Volume Of Fluid Resuscitation Research Articles

Efficacy of compound sodium acetate Ringer’s solution in early fluid resuscitation for children with septic shock: a preliminary retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe effectiveness of acetated Ringer’s solution in pediatric shock has received little attention. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of using compound sodium acetate Ringer’s solution (AR) for fluid resuscitation in children with septic shock.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of children with septic shock admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from December 2019 to January 2023. Based on the resuscitation fluid administered, the participants were categorized into the compound AR and normal saline (NS) groups. We compared blood circulation conditions, internal environment parameters (arterial blood pH, lactic acid, serum sodium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and blood glucose), and 28-day clinical outcomes between the two groups.ResultsThis study included 40 children, with 13 and 27 in the compound AR and NS groups, respectively. The two groups showed no significant differences in sex, age, body weight, body mass index, primary inflammation level, or Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment on admission. Similarly, no significant difference was observed in resuscitation fluid volume administered during the first hour (compound AR group: 250.00 mL [100.00, 390.00]; NS group: 250.00 mL [100.00, 500.00]). The total amount of crystalloid and colloid fluids administered within 24 h, vasoactive drug use, and blood pressure recovery post-resuscitation did not significantly differ between the groups. However, at 6 h post-resuscitation, the compound AR had considerably lower lactate level than the NS group (1.12 vs. 2.20 mmol/L). There were no significant differences in arterial blood pH, serum sodium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and blood glucose levels between the groups. After treatment, in the compound AR group, 3 patients died, 2 improved, and 8 were cured. In the NS group, 7 patients died, 8 improved, and 12 were cured. The 28-day treatment outcomes (mortality rate, improvement rate, cure rate, or side effects) showed no significant differences between the groups.ConclusionsCompound AR was as effective as NS as a resuscitation fluid in pediatric septic shock, demonstrating similar intravascular volume restoration and hemodynamic stability maintenance. However, it caused a faster decline in arterial lactate levels without obvious side effects.

Optimal fluid resuscitation targets in septic patients with acutely decompensated heart failure

BackgroundTo determine the optimal fluid resuscitation volume in septic patients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF).MethodsSeptic patients with ADHF were identified from a tertiary urban medical center. The generalized additive models were used to explore the association between fluid resuscitation volume and endpoints, and the initial 3 h fluid resuscitation volume was divided into four groups according to this model: < 10 mL/kg group, ≥ 10 to ≤ 15 mL/kg group, > 15 to ≤ 20 mL/kg group, and > 20 mL/kg group. Logistic and Cox regression models were employed to explore the association between resuscitation volume and primary endpoint, in-hospital mortality, as well as secondary endpoints including 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, invasive ventilation, and ICU admission.ResultsA total of 598 septic patients with a well-documented history of HF were enrolled in the study; 405 patients (68.8%) had sepsis-induced hypoperfusion. Patients with NYHA functional class III and IV were 494 (83.9%) and 22 (3.74%), respectively. Resuscitation volumes above 20 mL/kg (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.31–8.15) or below 10 mL/kg (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.14–5.20) significantly increased the risk of in-hospital mortality in septic patients, while resuscitation volumes between 15 and 20 mL/kg were not associated with the risk of in-hospital death in septic patients (OR 1.79, 95% CI 0.68–4.81). In the multivariable Cox models, the effect of resuscitation volume on 30-day and 1-year mortality in septic patients was similar to the effect on in-hospital mortality. Resuscitation volume exceeds 15 mL/kg significantly increased the risk of tracheal intubation, while fluid resuscitation volume was not associated with ICU admission in the septic patients. In septic patients with hypoperfusion, these fluid resuscitation volumes have similar effects on patient outcomes. This association was consistent across the three subgroups with worsened cardiac function, as well as in sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsOur study observed that an initial fluid resuscitation volume of 10–15 mL/kg in the first 3 h was optimal for early resuscitation in septic patients with ADHF, particularly those with worsened cardiac function. These results need to be confirmed in randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes.

Small volume fluid resuscitation and supplementation with 20% albumin versus buffered crystalloids in adults with septic shock: A protocol for a randomised feasibility trial

Background: Fluid therapy is universally administered in the management of patients with sepsis, however excessive cumulative fluid balance has been shown to result in worse outcomes. Hyperoncotic albumin results in both lower fluid volumes and early cumulative fluid balance, and may reduce short-term mortality in patients with septic shock. Methods: In this single centre, open label, feasibility trial; patients with early septic shock will be randomly allocated either 20% albumin for resuscitation and daily supplementation, versus buffered crystalloids alone for all fluid therapy. The intervention period will last 7 days, with follow up points at ICU and hospital discharge, and 90 days after randomisation. Objectives: Primary outcome measures including recruitment rate, intervention adherence, data completeness and safety will constitute objective evidence of feasibility, according to pre-specified thresholds. Secondary outcomes will include mortality and healthcare utilisation at 90 days, alongside other physiological and patient centred outcomes to inform the design of a future effectiveness trial. Conclusion: This study will rigorously test the feasibility of conducting a future trial to test both the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hyperoncotic albumin in patients with early septic shock.

Effect of Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) versus 5% Albumin Solution on Intra-Abdominal Pressure in Severe Burn Patients: A Randomized Clinical Study

Abstract Introduction Massive burn patients are at high risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) as a complication of aggressive resuscitation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus 5% albumin solution on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in massive burn patients. Methods This was a single-center, prospective randomized clinical trial carried on at Ain Shams University (ASU) burn unit for 2 years. Where adult patients with burns 20 to 60 % of TBSA were equally randomized into HES group or albumin group. Results Fifty-two patients were equally randomized into 2 groups. There was no difference in age, sex, weight, type of burn, and TBSA between the two groups. The mean total resuscitation fluid volume in the first 48 hours was 213 ml/kg and 206.2 ml/kg for the HES group and the albumin group respectively (p = 0.674). IAP statistically was non-significantly higher in the HES group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups as regards the renal function tests. Conclusion Both HES and 5% albumin solution are effective and safe colloids for burn resuscitation. They partially have an equal effect on intra-abdominal pressure, renal involvement, and vital data stability in massive burn patients.

Effect of the 1-h bundle on mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department: a stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial.

The efficacy of the 1-h bundle for emergency department (ED) patients with suspected sepsis, which includes lactate measurement, blood culture, broad-spectrum antibiotics administration, administration of 30mL/kg crystalloid fluid for hypotension or lactate ≥ 4mmol/L, remains controversial. We carried out a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial in 23 EDs in France and Spain. Adult patients with Sepsis-3 criteria or a quick sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 2 or a lactate > 2mmol/L were eligible. The intervention was theimplementation of the 1-h sepsis bundle.The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality truncated at 28 days. Secondary outcomes included volume of fluid resuscitation at 24h, acute heart failure at 24h, SOFA score at 72h, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, number of days on mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy, vasopressor free days, unnecessary antibiotic administration, and mortality at 28days. 1148 patients were planned to be analysed; the study period ended after 873 patients were included. 872 patients (mean age 66, 42% female) were analyzed: 387 (44.4%) in the intervention group and 485 (55.6%) in the control group. Median SOFA score was 3 [1-5]. Median time to antibiotic administration was 40min in the intervention group vs 113min in the control group (difference - 73 [95% confidence interval (CI) - 93 to - 53]). There was a significantly higher rate, volume, and shorter time to fluid resuscitation within 3h in the intervention group. There were 47 (12.1%) in-hospital deaths in the intervention group compared to 61 (12.6%) in the control group (difference in percentage - 0.4 [95% CI - 5.1 to 4.2], adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.48 to 1.39]). There were no differences between groups for other secondary endpoints. Among patients with suspected sepsis in the ED, the implementation of the 1-h sepsis bundle was not associated with significant difference in in-hospital mortality. However, this study may be underpowered to report a statistically significant difference between groups.

Management and treatment of perioperative hypersensitivity.

Perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are rare but potentially catastrophic events. This review acts to summarize recent recommendations for both immediate and poststabilization management of suspected reactions, alongside practical advice for anaesthetists who may be faced with these events. Prompt treatment is essential but may be hampered by delay in recognition. This can occur because there are multiple differential diagnoses for the observed clinical signs as well as variations in clinical presentation. Resuscitation is dependent on the use of adrenaline and fluids. Adrenaline should be administered in small, titrated intravenous boluses. Low-dose infusions should be commenced early if the response to boluses is poor. Large volume fluid resuscitation may be required to maintain adequate circulating volume. Chest compressions are recommended when there is evidence of inadequate perfusion, rather than waiting until cardiac arrest is confirmed. Antihistamines and corticosteroids are no longer recommended in the immediate management phase. Once the patient has been stabilized, it is important to obtain serial tryptase concentrations to aid the subsequent clinic investigation. The decision to proceed or abandon surgery will be based on an individual risk-benefit analysis. All cases of suspected perioperative hypersensitivity, including fatal cases, must be referred for formal investigation. There have been recent updates to management guidelines in perioperative hypersensitivity. Treatment algorithms, treatment packs and referral packs can all help the anaesthetist manage these complex cases, aid the subsequent investigation and ensure patient safety in the future.

Does Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affect Fluid Resuscitation Volume in Patients with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Review.

Fixed, large volume resuscitation with intravenous fluids (IVFs) in septic shock can cause inadvertent hypervolemia, increased medical interventions, and death when unguided by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The primary study objective was to evaluate whether total IVF volume differs for emergency department (ED) septic shock patients receiving POCUS versus no POCUS. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study from 7/1/2018 to 8/31/2021 of atraumatic adult ED patients with septic shock. We agreed upon a priori variables and defined septic shock as lactate ≥4 and hypotension (SBP <90 or MAP <65). A sample size of 300 patients would provide 85% power to detect an IVF difference of 500 milliliters between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts. Data are reported as frequencies, median (IQR), and associations from bivariate logistic models. 304 patients met criteria and 26% (78/304) underwent POCUS. Cardiac POCUS demonstrated reduced ejection fraction in 15.4% of patients. Lung ultrasound showed normal findings in 53% of patients. The POCUS vs. non-POCUS cohorts had statistically significant differences for the following variables: higher median lactate (6.7 [IQR 5.2-8.7] vs. 5.6], p = 0.003), lower systolic blood pressure (77.5 [IQR 61-86] vs. 85.0, p < 0.001), more vasopressor use (51% vs. 34%, p = 0.006), and more positive pressure ventilation (38% vs. 24%, p = 0.017). However, there were no statistically significant differences between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts in total IVF volume ml/kg (33.02 vs. 32.1, p = 0.47), new oxygen requirement (68% vs. 59%, p = 0.16), ED death (3% vs. 4%, p = 0.15), or hospital death (31% vs. 27%, p = 0.48). There were similar distributions of lactate, total fluids, and vasopressors in patients with CHF and severe renal failure. Among ED patients with septic shock, POCUS was more likely to be used in sicker patients. Patients who had POCUS were given similar volume of crystalloids although these patients were more critically ill. There were no differences in new oxygen requirement or mortality in the POCUS group compared to the non-POCUS group.

Establishing a prognostic prediction model for patients with septic shock based on the completion time of fluid resuscitation and the negative fluid balance volumes

To explore the relationship between the completion time of fluid resuscitation as well as negative fluid balance volumes and the prognosis of patients with septic shock, and to try to construct a prediction model based on the completion time of fluid resuscitation and negative fluid balance volumes, and to verify the predictive efficacy of the model on the prognosis of patients with septic shock. Patients with septic shock admitted to Wuxi People's Hospital from April 2020 to April 2023 were selected. The general data (gender, age, body mass index, infection site), pathological indicators on admission, the difference of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) between admission and 24 hours after fluid resuscitation, the completion time of fluid resuscitation and negative fluid balance volume were recorded. Multivariate Logistic analysis was used to screen the influencing factors of the prognosis of patients with septic shock, and a nomogram model was established. Bootstrap method was used for internal validation of the model. The consistency index, calibration curve and receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) were used to evaluate the accuracy and prediction efficiency of the model. A total of 96 patients with septic shock were enrolled, 38 patients died and 58 patients survived at 28 days. Compared with the survival group, the difference of APACHE II score, SOFA score, the proportion of fluid resuscitation completed within 1 to 3 hours, and the proportion of negative fluid balance volume -500 to -250 mL per day in the death group were lower, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that the completion time of fluid resuscitation was a risk factor for the prognosis of patients with septic shock [odds ratio (OR) = 26.285, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 9.984-76.902, P < 0.05]. The difference of APACHE II score (OR = 0.045, 95%CI was 0.015-0.131), SOFA score (OR = 0.056, 95%CI was 0.019-0.165) between admission and 24 hours after fluid resuscitation, and negative fluid balance volume (OR = 0.043, 95%CI was 0.015-0.127) were protective factors for the prognosis of patients with septic shock (all P < 0.05). The model validation results showed that the consistency index was 0.681 (95%CI was 0.596-0.924), indicating good discrimination. The calibration curve showed that the calibration curve fitted well with the ideal curve. The ROC curve showed that the sensitivity of the nomogram model for predicting the death of patients with septic shock was 83.7%, the specificity was 97.2%, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.931 (95%CI was 0.846-0.985), indicating that the model had good prediction efficiency. The completion time of fluid resuscitation and negative fluid balance volumes are related to the prognosis of septic shock patients, and the alignment diagram model improve the identification of the risk of death in septic shock patients.

Appraisal of Australian and New Zealand paediatric sepsis guidelines.

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are an important tool for the management of children with sepsis. The quality, consistency and concordance of Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) childhood sepsis CPGs with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (ACSQHC) sepsis clinical care standards and international sepsis guidelines is unclear. We accessed childhood sepsis CPGs for all ANZ states and territories through Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative members. The guidelines were assessed for quality using the AGREE-II instrument. Consistency between CPG treatment recommendations was assessed, as was concordance with the ACSQHC sepsis clinical care standards and international sepsis guidelines. Overall, eight CPGs were identified and assessed. CPGs used a narrative and pathway format, with those using both having the highest quality overall. CPG quality was highest for description of scope and clarity of presentation, and lowest for editorial independence. Consistency between guidelines for initial treatment recommendations was poor, with substantial variation in the choice and urgency of empiric antimicrobial administration; the choice, volume and urgency of fluid resuscitation; and the choice of first-line vasoactive agent. Most CPGs were concordant with time-critical components of the ACSQHC sepsis clinical care standard, although few addressed post-acute care. Concordance with international sepsis guidelines was poor. Childhood sepsis CPGs in current use in ANZ are of variable quality and lack consistency with key treatment recommendations. CPGs are concordant with the ACSQHC care standard, but not with international sepsis guidelines. A bi-national sepsis CPG may reduce unnecessary variation in care.

Crystalloid Fluid Management of Non-Traumatic Hypotension by New South Wales Ambulance

Introduction Shock is circulatory insufficiency, inadequate oxygen delivery, and cellular hypoxia. Intravenous fluids are essential for shock management. Despite treatment, patients can face persistent shock with ongoing hypotension, contributing to higher mortality. This analysis aims to quantify hypotensive non-traumatic cases in an Australian ambulance service, determine persistent hypotension prevalence, and assess paramedic-administered intravascular fluids’ impact on blood pressure changes. Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of prehospital fluid resuscitation by New South Wales Ambulance paramedics during 2022. Hypotension is defined as a systolic blood pressure of ≤ 90 mmHg, and persistent hypotension is a systolic blood pressure consistently below 90 mmHg across all observations, with a final blood pressure below 90 mmHg. This study aimed to determine the volume of fluid resuscitation at which a plateau in population-level systolic blood pressure response is observed, by calculating the derivative of the fitted logistic regression model. Moreover, this analysis identified the relative contribution of factors influencing the probability of an attempt at intravenous or intraosseous access using machine learning. Results Among 796,865 attendances, 23,049 (2.9%) involved non-traumatic patients with hypotension. In total 7,388 (32.1%) of the hypotensive cases resulted in persistent hypotension, of which 3,235 (43.8%) received Hartmann’s solution and 1,745 (53.9%) received at least 500 ml of fluids but still had hypotension. The model showed that systolic blood pressure tends to stop increasing after 500–600 milliliters of fluid are given. This suggests that, on average, giving more fluid than this may not raise blood pressure further in a prehospital setting, though individual patient needs can differ. The top four factors from the machine learning shows that as initial respiratory rate goes up, the probability of intravascular access rises. Transport times less than 20 min are associated with a smaller chance of access and younger patients are less likely to receive an attempt. Finally, extremes of systolic blood pressure are more likely to receive access attempts. Conclusion This study found that three percent of non-traumatic attendances have at least one episode of hypotension, and that more than half of these have persistent hypotension. Only 44% of persistently hypotensive received fluids, and half of persistently hypotensive patients stayed hypotensive despite a reasonable volume of prehospital crystalloids.

Hemodynamic Resuscitation Characteristics of Emergency Department Patients with Sepsis and Hypotension who are and are not Admitted to ICU; a Prospective Cross-sectional Study.

There is an evidence-practice gap in the optimal timing and volume of intravenous fluid as well as vasopressor administration in managing patients with sepsis. This study aimed to explore current hemodynamic resuscitation practice in emergency department (ED) for patients with sepsis and hypotension. This is a sub-analysis of the prospective multicentre ARISE FLUIDS observational study, which was conducted in 70 EDs across Australia and New Zealand. Baseline characteristics, as well as ED management and outcome of sepsis patients were compared between patients who were and were not admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU). A total of 587 patients with a median age of 65 years and even sex distribution (49% female) were available for analysis. Almost two-thirds of patients with sepsis (63.2%, n=371) were not admitted to ICU/HDU and were given lower intravenous (IV) fluid volumes over 24-hours, compared to those receiving critical care (4077ml vs. 5421ml, p<0.001). Patients not admitted to an ICU/HDU had a lower Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (median 14 vs. 18, P<0.001) and serum lactate level (1.8 vs. 2.8 mmol/L, P<0.001) compared to those admitted to ICU/HDU and 5.9% received a vasopressor infusion in the first 24-hours. Females, patients aged <65 years, and those with urosepsis or sepsis of non-respiratory origin received a greater volume of IV fluids. Almost two-thirds of patients were not admitted to ICU/HDU. In patients not admitted to ICU/HDU, 1 in 17 received a vasopressor infusion during their ED or early hospital stay. Patients not admitted to ICU/HDU received less fluid in the first 24 hours than those who were. Greater resuscitation fluid volumes were independently associated with female sex, age <65 years, higher lactate levels, and urinary or non-respiratory source of sepsis.

American Burn Association Clinical Practice Guidelines on Burn Shock Resuscitation.

This Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) addresses the topic of acute fluid resuscitation during the first 48 hours following a burn injury for adults with burns ≥20% of the total body surface area (%TBSA). The listed authors formed an investigation panel and developed clinically relevant PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions. A systematic literature search returned 5978 titles related to this topic and after 3 levels of screening, 24 studies met criteria to address the PICO questions and were critically reviewed. We recommend that clinicians consider the use of human albumin solution, especially in patients with larger burns, to lower resuscitation volumes and improve urine output. We recommend initiating resuscitation based on providing 2 mL/kg/% TBSA burn in order to reduce resuscitation fluid volumes. We recommend selective monitoring of intra-abdominal and intraocular pressure during burn shock resuscitation. We make a weak recommendation for clinicians to consider the use of computer decision support software to guide fluid titration and lower resuscitation fluid volumes. We do not recommend the use of transpulmonary thermodilution-derived variables to guide burn shock resuscitation. We are unable to make any recommendations on the use of high-dose vitamin C (ascorbic acid), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), early continuous renal replacement therapy, or vasopressors as adjuncts during acute burn shock resuscitation. Mortality is an important outcome in burn shock resuscitation, but it was not formally included as a PICO outcome because the available scientific literature is missing studies of sufficient population size and quality to allow us to confidently make recommendations related to the outcome of survival at this time.

Using a Fluid Resuscitation Algorithm to Reduce the Incidence of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome in the Burn Intensive Care Unit.

Patients with large burns must be carefully resuscitated to balance adequate tissue perfusion with the risk of end-organ damage. One devastating complication of overresuscitation is abdominal compartment syndrome. Reducing the volume of fluids given during resuscitation may reduce the incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome and improve outcomes. To determine whether decreasing fluid resuscitation volume in a burn center reduced the incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome. This retrospective cohort study involved all patients with severe burns (total body surface area ≥20%) who were admitted to a burn intensive care unit over 4 years (n = 166). Primary outcomes were required fluid volume, whether differences in the patient characteristics measured affected outcomes, rate of abdominal compartment syndrome, and incidence of abdominal hypertension. After the first 2 years, the Parkland fluid resuscitation algorithm was modified to decrease the volume goal, and patients were assessed for the incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome and related complications such as kidney failure, abdominal hypertension, and ventilator days. A total of 16% of patients resuscitated using the Parkland equation experienced abdominal compartment syndrome compared with 10% of patients resuscitated using the modified algorithm, a difference of 6 percentage points (P = .39). Average volume administered was 11.8 L using the Parkland formula and 9.4 L using the modified algorithm (P = .03). Despite a significant decrease in the amount of fluid administered, no significant difference was found in incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome or urine output. Matched prospective studies are needed to improve resuscitation care for patients with large burns.

Hypertension during transfer is associated with poor outcomes in unstable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

ObjectiveLimited data exist for optimal blood pressure (BP) management during transfer of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). This study evaluates the effects of hypertension and severe hypotension during interhospital transfers in a cohort of patients with rAAA in hemorrhagic shock. MethodsWe performed a retrospective, single-institution review of patients with rAAA transferred via air ambulance to a quaternary referral center for repair (2003-2019). Vitals were recorded every 5 minutes in transit. Hypertension was defined as a systolic BP of ≥140 mm Hg. The primary cohort included patients with rAAA with hemorrhagic shock (≥1 episode of a systolic BP of <90 mm Hg) during transfer. The primary analysis compared those who experienced any hypertensive episode to those who did not. A secondary analysis evaluated those with either hypertension or severe hypotension <70 mm Hg. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. ResultsDetailed BP data were available for 271 patients, of which 125 (46.1%) had evidence of hemorrhagic shock. The mean age was 74.2 ± 9.1 years, 93 (74.4%) were male, and the median total transport time from helicopter dispatch to arrival at the treatment facility was 65 minutes (interquartile range, 46-79 minutes). Among the cohort with shock, 26.4% (n = 33) had at least one episode of hypertension. There were no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, AAA repair type, AAA anatomic location, fluid resuscitation volume, blood transfusion volume, or vasopressor administration between the hypertensive and nonhypertensive groups. Patients with hypertension more frequently received prehospital antihypertensives (15% vs 2%; P = .01) and pain medication (64% vs 24%; P < .001), and had longer transit times (36.3 minutes vs 26.0 minutes; P = .006). Episodes of hypertension were associated with significantly increased 30-day mortality on multivariable logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-14.39; P = .007; 59.4% [n = 19] vs 40.2% [n = 37]; P = .01). Severe hypotension (46%; n = 57) was also associated with higher 30-day mortality (aOR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.27-6.28; P = .01; 60% [n = 34] vs 32% [n = 22]; P = .01). Those with either hypertension or severe hypotension (54%; n = 66) also had an increased odds of mortality (aOR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.08-8.11; P = .04; 58% [n = 38] vs 31% [n = 18]; P < .01). Level of hypertension, BP fluctuation, and timing of hypertension were not significantly associated with mortality. ConclusionsHypertensive and severely hypotensive episodes during interhospital transfer were independently associated with increased 30-day mortality in patients with rAAA with shock. Hypertension should be avoided in these patients, but permissive hypotension approaches should also maintain systolic BPs above 70 mm Hg whenever possible.

Pediatric Profound Dengue Shock Syndrome and Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound During Mechanical Ventilation to Guide Treatment: Single-Center Retrospective Study, 2013-2021.

Profound dengue shock syndrome (DSS) complicated by severe respiratory failure necessitating mechanical ventilation (MV) accounts for high case fatality rates among PICU-admitted patients. A major challenge to management is the assessment of intravascular volume, which can be hampered by severe plasma leakage and the use of MV. Retrospective cohort, from 2013 to 2021. Sixty-seven children with profound DSS supported by MV, some of whom underwent bedside point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for assessment and monitoring of hemodynamics and fluid administration. PICU of the tertiary Children's Hospital No. 2 in Vietnam. None. We analyzed data clinical and laboratory data during PICU stay. In particular, during use of MV (i.e., at times 0-, 6-, and 24-hr after commencement) and fluid resuscitation. The primary study outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcomes were associations with changes in hemodynamics, blood lactate, and vasoactive-inotrope score (VIS). Patients had a median age of 7 years (interquartile range, 4-9). Use of POCUS during fluid management (39/67), as opposed to not using (28/67), was associated with lower mortality (6/39 [15%] vs. 18/28 [64%]; difference 49 % [95% CI, 28-70%], p < 0.001). Use of POCUS was associated with lower odds of death (adjusted odds ratio 0.17 [95% CI, 0.04-0.76], p = 0.02). The utilization of POCUS, versus not, was associated with greater use of resuscitation fluid, and reductions in VIS and pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD-2) score at 24 hours after MV and PICU discharge. In our experience of pediatric patients with profound DSS and undergoing MV (2013-2021), POCUS use was associated with lower odds of death, a higher volume of resuscitation fluid, and improvements in the blood lactate levels, VIS, and PELOD-2 score.

Fluid resuscitation and relation to respiratory support escalation in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension with sepsis.

To compare guideline-based fluid resuscitation and need for respiratory support escalation in septic patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) to those without PH. Single-center, retrospective cohort study. Tertiary care academic medical center in Detroit, Michigan. Adult patients with or without PH hospitalized and diagnosed with sepsis from November 1, 2013 through December 31, 2019. Patients with sepsis were assigned to one of two groups based on a previous PH diagnosis or no PH diagnosis. None. The primary outcome was incidence of respiratory support escalation within 72 h from sepsis time zero. Respiratory support escalation included high-flow nasal cannula, bilevel positive airway pressure, or intubation. One-hundred and four patients were included with 52 patients in each study group. Patients with PH were more likely to require escalation of respiratory support compared to non-PH patients (32.7% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.009). Fewer patients with PH received 30 mL/kg of crystalloid within 6 h of time zero compared with non-PH patients (3.8% vs. 42.3%; p < 0.001). Vasopressor initiation was more common in patients with PH compared with the non-PH group (40.4% vs. 19.2%; p = 0.018). PH diagnosis was the only independent predictor of respiratory support escalation. During initial sepsis management when compared with patients without PH, patients with PH had increased instances of respiratory support escalation within 72 h of sepsis time zero despite lower fluid resuscitation volumes.

The effect of dehydration, hyperchloremia and volume of fluid resuscitation on acute kidney injury in children admitted to hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a recognized comorbidity in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), although the exact etiology is unclear. The unique physiology of DKA makes dehydration assessments challenging, and these patients potentially receive excessive amounts of intravenous fluids (IVF). We hypothesized that dehydration is over-estimated in pediatric DKA, leading to over-administration of IVF and hyperchloremia that worsens AKI. Retrospective cohort of all DKA inpatients at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2014 to 2019. A total of 145 children were included; reasons for exclusion were pre-existing kidney disease or incomplete medical records. AKI was determined by change in creatinine during admission, and comparison to a calculated baseline value. Linear regression multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with AKI. True dehydration was calculated from patients' change in weight, as previously validated. Fluid over-resuscitation was defined as total fluids given above the true dehydration. A total of 19% of patients met KDIGO serum creatinine criteria for AKI on admission. Only 2% had AKI on hospital discharge. True dehydration and high serumurea levels were associated with high serumcreatinine levels on admission (p = 0.042; p < 0.001, respectively). Fluid over-resuscitation and hyperchloremia were associated with delayed kidney recovery (p < 0.001). Severity of initial AKI was associated with cerebral edema (p = 0.018). Dehydration was associated with initial AKI in children with DKA. Persistent AKI and delay to recovery was associated with hyperchloremia and over-resuscitation with IVF, potentially modifiable clinical variables for earlier AKI recovery and reduction in long-term morbidity. This highlights the need to re-address fluid protocols in pediatric DKA.

Albumin as Early Fluid Bolus Therapy after Cardiac Surgery in the Critical Care Units

Abstract Introduction After cardiac surgery, the use of intravenous fluids to reach specific goals is associated with improved clinical outcomes and shortened intensive care units (ICU) stay. Although type of fluid doesn’t seem to be of a great importance. Clinicians will have been involved in many local debates about the best fluid. Absence of evidence about what is the ideal fluid in this situation push researchers to conduct clinical trials in this context. Aim of the Work The aim of this study is to investigate the cardiovascular effect of using 20% albumin in patients after cardiac surgery. Methods This was a double blinded RCT that was conducted at Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ain Shams University Hospital over 6 months on post-cardiac surgery mechanically ventilated patients with a clinical decision to administer fluid bolus therapy, that was assessed for enrollment. Results There was no statistically significant difference between two groups regarding delta serum chloride at 24 h post-op (mmol/L) and renal replacement therapy post-operatively in ICU, and there was statistically significant difference found between two groups regarding ICU, and Hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, total dose nor epinephrine/kg in the first 24 h post-op (microg/kg), time to cessation of nor epinephrine infusion (h) and Delta serum creatinine at 24 h post-op (mg/dl). Conclusion In patients admitted to ICU following cardiac surgery, FBT with 20% albumin, when compared to crystalloid FBT, achieved equivalent cardiovascular optimization with smaller volumes of resuscitation fluid, less positive cumulative balance, and without evidence of any negative sequelae. Moreover, the use of 20% albumin for FBT was associated with lower amounts of vasopressor being delivered and shorter duration.

Effect of Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus 5% albumin solution on intra-abdominal pressure in severe burn patients: A prospective randomized clinical trial

IntroductionMassive burn patients are at risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) as a complication of resuscitation. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus 5% albumin solution on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in massive burn patients. MethodsThis was a prospective randomized clinical trial carried on at Ain Shams University (ASU) burn unit for 2 years. Where adult patients with burns more than 20% of TBSA were equally randomized into HES group or albumin group. ResultsFifty-two patients were equally randomized into 2 groups. We found no difference in age, sex, weight, type of burn, and TBSA between the two groups. The mean total resuscitation fluid volume in the first 48 h was 213 ml/kg and 206.2 ml/kg for the HES group and the albumin group respectively (p = 0.674). IAP statistically was non-significantly higher in the HES group. We found no statistical difference between the two groups as regards the renal function tests. ConclusionBoth HES and 5% albumin solution are effective and safe colloids for burn resuscitation. As regards the IAP, it seems that both 5% albumin and HES have comparable effect regarding IAH in severely burn patients. Both HES and 5% albumin were partially equal in terms of renal involvement and vital data stability.

Impact of initial fluid resuscitation volume on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure and septic shock

BackgroundFluid resuscitation is a key treatment for sepsis, but limited data exists in patients with existing heart failure (HF) and septic shock. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of initial fluid resuscitation volume on outcomes in HF patients with reduced or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with septic shock. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included patients with known HF (LVEF ≤50%) presenting with septic shock. Patients were divided into two groups based on the volume of fluid resuscitation in the first 6 h; <30 mL/kg or ≥30 mL/kg. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality or renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI), initiation of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay (LOS). All related data were collected and compared between the two groups. A generalized logistic mixed model was used to assess the association between fluid groups and the primary outcome while adjusting for baseline LVEF, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, inappropriate empiric antibiotics, and receipt of corticosteroids. ResultsOne hundred and fifty-four patients were included (93 patients in <30 mL/kg group and 61 patients in ≥30 mL/kg group). The median weight-based volume in the first 6 h was 17.7 (12.2–23.0) mL/kg in the <30 mL/kg group vs. 40.5 (34.2–53.1) mL/kg in the ≥30 mL/kg group (P <0.01). No statistical difference was detected in the composite of in-hospital mortality or RRT between the <30 mL/kg group compared to the ≥30 mL/kg group (55.9% vs. 45.9%, P=0.25), respectively. The <30 mL/kg group had a higher incidence of AKI, mechanical ventilation, and longer hospital LOS. ConclusionsIn patients with known reduced or mildly reduced LVEF presenting with septic shock, no difference was detected for in-hospital mortality or RRT in patients who received ≥30 mL/kg of resuscitation fluid compared to less fluid, although this study was underpowered to detect a difference. Importantly, ≥30 mL/kg fluid did not result in a higher need for mechanical ventilation.