Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire Research Articles

Sense of Coherence and Coping Strategies in Patients With Dysphonia

To analyze sense of coherence (SOC) of dysphonic individuals considering the type and degree of dysphonia, coping strategies, and sociodemographic variables. This cross-sectional study was performed with 50 dysphonic individuals under follow-up at a Brazilian Speech-Language Pathology Clinic. They answered a questionnaire with sociodemographic information, the PEED-10 (Brazilian Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire) and the Brazilian version of Sense of Coherence scale. The SOC was categorized as high or low using Cluster analysis. After descriptive analysis, data were analyzed through both the bivariate and multivariate logistic regression model method and the Spearman's correlation test (P< 0.05). Most individuals presented a high SOC (60%). Individuals with mild dysphonia were 7.00 times more likely to present high SOC (95% CI=1.24-39.38). Individuals between 45 and 70 years old were 5.03 times more likely to present high SOC (95% CI=1.25-20.28). In addition, the higher SOC, as well as the scores of manageability domain, the lower the use of strategies focused on emotion. Patients with mild dysphonia are more likely to have a high SOC. The same goes for individuals over the fourth decade of life. Also, the greater the SOC, the fewer emotional strategies are used to cope with dysphonia.

The Effects of Self-Esteem, Coping, and Voice-Related Quality of Life on Communicative Participation Before and After BOTOX® Treatment for Spasmodic Dysphonia

The purpose of this study was to (1) investigate the percent change in communicative participation in individuals with spasmodic dysphonia (SD) pre- and post-BOTOX® treatment; and (2) to investigate if percent change in communicative participation is predicted by change in self-esteem, coping, and/or Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) pre- and post-BOTOX® treatment. A cross-sectional study of 49 patients was conducted across three clinics, with each participant completing the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ), the V-RQOL instrument, and the Communication Participation Item Bank (CPIB) before BOTOX® treatment and 10-14 days following BOTOX® treatment. For Research Question 1, a paired t test was applied to test the equality of means for CPIB and to test the pre-post changes among other composite measurements before and after the BOTOX® treatment. For Research Question 2, a multivariable linear regression model was applied with percent change in CPIB as a main outcome, and change in Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, VDCQ, and the V-RQOL as independent variables (or covariates) in order to test the associations. The results indicated that pre- and post-BOTOX® measures of communicative participation are not statistically significantly different among the participants with SD. There was a strong positive correlation between change in coping and voice-related QOL. A better understanding of the relationship between communicative participation and voice-related QOL is warranted. Item analysis of the V-RQOL and the VDCQ may illustrate coping strategies and functional impairments and provide further information regarding highly variable communicative participation among individuals with SD.

Autopercepção da voz por professores de escola pública

Introduction: The professional voice usage has some aspects that are inherent to each profession and the teachers present a high vocal risk. Purpose: To identify the perception that public-school teachers have of their own voices and the type and focus of coping strategies they use when they perceive vocal changes. Methods: Three vocal self-assessment inventories were answered by 100 teachers (EG) and 40 non-teachers (CG): 100 Word-Descriptors for Voice (WDV), Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), which allows the calculation of the Activity Limitation Score (ALS) and Participation Restriction Score (PRS), and Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ), that classifies the strategies used to cope with voice disorders into focus on problem and on emotion. Higher scores on VAPP and VDCQ indicate greater disability. Data were compared with a 95% level of confidence. Results: Teachers classified 53 descriptors as negative, with 1% to 40% of occurrence, against 40 descriptors of the non-teachers, with maximum 11% of occurrence. The total scores of the VAPP and VDCQ were, respectively per group, 41.95/13.37 and 37.90/10.23, and the ALS was 7.59/1.96 and PRS, 4.95/1.43. EG reported more (37.90) coping strategies than CG (10.23), and the emotion-focused (EG = 23.21 and CG = 6.53) coping strategies were more frequent than problem-focused (EG = 14.69 and CG = 3,70) ones. All data showed significant difference (p<0.05) between EG and CG. Conclusion: Teachers perceive the impact of changes in their voices, with greater impact on daily communication. They show greater occurrence of coping strategies to deal with these modifications in their voices and these are more emotion than problem-focused.

Factor Analysis of the Persian Version of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire

Voice disorders can affect the quality of life and coping mechanisms and also coping mechanisms can affect the way in which patients deal with their voice problems. People with voice disorders need to use coping strategies to deal with the problems caused by their voice disorder. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties and cultural adaptation of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire in the Iranian population. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedures were performed according to the basic rules and instructions set by the International Quality of Life Assessment Project. Two hundred and forty-eight adults (218 patients with voice disorder and 30 healthy controls) were participated in the study. Face and content validity, clinical validity, and construct validity of the questionnaire were investigated by modern psychometric methods. Quantitative methods were used to measure content validity and all items were detected applicable. This means that the final version was clear and easy to answer. Clinical validity shows that the Persian version of VDCQ can distinguish between patients and healthy controls (P < 0.001). The construct validity of the VDCQ was tested in a cross-sectional study. The questionnaire was analyzed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Investigation of initial communality and after extraction of factors by Varimax rotation method showed that the share of items for all items in the questionnaire except item 12, is higher than 0.5. Therefore, item 12 should be removed from the questionnaire (Table 3). Based on the confirmatory factor analysis model, items 2 and 10, whose factor load were less than 0.4, were excluded from the questionnaire (Fig. 1). For reliability the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and ICC were obtained as 0.82 and 0.99, respectively. The results of studying the role of items in the reliability of the VDCQ showed that all items increase internal consistency. Based on modern statistical analysis conducted in this study, the original 15 item questionnaire was reduced to 12 item. The 12 item questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for quantifying coping strategies in people with voice disorder.

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Persian Version of Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (P-VDCQ): Introducing a New Instrument

Coping is one of the important concepts in psychology, which is pertinent to how persons with illness manage the stress of that condition. Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ) is an assessment tool for quantifying coping strategies in those with voice disability. The purpose of the present study was to investigate reliability and validity of the Persian version of VDCQ (P-VDCQ). Translation procedure was performed according to the World Health Organization guidelines, and then 138 persons (88 persons with voice disorders and 50 controls) completed the questionnaire. Psychometric properties of the P-VDCQ were investigated. There was a significant difference between the mean value of patients with dysphonia and that of the control group. The results of test-result reliability indicated that there is a high correlation between repeated administration of the questionnaire (intraclass correlation coefficient = 89.7). Also, a high Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α = 0.94) revealed a good internal consistency. Participants' scores in this instrument had a moderate correlation with their scores on Voice Activity Participation Profile-Persian version (r = 0.41, P < 0.001). The P-VDCQ is a reliable and a valid instrument that can be used to investigate coping strategies of patients with dysphonia in clinical settings and for research purposes.

Vocal activity profile and dysphonia coping strategies in subjects with laryngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy

ABSTRACT Purpose: to verify the vocal activity participation and the dysphonia coping strategies of subjects with laryngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy. Methods: a cross-sectional trial involving 17 individuals with laryngeal cancer treated only by radiotherapy with vocal complaints after radiotherapy management. A sociodemographic questionnaire, the Brazilian versions of Voice Activity and Participation Profile and Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire protocols were applied. Results: there was a prevalence of male participants (n=16) and the mean age was 62 years. All were former smokers and 15 were former drinkers. Voice Activity and Participation Profile in mean scores was: overall,141.2, self-perception of vocal problem, 6.2, effect at work, 19.1, effects on daily communication, 60.5, effects on media, 20.1, and effects on their emotional, 36.7. In Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire mean scores were: overall,71.7, focusing on problem, 33, and focusing on emotion, 38.9. Conclusion: the participants had high Voice Activity and Participation Profile scores as compared to the literature scores considered for dysphonic individuals in general, and activity with effects on daily communication was the most affected. Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire demonstrates that these patients adopt dysphonia coping strategies with greater focus on emotion.

Communicative aspects and coping strategies in patients with Parkinson's disease.

To investigate, in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the coping strategies; the most reported vocal symptoms; and the relation between coping, voice symptoms, and communicative aspects. Seventy-three subjects were included in the sample, 33 of which were participants in the experimental group (EG) with diagnosis of PD and 40 were control subjects, that is, healthy and without vocal complaints. They underwent the following procedures: application of Voice Symptoms Scale (VoiSS), Brazilian Version; Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ), Brazilian Version; and the questionnaire Living with Dysarthria (LwD). The EG presented deviations in all protocols: VDCQ, with the most frequently coping strategy being "self-control," VoiSS, with "Impairment" as the most prevalent domain, and LwD, presenting changes in all sections. Vocal signs and symptoms and communicative aspects were shown to have a regular correlation with coping. The correlation between vocal symptoms and communicative aspects was as follows: the greater the impairment in communication, the greater the VoiSS emotional scores and the more they complaint of voice-related signs and symptoms. Patients with PD use all kinds of coping strategies, but prefer using self-control. They present several vocal signs and symptoms, and "Impairment" was the most prevalent domain. There are difficulties in all aspects of communication. The higher the occurrence of vocal signs and symptoms, the more the patient reports the difficulties of living with dysarthria, particularly when deviations affect the emotional domain.

Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire

To perform the validation of the Brazilian version of the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (B-VDCQ) using procedures according to the Scientific Advisory Committee of Medical Outcomes Trust and psychometric analyses to determine the scales validity and reliability. In the preliminary procedures, the VDCQ was administered to 14 patients to determine if items were culturally valid and propose possible adaptations for a B-VDCQ. The sample of this study consisted of a data set of 178 individuals, 87 with vocal complaint, comprising 19 men and 68 women, with mean age of 34.1years and 91 without vocal complaint, comprising 29 men and 62 women, with mean age of 32.4years. To demonstrate validity, the B-VDCQ scores were compared to vocal self-assessment and perceptual analysis. To determine the reliability and test-retest reproducibility, 14 voice patients repeated the measurement between 3 and 14days after the first administration. Principal component analyses of the patients with vocal complaint yielded four coping strategies: venting, support seeking, minimisation, and avoidant acceptance. Subscales of the questionnaire showed acceptable internal consistency and reproducibility values, apart from the minimisation subscale. B-VDCQ validity was demonstrated through relationships with perceptual analyses and vocal self-assessment and subscale score differences between the two groups. The B-VDCQ has been submitted to essential steps necessary for cultural adaptation and validation. It is a simple instrument to administer and shows to be specific for evaluating patients with voice problems. The B-VDCQ can be an important addition to the voice evaluation of patients with dysphonia.

Communicative aspects and coping strategies in patients with Parkinson's disease

Purpose: To investigate in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), which are the coping strategies used and the relation between type of coping, voice symptoms and communicative aspects. Method: 73 subjects, 33 in the experimental group, with diagnosis of PD, and 40 subjects in the control group, healthy and without vocal complaints. They underwent the following procedures: application of the Voice Symptons Scale – VoiSS – Brazilian Version, Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire – VDCQ – Brazilian Version, and the questionnaire Living with Dysarthria – LwD. Results: The experimental group showed deviations in all protocols: VDCQ (p<0.001), VoiSS (p<0.001), LwD (p<0.001). The most frequently used coping strategy was self-control (p<0.001). The correlation between vocal symptoms and communicative aspects showed that the greater the impairment in communication, the greater the VoiSS emotional scores and the greater will be the amount of voice symptoms and signs. However, the vocal signs and symptoms and communicative aspects showed no correlation with coping. Conclusion: Patients with PD have a high amount of vocal signs and symptoms and the higher the occurrence, the more the patient reports being difficult to live with dysarthria, particularly when there are deviations in the emotional domain.

Coping Strategies in Teachers With Vocal Complaint

To understand the coping strategies used by teachers with vocal complaints, compare the differences between those who seek and those who do not seek voice therapy, and investigate the relationships among coping and voice perceptual analysis, coping and signs and symptoms of voice, and coping and participation restrictions and limitations in vocal activities. Cross-sectional nonrandomized prospective study with control group. Ninety female teachers participated in the study, of similar ages, divided into three groups: group 1 (G1) comprised 30 teachers with vocal complaints who sought voice therapy, group 2 (G2) comprised 30 teachers with vocal complaints who never sought voice therapy, and group 3 (G3) comprised 30 teachers without vocal complaints. The following analysis were conducted: identification and characterization questionnaire, addressing personal and occupational description, recording speech material for voice perceptual analysis, Voice Signs and Symptoms Questionnaire, Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), and Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ)-Brazilian Version. In relation to the voice perceptual analysis, there was statistically significant difference between the groups with vocal complaint (G1+G2), which had showed voices with mild-to-moderate deviation, and the group without vocal complaint (G1), which showed voices within the normal variability of voice quality (mean for G1=49.9, G2=43.7, and G3=32.3, P<0.001). G1 had higher mean of voice signs and symptoms (G1=8.6, G2=6.6, and G3=2.0, P<0.001) and higher scores in almost all dimensions of VAPP (P<0.001), except for the aspects effect on job and effect on social communication. Individuals with vocal complaints who looked for voice therapy (G1) tended to use more problem-focused strategies and had higher scores in VDCQ (G1=45.4, G2=38.5, and G3=9.5, P<0.001). The aspects that were correlated with VDCQ in the three groups were degree of vocal deviation, VAPP total score, VAPP partial scores of self-perceived severity of voice problem, effect on daily communication, effect on emotion, and participation restriction for G1; VAPP total score and partial score of effect on daily communication for G2; and all VAPP scores for G3. No correlation was found between voice signs and symptoms and coping. Teachers with vocal complaints who looked for voice therapy use more coping strategies. Moreover, they present a tendency to use more problem-focused coping strategies. Voice symptoms prompt the teachers into seeking treatment; however, they are not correlated with the coping itself. In general, the higher the perception of limitation and restriction of participating in vocal activities, the greater the use of coping strategies.

Coping Strategies in Voice Disorders of a Brazilian Population

The purpose of this research is to explore coping strategies of individuals with and without vocal complaint and to examine relationships between the type of coping and vocal complaint; vocal symptoms; vocal self-assessment; perceptual analysis and states of depression, anxiety, and aspects related to self-esteem; and locus of control. One hundred seventy-eight subjects with (n=87) and without vocal (n=91) complaint completed the following analysis: identification and characterization questionnaire, vocal self-assessment, perceptual analysis, Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ)-Brazilian Version, Beck Depression Inventory, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Health Locus of Control Scale. Age (P=0.219) and sex (P=0.132) were similar for both groups. The groups were statistically different for the following vocal characterization: number of symptoms, voice complaint, vocal self-assessment, and perceptual analysis. Conversely, the groups did not differ on states of depression,anxiety, and aspects related to self-esteem; and locus of control. Mean coping scores for the group with vocal complaint was 51.86 and for the group without vocal complaint was 23.18. Furthermore, men and women did not differ on the coping strategies reported (P=0.750); however, individuals with vocal complaint reported statistically more strategies than the individuals without vocal complaint (P<0.001). Problem-focused strategies were more frequently reported by individuals with vocal complaint (46.7%). Coping results correlated (Spearman's r) positively with vocal perceptual analysis (P=0.036), depression (P=0.006), and anxiety (P=0.022), and correlated negatively with locus of control (P=0.001). No correlation was found between coping and the other variables studied. These findings indicate that people with vocal complaint use a variety of coping strategies, problem focused in particular, to deal with their voice problems. Coping results appear to be associated with perceptual characteristics of voice and some traits, such as depression, anxiety, and locus of control.

How Do Individuals Cope With Voice Disorders? Introducing the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire

Coping is a key concept in psychological medicine, which refers to the way in which people deal with the stress of illness. Voice disorders may have pervasive effects upon the individual's life beyond the vocal impairment yet, there is little reference in current literature as to how people cope with voice problems. This study explored and validated the Voice Disability Coping Questionnaire (VDCQ), a newly developed disease-specific coping measure, which elicits how patients cope with voice problems. Eighty subjects presenting with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) and adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ASD) completed a 28-item VDCQ as part of an initial assessment protocol before intervention, within a longitudinal study. Principal component analyses were used to investigate the underlying structure of this questionnaire; analyses of variance were used to determine group differences in coping strategies. The principal component analyses generated four coping subscales: "social support," "passive coping," "avoidance," and "information seeking" measured over 15 items. The subscales revealed logical correlations between them. Avoidance and passive coping were found to be used by the ASD group significantly more than the MTD group. This study provided initial evidence for the validity and reliability of the VDCQ; it differentiated between clinical groups and may facilitate a patient-centered approach, which enhances the understanding of voice disorders.