between the volume of IABP use and mortality at the hospital level in patients with acute MI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Using a Japanese nationwide administrative database, a total of 26,490 patients with acute MI undergoing primary PCI from 154 hospitals were included. The primary endpoint was the observed/predicted in-hospital mortality ratio. The predicted mortality per patient was calculated using baseline variables and was averaged for each hospital. The associations among PCI volume for acute MI, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality, and observed and predicted IABP use were assessed at the hospital level. Results Of the 26,490 patients, 2,959 (11.2%) were treated with IABP and 1,283 (4.8%) died during hospitalization. The annualized number of IABP use per hospital in acute MI was 4.5 [2.4-10.7]. In lower primary PCI volume centers, IABP was more likely to be underused than expected, and the observed/predicted in-hospital mortality ratio was higher than in higher volume centers (Figure). The observed/predicted mortality ratio seemed lowest in hospitals where the observed/predicted IABP use ratio was around one. Conclusions The present study showed that the lower annual number of IABP use was associated with an increased mortality risk at the hospital level, and suggested that standardized IABP use can be an institutional quality indicator in a setting of acute MI.

The Role of a Community Surgeon in the Care of Hepatopancreatobiliary Patients: Short-Term Outcomes and Learning Curve.

Background Owing to the well-established volume-outcome relationship, hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery is commonly regionalized to academic, teaching hospitals. However, regionalization is associated with decreased access for some populations in need, as well as geographic and financial barriers for patients. If high surgeon and institutional volumes can be achieved, the community, non-teaching HPB surgical practice could help alleviate some issues associated with regionalization. The HPB experience of a community surgeon immediately after surgical oncology training was reviewed, hypothesizing that high volumes with acceptable short-term outcomes could be achieved, although a learning curve may be observed. Materials and methods Electronic medical records from 2013 to 2023 were reviewed. Data included patient demographics, perioperative details, pathology, complications, and deaths over 90 postoperative days. Perioperative quality metrics were assessed for trends over time in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and liver resection subgroups. Results A total of 295 patients underwent 176 (59.7%) pancreatic and 119 (40.3%) hepatobiliary operations. The most common operations were PD (n=87; 49.4%) and partial hepatic lobectomy (n=56; 41.1%). In the pancreas group, morbidity was 25% (n=44), and mortality was 4.5% (n=8). In the hepatobiliary group, morbidity and mortality were 19.3% (n=23) and 5.0% (n=6), respectively. Within the PD and liver resection subgroups, operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay (LOS) trended downward over time, with LOS decreasing significantly. Conclusion High HPB volumes with acceptable short-term outcomes can be achieved by a solo practitioner in the community, non-teaching setting. For PDs and liver resections, perioperative metrics trended downward over time, illustrating the learning curve encountered after training.

Procedural volume is linearly associated with mortality, major complications, and readmissions in patients undergoing malignant brain tumor resection.

Improved outcomes have been noted in patients undergoing malignant brain tumor resection at high-volume centers. Studies have arbitrarily chosen high-volume dichotomous cutoffs and have not evaluated volume-outcome associations at specific institutional procedural volumes. We sought to establish the continuous association of volume with patient outcomes and identify cutoffs significantly associated with mortality, major complications, and readmissions. We hypothesized that a linear volume-outcome relationship can estimate likelihood of adverse outcomes when comparing any two volumes. The patient cohort was identified with ICD-10 coding in the Nationwide Readmissions Database(NRD). The association of volume and mortality, major complications, and 30-/90-day readmissions were evaluated in multivariate analyses. Volume was used as a continuous variable with two/three-piece splines, with various knot positions to reflect the best model performance, based on the Quasi Information Criterion(QIC). From 2016 to 2018, 34,486 patients with malignant brain tumors underwent resection. When volume was analyzed as a continuous variable, mortality risk decreased at a steady rate of OR 0.988 per each additional procedure increase for hospitals with 1-65 cases/year(95% CI 0.982-0.993, p < 0.0001). Risk of major complications decreased from 1 to 41 cases/year(OR 0.983, 95% CI 0.979-0.988, p < 0.0001), 30-day readmissions from 1 to 24 cases/year(OR 0.987, 95% CI 0.979-0.995, p = 0.001) and 90-day readmissions from 1 to 23 cases/year(OR 0.989, 95% CI 0.983-0.995, p = 0.0003) and 24-349 cases/year(OR 0.9994, 95% CI 0.999-1, p = 0.01). In multivariate analyses, institutional procedural volume remains linearly associated with mortality, major complications, and 30-/90-day readmission up to specific cutoffs. The resulting linear association can be used to calculate relative likelihood of adverse outcomes between any two volumes.

Association Between Hospital Type and Resilience During COVID-19 Caseload Stress : A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Imbalances between hospital caseload and care resources that strained U.S. hospitals during the pandemic have persisted after the pandemic amid ongoing staff shortages. Understanding which hospital types were more resilient to pandemic overcrowding-related excess deaths may prioritize patient safety during future crises. To determine whether hospital type classified by capabilities and resources (that is, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO] capability, multiplicity of intensive care unit [ICU] types, and large or small hospital) influenced COVID-19 volume-outcome relationships during Delta wave surges. Retrospective cohort study. 620 U.S. hospitals in the PINC AI Healthcare Database. Adult inpatients with COVID-19 admitted July to November 2021. Hospital-months were ranked by previously validated surge index (severity-weighted COVID-19 inpatient caseload relative to hospital bed capacity) percentiles. Hierarchical models were used to evaluate the effect of log-transformed surge index on the marginally adjusted probability of in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice. Effect modification was assessed for by 4 mutually exclusive hospital types. Among 620 hospitals recording 223 380 inpatients with COVID-19 during the Delta wave, there were 208 ECMO-capable, 216 multi-ICU, 36 large (≥200 beds) single-ICU, and 160 small (<200 beds) single-ICU hospitals. Overall, 50 752 (23%) patients required admission to the ICU, and 34 274 (15.3%) died. The marginally adjusted probability for mortality was 5.51% (95% CI, 4.53% to 6.50%) per unit increase in the log surge index (strain attributable mortality = 7375 [CI, 5936 to 8813] or 1 in 5 COVID-19 deaths). The test for interaction showed no difference (P = 0.32) in log surge index-mortality relationship across 4 hospital types. Results were consistent after excluding transferred patients, restricting to patients with acute respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation, and using alternative strain metrics. Residual confounding. Comparably detrimental relationships between COVID-19 caseload and survival were seen across all hospital types, including highly advanced centers, and well beyond the pandemic's learning curve. These lessons from the pandemic heighten the need to minimize caseload surges and their effects across all hospital types during public health and staffing crises. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

Defining the optimal annual institutional case volume for minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum through a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes.

The Nuss procedure is the accepted standard approach to correct pectus excavatum. Still, is associated with potential major complications that are in part believed to be preventable as they might be the consequence of institutional case-volume differences. The objective is to evaluate the presence of a volume-outcome relation for the Nuss procedure and determine the optimal annual institutional case-volume threshold, defining high-volume centers. A systematic literature search was performed, considering studies from unique centers reporting on pectus excavatum patients who underwent the Nuss procedure. Primary and secondary outcomes were, respectively: the incidence of significant perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade-III and significant intraoperative complications) and bar displacement. The presence of a non-linear volume-outcome relation was evaluated through restricted-cubic-spline-analyses. If present, the optimal annual institutional case-volume was determined by the elbow method. Forty-nine studies from 49 unique centers were included, enrolling 13,352 patients in total. The significant perioperative complication rate was low [7.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-9.0%] and demonstrated a significant non-linear volume-outcome relation (P<0.001), even after covariate adjustment. The optimal annual institutional case-volume was determined at 73 cases/year (95% CI: 67-89). In this scenario, the number needed to treat to prevent a single perioperative complication compared to a low volume center was 11 (95% CI: 8-19). A similar volume-outcome relation (P<0.001) and optimal case volume of 73 cases/year was observed for bar displacement. A significant volume-outcome relation for repair of pectus excavatum by the Nuss procedure exists with an optimal annual institutional case-volume of 73 cases/year. These findings provide rationale for centralization.

332. OUTCOMES OF SALVAGE SURGERY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA: A NATIONWIDE COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background Compared to a standard resection, salvage esophagectomy is a more complex procedure and associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate short-term outcomes of salvage surgery for esophageal carcinoma and the influence of hospital volume and baseline characteristics on outcomes. Methods All patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) between 2012-2022 in the Netherlands were included. Patients were classified as salvage or non-salvage by registering surgeons. The definition was: surgery after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative mortality (30-day/-in-hospital) and morbidity were compared between salvage and non-salvage patients using multilevel logistic regression analyses. Hospital variation in the use of salvage esophagectomy was investigated using funnel plots. The influence of annual hospital volume (&amp;lt;40-&amp;gt;40) and annual salvage volume (&amp;lt;6-&amp;gt;6) on outcomes of salvage patients were investigated. Using backward elimination, relevant baseline characteristics influencing outcomes after salvage surgery were identified. Results Between 2012-2022, 7,749 patients underwent esophagectomy, of whom 251 (3%) underwent salvage resection, varying from 0%-8% of esophagectomies between centers. Salvage surgery was associated with an increased risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality (11% vs. 3%; OR:3.65; 95%CI:2.38-5.61) and severe complications (43% vs. 28%; OR:1.81; 95%CI:1.40-2.34). Salvage patients treated in high-volume esophagectomy centers (&amp;gt;40) had a decreased risk of 30-day/in-hospital mortality compared to low-volume centers (9% vs. 19%; OR:0.42; 95%CI:0.18-0.99), with no relation found between annual salvage volume and outcome. Certain baseline characteristics, foremost men, elderly (&amp;gt;75 years) and squamous cell carcinomas, were associated with worse short-term outcomes of salvage surgery. Conclusion Salvage surgery for esophageal carcinoma is infrequently but increasingly performed in the Netherlands, with wide hospital variation in its use. Salvage surgery is associated with worse short-term outcomes when compared with non-salvage esophagectomy. Outcomes after salvage surgery were favorable in high-volume esophagectomy centers, suggesting a volume-outcome relationship for salvage surgery.

Experience Curve With the Cone Procedure for Ebstein’s Anomaly: Effect on Cost and Resource Utilization

BackgroundThe volume-outcome relationship is well-known in health care. The Experience Curve, initially developed by the Boston Consulting Group for manufacturing, offers insight on this relationship and has never before been applied to health care. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the effect of experience on cost and resource utilization for the Cone procedure. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent Cone reconstruction for Ebstein’s anomaly at Boston Children’s Hospital between October 2010 and October 2021. Cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross clamp time over time were evaluated using exponential regression to assess the surgeon-level learning curve. At the hospital level, length of stay and cost over time were assessed using exponential regression. ResultsThere were 115 patients included in the study. Median hospital length of stay was 7.9 days (IQR: 6.4-10.2 days) with a decline of 3.3% per year. Median intensive care unit [ICU] length of stay was 3.2 days (IQR: 2-5.7 days) with a decline of 10.5% per year. Adjusted direct costs indexed to 2020 prices fell by 4% per year. There was no statistically significant change in cardiopulmonary bypass or aortic cross clamp time. In mediation analysis, the reduction in cost was completely accounted for in the decline in ICU length of stay. ICU length of stay was correlated with duration of intubation. ConclusionsIncreasing familiarity with Ebstein’s anomaly and Cone reconstruction led to a reduction in resource utilization.

Association between hospital procedure volume, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and adverse events related to surgical abortion: a nationwide population-based cohort study

BackgroundLimited evidence exists on the influence of hospital procedure volume, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities on surgical abortion outcomes. ObjectiveOur study aimed to assess the association between hospital procedure volume, individual and neighborhood deprivation, comorbidities, and abortion-related adverse events. Study DesignA nationwide population-based cohort study of all women hospitalized for surgical abortion was conducted from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019 in France. Annual hospital procedure volume was categorized into four levels based on spline function visualization: very low (<80), low ([80-300[), high ([300-650[), and very high-volume (≥650) centers. The primary outcome was the occurrence of at least one surgical-related adverse event, including hemorrhage, retained products of conception, genital tract and pelvic infection, transfusion, fistulas and neighboring lesions, local hematoma, failure of abortion, admission to an intensive care unit or death. These events were monitored during the index stay and during a subsequent hospitalization up to 90 days. The secondary outcome encompassed general adverse events not directly linked to surgery. ResultsOf the 112,842 hospital stays, 4,951 (4.39%) had surgical-related adverse events and 256 (0.23%) had general adverse events. The multivariate analysis showed a volume-outcome relationship, with lower rates of surgical-related adverse events in very high-volume (2.25%, aOR=0.34, 95%CI [0.29-0.39], p<0.001), high-volume (4.24%, aOR=0.61, 95%CI [0.55-0.69], p<0.001), and low-volume (4.69%, aOR=0.81, 95%CI [0.75-0.88], p<0.001) when compared to very low-volume centers (6.65%). Individual socioeconomic status (aOR=1.69, 95%CI [1.47-1.94], p<0.001), neighborhood deprivation (aOR=1.31, 95% CI [1.22-1.39], p<0.001), and comorbidities (aOR=1.79, 95%CI [1.35-2.38], p<0.001) were associated with surgical-related adverse events. Conversely, the multivariate analysis of general adverse events did not reveal any volume-outcome relationship. ConclusionThe presence of a volume-outcome relationship underscores the need for enhanced safety standards in low-volume centers to ensure equity in women's safety during surgical abortions. However, our findings also highlight the complexity of this safety concern which involves multiple other factors including socioeconomic status and comorbidities that policymakers must consider.

Procedural volume and outcomes with atrial fibrillation ablation: A report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry

BackgroundThe association of hospital and physician procedure volume with outcome has not been well evaluated for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in contemporary practice. ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the association between hospital and physician AF ablation volume and procedural success (isolation of all pulmonary veins) and major adverse events (MAEs). MethodsProcedures reported to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry AFib Ablation Registry between July 2019 and June 2022 were included. Hospital and physician procedural volumes were annualized and stratified into quartiles to compare outcomes. Three-level hierarchical (patient, hospital, and physician) models were used to assess the procedural volume–outcome relationship. ResultsA total of 70,296 first-time AF ablations at 186 US hospitals were included. Overall, procedural success and MAE rates were 98.5% and 1.0%, respectively. With hospital volume (Q4) as a reference, the likelihood of procedural success was lower for Q1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29–0.68), Q2 (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33–0.75), and Q3 (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40–0.89); the results were similarly significant for physician volume. With MAE for hospitals, there was an inverse procedural volume relationship for Q1 (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.26–2.52) but not for Q2 (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77–1.46) or Q3 (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.89–1.58) and similarly for physicians in Q1 and Q2 but not in Q3. An adjusted MAE ≤1% was predicted by an annual volume of approximately 190 for hospitals and 60 for physicians. ConclusionIn this national cohort, hospital and physician AF ablation procedural volumes were directly related to acute procedural success and inversely related to rates of MAE.

Transportation model for acute aortic dissection: implications for reduced treatment centres.

The objective of the present study was to model the effects of a reduced number of treatment centres for acute type A aortic dissection on preclinical transportation distance and time. We examined whether treatment in selected centres in Germany would be implementable with respect to time to treatment. For our transportation model, the number of aortic dissections and respective mean annual volume were collected from the annual quality reports (2015-2017) of all German cardiac surgery centres (n = 76). For each German postal code, the fastest and shortest routes to the nearest centre were calculated using Google Maps. Furthermore, we analysed data from the German Federal Statistical Office from January 2005 to December 2015 to identify all surgically treated patients with acute type A aortic dissection (n = 14102) and examined the relationship between in-hospital mortality and mean annual volume of medical centres. Our simulation showed a median transportation distance of 27.13 km and transportation time of 35.78 min for 76 centres. Doubling the transportation time (70 min) would allow providing appropriate care with only 12 medical centres. Therefore, a mean annual volume of >25 should be obtained. High mean annual volume was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality rates (P < 0.001). A significantly lower mortality rate of 14% was observed (P < 0.001) if a mean annual volume of 30 was achieved. Operationalizing the volume-outcome relationship with fewer but larger medical centres results in lower mortality, which outweighs the disadvantage of longer transportation time.

Hospital volume-outcome relationships for robot-assisted surgeries: a population-based analysis.

Associations between procedure volumes and outcomes can inform minimum volume standards and the regionalization of health services. Robot-assisted surgery continues to expand globally; however, data are limited regarding which hospitals should be using the technology. Using administrative health data for all residents of Ontario, Canada, this retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), total robotic hysterectomy (TRH), robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), or robotic portal lobectomy using 4 arms (RPL-4) between January 2010 and September 2021. Associations between yearly hospital volumes and 90-day major complications were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for patient characteristics and clustering at the level of the hospital. A total of 10,879 patients were included, with 7567, 1776, 724, and 812 undergoing a RARP, TRH, RAPN, and RPL-4, respectively. Yearly hospital volume was not associated with 90-day complications for any procedure. Doubling of yearly volume was associated with a 17-min decrease in operative time for RARP (95% confidence interval [CI] - 23 to - 10), 8-min decrease for RAPN (95% CI - 14 to - 2), 24-min decrease for RPL-4 (95% CI - 29 to - 19), and no significant change for TRH (- 7min; 95% CI - 17 to 3). The risk of 90-day major complications does not appear to be higher in low volume hospitals; however, they may not be as efficient with operating room utilization. Careful case selection may have contributed to the lack of an observed association between volumes and complications.

Volume-Outcome Relationships for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major scenario for the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock, although the utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices varies widely per hospital. We evaluated the relationship, at the hospital level, between the volume of IABP use and mortality in AMI. Using a Japanese nationwide administrative database, 26,490 patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 154 hospitals were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio. Predicted mortality per patient was calculated using baseline variables and averaged for each hospital. The associations among PCI volume for AMI, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality, and observed and predicted IABP use were assessed per hospital. Of 26,490 patients, 2,959 (11.2%) were treated with IABP and 1,283 (4.8%) died during hospitalization. The annualized number of uses of IABP per hospital in AMI was 4.5. In lower-volume primary PCI centers, IABP was more likely to be underused than expected, and the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio was higher than in higher-volume centers. A lower annual number of IABP use was associated with an increased mortality risk at the hospital level, suggesting that IABP use can be an institutional quality indicator in the setting of AMI.

Procedure Volume and Outcomes With WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Procedure volumes are associated with outcomes for many cardiovascular procedures, leading to guidelines on minimum volume thresholds for certain procedures; however, the volume-outcome relationship with left atrial appendage occlusion is poorly understood. As such, we sought to determine the relationship between hospital and physician volume and WATCHMAN left atrial appendage occlusion procedural success overall and with the new generation WATCHMAN FLX device. We performed an analysis of WATCHMAN procedures (January 2019 to October 2021) from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO Registry. Three-level hierarchical generalized linear models were used to assess the adjusted relationship between procedure volume and procedural success (device released with peridevice leak <5 mm, no in-hospital major adverse events). Among 87 480 patients (76.2±8.0 years; 58.8% men; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score, 4.8±1.5) from 693 hospitals, the procedural success rate was 94.2%. With hospital volume Q4 (greatest volume) as the reference, the likelihood of procedural success was significantly less among Q1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.66 [CI, 0.57-0.77]) and Q2 (OR, 0.78 [CI, 0.69-0.90]) but not Q3 (OR, 0.95 [CI, 0.84-1.07]). With physician volume Q4 (greatest volume) as the reference, the likelihood of procedural success was significantly less among Q1 (OR, 0.72 [CI, 0.63-0.82]), Q2 (OR, 0.79 [CI, 0.71-0.89]), and Q3 (OR, 0.88 [CI, 0.79-0.97]). Among WATCHMAN FLX procedures, there was attenuation of the volume-outcome relationships, with statistically significant but modest absolute differences of only ≈1% across volume quartiles. In this contemporary national analysis, greater hospital and physician WATCHMAN volumes were associated with increased procedure success. The WATCHMAN FLX transition was associated with increased procedural success and less heterogeneity in outcomes across volume quartiles. These findings indicate the importance of understanding the volume-outcome relationship for individual left atrial appendage occlusion devices.

Volume-Outcome Relationship in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: It Is Not as Simple as It Sounds.

Volume-Outcome Relationship in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: It Is Not as Simple as It Sounds.

Treatment of Hirschsprung's Disease in Germany: Analysis of National Hospital Discharge Data From 2016 to 2022

BackgroundHirschsprung's disease (HD) is a rare and complex malformation. The corrective operation is challenging and schedulable. The complete care situation for the corrective surgery for HD in Germany is uninvestigated. MethodsFor the years 2016–2022, the microdata of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) -statistics provided by the Research Data Center of the German Federal Statistical Office were accessed. All hospital stays for corrective surgery of HD in patients aged 0–17 were analyzed for patient's comorbidities, treatment characteristics and hospital structures. The occurrence of severe early postoperative complications during the hospital stay were documented. ResultsThe care structure for HD in Germany is decentralized with 109 hospitals performing 1199 corrective surgeries in 7 years. 75% of the participating hospitals performed three or less cases per year and 55 participating hospitals did not perform corrective surgery for HD each year. Early postoperative complications were common with at least one severe early complication in 18.6% of the cases. With an overall low case load per hospital, a volume outcome relationship cannot be established within Germany. Compared to international high volume centers the quality of outcomes for some of the investigated parameters was reduced. Despite the establishing of centers of expertise by the European reference network ERNICA for the treatment of HD no trend towards centralization occurred in Germany. ConclusionsThe corrective surgery for HD in Germany is decentralized and results in an overall high rate of early complications. The comparison with international studies from high-volume centers indicates potential for improvement for the corrective surgery of HD. Centralization remains essential for the improvement of care for patients with HD.

Demystifying the association of center-level operative trauma volume and outcomes of emergency general surgery

BackgroundRecent studies have demonstrated a positive volume-outcome relationship in emergency general surgery. Some have advocated for the sub-specialization of emergency general surgery independent from trauma. We hypothesized inferior clinical outcomes of emergency general surgery with increasing center-level operative trauma volume, potentially attributable to overall hospital quality. MethodsAdults (≥18 years) undergoing complex emergency general surgery operations (large and small bowel resection, repair of perforated peptic ulcer, lysis of adhesions, laparotomy) were identified in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multivariable risk-adjusted models were developed to evaluate the association of treatment at a high-volume trauma center (reference: low-volume trauma center) with clinical and financial outcomes after emergency general surgery. To evaluate hospital quality, mortality among adult hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction was assessed by hospital trauma volume. ResultsOf an estimated 785,793 patients undergoing a complex emergency general surgery operation, 223,116 (28.4%) were treated at a high-volume trauma center. Treatment at a high-volume trauma center was linked to 1.19 odds of in-hospital mortality (95% confidence interval 1.12–1.27). Although emergency general surgery volume was associated with decreasing predicted risk of mortality, increasing trauma volume was linked to an incremental rise in the odds of mortality after emergency general surgery. Secondary analysis revealed increased mortality for admissions for acute myocardial infarction with greater trauma volume. ConclusionWe note increased mortality for emergency general surgery and acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving treatment at high-volume trauma centers, signifying underlying structural factors to broadly affect quality. Thus, decoupling trauma and emergency general surgery services may not meaningfully improve outcomes for emergency general surgery patients. Our findings have implications for the evolving specialty of emergency general surgery, especially for the safety and continued growth of the acute care surgery model.

Overcoming Geographic Barriers: Surgical Care in Rural Populations

AbstractThis chapter examines the challenges rural Americans face in accessing surgical care, which is characterized by geographical barriers, a decreasing surgical workforce, and unique patient factors. The widening health care disparity between rural and urban residents highlights the need for comprehensive strategies to improve surgical care delivery to rural areas. Focusing on colorectal care delivery, encompassing the spectrum of common and complex care, exemplifies opportunities to optimize care delivery for rural populations. Here, we discuss the complex and unique interplay of challenges within rural hospital infrastructure, workforce shortages, and patient factors emphasizing financial strain, closure of rural hospitals, and limited access to specialty providers and resources. Current evidence focuses on volume–outcome relationships, the safety of common surgical care at rural hospitals, and the impact of rural hospitals joining larger health systems. Strategies to optimize care delivery include site-of-care optimization, improved care coordination, dissemination of specialty expertise, and policy programs to support the rural workforce. Recent federal policies, including the rural emergency hospital program, underscore the delicate balance between sustaining essential local health care services and the financial realities of rural health care delivery. We then conclude with evidence-based strategies to bridge the urban-rural health care gap, ensuring equitable access to high-quality surgical care regardless of geographic location.

Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in New Zealand: Balancing the volume-outcome relationship with accessibility in a surgically low volume country.

New Zealand has a population of only 5.5 million meaning that for many surgical procedures the country qualifies as a "low-volume center." However, the health system is well developed and required to provide complex surgical procedures that benchmark internationally against comparable countries. This investigation was undertaken to review regional variation and volumes of complex resection and palliative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgical procedures within New Zealand. Data pertaining to patients undergoing complex resectional UGI procedures (esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, and hepatectomies) and palliative UGI procedures (esophageal stenting, enteroenterostomy, biliary enteric anastomosis, and liver ablation) in a New Zealand hospital between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019 were obtained from the National Minimum Dataset. New Zealand is a low-volume center for UGI surgery (229 hepatectomies, 250 gastrectomies, 126 pancreatectomies, and 74 esophagectomies annually). Over 80% of patients undergoing hepatic resection/ablation, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, and pancreatectomy are treated in one of the six national cancer centers (Auckland, Waikato, Mid-Central, Capital Coast, Canterbury, or Southern). There is evidence of the decreasing frequency of these procedures in small centers with increasing frequency in large centers suggesting that some regionalization is occurring. Palliative procedures were more widely performed. Indigenous Māori were less likely to be treated in a nationally designated cancer center than non-Māori. The challenge for New Zealand and similarly sized countries is to develop and implement a system that optimizes the skills and pathways that come from a frequent performance of complex surgery while maintaining system resilience and ensuring equitable access for all patients.

The influence of hospital volume and physician volume on early mortality in acute promyelocytic leukemia patients

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a highly curable hematologic malignancy in the era of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) combination treatment. However, only a modest change in early mortality rate has been observed despite the wide availability of ATRA. In addition to the clinical characteristics of APL patients, studies on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the physician volume-outcome relationship remained limited. We aim to evaluate the association between hospital and physician volume and the early mortality rate among APL patients. The patients were collected from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Early mortality is defined as death within 30 days of diagnosis. Patients were categorized into four groups according to individual cumulative hospital and physician volume. The risk of all-cause mortality in APL patients with different cumulative volume groups was compared using a Cox proportional hazard model. The probability of overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. All 741 patients were divided into four quartile volume groups. In the multivariate analysis, only physician volume was significantly associated with early mortality rate. The physician volume of the highest quartile was a protective factor for early mortality compared with the physician volume of the lowest quartile (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02–0.65). Hospital characteristics were not associated with early mortality. In the sensitivity analyses, the results remained consistent using two other different definitions of early mortality. Higher physician volume was independently associated with lower early mortality, while hospital volume was not. Enhancing the clinical expertise of low-volume physicians may ensure better outcomes.

High but decreasing rates of reconstruction after total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and evidence of a direct volume outcome relationship.

Total (procto)colectomy is indicated in 15%-20% of ulcerative colitis(UC) patients during their disease course. Reconstruction options to avoid a permanent ileostomy include an ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IPAA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). This study aimed to investigate reconstruction rates using Australian-based population-level data, and factors influencing reconstruction. A retrospective data linkage study of the NSW population over a 19-year period was performed. Patients with UC who underwent total (procto)colectomy with a minimum of 1-year follow up were included. The main outcome was reconstruction with either IPAA or IRA. The influence of hospital and patient factors on reconstruction rates was assessed by Cox regression. Overall, 1047 patients underwent a (procto)colectomy for UC (mean age 45.9 years [SD ± 18.3], 640 [61.1%] male). The 5-year reconstruction rate was 55% (IPAA 89%). Advanced age, emergent colectomy, higher comorbidity burden, and geographical remoteness were significantly associated with lower reconstruction rates. A lower reconstruction rate was also observed in the most recent time-period (2014-2019) (aHR 0.68[95% CI 0.54-0.86]), and where index (procto)colectomy was performed in low-volume (<1 pouch/year) pouch hospitals (aHR 0.60 [95% CI 0.43-0.82]). NSW Australia has the highest reported rate of reconstruction following UC (procto)colectomy globally. However, rates reduced in the most recent time-period. There was variation in reconstruction rates across centres, with primary and overall reconstruction rates proportionate to hospital pouch volume. Reconstruction rates were also lower for patients living outside major cities. To ensure equitable opportunities for reconstruction, patients being considered for IBD pouch surgery should be centralized to a limited number of specialist pouch centres.