Therapeutic research is particularly dynamic in the setting of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite the low prevalence of this rare disease, the efficacy and safety of targeted PAH therapies have been evaluated in randomised controlled trials, providing important data for clinicians, health authorities and patients. Beside these well-studied targeted therapies, “supportive therapy” is also recommended. This includes antithrombotic therapy with vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) [1]. The background for the use of these agents is principally supported by findings in histopathological and biological studies [2, 3], as well as their potential indirect clinical consequences which may present as perfusion defects evaluated by ventilation/perfusion ( V ′/ Q ′) scan [4]. Clinical studies evaluating VKAs in the setting of PAH are, however, lacking. In the prospective study published by Rich et al. [5], VKA use improved prognosis, but the allocation to VKA treatment followed the demonstration of perfusion defects on V ′/ Q ′ scan, and not from proper randomisation. This explains the low level of the related recommendation in the guidelines from the European Respiratory Society and European Society of Cardiology [1], that being a class IIa recommendation for idiopathic or heritable PAH and for PAH due to anorexigens, and an even lower level of recommendation in patients with associated PAH. By extension, anticoagulant therapy has been proposed in other groups of pulmonary hypertension (groups 2, 3 or 5) despite the absence of specific studies. Paradoxically, whereas only half of patients with a certain indication for VKA therapy (for example, atrial fibrillation) receive VKA [6], most PAH patients are anticoagulated with VKA (90% of the patients included in the French registry) [7]. Conversely, antithrombotic therapy with VKA is the cornerstone of medical therapy in the case of …